Project

General

Profile

« Previous | Next » 

Revision 57627

testing for parthenost

View differences:

modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/java/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/IterableXmlParserTest.java
3 3
import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
4 4
import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
5 5

  
6
import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
7
import java.io.IOException;
8
import java.io.InputStream;
9
import java.io.StringReader;
10
import java.io.StringWriter;
6
import java.io.*;
7
import java.net.URI;
8
import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
9
import java.nio.file.*;
10
import java.util.Iterator;
11 11
import java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream;
12 12
import java.util.zip.ZipInputStream;
13 13

  
14
import eu.dnetlib.rmi.data.CollectorServiceException;
14 15
import org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils;
16
import org.apache.http.HttpStatus;
17
import org.apache.http.client.methods.CloseableHttpResponse;
18
import org.apache.http.client.methods.HttpGet;
19
import org.apache.http.impl.client.CloseableHttpClient;
20
import org.apache.http.impl.client.HttpClients;
15 21
import org.dom4j.Document;
16 22
import org.dom4j.DocumentException;
17 23
import org.dom4j.io.SAXReader;
18 24
import org.junit.Before;
25
import org.junit.Ignore;
19 26
import org.junit.Test;
20 27
import org.springframework.core.io.ClassPathResource;
21 28
import org.springframework.core.io.Resource;
29
import sun.nio.ch.IOUtil;
22 30

  
23 31
public class IterableXmlParserTest {
24 32

  
......
30 38

  
31 39
	private Resource xmlSingle = new ClassPathResource("eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/singleRepo.xml");
32 40

  
41
	private Resource xmlBig = new ClassPathResource("eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/big.xml");
42

  
33 43
	private String element = "repository";
34 44

  
35 45
	private IterableXmlParser parser;
......
79 89
		assertTrue(count == 3);
80 90
	}
81 91

  
92
	@Test
93
	public void testBig() throws Exception {
94
		int count = doTest(xmlBig.getInputStream(), "Entry");
95
		System.out.println(count);
96
	}
97

  
98
	@Test
99
	public void testBigRemote() throws Exception {
100
		Iterator<String> s = new XMLIterator("Entry", xmlBig.getInputStream());
101
		int i =0;
102
		Path dir = Paths.get("/tmp/foresight");
103
		Files.createDirectories(dir);
104
		while(s.hasNext()){
105
			System.out.println(++i);
106

  
107
			final Path path = Files.createTempFile(dir,"foresight", i+".xml");
108
			System.out.println("Temp file : " + path);
109

  
110
			//Writing data here
111
			byte[] strToBytes = s.next().getBytes();
112
			Files.write(path, strToBytes);
113

  
114
		}
115
	}
116

  
82 117
	private int doTest(final InputStream stream, final String element) throws DocumentException {
83 118
		parser = new IterableXmlParser(element, stream);
84 119
		int count = 0;
modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/resources/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/big.xml
1
<?xml version="1.0"?>
2
<root>
3
    <Entry>
4
        <id>1</id>
5
        <description>A social network analysis of Twitter: Mapping the digital humanities community</description>
6
        <type>
7
            <type>Trend</type>
8
        </type>
9
        <consequences>
10
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
11

