1
|
<section class="section greySection" id="sect-overview">
|
2
|
|
3
|
<div class="uk-container uk-container-expand uk-container-center uk-scrollspy-init-inview uk-scrollspy-inview uk-animation-scale-up" data-uk-scrollspy="{cls:'uk-animation-scale-up uk-invisible',delay:300,topoffset:-100}">
|
4
|
|
5
|
<div style="min-height: 500px;">
|
6
|
<h4>Coming soon....</h4>
|
7
|
</div>
|
8
|
|
9
|
|
10
|
<!--<!–Introduction–>-->
|
11
|
<!--<div class="">-->
|
12
|
<!--<h2>Introduction</h2>-->
|
13
|
|
14
|
<!--<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom">-->
|
15
|
<!--<div class="md-card-content large-padding">-->
|
16
|
<!--<p>-->
|
17
|
<!--This document describes the methodology , terms, and definitions of the indicators presented in Open Science Observatory.-->
|
18
|
<!--The Open Science Observatory combines data gathered from OpenAIRE and other data sources to develop and operate an-->
|
19
|
<!--interactive and dynamic portal, which informs users via rich visualizations and reports on different Open Science-->
|
20
|
<!--aspects and facets in Europe. The Observatory is an extendable monitor portal with indicators on open science and-->
|
21
|
<!--the framework uptake by national and sectoral set.-->
|
22
|
<!--</p>-->
|
23
|
<!--<p>-->
|
24
|
<!--The dynamic <strong>Open Science Observatory</strong> leverages existing information collected by OpenAIRE and-->
|
25
|
<!--<strong>at little additional cost or effort, produces and reports value added metrics</strong> regarding Open Science-->
|
26
|
<!--trends and evolution for Horizon 2020 and other funding sources. The goal is to provide an EU Open Science Observatory-->
|
27
|
<!--as key OpenAIRE product, and employing open metrics based on open data gathered by OpenAire to measure the openness-->
|
28
|
<!--of publications and data on various aspects (e.g., gold/green/fair), the metadata completeness, the regional or-->
|
29
|
<!--thematic distributions and will test out preliminary metrics for their FAIRness. This will ensure that research can-->
|
30
|
<!--be evaluated at the right level (including article-level metrics and altmetrics), in an <strong>open and transparent-->
|
31
|
<!--manner</strong>. Such services will deliver accurate metrics for European Research and enable informed recommendations-->
|
32
|
<!--to high-level decision makers.-->
|
33
|
<!--</p>-->
|
34
|
<!--</div>-->
|
35
|
<!--</div>-->
|
36
|
|
37
|
<!--</div>-->
|
38
|
|
39
|
<!--<!–Methodological Approach and Indicators–>-->
|
40
|
<!--<div class="">-->
|
41
|
<!--<h2>Methodological Approach and Indicators</h2>-->
|
42
|
|
43
|
<!--<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom">-->
|
44
|
<!--<div class="md-card-content large-padding">-->
|
45
|
<!--<p>-->
|
46
|
<!--Monitoring and evaluating the advancements, trends and impact of OS in Europe is recognised as one of the most-->
|
47
|
<!--important steps towards the realisation of the EOSC vision. The implementation of the Open Science Observatory-->
|
48
|
<!--follows the guidelines and <a target="_blank" href="https://eoscpilot.eu/wp3-policy/eosc-open-science-monitor-specifications/methodological-approach-monitoring-open-science">-->
|
49
|
<!--methodological approach</a> which was specified by the EOSCPilot project and more specifically the-->
|
50
|
<!--<a target="_blank" href="https://eoscpilot.eu/content/d32-eosc-open-science-monitor-specifications">EOSCpilot Open Science Monitor Framework (EOSCpilot OSMF)</a>.-->
|
51
|
<!--It aimed to build a model and initial high-level specifications for providing useful analytics to researchers as well-->
|
52
|
<!--as enabling research performing and funding organizations within EOSC to monitor and gain insights about the OS movement,-->
|
53
|
<!--regardless of their service management systems and the technology behind them. The six core steps of the specified methodology are:-->
|
54
|
<!--</p>-->
|
55
|
<!--<ul style="font-style: italic">-->
|
56
|
<!--<li>Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities;</li>-->
|
57
|
<!--<li>Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets;</li>-->
