Index: modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/java/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/IterableXmlParserTest.java
===================================================================
--- modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/java/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/IterableXmlParserTest.java	(revision 57626)
+++ modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/java/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/IterableXmlParserTest.java	(revision 57627)
@@ -3,22 +3,30 @@
 import static org.junit.Assert.assertNotNull;
 import static org.junit.Assert.assertTrue;
 
-import java.io.ByteArrayInputStream;
-import java.io.IOException;
-import java.io.InputStream;
-import java.io.StringReader;
-import java.io.StringWriter;
+import java.io.*;
+import java.net.URI;
+import java.nio.charset.StandardCharsets;
+import java.nio.file.*;
+import java.util.Iterator;
 import java.util.zip.GZIPInputStream;
 import java.util.zip.ZipInputStream;
 
+import eu.dnetlib.rmi.data.CollectorServiceException;
 import org.apache.commons.io.IOUtils;
+import org.apache.http.HttpStatus;
+import org.apache.http.client.methods.CloseableHttpResponse;
+import org.apache.http.client.methods.HttpGet;
+import org.apache.http.impl.client.CloseableHttpClient;
+import org.apache.http.impl.client.HttpClients;
 import org.dom4j.Document;
 import org.dom4j.DocumentException;
 import org.dom4j.io.SAXReader;
 import org.junit.Before;
+import org.junit.Ignore;
 import org.junit.Test;
 import org.springframework.core.io.ClassPathResource;
 import org.springframework.core.io.Resource;
+import sun.nio.ch.IOUtil;
 
 public class IterableXmlParserTest {
 
@@ -30,6 +38,8 @@
 
 	private Resource xmlSingle = new ClassPathResource("eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/singleRepo.xml");
 
+	private Resource xmlBig = new ClassPathResource("eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/big.xml");
+
 	private String element = "repository";
 
 	private IterableXmlParser parser;
@@ -79,6 +89,31 @@
 		assertTrue(count == 3);
 	}
 
+	@Test
+	public void testBig() throws Exception {
+		int count = doTest(xmlBig.getInputStream(), "Entry");
+		System.out.println(count);
+	}
+
+	@Test
+	public void testBigRemote() throws Exception {
+		Iterator<String> s = new XMLIterator("Entry", xmlBig.getInputStream());
+		int i =0;
+		Path dir = Paths.get("/tmp/foresight");
+		Files.createDirectories(dir);
+		while(s.hasNext()){
+			System.out.println(++i);
+
+			final Path path = Files.createTempFile(dir,"foresight", i+".xml");
+			System.out.println("Temp file : " + path);
+
+			//Writing data here
+			byte[] strToBytes = s.next().getBytes();
+			Files.write(path, strToBytes);
+
+		}
+	}
+
 	private int doTest(final InputStream stream, final String element) throws DocumentException {
 		parser = new IterableXmlParser(element, stream);
 		int count = 0;
Index: modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/resources/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/big.xml
===================================================================
--- modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/resources/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/big.xml	(nonexistent)
+++ modules/dnet-core-components/branches/saxonHE-SOLR-772/src/test/resources/eu/dnetlib/miscutils/iterators/xml/big.xml	(revision 57627)
@@ -0,0 +1,16376 @@
+<?xml version="1.0"?>
+<root>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>1</id>
+        <description>A social network analysis of Twitter: Mapping the digital humanities community</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>History</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related Studies</discipline>
+            <discipline>Archeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and applied disciplines</discipline>
+            <discipline>Social Sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Digital Humanities</tags>
+            <tags>Twitter</tags>
+            <tags>Social Studies</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>Article</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23311983.2016.1171458</related_items>
+        <comments>An interesting article about the behavior of the scientific community of digital humanities through a famous social network. In this paper, we found that defining digital humanities as a "community" avoids endless debates on its disciplinary boundaries but does not allow us to know who's practicing them today. As an attempt to identify this field, leaving aside the epistemological discussion, our study shows that this item is analysable through a social media widely used by the so-called "digital humanists" (2,500 users). In analysing the network of "who's following who?", it was found that a small number of individuals and institutions are focusing so much attention that the graph appears to be very homogeneous around them. The fact remains that many types of behaviour can be deduced from the graph and that structural characteristics of the network enable us to highlight some users holding remarkable positions. Specifically, we showed that French-speaking users, and to a lesser extent German-speaking users, stand out: the language factor strongly influences the network structure.
