Revision 58912
Added by Stefania Martziou almost 4 years ago
| methodology.component.html | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 2 |
|
| 3 | 3 |
<div class="uk-container uk-container-expand uk-container-center uk-scrollspy-init-inview uk-scrollspy-inview uk-animation-scale-up" data-uk-scrollspy="{cls:'uk-animation-scale-up uk-invisible',delay:300,topoffset:-100}">
|
| 4 | 4 |
|
| 5 |
<!--Introduction-->
|
|
| 6 |
<div class="">
|
|
| 7 |
<h2>Introduction</h2>
|
|
| 5 |
<div style="min-height: 500px;">
|
|
| 6 |
<h4>Coming soon....</h4>
|
|
| 7 |
</div>
|
|
| 8 | 8 |
|
| 9 |
<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom"> |
|
| 10 |
<div class="md-card-content large-padding"> |
|
| 11 |
<p> |
|
| 12 |
This document describes the methodology , terms, and definitions of the indicators presented in Open Science Observatory. |
|
| 13 |
The Open Science Observatory combines data gathered from OpenAIRE and other data sources to develop and operate an |
|
| 14 |
interactive and dynamic portal, which informs users via rich visualizations and reports on different Open Science |
|
| 15 |
aspects and facets in Europe. The Observatory is an extendable monitor portal with indicators on open science and |
|
| 16 |
the framework uptake by national and sectoral set. |
|
| 17 |
</p> |
|
| 18 |
<p> |
|
| 19 |
The dynamic <strong>Open Science Observatory</strong> leverages existing information collected by OpenAIRE and |
|
| 20 |
<strong>at little additional cost or effort, produces and reports value added metrics</strong> regarding Open Science |
|
| 21 |
trends and evolution for Horizon 2020 and other funding sources. The goal is to provide an EU Open Science Observatory |
|
| 22 |
as key OpenAIRE product, and employing open metrics based on open data gathered by OpenAire to measure the openness |
|
| 23 |
of publications and data on various aspects (e.g., gold/green/fair), the metadata completeness, the regional or |
|
| 24 |
thematic distributions and will test out preliminary metrics for their FAIRness. This will ensure that research can |
|
| 25 |
be evaluated at the right level (including article-level metrics and altmetrics), in an <strong>open and transparent |
|
| 26 |
manner</strong>. Such services will deliver accurate metrics for European Research and enable informed recommendations |
|
| 27 |
to high-level decision makers. |
|
| 28 |
</p> |
|
| 29 |
</div> |
|
| 30 |
</div> |
|
| 31 | 9 |
|
| 32 |
</div> |
|
| 10 |
<!--<!–Introduction–>--> |
|
| 11 |
<!--<div class="">--> |
|
| 12 |
<!--<h2>Introduction</h2>--> |
|
| 33 | 13 |
|
| 34 |
<!--Methodological Approach and Indicators--> |
|
| 35 |
<div class=""> |
|
| 36 |
<h2>Methodological Approach and Indicators</h2> |
|
| 14 |
<!--<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom">--> |
|
| 15 |
<!--<div class="md-card-content large-padding">--> |
|
| 16 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 17 |
<!--This document describes the methodology , terms, and definitions of the indicators presented in Open Science Observatory.--> |
|
| 18 |
<!--The Open Science Observatory combines data gathered from OpenAIRE and other data sources to develop and operate an--> |
|
| 19 |
<!--interactive and dynamic portal, which informs users via rich visualizations and reports on different Open Science--> |
|
| 20 |
<!--aspects and facets in Europe. The Observatory is an extendable monitor portal with indicators on open science and--> |
|
| 21 |
<!--the framework uptake by national and sectoral set.--> |
|
| 22 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 23 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 24 |
<!--The dynamic <strong>Open Science Observatory</strong> leverages existing information collected by OpenAIRE and--> |
|
| 25 |
<!--<strong>at little additional cost or effort, produces and reports value added metrics</strong> regarding Open Science--> |
|
| 26 |
<!--trends and evolution for Horizon 2020 and other funding sources. The goal is to provide an EU Open Science Observatory--> |
|
| 27 |
<!--as key OpenAIRE product, and employing open metrics based on open data gathered by OpenAire to measure the openness--> |
|
| 28 |
<!--of publications and data on various aspects (e.g., gold/green/fair), the metadata completeness, the regional or--> |
|
| 29 |
<!--thematic distributions and will test out preliminary metrics for their FAIRness. This will ensure that research can--> |
|
| 30 |
<!--be evaluated at the right level (including article-level metrics and altmetrics), in an <strong>open and transparent--> |
|
| 31 |
<!--manner</strong>. Such services will deliver accurate metrics for European Research and enable informed recommendations--> |
|
| 32 |
<!--to high-level decision makers.--> |
|
| 33 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 34 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 35 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 37 | 36 |
|
| 38 |
<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom"> |
|
| 39 |
<div class="md-card-content large-padding"> |
|
| 40 |
<p> |
|
| 41 |