|
58
|
<!--<li>Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators;</li>-->
|
59
|
<!--<li>Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows;</li>-->
|
60
|
<!--<li>Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework;</li>-->
|
61
|
<!--<li>Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets;</li>-->
|
62
|
<!--</ul>-->
|
63
|
|
64
|
<!--<p>-->
|
65
|
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 1. Identification of the Open Science Activities:</span> The first step addresses the need to identify-->
|
66
|
<!--which parts of the OS lifecycle are of interest in the monitoring process. These can include the conceptualization-->
|
67
|
<!--of a research task, the data and literature collection, the analysis and development of the research output, the-->
|
68
|
<!--publication, the review and evaluation of the research result as well as the reuse and reproducibility of results-->
|
69
|
<!--by the scientific community. These phases entail different open access practices and elements which are being considered-->
|
70
|
<!--by the monitor, with a special focus on the policies that these elements fall under.-->
|
71
|
<!--</p>-->
|
72
|
<!--<p>-->
|
73
|
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 2. Policy-driven derivation of monitoring targets:</span> The proposed monitoring-->
|
74
|
<!--framework adopts a policy-driven approach for deriving high level objectives, i.e., target dimensions to be measured-->
|
75
|
<!--in the monitoring process. Policies on Open Access at different levels, such as the international, national and-->
|
76
|
<!--regional levels, as well as micro policies are considered as primary sources for deriving more concrete measurable-->
|
77
|
<!--targets (e.g., Openness, FAIRness, etc.) that should be monitored in the framework. Furthermore, monitoring targets-->
|
78
|
<!--can be organised into more specialised sub-targets, to measure more specific aspects of OS. For example, a policy-->
|
79
|
<!--recommendation stating that research data repositories should follow a data archiving plan indicates the monitoring-->
|
80
|
<!--target for long-term preservation of OS artefacts monitored by a set of indicators, such as whether an organization-->
|
81
|
<!--applies such a plan, or the period (e.g., months, years) for which preservation is guaranteed.-->
|
82
|
<!--</p>-->
|
83
|
<!--<p>-->
|
84
|
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 3. Identification of the main Open Science Resources and Indicators:</span>-->
|
85
|
<!--In the next step, the monitoring targets are being mapped to OS elements they apply to, as well as to indicators-->
|
86
|
<!--that quantify these targets. OS elements are well-defined artefacts of OS practices, such as publication in open-->
|
87
|
<!--access journals, research data made available in open access repositories, open source software, open educational-->
|
88
|
<!--material, etc. In the context of this framework, these elements are called OS resources to state the importance-->
|
89
|
<!--of their contribution for the development of the “Open Science World”.-->
|
90
|
<!--</p>-->
|
91
|
<!--<p>-->
|
92
|
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 4. Design of monitoring processes, tasks and workflows:</span> Each indicator-->
|
93
|
<!--must be associated with a set of processes, which are employed for the collection of data, the validation and-->
|
94
|
<!--scoring of metrics (e.g., combination and aggregation of metrics for deriving an accumulated score for a target-->
|
95
|
<!--dimension), the visualization of the results, and so on. These processes must be well documented in the form of-->
|
96
|
<!--workflows and tasks, to be performed for the collection and quantification of the indicators.-->
|
97
|
<!--</p>-->
|
98
|
<!--<p>-->
|
99
|
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 5. Modelling and implementation of the framework:</span> The next step-->
|
100
|
<!--involves the detailed design, implementation, and customization of the framework, which includes the design of-->
|
101
|