+            Obviously, any quantification leads to a form of objectification whose limits we need to understand. But we note that the availability of this type of data-set and the opportunities offered by tools and theories such as social network analysis allows us to shed new light on this community.</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>2</id>
+        <description>The development of digital tools for the process of archaeological and historical research data has facilitated the overall analysis and has paved the way for more accurate interpretation. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>The interviewee describes the analysis she had to do during her PhD research, before the dissemination of digital tools. She had to manually assemble, combine and represent spatially a rich variety of data concerning the social, economic and political history of the city-state of ancient Corinth. The development of digital  methods has made this process faster and easier.</comments>
+        <quotation>She concludes that "had this work [the process of the research data for her PhD thesis] been done today, not only would it have been much more precise, not only would it have been carried out much faster, but I'm pretty sure that the historical interpretation per se would have been more accurate. [...] I think that today I would very much benefit from all those kinds of micro tools and micro services that are out there".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>3</id>
+        <description>Digital tools for use in the Humanities should be simple and easy to use, unless the possibilities they open are so important that they are worth the extra effort and training (e.g. GIS for archaeology). This factor should be assessed according to the criteria of the researchers themselves.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>The interviewee discusses the complexities arising from the use of state-of-the-art digital tools and infrastructures in scientific fields like archaeology and history, which had developed quite sophisiticated methods for the organization of research data, and states that digital tools should enable researchers to do their work more effectively and to open nerw possibilities for them, and not to alienate them by their complexity.</comments>
+        <quotation>The interviewee states that, coming "from a generation that have learned to carry out their work very efficiently without digital tools", she is not ready to embrace uncritically all those "very, very state-of-the-art environments", unless she is "convinced that there is something really concrete to gain out of them". In contrast to "any semantic linking tools that require endless nights to put your data in before they start working", digital tools have to be simple and easy to use. They have to "facilitate, enable, simplify", or create "a particular research interest in that effort and training", as the use of GIS in archaeology, in order to have an impact on the researchers' work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>4</id>
+        <description>Education in the use of digital tools and infrastructure for Humanists should start already in first years at the University.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>The interviewee discusses her generational intermediary position between the analog and the digital, a fact that urges her to function as a facilitator for younger generations and to plead for education in digital tools.</comments>
+        <quotation>The interviewee was educated "to do things manually, or using technology on a very superficial level, like Microsoft word or excel". She states that "unless people start being educated from a very, very early stage -first-year students, second-year students- and being exposed to the digital, this is not gonna change". She sees herself as having "this sort of a mission to carry out", i.e. "to train people from this kind of in-between generation [...] to work with the digital in any way possible that would make their life easier".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>5</id>
+        <description>The Humanities are seriously affected by funding cuts. At the same time, the development of sophisticated IT tools is not always really useful for Humanists.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>The fact that, on the first hand, there are important funding cuts in the Humanities departments, and, on the other hand, there is a very sophisticated IT development that does not always take into account the specific needs of Humanists, may alienate the latter significantly.</comments>
+        <quotation>"You've got money going into IT, towards the section development of very state-of-the-art tools, but whether these tools can really be useful for Humanities research is not necessarily the case".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>6</id>
+        <description>The combination of money cuts in the Humanities and the emergence of the digital has given rise to very engaged research communities that try to make use of the digital to compensate for not being able to do research in situ. Open access would be a great relief in this aspect. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentialty</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>Open access is understood as a partial but radical change in what concerns the praciticalities of research, as an empowering process for researchers who cannot afford travel costs. In this aspect, open access can reduce inequalities as to prospects, carreers, and peer recognition.</comments>
+        <quotation>The money cuts in the Humanities and the emergence of the digital has given rise to some "very, very driven research communities that work even more tightly together. Or communities around research themes, or around areas, or around digital environments, because when you don't have money, obviously you can't really travel, when you don't have money you can't visit the places and stay there for days and work in archives, and work in libraries and museums and collection-holding institutions [...]. And when humanities research is granted open access to data from across the world, even in this period of, you know, of budget cuts and kind of grumpiness and sometimes great concerns about where we're going and will be still be able to do our research, then there's still some light of hope".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>7</id>
+        <description>Open access is the most important potantiality for the near future. Open access should be understood not only in terms  of data, but of methodologies and research questions as well. In essence, it is a political statement.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>Open access is thus understood as a move towards a more democratic and cooperative way of doing research.</comments>
+        <quotation>"By open access I don't mean just open access to data. I mean open access to methods, methodologies [...]. Methods employed, say, ethnographic methods or social anthropological methods, are data themselves. So, openness is a political statement. Opening up your research as it happens is a political statement, opening up your data, your hard-collected data. I think that this is where it's all going. It's like breaking down all these barriers of extremely expensive stuff that should just be offered for free".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>8</id>
+        <description>An example of the obstacles that prevent open access is the high price of new books that, paradoxically enough, plead for open access.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <quotation>"My colleagues and I [from the research centre ATHENA in Greece] last year put together a small book in Routledge on digital infrastructures (PARTHENOS was one of them). And I think it's ? 58 or 68 to get that book -it may be more. I mean, why? It's crazy, it's absurd, and when you think these infrastructures have got funding from the European Union to open things up for free for the European citizens and the citizens of the world, and then people working on these infrastructures put together some articles, and these articles found their way into a book, and this book costs 70 ?! That's crazy".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>9</id>
+        <description>Teamwork and interdisciplinarity in the Humanities are closely connected.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <comments>Interdisciplinarity is a necessity and a blessing. It requires new kinds of acrtivity, but opens the way for better interpretation. Is is also an important community-building factor.</comments>
+        <quotation>"And the reason you cannot do without teamwork now, increasingly so, is because of interdisciplinarity. So, I mean, of course there are people working on their own, on coins, on manuscripts, on all sorts of things. But they're getting less and less with the years. So, it's wonderful that the interpretation of Humanities, the Humanities research field is getting so complicated, but this complexity requires interdisciplinarity, transdisciplinarity, and hence, teamwork".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>10</id>
+        <description>Networking and open access are parts of the same process.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Without networking you're an island. And no man is an island, and no man should be an island. Networking is another thing, because it has to do with outreach, publicity, and dissemination of your own work. I mean, if you're doing your work just, you know, for your own good, to read it before you go to bed, write up and read on your own, that's fine. But networking is dissemination and dissemination is also tied to open access and openness. So, the more we network, the more open we need to be. And the more open we need to be, the more we network. So these things go together".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>11</id>
+        <description>Digitality offers a potential for a more democratic, better informed and though-provoking interpretation, as well as for the creation of new narratives.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+            <discipline>Heritage and Applied Disciplines</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <quotation>Digitality helps "overcome some really important barriers: money, time, and effort". </quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>12</id>
+        <description>Progress in South-East Europe concerning the adoption of digital strategies in the Humanities is slow; active steps should be taken in the direction of infrastructure and institutional engagement.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Tools and Services</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV008</provenance>
+        <quotation>"I'm a bit unsure as to whether the field of historical research in Greece and South-east Europe is catching up with any digital developments as the rest of our European friends. I think that South-east Europe is the holder of much of European collective cultural heritage, yet the way young people are trained to work with it, research on it and interpret it is a bit old-fashioned [...] I think what we need to do on an infrastructure level -and this is why, I guess, the European Union is investing money on it- is that we should kind of and bring balance into that. Universities should be engaged more and more in such infrastructures, more educational and training activities should be taken up, like summer schools. [...] So, I guess this is something that should be taken up, because it's not just, you know, the Germans or the Dutch friends building simple and user-friendly tools, which we Greeks and we South-east Europeans can use. It's about exchange of expertise, and really cultivating this need of balancing out these differences".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>13</id>
+        <description>Artificial Intelligence is being developed rapidly and is going to play a very important role in DH.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Inerpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"We know how Artificial Intelligence contributes to translation, but we do not yet know what it can do for the Humanities in general".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>14</id>
+        <description>There is still a distrust of DH by Humanists and a tendency to theorize against it.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <comments>These theoretical approaches are included in attempts to analyze the overall implications of digitality and must be seen actually as a distinct part of Digital Humanities.</comments>
+        <quotation>"I would not object if this critique was of a philosophic nature. But to speak indefinetly of Digital Humanities without specific examples... We should discuss about these issues while working on actual projects and modify the projects or the theory accordingly".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>15</id>
+        <description>There is still a gap between Humanists and Social Scientists, on the one hand, and computer scientists and information engineers, on the other.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"This happens on the level of case-studies".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>16</id>
+        <description>Image processing will develop quickly towards a form of image entropy</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Inerpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>17</id>
+        <description>We need large digitized language corpora in Greek, with adequate tools for their analysis, as is the case with "bigger" languages.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Inerpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <comments>This may well be the case with other "small" European languages, too.</comments>
+        <quotation>"The most important thing for me is the amelioration of the tools for the analysis of Greek language data. [...] This is not easy, because Greek is a small language. [...] But we need to have good and simple tools at the researchers' disposal."</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>18</id>
+        <description>The introduction of specific tools in the market could boost the development of even better ones</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"There is a very good tool, "Symphony", which makes orthographic and syntactic corrections, but when I told the computer scientists 'Why don't you push it in the market? Sell it, and then you can go on with a second, better edition,' they told me 'It's difficult'".