  
12
        </consequences>
13
        <context>
14
            <context>Social</context>
15
            <context>Cultural</context>
16
        </context>
17
        <discipline>
18
            <discipline>History</discipline>
19
            <discipline>Language-related Studies</discipline>
20
            <discipline>Archeology</discipline>
21
            <discipline>Heritage and applied disciplines</discipline>
22
            <discipline>Social Sciences</discipline>
23
        </discipline>
24
        <tags>
25
            <tags>Digital Humanities</tags>
26
            <tags>Twitter</tags>
27
            <tags>Social Studies</tags>
28
        </tags>
29
        <provenance>Article</provenance>
30
        <related_items>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2016.1171458</related_items>
31
        <comments>An interesting article about the behavior of the scientific community of digital humanities through a famous social network. In this paper, we found that defining digital humanities as a "community" avoids endless debates on its disciplinary boundaries but does not allow us to know who's practicing them today. As an attempt to identify this field, leaving aside the epistemological discussion, our study shows that this item is analysable through a social media widely used by the so-called "digital humanists" (2,500 users). In analysing the network of "who's following who?", it was found that a small number of individuals and institutions are focusing so much attention that the graph appears to be very homogeneous around them. The fact remains that many types of behaviour can be deduced from the graph and that structural characteristics of the network enable us to highlight some users holding remarkable positions. Specifically, we showed that French-speaking users, and to a lesser extent German-speaking users, stand out: the language factor strongly influences the network structure.
32
            Obviously, any quantification leads to a form of objectification whose limits we need to understand. But we note that the availability of this type of data-set and the opportunities offered by tools and theories such as social network analysis allows us to shed new light on this community.</comments>
33
    </Entry>
34
    <Entry>
35
        <id>2</id>
36
        <description>The development of digital tools for the process of archaeological and historical research data has facilitated the overall analysis and has paved the way for more accurate interpretation. </description>
37
        <type>
38
            <type>Trend</type>
39
        </type>
40
        <consequences>
41
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
42
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
43
        </consequences>
44
        <context>
45
            <context>Tools and services</context>
46
        </context>
47
        <discipline>
48
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
49
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
50
        </discipline>
51
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
52
        <comments>The interviewee describes the analysis she had to do during her PhD research, before the dissemination of digital tools. She had to manually assemble, combine and represent spatially a rich variety of data concerning the social, economic and political history of the city-state of ancient Corinth. The development of digital  methods has made this process faster and easier.</comments>
53
        <quotation>She concludes that "had this work [the process of the research data for her PhD thesis] been done today, not only would it have been much more precise, not only would it have been carried out much faster, but I'm pretty sure that the historical interpretation per se would have been more accurate. [...] I think that today I would very much benefit from all those kinds of micro tools and micro services that are out there".</quotation>
54
    </Entry>
55
    <Entry>
56
        <id>3</id>
57
        <description>Digital tools for use in the Humanities should be simple and easy to use, unless the possibilities they open are so important that they are worth the extra effort and training (e.g. GIS for archaeology). This factor should be assessed according to the criteria of the researchers themselves.</description>
58
        <type>
59
            <type>Requirement</type>
60
        </type>
61
        <consequences>
62
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
63
        </consequences>
64
        <context>
65
            <context>Tools and services</context>
66
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
67
        </context>
68
        <discipline>
69
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
70
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
71
        </discipline>
72
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
73
        <comments>The interviewee discusses the complexities arising from the use of state-of-the-art digital tools and infrastructures in scientific fields like archaeology and history, which had developed quite sophisiticated methods for the organization of research data, and states that digital tools should enable researchers to do their work more effectively and to open nerw possibilities for them, and not to alienate them by their complexity.</comments>
74
        <quotation>The interviewee states that, coming "from a generation that have learned to carry out their work very efficiently without digital tools", she is not ready to embrace uncritically all those "very, very state-of-the-art environments", unless she is "convinced that there is something really concrete to gain out of them". In contrast to "any semantic linking tools that require endless nights to put your data in before they start working", digital tools have to be simple and easy to use. They have to "facilitate, enable, simplify", or create "a particular research interest in that effort and training", as the use of GIS in archaeology, in order to have an impact on the researchers' work.</quotation>
75
    </Entry>
76
    <Entry>
77
        <id>4</id>
78
        <description>Education in the use of digital tools and infrastructure for Humanists should start already in first years at the University.</description>
79
        <type>
80
            <type>Requirement</type>
81
        </type>
82
        <consequences>
83
            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
84
        </consequences>
85
        <context>
86
            <context>Tools and services</context>
87
            <context>Education</context>
88
        </context>
89
        <discipline>
90
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
91
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
92
        </discipline>
93
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
94
        <comments>The interviewee discusses her generational intermediary position between the analog and the digital, a fact that urges her to function as a facilitator for younger generations and to plead for education in digital tools.</comments>
95
        <quotation>The interviewee was educated "to do things manually, or using technology on a very superficial level, like Microsoft word or excel". She states that "unless people start being educated from a very, very early stage -first-year students, second-year students- and being exposed to the digital, this is not gonna change". She sees herself as having "this sort of a mission to carry out", i.e. "to train people from this kind of in-between generation [...] to work with the digital in any way possible that would make their life easier".</quotation>
96
    </Entry>
97
    <Entry>
98
        <id>5</id>
99
        <description>The Humanities are seriously affected by funding cuts. At the same time, the development of sophisticated IT tools is not always really useful for Humanists.</description>
100
        <type>
101
            <type>Trend</type>
102
            <type>Obstacle</type>
103
        </type>
104
        <consequences>
105
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
106
        </consequences>
107
        <context>
108
            <context>Political</context>
109
            <context>Economic </context>
110
        </context>
111
        <discipline>
112
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
113
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
114
        </discipline>
115
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
116
        <comments>The fact that, on the first hand, there are important funding cuts in the Humanities departments, and, on the other hand, there is a very sophisticated IT development that does not always take into account the specific needs of Humanists, may alienate the latter significantly.</comments>
117
        <quotation>"You've got money going into IT, towards the section development of very state-of-the-art tools, but whether these tools can really be useful for Humanities research is not necessarily the case".</quotation>
118
    </Entry>
119
    <Entry>
120
        <id>6</id>
121
        <description>The combination of money cuts in the Humanities and the emergence of the digital has given rise to very engaged research communities that try to make use of the digital to compensate for not being able to do research in situ. Open access would be a great relief in this aspect. </description>
122
        <type>
123
            <type>Potentialty</type>
124
            <type>Requirement</type>
125
        </type>
126
        <consequences>
127
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
128
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
129
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
130
        </consequences>
131
        <context>
132
            <context>Networks</context>
133
            <context>Social</context>
134
        </context>
135
        <discipline>
136
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
137
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
138
        </discipline>
139
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
140
        <comments>Open access is understood as a partial but radical change in what concerns the praciticalities of research, as an empowering process for researchers who cannot afford travel costs. In this aspect, open access can reduce inequalities as to prospects, carreers, and peer recognition.</comments>
141
        <quotation>The money cuts in the Humanities and the emergence of the digital has given rise to some "very, very driven research communities that work even more tightly together. Or communities around research themes, or around areas, or around digital environments, because when you don't have money, obviously you can't really travel, when you don't have money you can't visit the places and stay there for days and work in archives, and work in libraries and museums and collection-holding institutions [...]. And when humanities research is granted open access to data from across the world, even in this period of, you know, of budget cuts and kind of grumpiness and sometimes great concerns about where we're going and will be still be able to do our research, then there's still some light of hope".</quotation>
142
    </Entry>
143
    <Entry>
144
        <id>7</id>
145
        <description>Open access is the most important potantiality for the near future. Open access should be understood not only in terms  of data, but of methodologies and research questions as well. In essence, it is a political statement.</description>
146
        <type>
147
            <type>Trend</type>
148
            <type>Potentiality</type>
149
        </type>
150
        <consequences>
151
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
152
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
153
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
154
        </consequences>
155
        <context>
156
            <context>Social</context>
157
            <context>Cultural</context>
158
            <context>Political</context>
159
            <context>Methodologies</context>
160
            <context>Research Interests</context>
161
        </context>
162
        <discipline>
163
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
164
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
165
        </discipline>
166
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
167
        <comments>Open access is thus understood as a move towards a more democratic and cooperative way of doing research.</comments>
168
        <quotation>"By open access I don't mean just open access to data. I mean open access to methods, methodologies [...]. Methods employed, say, ethnographic methods or social anthropological methods, are data themselves. So, openness is a political statement. Opening up your research as it happens is a political statement, opening up your data, your hard-collected data. I think that this is where it's all going. It's like breaking down all these barriers of extremely expensive stuff that should just be offered for free".</quotation>
169
    </Entry>
170
    <Entry>
171
        <id>8</id>
172
        <description>An example of the obstacles that prevent open access is the high price of new books that, paradoxically enough, plead for open access.</description>
173
        <type>
174
            <type>Obstacle</type>
175
        </type>
176
        <consequences>
177
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
178
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
179
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
180
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
181
        </consequences>
182
        <context>
183
            <context>Economic</context>
184
            <context>Political</context>
185
            <context>Publication formats</context>
186
        </context>
187
        <discipline>
188
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
189
        </discipline>
190
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
191
        <quotation>"My colleagues and I [from the research centre ATHENA in Greece] last year put together a small book in Routledge on digital infrastructures (PARTHENOS was one of them). And I think it's ? 58 or 68 to get that book -it may be more. I mean, why? It's crazy, it's absurd, and when you think these infrastructures have got funding from the European Union to open things up for free for the European citizens and the citizens of the world, and then people working on these infrastructures put together some articles, and these articles found their way into a book, and this book costs 70 ?! That's crazy".</quotation>