<!--the functionality at its whole, as well as all added value services offered by the framework.-->
|
102
|
<!--</p>-->
|
103
|
<!--<p>-->
|
104
|
<!--<span style="font-style: italic">Step 6. Continuous validation of the monitoring targets:</span> The last step-->
|
105
|
<!--follows the operation of the OS monitoring framework and refers to the continuous validation and refinement of-->
|
106
|
<!--the monitoring methodology (i.e., targets and indicators) and results in EOSC. Α monitoring process, to be effective,-->
|
107
|
<!--must adapt to new OS practices and new policies, validating and readjusting its target goals as well as the indicators-->
|
108
|
<!--for their evaluation.-->
|
109
|
<!--</p>-->
|
110
|
|
111
|
<!--<p>-->
|
112
|
<!--<strong>The Open Science Observatory of the OpenAIRE is the first implementation</strong> of these specifications-->
|
113
|
<!--and it aspires to become a dynamic tool in the future, with benefits both to the organisations using it to measure-->
|
114
|
<!--the OA levels of implementation and impact to their community and for the High Level Stakeholders which are the-->
|
115
|
<!--European Union’s Legal Entities and Bodies, including the Member States and their respective Units. Gaps, implications-->
|
116
|
<!--and new ways of performing OS are among the elements that could be identified through OA Open Science Observatory-->
|
117
|
<!--which could then be easily incorporated within the stakeholders’ scope and strategic planning for OS.-->
|
118
|
<!--</p>-->
|
119
|
<!--</div>-->
|
120
|
<!--</div>-->
|
121
|
|
122
|
<!--</div>-->
|
123
|
|
124
|
<!--<!–Indicators–>-->
|
125
|
<!--<div class="">-->
|
126
|
<!--<h2>Indicators</h2>-->
|
127
|
|
128
|
<!--<div class="md-card uk-margin-bottom">-->
|
129
|
<!--<div class="md-card-content large-padding">-->
|
130
|
|
131
|
<!--<div class="">-->
|
132
|
<!--<ul class="uk-tab uk-tab-large uk-flex-center" data-uk-tab="{connect:'#tabs',animation: 'slide-bottom'}">-->
|
133
|
<!--<li class="uk-active" aria-expanded="true"><a href="#">Terms and definitions</a></li>-->
|
134
|
<!--<li aria-expanded="false"><a href="#">Continent overview</a></li>-->
|
135
|
<!--<li aria-expanded="false"><a href="#">COuntry page</a></li>-->
|
136
|
<!--</ul>-->
|
137
|
|
138
|
<!--<ul id="tabs" class="uk-switcher">-->
|
139
|
|
140
|
<!--<!–OVERVIEW tab–>-->
|
141
|
<!--<li aria-hidden="false" class="uk-active" style="animation-duration: 200ms;">-->
|
142
|
<!--<div class="uk-margin">-->
|
143
|
|
144
|
<!--<!–Terms and definitions–>-->
|
145
|
<!--<div>-->
|
146
|
<!--<!–<h3>Terms and definitions</h3>–>-->
|
147
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
148
|
<!--<dt>Publication</dt>-->
|
149
|
<!--<dd>a scientific publication</dd>-->
|
150
|
|
151
|
<!--<dt>Repository</dt>-->
|
152
|
<!--<dd>a repository of publications</dd>-->
|
153
|
|
154
|
<!--<dt>Dataset</dt>-->
|
155
|
<!--<dd>a dataset, usually associated with a publication</dd>-->
|
156
|
|
157
|
<!--<dt>Software</dt>-->
|
158
|
<!--<dd>software (e.g., open source), usually associated with a publication/dataset</dd>-->
|
159
|
|
160
|
<!--<dt>Other Research Products</dt>-->
|
161
|
<!--<dd>Other research outputs (e.g., dissemination or educational material) associated with a publication, dataset or software.</dd>-->
|
162
|
|
163
|
<!--<dt>Journal</dt>-->
|
164
|
<!--<dd>a scientific journal where authors publish their results in the form of publications</dd>-->
|
165
|
|
166
|
<!--<dt>Policy</dt>-->
|
167
|
<!--<dd>an Open Science mandate that organizations follow in order to engage in Open Science best practices</dd>-->
|
168
|
|
169
|
<!--<dt>Organization</dt>-->
|
170
|
<!--<dd>an academic institution, company, or any other legal entity with the context of OpenAIRE</dd>-->
|
171
|
|
172
|
<!--<dt>Vocabularies</dt>-->
|
173
|
<!--<dd>used in the Observatory are described in <a target="_blank" href="http://api.openaire.eu/vocabularies">http://api.openaire.eu/vocabularies</a></dd>-->
|
174
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
175
|
<!--</div>-->
|
176
|
|
177
|
<!--</div>-->
|
178
|