+        </quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>19</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities attempt to compensate for funding cuts in the Humanities by linking them with digitality.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>20</id>
+        <description>In Greece, the landscape of Digital Humanities is very fragmentary, a fact that affects data integration, scholarly careers, and ther potential to draw funding.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Finability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Everyone works on their own project, they do not share, there is not a common pool".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>21</id>
+        <description>Projects and networks as DARIAH and CLARIN help create the conditions for a more productive and interconnected use of digitality in the Humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Finability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Maybe thing are going to be better in five, ten years from now".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>22</id>
+        <description>National funding is necessary for the further development of Digital Humanities. In fact, it should be a priority, especially in countries like Greece that have gone through severe cuts in research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Universities are in a state of decline, as to their personnel: we are the half of the number we used to be ten years ago; there is not the necessary funding to support the scientific subjects, and I am afraid that we are missing a big chance. [...] There should be a privilieged funding of the Humanities since they are most severely hit by the crisis and, on the other hand, could help Greece overcome the crisis and be more extrovert".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>23</id>
+        <description>A narrow and unproductive understanding of copyrights prevents the productive development of Digital Humanities. We should opt for open access practices.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV009</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Copyrights are being defended with vigour. On the other hand, if you search on the Internet, you can find easily at least half of the relevant data [...]. The river doesn't flow backwards".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>24</id>
+        <description>The most important factor in the spread of digital practices in research is not the technology in itself, but the sociocultural context, that is, its generalized use in everyday life and work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Infrastructrure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"We are constantly networked and connected in our everyday life [...]. There is an all-encompassing flow of information [...]. On the one hand, this is time-saving; on the other hand, we construct ourselves in a permanent situation of data processing".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>25</id>
+        <description>Digitality requires close cooperation is not restricted to a sequence (a gradual completion of the projects' distinct parts), but to the whole of the projects in any given time. This emphasizes interdisciplinarity, planning and ingineering, and has an impact on methodology, too.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure. Social</context>
+            <context>Methodology</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"This is a crucial change for historians, who were used to doing research, making presentations, and composing articles and monographs individually.[...] Interdisciplinarity does not affect only Humanists, but has its impact on those, with whom we cooperate in the project. it makes them see things in a different light, too."</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>26</id>
+        <description>Digitality changes the way humanistic research is organized. On the one hand, the digital aspect becomes crucial for funding; on the other hand, research questions become broader and more context-conscious.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation
+            </consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>27</id>
+        <description>Digital practices should be introduced early in education and taught in a way that furthers creativity.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>28</id>
+        <description>Sustainability is a primary desideratum. Many projects and infrastructures become invisible after or before their completion. This prevents fruitful feedback and assessment.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"One negative aspect of the way digital industry is edeveloped is that many new products are being created and than left to their fate [...]. I am very much interested in sustainability. I would like the infrastructures to be used in a continuity. This would contribute much to our work".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>29</id>
+        <description>Digitality is dynamic. It furthers the incorporation of dissemination strategies in the very organization of research. At the same time, it contributes to a fusion of research questions and to the emergence of new ones. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"There is a growing concern for the results of research. What we call dissemination does not come 'after' anymore; its is a part of research as such. [...] There is a growing fusion in research questions and research fields. One example is Digital History. Things are going to mix even more: research, art, programming will go together".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>30</id>
+        <description>Digitality requires rather dexterities than knowledge. In this sense, critical thinking and dialectic reflection on needs and planning are crucial.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"'Traditional' critical thinking and choice are among the most improtant factors, as well as creativity. One has to reflect on the relationship between needs and planning, planning and needs, in all aspects of life".  </quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>31</id>
+        <description>In Digital Humanities there is a trend of "new empiricism" and an emphasis on taxonomic, technical issues, that is focused on funding and does not further reflective thinking..</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Inetrpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Methodology</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"There is s trend to come back to data processing with a taxonomic logic. It is, let us say, a new kind of empiricism. The difference is now that the digital tools and the way we work with them make you think that this the beginning and the end of research. [...]. Sometimes we plan and do things just because we can, without asking ourselves what we do and whether we actually need it. And sometimes we spend more time in order to feed the infrastructure with data and we do not have time for interpretation. [...] There are projects that focus almoast exclusively on planning in order to achieve funding and then they leave behind only a few things of real importance".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>32</id>
+        <description>Digitality has made us more bold in dealing with larger historical issues, and has made us conscious of "big data" in what concerns the sources for the study of the past.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Methodology</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <comments>This contributes to the exploration of historical context and to expanding the framework of research.</comments>
+        <quotation>"Now we feel obliged to use a much greater amount of material and sources in every research question. Once someone could use only, let us say, a particular archival corpus. [...] Now the stimuli are much more numerous".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>33</id>
+        <description>There is a trend for consortia and networks to become dominant in achieving funding, with all the inclusions and exclusions this entails.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias </consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Funding</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>34</id>
+        <description>Personal research interests will become more and more harmonized with the various digital projects, in which the researchers participate. A mutual enrichment is going to take place.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Until five years ago projects were a parallel occupation. You could hear a researcher say 'I have my research and I participate in a project, too'. Now there can be a fusion between the two, I think. This has to do with practice".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>35</id>
+        <description>Humanists are in a stage of transition and experiment. Digitality offers many possibilities, but we are not yet in a position to make full use of our humanistic knowledge in order to find our way. We need time for the necessary convergences to take place. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Questions</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>36</id>
+        <description>There is the need to go beyond the level of "flat" digital exhibits and to enrich digital research presenatations with the analytical depth of traditional' narratives (e.g. monographs), while making use ?f various data formats and multimedia applications.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation
+            </consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>integration</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Data Types