192
    </Entry>
193
    <Entry>
194
        <id>9</id>
195
        <description>Teamwork and interdisciplinarity in the Humanities are closely connected.</description>
196
        <type>
197
            <type>Trend</type>
198
        </type>
199
        <consequences>
200
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
201
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
202
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
203
        </consequences>
204
        <context>
205
            <context>Methodologies</context>
206
            <context>Research Interests</context>
207
        </context>
208
        <discipline>
209
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
210
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
211
        </discipline>
212
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
213
        <comments>Interdisciplinarity is a necessity and a blessing. It requires new kinds of acrtivity, but opens the way for better interpretation. Is is also an important community-building factor.</comments>
214
        <quotation>"And the reason you cannot do without teamwork now, increasingly so, is because of interdisciplinarity. So, I mean, of course there are people working on their own, on coins, on manuscripts, on all sorts of things. But they're getting less and less with the years. So, it's wonderful that the interpretation of Humanities, the Humanities research field is getting so complicated, but this complexity requires interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and hence, teamwork".</quotation>
215
    </Entry>
216
    <Entry>
217
        <id>10</id>
218
        <description>Networking and open access are parts of the same process.</description>
219
        <type>
220
            <type>Requirement</type>
221
        </type>
222
        <consequences>
223
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
224
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
225
        </consequences>
226
        <context>
227
            <context>Political</context>
228
            <context>Methodologies</context>
229
            <context>Research Interests</context>
230
        </context>
231
        <discipline>
232
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
233
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
234
        </discipline>
235
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
236
        <quotation>"Without networking you're an island. And no man is an island, and no man should be an island. Networking is another thing, because it has to do with outreach, publicity, and dissemination of your own work. I mean, if you're doing your work just, you know, for your own good, to read it before you go to bed, write up and read on your own, that's fine. But networking is dissemination and dissemination is also tied to open access and openness. So, the more we network, the more open we need to be. And the more open we need to be, the more we network. So these things go together".</quotation>
237
    </Entry>
238
    <Entry>
239
        <id>11</id>
240
        <description>Digitality offers a potential for a more democratic, better informed and though-provoking interpretation, as well as for the creation of new narratives.</description>
241
        <type>
242
            <type>Potentiality</type>
243
        </type>
244
        <consequences>
245
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
246
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
247
        </consequences>
248
        <context>
249
            <context>Political</context>
250
            <context>Economic</context>
251
            <context>Cultural</context>
252
            <context>Methodologies</context>
253
            <context>Research Interests</context>
254
        </context>
255
        <discipline>
256
            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
257
            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
258
        </discipline>
259
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
260
        <quotation>Digitality helps "overcome some really important barriers: money, time, and effort". </quotation>
261
    </Entry>
262
    <Entry>
263
        <id>12</id>
264
        <description>Progress in South-East Europe concerning the adoption of digital strategies in the Humanities is slow; active steps should be taken in the direction of infrastructure and institutional engagement.</description>
265
        <type>
266
            <type>Requirement</type>
267
        </type>
268
        <consequences>
269
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
270
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
271
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
272
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
273
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
274
        </consequences>
275
        <context>
276
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
277
            <context>Tools and Services</context>
278
            <context>Economic</context>
279
            <context>Political</context>
280
            <context>Education</context>
281
        </context>
282
        <discipline>
283
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
284
        </discipline>
285
        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
286
        <quotation>"I'm a bit unsure as to whether the field of historical research in Greece and South-east Europe is catching up with any digital developments as the rest of our European friends. I think that South-east Europe is the holder of much of European collective cultural heritage, yet the way young people are trained to work with it, research on it and interpret it is a bit old-fashioned [...] I think what we need to do on an infrastructure level -and this is why, I guess, the European Union is investing money on it- is that we should kind of and bring balance into that. Universities should be engaged more and more in such infrastructures, more educational and training activities should be taken up, like summer schools. [...] So, I guess this is something that should be taken up, because it's not just, you know, the Germans or the Dutch friends building simple and user-friendly tools, which we Greeks and we South-east Europeans can use. It's about exchange of expertise, and really cultivating this need of balancing out these differences".</quotation>
287
    </Entry>
288
    <Entry>
289
        <id>13</id>
290
        <description>Artificial Intelligence is being developed rapidly and is going to play a very important role in DH.</description>
291
        <type>
292
            <type>Trend</type>
293
            <type>Potentiality</type>
294
        </type>
295
        <consequences>
296
            <consequences>Scientific Inerpretation</consequences>
297
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
298
        </consequences>
299
        <context>
300
            <context>Tools and services</context>
301
        </context>
302
        <discipline>
303
            <discipline>Language related studies</discipline>
304
        </discipline>
305
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
306
        <quotation>"We know how Artificial Intelligence contributes to translation, but we do not yet know what it can do for the Humanities in general".</quotation>
307
    </Entry>
308
    <Entry>
309
        <id>14</id>
310
        <description>There is still a distrust of DH by Humanists and a tendency to theorize against it.</description>
311
        <type>
312
            <type>Trend</type>
313
            <type>Obstacle</type>
314
        </type>
315
        <consequences>
316
            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
317
        </consequences>
318
        <context>
319
            <context>Social</context>
320
            <context>Cultural</context>
321
            <context>Theory</context>
322
        </context>
323
        <discipline>
324
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
325
        </discipline>
326
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
327
        <comments>These theoretical approaches are included in attempts to analyze the overall implications of digitality and must be seen actually as a distinct part of Digital Humanities.</comments>
328
        <quotation>"I would not object if this critique was of a philosophic nature. But to speak indefinetly of Digital Humanities without specific examples... We should discuss about these issues while working on actual projects and modify the projects or the theory accordingly".</quotation>
329
    </Entry>
330
    <Entry>
331
        <id>15</id>
332
        <description>There is still a gap between Humanists and Social Scientists, on the one hand, and computer scientists and information engineers, on the other.</description>
333
        <type>
334
            <type>Obstacle</type>
335
        </type>
336
        <consequences>
337
            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
338
            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
339
        </consequences>
340
        <context>
341
            <context>Social</context>
342
            <context>Cultural</context>
343
        </context>
344
        <discipline>
345
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
346
        </discipline>
347
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
348
        <quotation>"This happens on the level of case-studies".</quotation>
349
    </Entry>
350
    <Entry>
351
        <id>16</id>
352
        <description>Image processing will develop quickly towards a form of image entropy</description>
353
        <type>
354
            <type>Trend</type>
355
            <type>Potentiality</type>
356
        </type>
357
        <consequences>
358
            <consequences>Scientific Inerpretation</consequences>
359
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
360
        </consequences>
361
        <context>
362
            <context>Tools and services</context>
363
        </context>
364
        <discipline>
365
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
366
        </discipline>
367
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
368
    </Entry>
369
    <Entry>
370
        <id>17</id>
371
        <description>We need large digitized language corpora in Greek, with adequate tools for their analysis, as is the case with "bigger" languages.</description>
372
        <type>
373
            <type>Requirement</type>
374
        </type>
375
        <consequences>
376
            <consequences>Scientific Inerpretation</consequences>
377
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
378
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
379
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
380
        </consequences>
381
        <context>
382
            <context>Tools and services</context>
383
            <context>Integration</context>
384
        </context>
385
        <discipline>
386
            <discipline>Language related studies</discipline>
387
        </discipline>
388
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
389
        <comments>This may well be the case with other "small" European languages, too.</comments>
390
        <quotation>"The most important thing for me is the amelioration of the tools for the analysis of Greek language data. [...] This is not easy, because Greek is a small language. [...] But we need to have good and simple tools at the researchers' disposal."</quotation>
391
    </Entry>
392
    <Entry>
393
        <id>18</id>
394
        <description>The introduction of specific tools in the market could boost the development of even better ones</description>
395
        <type>
396
            <type>Potentiality</type>
397
        </type>
398
        <consequences>
399
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
400
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
401
        </consequences>
402
        <context>
403
            <context>Tools and services</context>
404
        </context>
405
        <discipline>
406
            <discipline>Language related studies</discipline>
407
        </discipline>
408
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
409
        <quotation>"There is a very good tool, "Symphony", which makes orthographic and syntactic corrections, but when I told the computer scientists 'Why don't you push it in the market? Sell it, and then you can go on with a second, better edition,' they told me 'It's difficult'".
410
        </quotation>
411
    </Entry>
412
    <Entry>
413
        <id>19</id>
414
        <description>Digital Humanities attempt to compensate for funding cuts in the Humanities by linking them with digitality.</description>
415
        <type>
416
            <type>Trend</type>
417
        </type>
418
        <consequences>
419
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
420
        </consequences>
421
        <context>
422
            <context>Tools and services</context>
423
            <context>Social</context>
424
            <context>Political</context>
425
            <context>Economic</context>
426
            <context>Methodologies</context>
427
        </context>
428
        <discipline>
429
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
430
        </discipline>
431
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
432
    </Entry>
433
    <Entry>
434
        <id>20</id>
435
        <description>In Greece, the landscape of Digital Humanities is very fragmentary, a fact that affects data integration, scholarly careers, and ther potential to draw funding.</description>
436
        <type>
437
            <type>Obstacle</type>
438
        </type>
439
        <consequences>
440
            <consequences>Finability</consequences>
441
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
442
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
443
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
444
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
445
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
446
        </consequences>
447
        <context>
448
            <context>Integration</context>
449
            <context>Economic</context>
450
            <context>Political</context>
451
            <context>Research interests</context>
452
        </context>
453
        <discipline>
454
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
455