Monitoring and evaluating the advancements, trends and impact of OS in Europe is recognised as one of the most |
|
| 42 |
important steps towards the realisation of the EOSC vision. The implementation of the Open Science Observatory |
|
| 43 |
follows the guidelines and <a target="_blank" href="https://eoscpilot.eu/wp3-policy/eosc-open-science-monitor-specifications/methodological-approach-monitoring-open-science"> |
|
| 44 |
methodological approach</a> which was specified by the EOSCPilot project and more specifically the |
|
| 45 |
<a target="_blank" href="https://eoscpilot.eu/content/d32-eosc-open-science-monitor-specifications">EOSCpilot Open Science Monitor Framework (EOSCpilot OSMF)</a>. |
|
| 46 |
It aimed to build a model and initial high-level specifications for providing useful analytics to researchers as well |
|
| 47 |
as enabling research performing and funding organizations within EOSC to monitor and gain insights about the OS movement, |
|
| 48 |
regardless of their service management systems and the technology behind them. The six core steps of the specified methodology are: |
|
| 49 |
</p> |
|
| 50 |
<ul style="font-style: italic"> |
|
| 51 |
<li>Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities;</li> |
|
| 52 |
<li>Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets;</li> |
|
| 53 |
<li>Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators;</li> |
|
| 54 |
<li>Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows;</li> |
|
| 55 |
<li>Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework;</li> |
|
| 56 |
<li>Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets;</li> |
|
| 57 |
</ul> |
|
| 37 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 58 | 38 |
|
| 59 |
<p> |
|
| 60 |
<span style="font-style: italic">Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities:</span> The first step addresses the need to identify |
|
| 61 |
which parts of the OS lifecycle are of interest in the monitoring process. These can include the conceptualization |
|
| 62 |
of a research task, the data and literature collection, the analysis and development of the research output, the |
|
| 63 |
publication, the review and evaluation of the research result as well as the reuse and reproducibility of results |
|
| 64 |
by the scientific community. These phases entail different open access practices and elements which are being considered |
|
| 65 |
by the monitor, with a special focus on the policies that these elements fall under. |
|
| 66 |
</p> |
|
| 67 |
<p> |
|
| 68 |
<span style="font-style: italic">Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets:</span> The proposed monitoring |
|
| 69 |
framework adopts a policy-driven approach for deriving high level objectives, i.e., target dimensions to be measured |
|
| 70 |
in the monitoring process. Policies on Open Access at different levels, such as the international, national and |
|
| 71 |
regional levels, as well as micro policies are considered as primary sources for deriving more concrete measurable |
|
| 72 |
targets (e.g., Openness, FAIRness, etc.) that should be monitored in the framework. Furthermore, monitoring targets |
|
| 73 |
can be organised into more specialised sub-targets, to measure more specific aspects of OS. For example, a policy |
|
| 74 |
recommendation stating that research data repositories should follow a data archiving plan indicates the monitoring |
|
| 75 |
target for long-term preservation of OS artefacts monitored by a set of indicators, such as whether an organization |
|
| 76 |
applies such a plan, or the period (e.g., months, years) for which preservation is guaranteed. |
|
| 77 |
</p> |
|
| 78 |
<p> |
|
| 79 |
<span style="font-style: italic">Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators:</span> |
|
| 80 |
In the next step, the monitoring targets are being mapped to OS elements they apply to, as well as to indicators |
|
| 81 |
that quantify these targets. OS elements are well-defined artefacts of OS practices, such as publication in open |
|
| 82 |
access journals, research data made available in open access repositories, open source software, open educational |
|
| 83 |
material, etc. In the context of this framework, these elements are called OS resources to state the importance |
|
| 84 |
of their contribution for the development of the “Open Science World”. |
|
| 85 |
</p> |
|
| 86 |
<p> |
|
| 87 |
<span style="font-style: italic">Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows:</span> Each indicator |
|
| 88 |
must be associated with a set of processes, which are employed for the collection of data, the validation and |
|
| 89 |
scoring of metrics (e.g., combination and aggregation of metrics for deriving an accumulated score for a target |
|
| 90 |
dimension), the visualization of the results, and so on. These processes must be well documented in the form of |
|
| 91 |
workflows and tasks, to be performed for the collection and quantification of the indicators. |
|
| 92 |
</p> |
|
| 93 |
<p> |
|
| 94 |
<span style="font-style: italic">Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework:</span> The next step |
|
| 95 |