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV011</provenance>
+        <quotation>"New forms of presentation have their own restrictions, imposed by new media: they ask for smaller textual units, often fragmentary, that often lack of depth and connections. Now, in a monograph you can follow in detail an interpretation and a thinking process. The chjallenge for us is to enrich our digital compositions with this analytical width and depth".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>37</id>
+        <description>The turning point for the emergence of Digital Humanities was the World Wide Web with its potential for connectivity and communication, and not generally the techonological developments in computing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastrucrure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Humanities computing is an old story. [...] Digital Humanities did not emerge out of the blue. I see it as a gradual development. The most important thing, however, was the World Wide Web, because it opened the way to a more 'structural' change instead of instrumentalizing approaches. The Internet made possible new ways of connectivity, communication and networking in regard to data and people".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>38</id>
+        <description>Extensive digitization gave to researchers access to a big volume of data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>39</id>
+        <description>Digitization is not enough. The essential thing is good data curation, in accordance with the structured construction of analog archives.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+        <quotation>"If there is no structure, the digitized data are much more difficult to access than the ones in the analog archive with its structured construction. [...] If there is a good digital curation, you can access collections you couldn't easily access otherwise".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>40</id>
+        <description>New work spaces will emerge, which will combine the digital and the physical in ways we cannot yet identify. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potential</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>41</id>
+        <description>The familiarization with digitality, particularly among younger generations, will led to a blend of the digital and the analog that will come naturally. This will have an impact on our work, too.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+        <quotation>"what we still lack is a change in mentality in how we understand digitality, tools, environments and media. [...] Sometimes for us researchers it is hard to conceptualize, while for the public it is a more simple matter, because it comes naturally through evertyday use".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>43</id>
+        <description>The emphasis on Digital Humanities, evident in funding practices, is connected to particular EU policies on innovation, which include the relationship between Humanities and Creative Industries.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and Services</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>44</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities are already the subject of post-graduate programmes. This trend should be followed more intensively in order for Digiral Humanities to be represented in University Departmens.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>45</id>
+        <description>Digitality helps us refine our analytical tools on the performance of history and memory.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation </consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Digitality has affected our scholarly practices. [...] The new practices we use  (e.g. crowdsourcing) make us reflect on our concepts and our analytical tools. When we analyze the concept of memory, we have to take into account its transformations in the digital era [...]. This does not render obsolete our theoretical assumptions; its puts them in historical perspective".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>46</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities, with its experimental character, may constitute a factor for a transformation of the Humanities and for a blend of Humanities with Science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potantiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>47</id>
+        <description>Crowdsourcing projects give us the possibility to analyze a large amount of data on how people understand and remember the past; they also help the wider public appropriate history.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potantiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Nerworks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+        <quotation>"The changes introduced by crowdsourcing are, first, the scale of data, and secondly, the possibility for the wider public to appropriate again the past".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>48</id>
+        <description>Digital curation in crowdsourcing projects is very important, because the historian has to do with a highly communicative material that may be relevant to a lot of actual controversial issues. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Data Types</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+        <quotation>"The role of the historian is actually more accentuated, because it is a different thing to write a monograph that will be read by the academic and research community, and a diffrerent thing to produce something that will be accessed by a wider public and will be eventually diffused in various ways on the Internet".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>52</id>
+        <description>The teaching of history should be enriched with digital experiential projects that help students familiarize with history and with research, instead of memorizing names and dates.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV012</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>53</id>
+        <description>Researchers have a wide range of digitized data at their disposal. This boosts scientific productivity, but at the same time imposes new expectations ans requirements that worsen work conditions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+        <quotation>"When I was doing my PhD, I had to rely on microfilm from the British Library. Now all this stuff has been digitized. This is how expectations change. I require from my PhD students to take into account a lot of sources, since they are now digitized and easy to access. [...] We require from researchers to rise to much higher expectations. In the USA and elsewhere, where the 'publish or perish' principle is dominant, research is being transfromed into a kind of industrial activity. [...] In addition, digitality has tranformed us all into 'secretaries of ourselves' and has almost eliminated particular specifications, as for instance phototypesetting. It is often the researcher who must do the work in order for his or her article to be published. This applies to proof-reading, too".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>54</id>
+        <description>Digitality has helped increase the profits of publishing houses by allocating significant workload on researchers. This does not contribute to better research, but to capitalist profitability.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+        <quotation>"This is not for the benefit of Academia, but fot the benefit of big publishing houses. [...] Let us say you have written a good paper and it has been published in a journal. They can sell it pro view, and if it is good, they can sell it to a lot of people with a very good profit, since you have done almost all the necessary publishing work (besides the scientific work) on the template they have given you. [...] This does not have to do with research and scientific progress, this has to do with business".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>55</id>
+        <description>Digitality boosts communication and sharing. This is very important for the Humanities, wher such attitudes were rather absent. It brings them closer to Science and it helps create projects based on international cooperation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>56</id>
+        <description>Digitality represents a new social, political, and epistemological paradigm. Social subjects (and humanistic research, as well) have to re-invent themselves in this new condition. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+        <quotation>"A change of scientific paradigm refers usually to specific disciplines, it is not an overall change of paradigm in society. [...] But now digitality is a change of paradigm that affects so many branches of scientific knowledge that it represents an overall tranformation, similar to the scientific revolution of the 17th century".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>57</id>
+        <description>Society comprises competing forces with different interests. Digitality can lead to different patterns of social and scientific activity. On the one hand, there is the reality of the algorithmization of work; on the other hand, there is the potentiality to create new scientific and social networks and subjects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+        <quotation>"There is a very interesting book by a LSE professor with the title 'Platform Capitalism', which focuses on the re-invention of capitalism within digitality. This is a foreseeable -if not actual- response, but is not the only possible. [...] This stage of transition we are in could lead to an active involvement of people who are outside the traditional boundaries of the academic community. [...[ An important development, which we can already observe, is the discussion between Humanists and artists. [...] A fruitful intervention should involve the interaction between universities and society, specialists and non-specialists, scientists and artists. [...] Intervention should lead to a creative transgression of boundaries and to the creation of new knowledge".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>58</id>