        </discipline>
456
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
457
        <quotation>"Everyone works on their own project, they do not share, there is not a common pool".</quotation>
458
    </Entry>
459
    <Entry>
460
        <id>21</id>
461
        <description>Projects and networks as DARIAH and CLARIN help create the conditions for a more productive and interconnected use of digitality in the Humanities.</description>
462
        <type>
463
            <type>Trend</type>
464
            <type>Potentiality</type>
465
        </type>
466
        <consequences>
467
            <consequences>Finability</consequences>
468
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
469
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
470
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
471
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
472
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
473
        </consequences>
474
        <context>
475
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
476
            <context>Tools and services</context>
477
            <context>Social</context>
478
            <context>Cultural</context>
479
        </context>
480
        <discipline>
481
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
482
        </discipline>
483
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
484
        <quotation>"Maybe thing are going to be better in five, ten years from now".</quotation>
485
    </Entry>
486
    <Entry>
487
        <id>22</id>
488
        <description>National funding is necessary for the further development of Digital Humanities. In fact, it should be a priority, especially in countries like Greece that have gone through severe cuts in research.</description>
489
        <type>
490
            <type>Requirement</type>
491
        </type>
492
        <consequences>
493
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
494
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
495
        </consequences>
496
        <context>
497
            <context>Economic</context>
498
            <context>Political</context>
499
        </context>
500
        <discipline>
501
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
502
        </discipline>
503
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
504
        <quotation>"Universities are in a state of decline, as to their personnel: we are the half of the number we used to be ten years ago; there is not the necessary funding to support the scientific subjects, and I am afraid that we are missing a big chance. [...] There should be a privilieged funding of the Humanities since they are most severely hit by the crisis and, on the other hand, could help Greece overcome the crisis and be more extrovert".</quotation>
505
    </Entry>
506
    <Entry>
507
        <id>23</id>
508
        <description>A narrow and unproductive understanding of copyrights prevents the productive development of Digital Humanities. We should opt for open access practices.</description>
509
        <type>
510
            <type>Obstacle</type>
511
            <type>Requirement</type>
512
        </type>
513
        <consequences>
514
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
515
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
516
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
517
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
518
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
519
            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
520
        </consequences>
521
        <context>
522
            <context>Social</context>
523
            <context>Political</context>
524
        </context>
525
        <discipline>
526
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
527
        </discipline>
528
        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
529
        <quotation>"Copyrights are being defended with vigour. On the other hand, if you search on the Internet, you can find easily at least half of the relevant data [...]. The river doesn't flow backwards".</quotation>
530
    </Entry>
531
    <Entry>
532
        <id>24</id>
533
        <description>The most important factor in the spread of digital practices in research is not the technology in itself, but the sociocultural context, that is, its generalized use in everyday life and work.</description>
534
        <type>
535
            <type>Trend</type>
536
        </type>
537
        <consequences>
538
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
539
        </consequences>
540
        <context>
541
            <context>Social</context>
542
            <context>Cultural</context>
543
            <context>Infrastructrure</context>
544
            <context>Networks</context>
545
            <context>Data</context>
546
        </context>
547
        <discipline>
548
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
549
        </discipline>
550
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
551
        <quotation>"We are constantly networked and connected in our everyday life [...]. There is an all-encompassing flow of information [...]. On the one hand, this is time-saving; on the other hand, we construct ourselves in a permanent situation of data processing".</quotation>
552
    </Entry>
553
    <Entry>
554
        <id>25</id>
555
        <description>Digitality requires close cooperation is not restricted to a sequence (a gradual completion of the projects' distinct parts), but to the whole of the projects in any given time. This emphasizes interdisciplinarity, planning and ingineering, and has an impact on methodology, too.</description>
556
        <type>
557
            <type>Trend</type>
558
            <type>Requirement</type>
559
        </type>
560
        <consequences>
561
            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
562
        </consequences>
563
        <context>
564
            <context>Infrastructure. Social</context>
565
            <context>Methodology</context>
566
        </context>
567
        <discipline>
568
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
569
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
570
        </discipline>
571
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
572
        <quotation>"This is a crucial change for historians, who were used to doing research, making presentations, and composing articles and monographs individually.[...] Interdisciplinarity does not affect only Humanists, but has its impact on those, with whom we cooperate in the project. it makes them see things in a different light, too."</quotation>
573
    </Entry>
574
    <Entry>
575
        <id>26</id>
576
        <description>Digitality changes the way humanistic research is organized. On the one hand, the digital aspect becomes crucial for funding; on the other hand, research questions become broader and more context-conscious.</description>
577
        <type>
578
            <type>Trend</type>
579
            <type>Requirement</type>
580
        </type>
581
        <consequences>
582
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
583
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
584
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
585
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
586
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation
587
            </consequences>
588
        </consequences>
589
        <context>
590
            <context>Methodologies</context>
591
            <context>Economic</context>
592
            <context>Theory</context>
593
            <context>Research interests
594
            </context>
595
        </context>
596
        <discipline>
597
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
598
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
599
        </discipline>
600
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
601
    </Entry>
602
    <Entry>
603
        <id>27</id>
604
        <description>Digital practices should be introduced early in education and taught in a way that furthers creativity.</description>
605
        <type>
606
            <type>Requirement</type>
607
        </type>
608
        <consequences>
609
            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
610
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
611
        </consequences>
612
        <context>
613
            <context>Education</context>
614
        </context>
615
        <discipline>
616
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
617
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
618
        </discipline>
619
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
620
    </Entry>
621
    <Entry>
622
        <id>28</id>
623
        <description>Sustainability is a primary desideratum. Many projects and infrastructures become invisible after or before their completion. This prevents fruitful feedback and assessment.</description>
624
        <type>
625
            <type>Obstacle</type>
626
            <type>Trend</type>
627
        </type>
628
        <consequences>
629
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
630
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
631
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
632
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
633
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
634
        </consequences>
635
        <context>
636
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
637
            <context>Economic</context>
638
            <context>Political</context>
639
        </context>
640
        <discipline>
641
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
642
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
643
        </discipline>
644
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
645
        <quotation>"One negative aspect of the way digital industry is edeveloped is that many new products are being created and than left to their fate [...]. I am very much interested in sustainability. I would like the infrastructures to be used in a continuity. This would contribute much to our work".</quotation>
646
    </Entry>
647
    <Entry>
648
        <id>29</id>
649
        <description>Digitality is dynamic. It furthers the incorporation of dissemination strategies in the very organization of research. At the same time, it contributes to a fusion of research questions and to the emergence of new ones. </description>
650
        <type>
651
            <type>Trend</type>
652
            <type>Potentiality</type>
653
        </type>
654
        <consequences>
655
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
656
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
657
            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
658
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
659
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
660
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
661
        </consequences>
662
        <context>
663
            <context>Methodologies</context>
664
            <context>Theory</context>
665
            <context>Research interests
666
            </context>
667
        </context>
668
        <discipline>
669
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
670
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
671
        </discipline>
672
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
673
        <quotation>"There is a growing concern for the results of research. What we call dissemination does not come 'after' anymore; its is a part of research as such. [...] There is a growing fusion in research questions and research fields. One example is Digital History. Things are going to mix even more: research, art, programming will go together".</quotation>
674
    </Entry>
675
    <Entry>
676
        <id>30</id>
677
        <description>Digitality requires rather dexterities than knowledge. In this sense, critical thinking and dialectic reflection on needs and planning are crucial.</description>
678
        <type>
679
            <type>Trend</type>
680
        </type>
681
        <consequences>
682
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
683
            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
684
        </consequences>
685
        <context>
686
            <context>Social</context>
687
            <context>Cultural</context>
688
        </context>
689
        <discipline>
690
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
691
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
692
        </discipline>
693
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
694
        <quotation>"'Traditional' critical thinking and choice are among the most improtant factors, as well as creativity. One has to reflect on the relationship between needs and planning, planning and needs, in all aspects of life".  </quotation>
695
    </Entry>
696
    <Entry>
697
        <id>31</id>
698
        <description>In Digital Humanities there is a trend of "new empiricism" and an emphasis on taxonomic, technical issues, that is focused on funding and does not further reflective thinking..</description>
699
        <type>
700
            <type>Obstacle</type>
701
        </type>
702
        <consequences>
703
            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
704
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
705
            <consequences>Scientific Inetrpretation</consequences>
706
        </consequences>
707
        <context>
708
            <context>Tools and services</context>
709
            <context>Methodology</context>
710
            <context>Theory</context>
711
        </context>
712
        <discipline>
713
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
714
        </discipline>
715
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
716
        <quotation>"There is s trend to come back to data processing with a taxonomic logic. It is, let us say, a new kind of empiricism. The difference is now that the digital tools and the way we work with them make you think that this the beginning and the end of research. [...]. Sometimes we plan and do things just because we can, without asking ourselves what we do and whether we actually need it. And sometimes we spend more time in order to feed the infrastructure with data and we do not have time for interpretation. [...] There are projects that focus almoast exclusively on planning in order to achieve funding and then they leave behind only a few things of real importance".</quotation>
717