involves the detailed design, implementation, and customization of the framework, which includes the design of |
|
| 96 |
the functionality at its whole, as well as all added value services offered by the framework. |
|
| 97 |
</p> |
|
| 98 |
<p> |
|
| 99 |
<span style="font-style: italic">Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets:</span> The last step |
|
| 100 |
follows the operation of the OS monitoring framework and refers to the continuous validation and refinement of |
|
| 101 |
the monitoring methodology (i.e., targets and indicators) and results in EOSC. Α monitoring process, to be effective, |
|
| 102 |
must adapt to new OS practices and new policies, validating and readjusting its target goals as well as the indicators |
|
| 103 |
for their evaluation. |
|
| 104 |
</p> |
|
| 39 |
<!--<!–Methodological Approach and Indicators–>--> |
|
| 40 |
<!--<div class="">--> |
|
| 41 |
<!--<h2>Methodological Approach and Indicators</h2>--> |
|
| 105 | 42 |
|
| 106 |
<p> |
|
| 107 |
<strong>The Open Science Observatory of the OpenAIRE is the first implementation</strong> of these specifications |
|
| 108 |
and it aspires to become a dynamic tool in the future, with benefits both to the organisations using it to measure |
|
| 109 |
the OA levels of implementation and impact to their community and for the High Level Stakeholders which are the |
|
| 110 |
European Union’s Legal Entities and Bodies, including the Member States and their respective Units. Gaps, implications |
|
| 111 |
and new ways of performing OS are among the elements that could be identified through OA Open Science Observatory |
|
| 112 |
which could then be easily incorporated within the stakeholders’ scope and strategic planning for OS. |
|
| 113 |
</p> |
|
| 114 |
</div> |
|
| 115 |
</div> |
|
| 43 |
<!--<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom">--> |
|
| 44 |
<!--<div class="md-card-content large-padding">--> |
|
| 45 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 46 |
<!--Monitoring and evaluating the advancements, trends and impact of OS in Europe is recognised as one of the most--> |
|
| 47 |
<!--important steps towards the realisation of the EOSC vision. The implementation of the Open Science Observatory--> |
|
| 48 |
<!--follows the guidelines and <a target="_blank" href="https://eoscpilot.eu/wp3-policy/eosc-open-science-monitor-specifications/methodological-approach-monitoring-open-science">--> |
|
| 49 |
<!--methodological approach</a> which was specified by the EOSCPilot project and more specifically the--> |
|
| 50 |
<!--<a target="_blank" href="https://eoscpilot.eu/content/d32-eosc-open-science-monitor-specifications">EOSCpilot Open Science Monitor Framework (EOSCpilot OSMF)</a>.--> |
|
| 51 |
<!--It aimed to build a model and initial high-level specifications for providing useful analytics to researchers as well--> |
|
| 52 |
<!--as enabling research performing and funding organizations within EOSC to monitor and gain insights about the OS movement,--> |
|
| 53 |
<!--regardless of their service management systems and the technology behind them. The six core steps of the specified methodology are:--> |
|
| 54 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 55 |
<!--<ul style="font-style: italic">--> |
|
| 56 |
<!--<li>Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities;</li>--> |
|
| 57 |
<!--<li>Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets;</li>--> |
|
| 58 |
<!--<li>Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators;</li>--> |
|
| 59 |
<!--<li>Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows;</li>--> |
|
| 60 |
<!--<li>Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework;</li>--> |
|
| 61 |
<!--<li>Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets;</li>--> |
|
| 62 |
<!--</ul>--> |
|
| 116 | 63 |
|
| 117 |
</div> |
|
| 64 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 65 |
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities:</span> The first step addresses the need to identify--> |
|
| 66 |
<!--which parts of the OS lifecycle are of interest in the monitoring process. These can include the conceptualization--> |
|
| 67 |
<!--of a research task, the data and literature collection, the analysis and development of the research output, the--> |
|
| 68 |
<!--publication, the review and evaluation of the research result as well as the reuse and reproducibility of results--> |
|
| 69 |
<!--by the scientific community. These phases entail different open access practices and elements which are being considered--> |
|
| 70 |
<!--by the monitor, with a special focus on the policies that these elements fall under.--> |
|
| 71 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 72 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 73 |
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets:</span> The proposed monitoring--> |
|
| 74 |
<!--framework adopts a policy-driven approach for deriving high level objectives, i.e., target dimensions to be measured--> |
|
| 75 |
<!--in the monitoring process. Policies on Open Access at different levels, such as the international, national and--> |
|
| 76 |