+        <description>Digitality re-invents the notion of public sphere. A fruitful way to deal with this transformation is a field of study that deals with the interaction of science, technology and society, and focuses on the co-constructive relationship between the three.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Technological artefacts (broadly speaking) are not simply products of a specific workshop or factory, but are the outcome of a long process of co-construction, in which users have an active role"</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>59</id>
+        <description>We are in a stage of transition and paradigm change. we cannot interpret adequately the new condition of digitality with the epistemological tools of Modernity; new tools and theory must be developed.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV010</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Modernity was based on specific and clear distinctions that were operative, produced wealth, and gave rise to political regimes With digitality these distinctions began to blur. We cannot use the analytical tools we used until now in order to understand reality, but the new tools have not yet been created. [...] It is somewhat similar to war and revolution. New analytical thought for the interpretation of the new paradigm will need one or two generations to develop".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>60</id>
+        <description>Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Warwick et al 2008 "If you build it will they come?:  the LAIRAH Study: Quantifying the Use of Online Resources in the Arts and Humanities through Statistical Analysis of User Log Data"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/4KCFTSCH</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=0</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>61</id>
+        <description>Project Sustainability in DH: Collaboration and Community</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reuseable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Villa, 2015 "Project Sustainability in DH: Collaboration and Community"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/ZPP67ZBZ</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=0</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>62</id>
+        <description>Authority and Judgement in the Digital Archive.  This article is about practices within digital archiving, and how unintended bias can impact on its FAIRness.  Also, attitudes towards archiving in terms of scholarly contribution</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Dix et al 2014, "Authority and Judgement in the Digital Archive"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/9C5Z84IZ</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=1</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>63</id>
+        <description>Taking Public Scholarship Seriously.  This article is about how definitions of scholarship can be limiting, especially when talking about 'citizen science'.  Also in terms of career, as it can be seen as a hindrance</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Cantor and Lavine 2006, "Taking Public Scholarship Seriously"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/MXERVH9D</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=2</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>64</id>
+        <description>Effects of socio?technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing.  This article is about how motivation to either share knwoledge can come down to factors in IT and organisational structure</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Lin and Gwo-Guang 2006 "Effects of socio?technical factors on organizational intention to encourage knowledge sharing"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/X56UPG72</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=3 </comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>65</id>
+        <description>Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library.  This article is about how eductational infrastructure promotes digital skills, yet retains a more traditional approach, impacting on publications and willingness to engage in Public Scholarship, particularly among ECRs</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findable</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessible</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Cheverie, Boettcher and Buschmen 2009, "Digital Scholarship in the University Tenure and Promotion Process: A Report on the Sixth Scholarly Communication Symposium at Georgetown University Library"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/QVFUBNAK</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=4</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>66</id>
+        <description>Collaborating, Connecting, and Clustering in the Humanities A Case Study of Networked Scholarship in an Interdisciplinary, Dispersed Team.  This article discusses potential issues around team structure and scholary practices (e.g. co-authorship, co-writing)</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team Structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Quan-Haase, Suarez and Brown 2015, "Collaborating, Connecting, and Clustering in the Humanities A Case Study of Networked Scholarship in an Interdisciplinary, Dispersed Team"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/HA3BXK6P</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=5</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>67</id>
+        <description>Humanities Unbound: Supporting Careers and Scholarship Beyond the Tenure Track.  This article discusses the need to showcase alternative careers post-PhD, particularly in the face of budget cuts to academia</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Rogers 2015, "Humanities Unbound: Supporting Careers and Scholarship Beyond the Tenure Track"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/AMACMRK2</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=6</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>68</id>
+        <description>On the Reuse of Scientific Data.  This article discusses the current practices (or lack thereof) around data citation, and offers suggestions for how to increase the practice</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Pasquetto, Randles and Borgman 2017, "On the Reuse of Scientific Data"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/PNRVHSEG</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=7</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>69</id>
+        <description>Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data.  This articles  highlights issues that can lead to 'unFAIR' data, and what steps can be taken to ensure data is more reusable</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Goodman et al 2014, "Ten Simple Rules for the Care and Feeding of Scientific Data"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/FH2MEBWJ/itemPage/2</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=8</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>70</id>
+        <description>Metadata Realities for Cyberinfrastructure: Data Authors as Metadata Creators.  This article covers a lot, but does mention how difficulty in imagining how others might use their data can lead to practices in data management that hinder reuse</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusable</consequences>
+
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>Article: Mayernik 2011, "Metadata Realities for Cyberinfrastructure: Data Authors as Metadata Creators"</provenance>
+        <related_items>https://www.zotero.org/groups/parthenos_wp3/items/collectionKey/RDF9FMXP/itemKey/2BB73WFB</related_items>
+        <comments>Full article breakdown: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/143hNN0ehWhxClkHdtI1v6URL-poJ7juKNu9SIG8gFIk/edit#gid=9</comments>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>71</id>
+        <description>Digital image and sound applications facilitate a fuller and more nuanced collection of cultural data; digital documentation and data management offers new possibilities for the interconnection of cultural phenomena and for their effective interpretation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>72</id>
+        <description>Digitality facilitates the collection of vast amounts of data. At the same time, is creates pressing requirements for their adequate documentation and interconnection; this emphasizes management at the expense of interpretation. However, the positive aspects outweigh the negative.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>73</id>
+        <description>Adequate documentation and annotation is even more important when dealing with digital or digitized data, because it is only through it that one can have access to the information.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Finability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>74</id>
+        <description>In recent years, it is more difficult to receive a grant for long-term infrastructure work or interpretation. Most grants require short-term results that can be presented as "products". Textual data analysis and presentation has less opportunities to be promoted than image and sound data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>75</id>