<!--</li>-->
|
179
|
|
180
|
<!--<!–OPEN SCIENCE tab–>-->
|
181
|
<!--<li aria-hidden="true" style="animation-duration: 200ms;">-->
|
182
|
<!--<div class="uk-margin">-->
|
183
|
|
184
|
<!--<!–Continent overview–>-->
|
185
|
<!--<div>-->
|
186
|
<!--<!–<h3>Continent overview</h3>–>-->
|
187
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
188
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA publications</dt>-->
|
189
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications.</dd>-->
|
190
|
|
191
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA datasets</dt>-->
|
192
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of datasets.</dd>-->
|
193
|
|
194
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA repositories</dt>-->
|
195
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE.</dd>-->
|
196
|
|
197
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA journals</dt>-->
|
198
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE, along with the percentage they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.</dd>-->
|
199
|
|
200
|
<!--<dt>Number of organizations with OA policies</dt>-->
|
201
|
<!--<dd>The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE that have Open Access policies associated with them. Source: RoarMap.</dd>-->
|
202
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
203
|
|
204
|
<!--<!–Overview–>-->
|
205
|
<!--<div>-->
|
206
|
<!--<h4>Overview</h4>-->
|
207
|
<!--<p>Each table row refers to a country. For each country, the table shows <span style="font-style: italic">total numbers of OA repositories,-->
|
208
|
<!--journals, policies, publications, datasets, software and other research products.</span><br>-->
|
209
|
<!--The total numbers and percentages are computed as described in the continent overview.-->
|
210
|
<!--</p>-->
|
211
|
<!--</div>-->
|
212
|
|
213
|
<!--<!–Open Science–>-->
|
214
|
<!--<div>-->
|
215
|
<!--<h4>Open Science</h4>-->
|
216
|
<!--<p>Open science related resources, specifically OA publications, datasets, software and other research products.</p>-->
|
217
|
<!--</div>-->
|
218
|
|
219
|
<!--</div>-->
|
220
|
|
221
|
<!--</div>-->
|
222
|
<!--</li>-->
|
223
|
|
224
|
<!--<li aria-hidden="true" style="animation-duration: 200ms;">-->
|
225
|
<!--<div class="uk-margin">-->
|
226
|
|
227
|
<!--<!–Country page–>-->
|
228
|
<!--<div>-->
|
229
|
<!--<!–<h3>Country page</h3>–>-->
|
230
|
|
231
|
<!--<!–Country overview–>-->
|
232
|
<!--<div>-->
|
233
|
<!--<h4>Country overview</h4>-->
|
234
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
235
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA publications</dt>-->
|
236
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access publications currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the-->
|
237
|
<!--percentage they represent with respect to the total number of publications of this country.</dd>-->
|
238
|
|
239
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA datasets</dt>-->
|
240
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access datasets currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage-->
|
241
|
<!--they represent with respect to the total number of datasets of this country.-->
|
242
|
<!--</dd>-->
|
243
|
|
244
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA repositories</dt>-->
|
245
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access repositories currently in OpenAIRE for this country.</dd>-->
|
246
|
|
247
|
<!--<dt>Number of OA journals</dt>-->
|
248
|
<!--<dd>The total number of open access journals currently in OpenAIRE for this country, along with the percentage-->
|
249
|
<!--they represent with respect to the total number of journals. Source: DOAJ.</dd>-->
|
250
|
|
251
|
<!--<dt>Number of organizations with OA policies</dt>-->
|
252
|
<!--<dd>The total number of organizations in OpenAIRE for this country that have Open Access policies associated-->
|
253
|
<!--with them. Source: RoarMap.</dd>-->
|
254
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
255
|
<!--</div>-->
|
256
|
|
257
|
<!--<!–Info Box–>-->
|
258