<!--regional levels, as well as micro policies are considered as primary sources for deriving more concrete measurable--> |
|
| 77 |
<!--targets (e.g., Openness, FAIRness, etc.) that should be monitored in the framework. Furthermore, monitoring targets--> |
|
| 78 |
<!--can be organised into more specialised sub-targets, to measure more specific aspects of OS. For example, a policy--> |
|
| 79 |
<!--recommendation stating that research data repositories should follow a data archiving plan indicates the monitoring--> |
|
| 80 |
<!--target for long-term preservation of OS artefacts monitored by a set of indicators, such as whether an organization--> |
|
| 81 |
<!--applies such a plan, or the period (e.g., months, years) for which preservation is guaranteed.--> |
|
| 82 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 83 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 84 |
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators:</span>--> |
|
| 85 |
<!--In the next step, the monitoring targets are being mapped to OS elements they apply to, as well as to indicators--> |
|
| 86 |
<!--that quantify these targets. OS elements are well-defined artefacts of OS practices, such as publication in open--> |
|
| 87 |
<!--access journals, research data made available in open access repositories, open source software, open educational--> |
|
| 88 |
<!--material, etc. In the context of this framework, these elements are called OS resources to state the importance--> |
|
| 89 |
<!--of their contribution for the development of the “Open Science World”.--> |
|
| 90 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 91 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 92 |
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows:</span> Each indicator--> |
|
| 93 |
<!--must be associated with a set of processes, which are employed for the collection of data, the validation and--> |
|
| 94 |
<!--scoring of metrics (e.g., combination and aggregation of metrics for deriving an accumulated score for a target--> |
|
| 95 |
<!--dimension), the visualization of the results, and so on. These processes must be well documented in the form of--> |
|
| 96 |
<!--workflows and tasks, to be performed for the collection and quantification of the indicators.--> |
|
| 97 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 98 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 99 |
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework:</span> The next step--> |
|
| 100 |
<!--involves the detailed design, implementation, and customization of the framework, which includes the design of--> |
|
| 101 |
<!--the functionality at its whole, as well as all added value services offered by the framework.--> |
|
| 102 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 103 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 104 |
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets:</span> The last step--> |
|
| 105 |
<!--follows the operation of the OS monitoring framework and refers to the continuous validation and refinement of--> |
|
| 106 |
<!--the monitoring methodology (i.e., targets and indicators) and results in EOSC. Α monitoring process, to be effective,--> |
|
| 107 |
<!--must adapt to new OS practices and new policies, validating and readjusting its target goals as well as the indicators--> |
|
| 108 |
<!--for their evaluation.--> |
|
| 109 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 118 | 110 |
|
| 119 |
<!--Indicators--> |
|
| 120 |
<div class=""> |
|
| 121 |
<h2>Indicators</h2> |
|
| 111 |
<!--<p>--> |
|
| 112 |
<!--<strong>The Open Science Observatory of the OpenAIRE is the first implementation</strong> of these specifications--> |
|
| 113 |
<!--and it aspires to become a dynamic tool in the future, with benefits both to the organisations using it to measure--> |
|
| 114 |
<!--the OA levels of implementation and impact to their community and for the High Level Stakeholders which are the--> |
|
| 115 |
<!--European Union’s Legal Entities and Bodies, including the Member States and their respective Units. Gaps, implications--> |
|
| 116 |
<!--and new ways of performing OS are among the elements that could be identified through OA Open Science Observatory--> |
|
| 117 |
<!--which could then be easily incorporated within the stakeholders’ scope and strategic planning for OS.--> |
|
| 118 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 119 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 120 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 122 | 121 |
|
| 123 |
<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom"> |
|
| 124 |
<div class="md-card-content large-padding"> |
|
| 122 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 125 | 123 |
|
| 126 |
<div class=""> |
|
| 127 |
<ul class="uk-tab uk-tab-large uk-flex-center" data-uk-tab="{connect:'#tabs',animation: 'slide-bottom'}">
|
|
| 128 |
<li class="uk-active" aria-expanded="true"><a href="#">Terms and definitions</a></li> |
|
| 129 |
<li aria-expanded="false"><a href="#">Continent overview</a></li> |
|
| 130 |
<li aria-expanded="false"><a href="#">COuntry page</a></li> |