+        <description>Digitality leads to interaction between researchers and the public in the direction of shared authority. This is more pronounced in disciplines as social and cultural anthropology and folk culture studies, because the persons and communities that serve as "informants" of culture become actually partners. In consequence, we are urged to reflect on our thoretical and epistemological assumptions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>76</id>
+        <description>Digitality opens up new fields for ethnographic research. The Internet, as well as digital telephony, emerge as communication and interaction environments where cultural identities and practices are perfomed, shared and negotiated.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>77</id>
+        <description>Multimedia applications may contribute to presentation forms that will combine more effectively the phenomena of folk culture and their interpretation. The interconnection of text, visual and sound applications can blend into a synthesis of all levels of data (and of their interpretation) in a logic of enhanced publications.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>78</id>
+        <description>Digital documentation of ethnographic data, with its potential for flexibility and interoperability, begs for comparison with traditional taxonomic documentation systems; this comparison reveals historical developments and cleavages within the discipline of folk culture studies and contributes to epistemological and theoretical reflection.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+            <context>Research Interests</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>79</id>
+        <description>The fundamental reqirements for us are two: promoting interoperability and securing preservation and sustainability.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>80</id>
+        <description>Archival corpora may be re-organized digitally in order to facilitate interconnection between different genres of data that represent phenomena and expressions of folk culture. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>81</id>
+        <description>Interoperability requires a better understanding between humanists and information scientists.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Social Sciences</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV022</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>82</id>
+        <description>The most important technical development in relation to Humanities is the emergence of web-based collective research environments and digital tools for data management and analysis</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>83</id>
+        <description>Diigtal tools for data management and analysis enable iterative thinking and constant feedback in the refinement of research questions</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpetation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Research questions</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>84</id>
+        <description>The emergence of social media has facilitated communication, but has also contributed to distortion in relation to documented and valid information</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>85</id>
+        <description>Social media are important sources for contemporary history. We have to develop adequate methodologies and tools for their analysis and interpretation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>86</id>
+        <description>Digital research will never be able to cover all aspects of the historian's work. Examination of analog primary sources and context-based theorization are indispensable. Digitality helps manage (and find additional) data; it can't do your thinking for you.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>87</id>
+        <description>As to funding and research in Digital Humanities, there is a gap between Greece (and other European countries as well) and western Europe. The lack of feedback and continuity in the development of new projects may jeopardize the opportunity to move forward. Given that digital research is very expensive, the lack of coordination and political commitment may be fatal.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>88</id>
+        <description>Interdisciplinarity and digital presentation of our research has made our sicentific interpretations accessible to a large public.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>89</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities should be included in University education and research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>90</id>
+        <description>Digitality raises the issue of digital scientific publishing and poses the challenge of constructing adequate platforms, peer-reviewing practices, and validity. Digital platforms for scientific publications may move in the direction of "enhanced publications", which combine text, databases, multimedia applications etc. Developing peer-reviewing standards for digital publications is crucial, as well as guaranteeing that researchers will not have to pay in order to publish.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Resuirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly Publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>91</id>
+        <description>Globalization and digitality foster research on world history issues. On the other hand, the analysis on a very large scale may lose in granularity. Global phenomena are better suited to be researched in the framework of world history, but you have to have the experience.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Resuirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>All Studies of the Past</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV013</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>92</id>
+        <description>The possibility to store and process an immense quantity if data with a minimized cost has a very important impact on research. Computational storing power increases in inverse proportion to cost, a fact confirming Moore's law.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>93</id>
+        <description>Storing power plus processing power is an economic-technological process that causes -among others- a regression effect, which allows us to develop research methods that had been abandoned for a while, as, for instance, neural networks.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>94</id>
+        <description>Storing and processing power give us the opportunity to process a vast archive of texts, which broadens the scope of analysis and facilitate the interpretation of a linguistic "universe" of resources. We can work on inventories, not just samples.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+        <quotation>"When you have access to a text archive that contains the entire European literature of the 19th century, your research hypotheses become much different from those you used to make when all you had in your disposal were, let's us say, three French, three Italian and three Greek novels". </quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>95</id>
+        <description>Until now the computer was a gate to the digital world. Things now evolve toward a blending of the digital and the analog into a synthesis, toward hybrid models of interaction with the digital on all levels of everyday life and, of course, of research. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+        <quotation>"We will not go to look for data, data will come to us according to the spatio-temporal environment, in which we will be".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>96</id>
+        <description>Learning a foreign language develops into a process that employs digital immersion and augmented reality environments.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>97</id>
+        <description>The use of algorithms in cases of crucial decision-making and of extrracting knowledge about persons and social groups, something evident in stylometry, too, poses ethical problems that we have not yet confronted seriously.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Technology allows us to do a lot of things, but there are ethical issues in relation to research that need to be discussed [...] Stylometry can even trace whether there is a potential for Alzheimer's disease. Can we use and disseminate this knowledge? [...] Can we give information about a person to an eventual employer? Can we use information about a person's psychological profile or sexual identity?"</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>98</id>
+        <description>Technological changes -and their socio-cultural effects- happen at a pace quicker than our capacity to reflect on them in depth.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>99</id>
+        <description>I would like to see the full content of all printed works digitized and access-free for all. This would be in fact a knowledge society. Copyright issues should be solved in order for society and research community to have a free access to knowledge. </description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>100</id>
+        <description>Digital technology, produces new dangers and, at the same time, opens new perspectives. As to politics and power, we have now the tools for a thorough control of power and for democratizing our societies, and, on the other hand, the tools for far more efficient propaganda and mass control. Those two trends will be in constant struggle.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and Outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>101</id>