    </Entry>
718
    <Entry>
719
        <id>32</id>
720
        <description>Digitality has made us more bold in dealing with larger historical issues, and has made us conscious of "big data" in what concerns the sources for the study of the past.</description>
721
        <type>
722
            <type>Potentiality</type>
723
            <type>Trend</type>
724
        </type>
725
        <consequences>
726
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
727
        </consequences>
728
        <context>
729
            <context>Data</context>
730
            <context>Methodology</context>
731
            <context>Research Interests</context>
732
        </context>
733
        <discipline>
734
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
735
        </discipline>
736
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
737
        <comments>This contributes to the exploration of historical context and to expanding the framework of research.</comments>
738
        <quotation>"Now we feel obliged to use a much greater amount of material and sources in every research question. Once someone could use only, let us say, a particular archival corpus. [...] Now the stimuli are much more numerous".</quotation>
739
    </Entry>
740
    <Entry>
741
        <id>33</id>
742
        <description>There is a trend for consortia and networks to become dominant in achieving funding, with all the inclusions and exclusions this entails.</description>
743
        <type>
744
            <type>Trend</type>
745
            <type>obstacle</type>
746
        </type>
747
        <consequences>
748
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
749
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
750
            <consequences>Bias </consequences>
751
        </consequences>
752
        <context>
753
            <context>Funding</context>
754
            <context>Political</context>
755
            <context>Economic</context>
756
        </context>
757
        <discipline>
758
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
759
        </discipline>
760
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
761
    </Entry>
762
    <Entry>
763
        <id>34</id>
764
        <description>Personal research interests will become more and more harmonized with the various digital projects, in which the researchers participate. A mutual enrichment is going to take place.</description>
765
        <type>
766
            <type>Trend</type>
767
            <type>Potentiality</type>
768
        </type>
769
        <consequences>
770
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
771
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
772
        </consequences>
773
        <context>
774
            <context>Research Interests</context>
775
        </context>
776
        <discipline>
777
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
778
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
779
        </discipline>
780
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
781
        <quotation>"Until five years ago projects were a parallel occupation. You could hear a researcher say 'I have my research and I participate in a project, too'. Now there can be a fusion between the two, I think. This has to do with practice".</quotation>
782
    </Entry>
783
    <Entry>
784
        <id>35</id>
785
        <description>Humanists are in a stage of transition and experiment. Digitality offers many possibilities, but we are not yet in a position to make full use of our humanistic knowledge in order to find our way. We need time for the necessary convergences to take place. </description>
786
        <type>
787
            <type>Trend</type>
788
            <type>Potentiality</type>
789
        </type>
790
        <consequences>
791
            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
792
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
793
        </consequences>
794
        <context>
795
            <context>Social</context>
796
            <context>Cultural</context>
797
            <context>Theory</context>
798
            <context>Methodologies</context>
799
            <context>Research Questions</context>
800
        </context>
801
        <discipline>
802
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
803
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
804
        </discipline>
805
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
806
    </Entry>
807
    <Entry>
808
        <id>36</id>
809
        <description>There is the need to go beyond the level of "flat" digital exhibits and to enrich digital research presenatations with the analytical depth of traditional' narratives (e.g. monographs), while making use ?f various data formats and multimedia applications.</description>
810
        <type>
811
            <type>Potentiality</type>
812
        </type>
813
        <consequences>
814
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
815
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
816
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation
817
            </consequences>
818
        </consequences>
819
        <context>
820
            <context>Data</context>
821
            <context>integration</context>
822
            <context>Methodologies</context>
823
            <context>Data Types
824
            </context>
825
        </context>
826
        <discipline>
827
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
828
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
829
        </discipline>
830
        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
831
        <quotation>"New forms of presentation have their own restrictions, imposed by new media: they ask for smaller textual units, often fragmentary, that often lack of depth and connections. Now, in a monograph you can follow in detail an interpretation and a thinking process. The chjallenge for us is to enrich our digital compositions with this analytical width and depth".</quotation>
832
    </Entry>
833
    <Entry>
834
        <id>37</id>
835
        <description>The turning point for the emergence of Digital Humanities was the World Wide Web with its potential for connectivity and communication, and not generally the techonological developments in computing.</description>
836
        <type>
837
            <type>Trend</type>
838
        </type>
839
        <consequences>
840
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
841
        </consequences>
842
        <context>
843
            <context>Infrastrucrure</context>
844
            <context>Networks</context>
845
            <context>Social</context>
846
        </context>
847
        <discipline>
848
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
849
        </discipline>
850
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
851
        <quotation>"Humanities computing is an old story. [...] Digital Humanities did not emerge out of the blue. I see it as a gradual development. The most important thing, however, was the World Wide Web, because it opened the way to a more 'structural' change instead of instrumentalizing approaches. The Internet made possible new ways of connectivity, communication and networking in regard to data and people".</quotation>
852
    </Entry>
853
    <Entry>
854
        <id>38</id>
855
        <description>Extensive digitization gave to researchers access to a big volume of data.</description>
856
        <type>
857
            <type>Trend</type>
858
        </type>
859
        <consequences>
860
            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
861
        </consequences>
862
        <context>
863
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
864
            <context>Networks</context>
865
            <context>Data</context>
866
        </context>
867
        <discipline>
868
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
869
        </discipline>
870
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
871
    </Entry>
872
    <Entry>
873
        <id>39</id>
874
        <description>Digitization is not enough. The essential thing is good data curation, in accordance with the structured construction of analog archives.</description>
875
        <type>
876
            <type>Obstacle</type>
877
            <type>Requirement</type>
878
        </type>
879
        <consequences>
880
            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
881
            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
882
        </consequences>
883
        <context>
884
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
885
            <context>Networks</context>
886
            <context>Data</context>
887
        </context>
888
        <discipline>
889
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
890
        </discipline>
891
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
892
        <quotation>"If there is no structure, the digitized data are much more difficult to access than the ones in the analog archive with its structured construction. [...] If there is a good digital curation, you can access collections you couldn't easily access otherwise".</quotation>
893
    </Entry>
894
    <Entry>
895
        <id>40</id>
896
        <description>New work spaces will emerge, which will combine the digital and the physical in ways we cannot yet identify. </description>
897
        <type>
898
            <type>Potential</type>
899
        </type>
900
        <consequences>
901
            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
902
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
903
        </consequences>
904
        <context>
905
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
906
            <context>Networks</context>
907
            <context>Social</context>
908
            <context>Cultural</context>
909
        </context>
910
        <discipline>
911
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
912
        </discipline>
913
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
914
    </Entry>
915
    <Entry>
916
        <id>41</id>
917
        <description>The familiarization with digitality, particularly among younger generations, will led to a blend of the digital and the analog that will come naturally. This will have an impact on our work, too.</description>
918
        <type>
919
            <type>Requirement</type>
920
        </type>
921
        <consequences>
922
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
923
        </consequences>
924
        <context>
925
            <context>Infrastructure</context>
926
            <context>Networks</context>
927
            <context>Social</context>
928
            <context>Cultural</context>
929
        </context>
930
        <discipline>
931
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
932
        </discipline>
933
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
934
        <quotation>"what we still lack is a change in mentality in how we understand digitality, tools, environments and media. [...] Sometimes for us researchers it is hard to conceptualize, while for the public it is a more simple matter, because it comes naturally through evertyday use".</quotation>
935
    </Entry>
936
    <Entry>
937
        <id>43</id>
938
        <description>The emphasis on Digital Humanities, evident in funding practices, is connected to particular EU policies on innovation, which include the relationship between Humanities and Creative Industries.</description>
939
        <type>
940
            <type>Trend</type>
941
        </type>
942
        <consequences>
943
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
944
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
945
        </consequences>
946
        <context>
947
            <context>Tools and Services</context>
948
            <context>Political</context>
949
            <context>Economic</context>
950
        </context>
951
        <discipline>
952
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
953
        </discipline>
954
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
955
    </Entry>
956
    <Entry>
957
        <id>44</id>
958
        <description>Digital Humanities are already the subject of post-graduate programmes. This trend should be followed more intensively in order for Digiral Humanities to be represented in University Departmens.</description>
959
        <type>
960
            <type>Trend</type>
961
            <type>Requirement</type>
962
        </type>
963
        <consequences>
964
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
965
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
966
        </consequences>
967
        <context>
968
            <context>Education</context>
969
        </context>
970
        <discipline>
971
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
972
        </discipline>
973
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
974
    </Entry>
975
    <Entry>
976
        <id>45</id>
977
        <description>Digitality helps us refine our analytical tools on the performance of history and memory.</description>
978
        <type>
979
            <type>Trend</type>
980
        </type>
981
        <consequences>
982
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation </consequences>
983
        </consequences>
984
        <context>
985
            <context>Methodologies</context>
986
            <context>Research Interests</context>
987
        </context>
988
        <discipline>
989
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
990
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
991
        </discipline>
992
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
993
        <quotation>"Digitality has affected our scholarly practices. [...] The new practices we use  (e.g. crowdsourcing) make us reflect on our concepts and our analytical tools. When we analyze the concept of memory, we have to take into account its transformations in the digital era [...]. This does not render obsolete our theoretical assumptions; its puts them in historical perspective".</quotation>
994
    </Entry>
995
    <Entry>
996
        <id>46</id>
997
        <description>Digital Humanities, with its experimental character, may constitute a factor for a transformation of the Humanities and for a blend of Humanities with Science.</description>
998
        <type>
999
            <type>Potantiality</type>
1000
        </type>
1001
        <consequences>
1002
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1003
        </consequences>