|
| 131 |
</ul> |
|
| 124 |
<!--<!–Indicators–>--> |
|
| 125 |
<!--<div class="">--> |
|
| 126 |
<!--<h2>Indicators</h2>--> |
|
| 132 | 127 |
|
| 133 |
<ul id="tabs" class="uk-switcher"> |
|
| 128 |
<!--<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom">--> |
|
| 129 |
<!--<div class="md-card-content large-padding">--> |
|
| 134 | 130 |
|
| 135 |
<!--OVERVIEW tab--> |
|
| 136 |
<li aria-hidden="false" class="uk-active" style="animation-duration: 200ms;"> |
|
| 137 |
<div class="uk-margin"> |
|
| 131 |
<!--<div class="">--> |
|
| 132 |
<!--<ul class="uk-tab uk-tab-large uk-flex-center" data-uk-tab="{connect:'#tabs',animation: 'slide-bottom'}">-->
|
|
| 133 |
<!--<li class="uk-active" aria-expanded="true"><a href="#">Terms and definitions</a></li>--> |
|
| 134 |
<!--<li aria-expanded="false"><a href="#">Continent overview</a></li>--> |
|
| 135 |
<!--<li aria-expanded="false"><a href="#">COuntry page</a></li>--> |
|
| 136 |
<!--</ul>--> |
|
| 138 | 137 |
|
| 139 |
<!--Terms and definitions--> |
|
| 140 |
<div> |
|
| 141 |
<!--<h3>Terms and definitions</h3>--> |
|
| 142 |
<dl> |
|
| 143 |
<dt>Publication</dt> |
|
| 144 |
<dd>a scientific publication</dd> |
|
| 138 |
<!--<ul id="tabs" class="uk-switcher">--> |
|
| 145 | 139 |
|
| 146 |
<dt>Repository</dt> |
|
| 147 |
<dd>a repository of publications</dd> |
|
| 140 |
<!--<!–OVERVIEW tab–>--> |
|
| 141 |
<!--<li aria-hidden="false" class="uk-active" style="animation-duration: 200ms;">--> |
|
| 142 |
<!--<div class="uk-margin">--> |
|
| 148 | 143 |
|
| 149 |
<dt>Dataset</dt> |
|
| 150 |
<dd>a dataset, usually associated with a publication</dd> |
|
| 144 |
<!--<!–Terms and definitions–>--> |
|
| 145 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 146 |
<!--<!–<h3>Terms and definitions</h3>–>--> |
|
| 147 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 148 |
<!--<dt>Publication</dt>--> |
|
| 149 |
<!--<dd>a scientific publication</dd>--> |
|
| 151 | 150 |
|
| 152 |
<dt>Software</dt>
|
|
| 153 |
<dd>software (e.g., open source), usually associated with a publication/dataset</dd>
|
|
| 151 |
<!--<dt>Repository</dt>-->
|
|
| 152 |
<!--<dd>a repository of publications</dd>-->
|
|
| 154 | 153 |
|
| 155 |
<dt>Other Research Products</dt>
|
|
| 156 |
<dd>Other research outputs (e.g., dissemination or educational material) associated with a publication, dataset or software.</dd>
|
|
| 154 |
<!--<dt>Dataset</dt>-->
|
|
| 155 |
<!--<dd>a dataset, usually associated with a publication</dd>-->
|
|
| 157 | 156 |
|
| 158 |
<dt>Journal</dt>
|
|
| 159 |
<dd>a scientific journal where authors publish their results in the form of publications</dd>
|
|
| 157 |
<!--<dt>Software</dt>-->
|
|
| 158 |
<!--<dd>software (e.g., open source), usually associated with a publication/dataset</dd>-->
|
|
| 160 | 159 |
|
| 161 |
<dt>Policy</dt>
|
|
| 162 |
<dd>an Open Science mandate that organizations follow in order to engage in Open Science best practices</dd>
|
|
| 160 |
<!--<dt>Other Research Products</dt>-->
|
|
| 161 |
<!--<dd>Other research outputs (e.g., dissemination or educational material) associated with a publication, dataset or software.</dd>-->
|
|
| 163 | 162 |
|
| 164 |
<dt>Organization</dt>
|
|
| 165 |
<dd>an academic institution, company, or any other legal entity with the context of OpenAIRE</dd>
|
|
| 163 |
<!--<dt>Journal</dt>-->
|
|
| 164 |
<!--<dd>a scientific journal where authors publish their results in the form of publications</dd>-->
|
|
| 166 | 165 |
|
| 167 |
<dt>Vocabularies</dt> |
|
| 168 |
<dd>used in the Observatory are described in <a target="_blank" href="http://api.openaire.eu/vocabularies">http://api.openaire.eu/vocabularies</a></dd> |
|
| 169 |
</dl> |
|
| 170 |
</div> |
|
| 166 |
<!--<dt>Policy</dt>--> |
|
| 167 |
<!--<dd>an Open Science mandate that organizations follow in order to engage in Open Science best practices</dd>--> |
|
| 171 | 168 |
|
| 172 |
</div>
|
|
| 173 |
</li>
|
|
| 169 |
<!--<dt>Organization</dt>-->
|
|
| 170 |
<!--<dd>an academic institution, company, or any other legal entity with the context of OpenAIRE</dd>-->
|
|
| 174 | 171 |
|
| 175 |
<!--OPEN SCIENCE tab--> |
|
| 176 |
<li aria-hidden="true" style="animation-duration: 200ms;"> |
|
| 177 |
<div class="uk-margin"> |
|
| 172 |
<!--<dt>Vocabularies</dt>--> |
|
| 173 |
<!--<dd>used in the Observatory are described in <a target="_blank" href="http://api.openaire.eu/vocabularies">http://api.openaire.eu/vocabularies</a></dd>--> |
|
| 174 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 175 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 178 | 176 |
|
| 179 |
<!--Continent overview--> |
|
| 180 |
<div> |
|
| 181 |
<!--<h3>Continent overview</h3>--> |
|
| 182 |
<dl> |
|
| 183 |
<dt>Number of OA publications</dt> |
|
| 184 |
<dd>The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications.</dd> |
|
| 177 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 178 |
<!--</li>--> |
|
| 185 | 179 |
|
| 186 |
<dt>Number of OA datasets</dt> |
|
| 187 |
<dd>The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of datasets.</dd> |
|
| 180 |
<!--<!–OPEN SCIENCE tab–>--> |
|
| 181 |