+        <description>Scientists who are in the core of technological innovation will become stars. Not geeks anymore, but holders of fame and money. The millionaires of the past were industrialists. Those of the present are founders and directors of companies that have to do with digital technology.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>102</id>
+        <description>We must examine again the issue of critical thinking, this time within the condition of digitality. We must start with education. Educational programmes and methods follow 20th-century standards. This must change. We need to focus on educational projects for digital literacy.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior Knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>103</id>
+        <description>We must avoid a strictly technocratic attitude that allows us to do things just because we can, and think about the general effects of doing research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>104</id>
+        <description>Interdisciplinarity has been given a boost by digital technology. It has moved to the centre of research. Whan i started doing research, there were the "hard" and "soft" disciplines and sub-disciplines. Now things have changed.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+        <quotation>"I am the supervisor of a PhD that focuses on models of relating music and language through psycho-linguistical experiments and ?agnetic resonance imaging [...] This combines language studies, psychology, musicology, biology, didactics, and therapy".</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>105</id>
+        <description>Cognitive science tends has moved to the centre of scientific research.The most important scientific trend is computational modeling of human intelligence and cognition, and brain-computer interfacing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>106</id>
+        <description>I would like to see young people with high motivation get ivolved in research not just for money but because of a genuine drive for understanding and explaining the world. I would like new ideas be seriously funded and tasted, even if this is sometimes risky.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>107</id>
+        <description>I would like to see projects be funded and endorsed even when they are outside of established networks and trusts. I would like to see the private sector participate seriously in research and not just in order to make quick money without contributing anything substantial.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>108</id>
+        <description>We need more interdisciplinarity and more collaboration between research foundations and Universities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+            <context>Political
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>109</id>
+        <description>More and better institutional initiatives toward the inclusion of young people and research funding are an important requirement for essential progress and fair scientific development.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>110</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities is a very broad and sometimes vague field that soon will break down in meaningful clusters according to specific research questions, theories and methodologies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific Interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Research interests
+            </context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Language-related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV039</provenance>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>111</id>
+        <description>The biggest change in field reporting in archaeology is in terms of use of digital imagery and structure from motion, 3D photogrammetry, RTI, etc.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>biggest changes in field reporting in archaeology is in terms of use of digital imagery and structure from motion, 3D photogrammetry, RTI, etc.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>112</id>
+        <description>The increased availability of relatively low cost AR and VR, that you can now do on a standard Apple Tablet, or indeed with Google Cardboard, enables more analysis and visualization.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>more on the analysis and visualization side, it's the increased availability of relatively low cost AR and VR stuff that you can now do on a standard Apple Tablet, or indeed with Google Cardboard</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>113</id>
+        <description>There is a growing availability of open access to online data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>growing availability of open access to online data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>114</id>
+        <description>An important new development is image processing of photographs, and object recognition.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>image processing of photographs, object recognition for example, I think are growing area</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>115</id>
+        <description>Online access to databases is an important trend.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>access to online databases (such as portable antiquities scheme)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>116</id>
+        <description>Natural language processing and data mining of grey literature is an important development.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>natural language processing and data mining</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>117</id>
+        <description>Virtual integration of previously dispersed archival sources.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>virtual integration of previously dispersed archival sources.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>118</id>
+        <description>Developments of standards in how you catalogue archival sources.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>developments in terms of standards and in terms of systems in how you catalogue archival sources.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>119</id>
+        <description>Developments in database technology make it much easier to harvest information from different databases and unify them in a central system.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>developments in terms of database technology, and so they make it much easier to harvest information from different databases and unified them in a central system.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>120</id>
+        <description>Cataloguing systems are increasingly digitized.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>archives are generally speaking moving more towards, first of all, digital cataloguing systems, because there were still quite a few that had paper-based finding aids and so on, and they've become more and more digitized</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>121</id>
+        <description>A move towards more open IT systems.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>a movement to more open systems. So I think one of the problems we had, especially at the beginning that even archival institutions that had digital cataloguing system and digital finding aid quite often they were locked into IT systems, and it was very hard to get information out of them again.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>122</id>
+        <description>Digitally enabled analysis of digitized archival sources; once you have archives digitized you can apply digital methods and tools for analysis on them.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>digitally enabled analysis of digitized archival sources.If that makes sense. So I mean, what we are mainly dealing with in EHRI traditionally has been integration of archival metadata, but at the same time obviously a lot sources have also become digitized, and once you have them digitized you can apply digital methods and tools for analysis on them</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>123</id>
+        <description>More critical engagement. If we apply many more algorithms on sources, rather than close reading, we need theoretical investigations of what that shift implies of the overall methodology of doing holocaust history and more investigations on what we can gain methodologically, what we might lose, also how we can integrate old traditional methods of doing historical research with new ones.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>more critical engagement. So far it has been a small group of pioneers that have experimented in that field, and have done very interesting work as well, but I think obviously that that could ultimately be quite a significant shift in the methodology and epistimology of doing history in general, and holocaust studies in particular. If we apply many more algorithms on sources, rather than the typical thing that historians have done in the past, which is reading them - doing close reading and making sense of them, and I think I kind of would hope that with that becoming more widespread that that's also matched by more theoretical investigations of what that shift implies of the overall methodology of doing holocaust history and more investigations on what we can gain methodologically, what we might lose, also how we can integrate old traditional methods of doing historical research with new ones.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>124</id>