|
<!--<div>-->
|
259
|
<!--<h4>Info Box</h4>-->
|
260
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
261
|
<!--<dt>R&D Expenditure</dt>-->
|
262
|
<!--<dd>The total R&D expenditure for this country since 2008. Source: Eurostat.</dd>-->
|
263
|
|
264
|
<!--<dt>Funding sources</dt>-->
|
265
|
<!--<dd></dd>-->
|
266
|
|
267
|
<!--<dt>Funding Organizations</dt>-->
|
268
|
<!--<dd></dd>-->
|
269
|
|
270
|
<!--<dt>Organizations funded by the European Commission since 2013</dt>-->
|
271
|
<!--<dd>The total number of organizations in this country that have participated/participate in a project that was/is-->
|
272
|
<!--funded by the European Commission.</dd>-->
|
273
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
274
|
<!--</div>-->
|
275
|
|
276
|
<!--<!–Green vs. Gold–>-->
|
277
|
<!--<div>-->
|
278
|
<!--<h4>Green vs. Gold</h4>-->
|
279
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
280
|
<!--<dt>Green vs Gold Publications</dt>-->
|
281
|
<!--<dd>The line shows the evolution of the total number of publications that have been published through a green-->
|
282
|
<!--open access route, vs the total number of publications that have been published through a gold open access route.</dd>-->
|
283
|
|
284
|
<!--<dt>Gold Open Access</dt>-->
|
285
|
<!--<dd>The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total-->
|
286
|
<!--count of gold open access publications.</dd>-->
|
287
|
|
288
|
<!--<dt>Green Open Access</dt>-->
|
289
|
<!--<dd>The chart shows a ranking of the top 15 organizations of this country in descending order of their total-->
|
290
|
<!--count of green open access publications. </dd>-->
|
291
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
292
|
<!--</div>-->
|
293
|
|
294
|
<!--<!–EU Funded Open Science–>-->
|
295
|
<!--<div>-->
|
296
|
<!--<h4>EU Funded Open Science</h4>-->
|
297
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
298
|
<!--<dt>Publications vs Datasets vs Software</dt>-->
|
299
|
<!--<dd>The chart shows a per-year count and comparison of open access publications, datasets and software for this country.</dd>-->
|
300
|
|
301
|
<!--<dt>Organizations</dt>-->
|
302
|
<!--<dd>This table shows all organizations from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets and-->
|
303
|
<!--software that have authors that are affiliated with each organization. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.</dd>-->
|
304
|
|
305
|
<!--<dt>Repositories</dt>-->
|
306
|
<!--<dd>This table shows all repositories from this country, along with the total number of publications, datasets-->
|
307
|
<!--and software that reside in each repository. The rows can be ordered by any of the three numbers.</dd>-->
|
308
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
309
|
<!--</div>-->
|
310
|
|
311
|
<!--<!–Funding Sources–>-->
|
312
|
<!--<div>-->
|
313
|
<!--<h4>Funding Sources</h4>-->
|
314
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
315
|
<!--<dt>Publications vs Datasets vs Software</dt>-->
|
316
|
<!--<dd>This chart shows colored horizontal bars representing total number of publications, datasets and software-->
|
317
|
<!--for each funder organization associated with this country.</dd>-->
|
318
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
319
|
<!--</div>-->
|
320
|
|
321
|
<!--<!–Project Performance–>-->
|
322
|
<!--<div>-->
|
323
|
<!--<h4>Project Performance</h4>-->
|
324
|
<!--<dl>-->
|
325
|
<!--<dt>Top 10 Projects by publications / datasets / software</dt>-->
|
326
|
<!--<dd>A ranking of the top 10 projects in descending order of their associated publication/dataset/software count.-->
|
327
|
<!--Publication/dataset/software count is computed as the total number of publications/datasets/software that have-->
|
328
|
<!--been funded by a project.</dd>-->
|
329
|
<!--</dl>-->
|
330
|
<!--</div>-->
|
331
|
|
332
|
|
333
|
<!--</div>-->
|
334
|
|
335
|
<!--</div>-->
|
336
|
<!--</li>-->
|
337
|
<!--</ul>-->
|
338
|
<!--</div>-->
|
339
|
|
340
|
|
341
|
<!--</div>-->
|
342
|
<!--</div>-->
|
343
|
|
344
|
<!--</div>-->
|
345
|
|
346
|
</div>
|
347
|
</section>
|