<!--<li aria-hidden="true" style="animation-duration: 200ms;">--> |
|
| 182 |
<!--<div class="uk-margin">--> |
|
| 188 | 183 |
|
| 189 |
<dt>Number of OA repositories</dt> |
|
| 190 |
<dd>The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE.</dd> |
|
| 184 |
<!--<!–Continent overview–>--> |
|
| 185 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 186 |
<!--<!–<h3>Continent overview</h3>–>--> |
|
| 187 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 188 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA publications</dt>--> |
|
| 189 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications.</dd>--> |
|
| 191 | 190 |
|
| 192 |
<dt>Number of OA journals</dt>
|
|
| 193 |
<dd>The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.</dd>
|
|
| 191 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA datasets</dt>-->
|
|
| 192 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of datasets.</dd>-->
|
|
| 194 | 193 |
|
| 195 |
<dt>Number of organizations with OA policies</dt> |
|
| 196 |
<dd>The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE that have Open Access policies associated with them. Source: RoarMap.</dd> |
|
| 197 |
</dl> |
|
| 194 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA repositories</dt>--> |
|
| 195 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE.</dd>--> |
|
| 198 | 196 |
|
| 199 |
<!--Overview--> |
|
| 200 |
<div> |
|
| 201 |
<h4>Overview</h4> |
|
| 202 |
<p>Each table row refers to a country. For each country, the table shows <span style="font-style: italic">total numbers of OA repositories, |
|
| 203 |
journals, policies, publications, datasets, software and other research products.</span><br> |
|
| 204 |
The total numbers and percentages are computed as described in the continent overview. |
|
| 205 |
</p> |
|
| 206 |
</div> |
|
| 197 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA journals</dt>--> |
|
| 198 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.</dd>--> |
|
| 207 | 199 |
|
| 208 |
<!--Open Science--> |
|
| 209 |
<div> |
|
| 210 |
<h4>Open Science</h4> |
|
| 211 |
<p>Open science related resources, specifically OA publications, datasets, software and other research products.</p> |
|
| 212 |
</div> |
|
| 200 |
<!--<dt>Number of organizations with OA policies</dt>--> |
|
| 201 |
<!--<dd>The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE that have Open Access policies associated with them. Source: RoarMap.</dd>--> |
|
| 202 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 213 | 203 |
|
| 214 |
</div> |
|
| 204 |
<!--<!–Overview–>--> |
|
| 205 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 206 |
<!--<h4>Overview</h4>--> |
|
| 207 |
<!--<p>Each table row refers to a country. For each country, the table shows <span style="font-style: italic">total numbers of OA repositories,--> |
|
| 208 |
<!--journals, policies, publications, datasets, software and other research products.</span><br>--> |
|
| 209 |
<!--The total numbers and percentages are computed as described in the continent overview.--> |
|
| 210 |
<!--</p>--> |
|
| 211 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 215 | 212 |
|
| 216 |
</div> |
|
| 217 |
</li> |
|
| 213 |
<!--<!–Open Science–>--> |
|
| 214 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 215 |
<!--<h4>Open Science</h4>--> |
|
| 216 |
<!--<p>Open science related resources, specifically OA publications, datasets, software and other research products.</p>--> |
|
| 217 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 218 | 218 |
|
| 219 |
<li aria-hidden="true" style="animation-duration: 200ms;"> |
|
| 220 |
<div class="uk-margin"> |
|
| 219 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 221 | 220 |
|
| 222 |
<!--Country page--> |
|
| 223 |
<div> |
|
| 224 |
<!--<h3>Country page</h3>--> |
|
| 221 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 222 |
<!--</li>--> |
|
| 225 | 223 |
|
| 226 |
<!--Country overview--> |
|
| 227 |
<div> |
|
| 228 |
<h4>Country overview</h4> |
|
| 229 |
<dl> |
|
| 230 |
<dt>Number of OA publications</dt> |
|
| 231 |
<dd>The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the |
|
| 232 |
percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications of this country.</dd> |
|
| 224 |
<!--<li aria-hidden="true" style="animation-duration: 200ms;">--> |
|
| 225 |
<!--<div class="uk-margin">--> |
|
| 233 | 226 |
|
| 234 |
<dt>Number of OA datasets</dt> |
|
| 235 |
<dd>The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage |
|
| 236 |
they represent with respect to the total number of datasets of this country. |
|
| 237 |
</dd> |
|
| 227 |
<!--<!–Country page–>--> |
|
| 228 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 229 |
<!--<!–<h3>Country page</h3>–>--> |
|
| 238 | 230 |
|
| 239 |
<dt>Number of OA repositories</dt> |
|
| 240 |
<dd>The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE for this country.</dd> |
|
| 231 |
<!--<!–Country overview–>--> |
|
| 232 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 233 |
<!--<h4>Country overview</h4>--> |
|
| 234 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 235 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA publications</dt>--> |