1004
        <context>
1005
            <context>Methodologies</context>
1006
            <context>Research Interests</context>
1007
        </context>
1008
        <discipline>
1009
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1010
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
1011
        </discipline>
1012
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
1013
    </Entry>
1014
    <Entry>
1015
        <id>47</id>
1016
        <description>Crowdsourcing projects give us the possibility to analyze a large amount of data on how people understand and remember the past; they also help the wider public appropriate history.</description>
1017
        <type>
1018
            <type>Trend</type>
1019
            <type>Potantiality</type>
1020
        </type>
1021
        <consequences>
1022
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1023
        </consequences>
1024
        <context>
1025
            <context>Nerworks</context>
1026
            <context>Social</context>
1027
            <context>Political</context>
1028
            <context>Cultural</context>
1029
            <context>Research Interests</context>
1030
            <context>Data types</context>
1031
        </context>
1032
        <discipline>
1033
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1034
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
1035
        </discipline>
1036
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
1037
        <quotation>"The changes introduced by crowdsourcing are, first, the scale of data, and secondly, the possibility for the wider public to appropriate again the past".</quotation>
1038
    </Entry>
1039
    <Entry>
1040
        <id>48</id>
1041
        <description>Digital curation in crowdsourcing projects is very important, because the historian has to do with a highly communicative material that may be relevant to a lot of actual controversial issues. </description>
1042
        <type>
1043
            <type>Requirement</type>
1044
        </type>
1045
        <consequences>
1046
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1047
            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
1048
        </consequences>
1049
        <context>
1050
            <context>Social</context>
1051
            <context>Cultural</context>
1052
            <context>Political</context>
1053
            <context>Data Types</context>
1054
            <context>Methodologies</context>
1055
        </context>
1056
        <discipline>
1057
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1058
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
1059
        </discipline>
1060
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
1061
        <quotation>"The role of the historian is actually more accentuated, because it is a different thing to write a monograph that will be read by the academic and research community, and a diffrerent thing to produce something that will be accessed by a wider public and will be eventually diffused in various ways on the Internet".</quotation>
1062
    </Entry>
1063
    <Entry>
1064
        <id>52</id>
1065
        <description>The teaching of history should be enriched with digital experiential projects that help students familiarize with history and with research, instead of memorizing names and dates.</description>
1066
        <type>
1067
            <type>Requirement</type>
1068
        </type>
1069
        <consequences>
1070
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
1071
        </consequences>
1072
        <context>
1073
            <context>Social</context>
1074
            <context>Cultural</context>
1075
            <context>Education</context>
1076
        </context>
1077
        <discipline>
1078
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1079
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
1080
        </discipline>
1081
        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
1082
    </Entry>
1083
    <Entry>
1084
        <id>53</id>
1085
        <description>Researchers have a wide range of digitized data at their disposal. This boosts scientific productivity, but at the same time imposes new expectations ans requirements that worsen work conditions.</description>
1086
        <type>
1087
            <type>Trend</type>
1088
        </type>
1089
        <consequences>
1090
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
1091
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
1092
        </consequences>
1093
        <context>
1094
            <context>Data</context>
1095
            <context>Social</context>
1096
            <context>Economic</context>
1097
        </context>
1098
        <discipline>
1099
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1100
        </discipline>
1101
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1102
        <quotation>"When I was doing my PhD, I had to rely on microfilm from the British Library. Now all this stuff has been digitized. This is how expectations change. I require from my PhD students to take into account a lot of sources, since they are now digitized and easy to access. [...] We require from researchers to rise to much higher expectations. In the USA and elsewhere, where the 'publish or perish' principle is dominant, research is being transfromed into a kind of industrial activity. [...] In addition, digitality has tranformed us all into 'secretaries of ourselves' and has almost eliminated particular specifications, as for instance phototypesetting. It is often the researcher who must do the work in order for his or her article to be published. This applies to proof-reading, too".</quotation>
1103
    </Entry>
1104
    <Entry>
1105
        <id>54</id>
1106
        <description>Digitality has helped increase the profits of publishing houses by allocating significant workload on researchers. This does not contribute to better research, but to capitalist profitability.</description>
1107
        <type>
1108
            <type>Trend</type>
1109
        </type>
1110
        <consequences>
1111
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
1112
        </consequences>
1113
        <context>
1114
            <context>Social</context>
1115
            <context>Economic</context>
1116
        </context>
1117
        <discipline>
1118
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1119
        </discipline>
1120
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1121
        <quotation>"This is not for the benefit of Academia, but fot the benefit of big publishing houses. [...] Let us say you have written a good paper and it has been published in a journal. They can sell it pro view, and if it is good, they can sell it to a lot of people with a very good profit, since you have done almost all the necessary publishing work (besides the scientific work) on the template they have given you. [...] This does not have to do with research and scientific progress, this has to do with business".</quotation>
1122
    </Entry>
1123
    <Entry>
1124
        <id>55</id>
1125
        <description>Digitality boosts communication and sharing. This is very important for the Humanities, wher such attitudes were rather absent. It brings them closer to Science and it helps create projects based on international cooperation.</description>
1126
        <type>
1127
            <type>Trend</type>
1128
        </type>
1129
        <consequences>
1130
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1131
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
1132
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
1133
        </consequences>
1134
        <context>
1135
            <context>Networks</context>
1136
            <context>Social</context>
1137
            <context>Research Interests</context>
1138
        </context>
1139
        <discipline>
1140
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1141
        </discipline>
1142
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1143
    </Entry>
1144
    <Entry>
1145
        <id>56</id>
1146
        <description>Digitality represents a new social, political, and epistemological paradigm. Social subjects (and humanistic research, as well) have to re-invent themselves in this new condition. </description>
1147
        <type>
1148
            <type>Trend</type>
1149
        </type>
1150
        <consequences>
1151
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1152
        </consequences>
1153
        <context>
1154
            <context>Social</context>
1155
            <context>Political</context>
1156
        </context>
1157
        <discipline>
1158
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1159
            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
1160
        </discipline>
1161
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1162
        <quotation>"A change of scientific paradigm refers usually to specific disciplines, it is not an overall change of paradigm in society. [...] But now digitality is a change of paradigm that affects so many branches of scientific knowledge that it represents an overall tranformation, similar to the scientific revolution of the 17th century".</quotation>
1163
    </Entry>
1164
    <Entry>
1165
        <id>57</id>
1166
        <description>Society comprises competing forces with different interests. Digitality can lead to different patterns of social and scientific activity. On the one hand, there is the reality of the algorithmization of work; on the other hand, there is the potentiality to create new scientific and social networks and subjects.</description>
1167
        <type>
1168
            <type>Trend</type>
1169
            <type>Potentiality</type>
1170
        </type>
1171
        <consequences>
1172
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1173
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
1174
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
1175
        </consequences>
1176
        <context>
1177
            <context>Networks</context>
1178
            <context>Social</context>
1179
            <context>Political</context>
1180
            <context>Economic</context>
1181
        </context>
1182
        <discipline>
1183
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1184
        </discipline>
1185
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1186
        <quotation>"There is a very interesting book by a LSE professor with the title 'Platform Capitalism', which focuses on the re-invention of capitalism within digitality. This is a foreseeable -if not actual- response, but is not the only possible. [...] This stage of transition we are in could lead to an active involvement of people who are outside the traditional boundaries of the academic community. [...[ An important development, which we can already observe, is the discussion between Humanists and artists. [...] A fruitful intervention should involve the interaction between universities and society, specialists and non-specialists, scientists and artists. [...] Intervention should lead to a creative transgression of boundaries and to the creation of new knowledge".</quotation>
1187
    </Entry>
1188
    <Entry>
1189
        <id>58</id>
1190
        <description>Digitality re-invents the notion of public sphere. A fruitful way to deal with this transformation is a field of study that deals with the interaction of science, technology and society, and focuses on the co-constructive relationship between the three.</description>
1191
        <type>
1192
            <type>Trend</type>
1193
        </type>
1194
        <consequences>
1195
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1196
        </consequences>
1197
        <context>
1198
            <context>Networks</context>
1199
            <context>Social</context>
1200
            <context>Political</context>
1201
            <context>Theory</context>
1202
        </context>
1203
        <discipline>
1204
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1205
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1206
        </discipline>
1207
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1208
        <quotation>"Technological artefacts (broadly speaking) are not simply products of a specific workshop or factory, but are the outcome of a long process of co-construction, in which users have an active role"</quotation>
1209
    </Entry>
1210
    <Entry>
1211
        <id>59</id>
1212
        <description>We are in a stage of transition and paradigm change. we cannot interpret adequately the new condition of digitality with the epistemological tools of Modernity; new tools and theory must be developed.</description>
1213
        <type>
1214
            <type>Requirement</type>
1215
        </type>
1216
        <consequences>
1217
            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
1218
        </consequences>
1219
        <context>
1220
            <context>Social</context>
1221
            <context>Political</context>
1222
            <context>Cultural</context>
1223
            <context>Theory</context>
1224
        </context>
1225
        <discipline>
1226
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1227
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1228
        </discipline>
1229
        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
1230
        <quotation>"Modernity was based on specific and clear distinctions that were operative, produced wealth, and gave rise to political regimes With digitality these distinctions began to blur. We cannot use the analytical tools we used until now in order to understand reality, but the new tools have not yet been created. [...] It is somewhat similar to war and revolution. New analytical thought for the interpretation of the new paradigm will need one or two generations to develop".</quotation>
1231
    </Entry>
1232
    <Entry>
1233
        <id>60</id>
1234
        <description>Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data</description>
1235
        <type>
1236
            <type>Trend</type>
1237
            <type>Obstacle</type>
1238
        </type>
1239
        <consequences>
1240
            <consequences>Findable</consequences>
1241
            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
1242
            <consequences>Interoperable</consequences>
1243
            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
1244
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
1245
            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
1246