|
| 236 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the--> |
|
| 237 |
<!--percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications of this country.</dd>--> |
|
| 241 | 238 |
|
| 242 |
<dt>Number of OA journals</dt> |
|
| 243 |
<dd>The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage |
|
| 244 |
they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.</dd> |
|
| 239 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA datasets</dt>--> |
|
| 240 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage--> |
|
| 241 |
<!--they represent with respect to the total number of datasets of this country.--> |
|
| 242 |
<!--</dd>--> |
|
| 245 | 243 |
|
| 246 |
<dt>Number of organizations with OA policies</dt> |
|
| 247 |
<dd>The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE for this country that have Open Access policies associated |
|
| 248 |
with them. Source: RoarMap.</dd> |
|
| 249 |
</dl> |
|
| 250 |
</div> |
|
| 244 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA repositories</dt>--> |
|
| 245 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE for this country.</dd>--> |
|
| 251 | 246 |
|
| 252 |
<!--Info Box--> |
|
| 253 |
<div> |
|
| 254 |
<h4>Info Box</h4> |
|
| 255 |
<dl> |
|
| 256 |
<dt>R&D Expenditure</dt> |
|
| 257 |
<dd>The total R&D expenditure for this country since 2008. Source: Eurostat.</dd> |
|
| 247 |
<!--<dt>Number of OA journals</dt>--> |
|
| 248 |
<!--<dd>The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage--> |
|
| 249 |
<!--they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.</dd>--> |
|
| 258 | 250 |
|
| 259 |
<dt>Funding sources</dt> |
|
| 260 |
<dd></dd> |
|
| 251 |
<!--<dt>Number of organizations with OA policies</dt>--> |
|
| 252 |
<!--<dd>The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE for this country that have Open Access policies associated--> |
|
| 253 |
<!--with them. Source: RoarMap.</dd>--> |
|
| 254 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 255 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 261 | 256 |
|
| 262 |
<dt>Funding Organizations</dt> |
|
| 263 |
<dd></dd> |
|
| 257 |
<!--<!–Info Box–>--> |
|
| 258 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 259 |
<!--<h4>Info Box</h4>--> |
|
| 260 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 261 |
<!--<dt>R&D Expenditure</dt>--> |
|
| 262 |
<!--<dd>The total R&D expenditure for this country since 2008. Source: Eurostat.</dd>--> |
|
| 264 | 263 |
|
| 265 |
<dt>Organizations funded by the European Commission since 2013</dt> |
|
| 266 |
<dd>The total number of organizations in this country that have participated/participate in a project that was/is |
|
| 267 |
funded by the European Commission.</dd> |
|
| 268 |
</dl> |
|
| 269 |
</div> |
|
| 264 |
<!--<dt>Funding sources</dt>--> |
|
| 265 |
<!--<dd></dd>--> |
|
| 270 | 266 |
|
| 271 |
<!--Green vs. Gold--> |
|
| 272 |
<div> |
|
| 273 |
<h4>Green vs. Gold</h4> |
|
| 274 |
<dl> |
|
| 275 |
<dt>Green vs Gold Publications</dt> |
|
| 276 |
<dd>The line shows the evolution of the total number of publications that have been published through a green |
|
| 277 |
open access route, vs the total number of publications that have been published through a gold open access route.</dd> |
|
| 267 |
<!--<dt>Funding Organizations</dt>--> |
|
| 268 |
<!--<dd></dd>--> |
|
| 278 | 269 |
|
| 279 |
<dt>Gold Open Access</dt> |
|
| 280 |
<dd>The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total |
|
| 281 |
count of gold open access publications.</dd> |
|
| 270 |
<!--<dt>Organizations funded by the European Commission since 2013</dt>--> |
|
| 271 |
<!--<dd>The total number of organizations in this country that have participated/participate in a project that was/is--> |
|
| 272 |
<!--funded by the European Commission.</dd>--> |
|
| 273 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 274 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 282 | 275 |
|
| 283 |
<dt>Green Open Access</dt> |
|
| 284 |
<dd>The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total |
|
| 285 |
count of green open access publications. </dd> |
|
| 286 |
</dl> |
|
| 287 |
</div> |
|
| 276 |
<!--<!–Green vs. Gold–>--> |
|
| 277 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 278 |
<!--<h4>Green vs. Gold</h4>--> |
|
| 279 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 280 |
<!--<dt>Green vs Gold Publications</dt>--> |
|
| 281 |
<!--<dd>The line shows the evolution of the total number of publications that have been published through a green--> |
|
| 282 |
<!--open access route, vs the total number of publications that have been published through a gold open access route.</dd>--> |
|
| 288 | 283 |
|
| 289 |
<!--EU Funded Open Science--> |
|
| 290 |
<div> |
|
| 291 |
<h4>EU Funded Open Science</h4> |
|
| 292 |
<dl> |
|
| 293 |
<dt>Publications vs Datasets vs Software</dt> |
|
| 294 |
<dd>The chart shows a per-year count and comparison of open access publications, datasets and software for this country.</dd> |
|
| 284 |
<!--<dt>Gold Open Access</dt>--> |
|
| 285 |
<!--<dd>The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total--> |
|
| 286 |
<!--count of gold open access publications.</dd>--> |
|
| 295 | 287 |
|
| 296 |
<dt>Organizations</dt> |
|
| 297 |
<dd>This table shows all organizations from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets and |
|
| 298 |
software that have authors that are affiliated with each organization. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.</dd> |
|
| 288 |
<!--<dt>Green Open Access</dt>--> |
|
| 289 |
<!--<dd>The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total--> |
|
| 290 |
<!--count of green open access publications. </dd>--> |
|
| 291 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 292 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 299 | 293 |
|
| 300 |
<dt>Repositories</dt> |
|
| 301 |
<dd>This table shows all repositories from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets |
|
| 302 |
and software that reside in each repository. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.</dd> |
|
| 303 |
</dl> |
|
| 304 |
</div> |
|
| 294 |
<!--<!–EU Funded Open Science–>--> |
|
| 295 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 296 |
<!--<h4>EU Funded Open Science</h4>--> |
|
| 297 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 298 |
<!--<dt>Publications vs Datasets vs Software</dt>--> |
|
| 299 |
<!--<dd>The chart shows a per-year count and comparison of open access publications, datasets and software for this country.</dd>--> |
|
| 305 | 300 |
|
| 306 |
<!--Funding Sources--> |
|
| 307 |
<div> |
|
| 308 |
<h4>Funding Sources</h4> |
|
| 309 |
<dl> |
|
| 310 |
<dt>Publications vs Datasets vs Software</dt> |
|
| 311 |
<dd>This chart shows colored horizontal bars representing total number of publications, datasets and software |
|
| 312 |
for each funder organization associated with this country.</dd> |
|
| 313 |
</dl> |
|
| 314 |
</div> |
|
| 301 |
<!--<dt>Organizations</dt>--> |
|
| 302 |
<!--<dd>This table shows all organizations from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets and--> |
|
| 303 |
<!--software that have authors that are affiliated with each organization. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.</dd>--> |
|
| 315 | 304 |
|
| 316 |
<!--Project Performance--> |
|
| 317 |
<div> |
|
| 318 |
<h4>Project Performance</h4> |
|
| 319 |
<dl> |
|
| 320 |
<dt>Top 10 Projects by publications / datasets / software</dt> |
|
| 321 |
<dd>A ranking of the top 10 projects in descending order of their associated publication/dataset/software count. |
|
| 322 |
Publication/dataset/software count is computed as the total number of publications/datasets/software that have |
|
| 323 |
been funded by a project.</dd> |
|
| 324 |
</dl> |
|
| 325 |
</div> |
|
| 305 |
<!--<dt>Repositories</dt>--> |
|
| 306 |
<!--<dd>This table shows all repositories from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets--> |
|
| 307 |
<!--and software that reside in each repository. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.</dd>--> |
|
| 308 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 309 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 326 | 310 |
|
| 311 |
<!--<!–Funding Sources–>--> |
|
| 312 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 313 |
<!--<h4>Funding Sources</h4>--> |
|
| 314 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 315 |
<!--<dt>Publications vs Datasets vs Software</dt>--> |
|
| 316 |
<!--<dd>This chart shows colored horizontal bars representing total number of publications, datasets and software--> |
|
| 317 |
<!--for each funder organization associated with this country.</dd>--> |
|
| 318 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 319 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 327 | 320 |
|
| 328 |
</div> |
|
| 321 |
<!--<!–Project Performance–>--> |
|
| 322 |
<!--<div>--> |
|
| 323 |
<!--<h4>Project Performance</h4>--> |
|
| 324 |
<!--<dl>--> |
|
| 325 |
<!--<dt>Top 10 Projects by publications / datasets / software</dt>--> |
|
| 326 |
<!--<dd>A ranking of the top 10 projects in descending order of their associated publication/dataset/software count.--> |
|
| 327 |
<!--Publication/dataset/software count is computed as the total number of publications/datasets/software that have--> |
|
| 328 |
<!--been funded by a project.</dd>--> |
|
| 329 |
<!--</dl>--> |
|
| 330 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 329 | 331 |
|
| 330 |
</div> |
|
| 331 |
</li> |
|
| 332 |
</ul> |
|
| 333 |
</div> |
|
| 334 | 332 |
|
| 333 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 335 | 334 |
|
| 336 |
</div> |
|
| 337 |
</div> |
|
| 335 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 336 |
<!--</li>--> |
|
| 337 |
<!--</ul>--> |
|
| 338 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 338 | 339 |
|
| 339 |
</div> |
|
| 340 | 340 |
|
| 341 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 342 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 343 |
|
|
| 344 |
<!--</div>--> |
|
| 345 |
|
|
| 341 | 346 |
</div> |
| 342 | 347 |
</section> |
Also available in: Unified diff
Working on the new version of the oso - started incorporating charts and created a treemap highcharts component