  
1247
        </consequences>
1248
        <context>
1249
            <context>Social</context>
1250
            <context>Political</context>
1251
            <context>Cultural</context>
1252
            <context>Theory</context>
1253
        </context>
1254
        <discipline>
1255
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1256
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1257
        </discipline>
1258
        <provenance>Article: Warwick et al 2008 "If you build it will they come?:  the LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data"</provenance>
1259
        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/4KCFTSCH</related_items>
1260
        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=0</comments>
1261
    </Entry>
1262
    <Entry>
1263
        <id>61</id>
1264
        <description>Project Sustainability in DH: Collaboration and Community</description>
1265
        <type>
1266
            <type>Trend</type>
1267
            <type>Requirement</type>
1268
        </type>
1269
        <consequences>
1270
            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
1271
            <consequences>Interoperable</consequences>
1272
            <consequences>Reuseable</consequences>
1273
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
1274
            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
1275
            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
1276
        </consequences>
1277
        <context>
1278
            <context>Social</context>
1279
            <context>Political</context>
1280
            <context>Cultural</context>
1281
            <context>Theory</context>
1282
        </context>
1283
        <discipline>
1284
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1285
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1286
        </discipline>
1287
        <provenance>Article: Villa, 2015 "Project Sustainability in DH: Collaboration and Community"</provenance>
1288
        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/ZPP67ZBZ</related_items>
1289
        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=0</comments>
1290
    </Entry>
1291
    <Entry>
1292
        <id>62</id>
1293
        <description>Authority and Judgement in the Digital Archive.  This article is about practices within digital archiving, and how unintended bias can impact on its FAIRness.  Also, attitudes towards archiving in terms of scholarly contribution</description>
1294
        <type>
1295
            <type>Trend</type>
1296
            <type>obstacle</type>
1297
        </type>
1298
        <consequences>
1299
            <consequences>Findable</consequences>
1300
            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
1301
            <consequences>Interoperable</consequences>
1302
            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
1303
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
1304
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
1305
        </consequences>
1306
        <context>
1307
            <context>Social</context>
1308
            <context>Political</context>
1309
            <context>Cultural</context>
1310
            <context>Theory</context>
1311
        </context>
1312
        <discipline>
1313
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1314
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1315
        </discipline>
1316
        <provenance>Article: Dix et al 2014, "Authority and Judgement in the Digital Archive"</provenance>
1317
        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/9C5Z84IZ</related_items>
1318
        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=1</comments>
1319
    </Entry>
1320
    <Entry>
1321
        <id>63</id>
1322
        <description>Taking Public Scholarship Seriously.  This article is about how definitions of scholarship can be limiting, especially when talking about 'citizen science'.  Also in terms of career, as it can be seen as a hindrance</description>
1323
        <type>
1324
            <type>Trend</type>
1325
            <type>Obstacle</type>
1326
        </type>
1327
        <consequences>
1328
            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
1329
            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
1330
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
1331

  
1332
        </consequences>
1333
        <context>
1334
            <context>Social</context>
1335
            <context>Political</context>
1336
            <context>Cultural</context>
1337
            <context>Theory</context>
1338
        </context>
1339
        <discipline>
1340
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1341
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1342
        </discipline>
1343
        <provenance>Article: Cantor and Lavine 2006, "Taking Public Scholarship Seriously"</provenance>
1344
        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/MXERVH9D</related_items>
1345
        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=2</comments>
1346
    </Entry>
1347
    <Entry>
1348
        <id>64</id>
1349
        <description>Effects of socio?technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing.  This article is about how motivation to either share knwoledge can come down to factors in IT and organisational structure</description>
1350
        <type>
1351
            <type>Trend</type>
1352
            <type>Obstacle</type>
1353
        </type>
1354
        <consequences>
1355
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
1356
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
1357

  
1358
        </consequences>
1359
        <context>
1360
            <context>Social</context>
1361
            <context>Political</context>
1362
            <context>Cultural</context>
1363
            <context>Theory</context>
1364
        </context>
1365
        <discipline>
1366
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1367
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1368
        </discipline>
1369
        <provenance>Article: Lin and Gwo-Guang 2006 "Effects of socio?technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing"</provenance>
1370
        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/X56UPG72</related_items>
1371
        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=3 </comments>
1372
    </Entry>
1373
    <Entry>
1374
        <id>65</id>
1375
        <description>Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library.  This article is about how eductational infrastructure promotes digital skills, yet retains a more traditional approach, impacting on publications and willingness to engage in Public Scholarship, particularly among ECRs</description>
1376
        <type>
1377
            <type>Trend</type>
1378
            <type>Obstacle</type>
1379
            <type>Requirement</type>
1380
        </type>
1381
        <consequences>
1382
            <consequences>Findable</consequences>
1383
            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
1384
            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
1385
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
1386
            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
1387
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
1388
        </consequences>
1389
        <context>
1390
            <context>Social</context>
1391
            <context>Political</context>
1392
            <context>Cultural</context>
1393
            <context>Theory</context>
1394
        </context>
1395
        <discipline>
1396
            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
1397
            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
1398
        </discipline>
1399
        <provenance>Article: Cheverie, Boettcher and Buschmen 2009, "Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library"</provenance>
1400
        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/QVFUBNAK</related_items>
1401
        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=4</comments>
1402
    </Entry>
1403
    <Entry>
1404
        <id>66</id>
1405
        <description>Collaborating, Connecting, and Clustering in the Humanities A Case Study of Networked Scholarship in an Interdisciplinary, Dispersed Team.  This article discusses potential issues around team structure and scholary practices (e.g. co-authorship, co-writing)</description>
1406
        <type>
1407
            <type>Obstacle</type>
1408
        </type>
1409
        <consequences>
1410
            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
1411
            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
1412
        </consequences>
1413
        <context>
1414
            <context>Social</context>
1415
            <context>Political</context>
... This diff was truncated because it exceeds the maximum size that can be displayed.

Also available in: Unified diff