+        <description>There's still social change that needs to happen, there is still a fair bit of sceptism about doing source analysis and source intrepretation digitally.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's still social change that needs to happen, in the sense that. There is a group, especially of course of young holocaust scholars, that are really engaged and excited by the prospect of what digital tools and methods can provide. But I think there is also still a fair bit of sceptism about doing source analysis and source intrepretation digitally, and so I think we still have to make the case why it is useful to do that, and what we gain by that.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>125</id>
+        <description>There's a digital divide between well resourced digitally mature institutions and the ones that are left behind, and that'll have a very negative impact on the future of holocaust research, because often the most important sources, and especially the sources that have traditionally not been used extensively in holocaust research are located in marginal regions, in marginal institutions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>you have a digital divide between well resourced digitally mature institutions, and the ones that are left behind. And of course that'll have a very negative impact on the future of holocaust research, because often the most important sources, and especially the sources that have traditionally not been used extensively in holocaust research are located in marginal regions, in marginal institutions, so I think another thing that needs to happen really, and that's in a way not a technological development as such, but it has to do with bridging that divide.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>126</id>
+        <description>There needs to be resource and knowledge transfer.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>have to have resource transfer and you have to have knowledge transfer between centres of excellence and digitally very advanced institions and to more marginal ones</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>127</id>
+        <description>There is an opening up of resources and an exchange of expertise across boundaries, not only on the level of individual researchers or institutions, but also wider politically and socially.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have an opening up of resources and an exchange of expertise, much more across boundaries, and that's really not only on the level of individual researchers or even on the level of institutions, but I think also wider politically and socially.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>128</id>
+        <description>The rise of nationalism, xenophobia, and anti-semitism, is a great and grave danger to the more positive trend towards Europeanisation, integration, and exchange.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have seen an increase very narrow nationalist in a variety of European countries, you could even say across Europe, we have seen a rise in xenophobia, we have seen a very troubling rise in anti-semitism, and at times very overtly anti-semitic sentiments. And I think what has really changed is that this has moved from the political periphery, and mean there has always been far-right parties, there have always been anti-semites, there have always been racists, but you know that really has moved in several societies from the periphery to the centre, and obviously that is a great and grave danger to the sort of more positive trend which is toward Europeanisation, towards integration, towards exchange,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>129</id>
+        <description>The survivor generations, the people that survived the holocaust, they are now dying out.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>The survivor generations, the people that survived the holocaust, they are now dying out. We have very few survivors left, and the ones who are left - first generation survivors - they will be gone in the coming decade. Of course that has an impact on how we relate to the holocaust, and how we tell the story of the holocaust.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>130</id>
+        <description>Political non-interference is required.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>political non-interference, which has started to happen. I told you about Poland and the holocaust law there, I know in other countries holocaust researchers and holocaust archivists are under enormous political - real political pressure - to persue lines of enquiry, or rather not persue certain lines of enquiry because it countervails the narrative that the government and the nation, the image they want to portray of themselves.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>131</id>
+        <description>There's a need to keep on making the case why we need to study the holocaust, and the relevance of the event in contemporary societies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>we just have to keep on making the case why we need to study the holocaust, and I think that also implies that we have to make the case of what the relevance of the event is in contemporary societies.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>132</id>
+        <description>Holocaust research can be opened up moreto other related fields of enquiry.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>open up - and that's already happened to a large extent - but I think more can be opened up to other related fields of enquiry like the study of other and more contemporary genocides of other...to other fields of enquiry that look at systematic systems of inclusion, mass violence and so on.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>133</id>
+        <description>There are two different trends: a very broad transnational macro perspective, anda very small micro one. Work is being done trying to integrate and bring together the macro and the micro.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>one of the things that has become an important trend recently, and that has to do with the integration of dispersed archives, is also attempts to integrate trans-national perspectives on the event. So studying the holocaust from a European perspective rather than from a national one, with studies that are very local, looking at the events or what was happening from very small local perspectives in one village, or one small region in romania. I think one of the interesting things, you have again these two different trends: 1) you look at it from a very broad macro perspective, and one from a very small micro one. And I think very interesting work is being done trying to integrate and bring together the macro and the micro, if you like.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>134</id>
+        <description>There has been a trend in studying social political networks, both of victims and of perpetraitors. Looking at how wider social networks of victims had an impact on their chance of survival, or similarly how did networks influence decision of perpetraitors.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>Another thing I think has happened recently is studying social political networks, both of victims and of perpetraitors. So really looking at how wider social networks say of victims, had had an impact on their chance of survival. Studies like looking at what kind of people did you need to know if you were to say in the netherlands, what kind of people did you need to know in order to survive. You know stuff like that, and similar also on the level of perpetrators. How did networks influence decision making and so on.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>135</id>
+        <description>The development in spatial digital humanties.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>another different trend, is an enormous interest in geography, and I think that is also related to technological change, and especially things like the development of GIS systems and so on. That has fed into the trend, but I think the holocaust is now really seen as fundamentally being about space. It's about controlling of space, about management of space and so on. A lot of work is done on the geography of the holocaust and a lot of that work has really benefited from the development in spatial digital humanties.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>136</id>
+        <description>Archives have become much more open, they've started to do much more outreach activities to the general public, genealogists, family historians and local historians.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>archives have become much more open in other respects well. I they've started to do much more outreach activities, both to the general public, and I should say there's huge public interest in the holocaust and holocaust archives. I mean there are whole armies of genealogists and family historians and local historians that have an interest, and I think archive institutions really - more generally beyond the holocaust- have really started to reach out to the general public, much more forcably recently, and I think that will continue.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>137</id>
+        <description>Collaboration and interaction between historians, researchers and archivists has become applified over the last few years.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>collaboration and interaction between historians, researchers and archivists has become applified over the last few years. I think if you go back 10,15 years, I think a lot of archivists basically saw themselves as sort of the custodians of the material they have, they weren't really interested what any body else might do with the material. I think with some of them you felt users were a nuisance because they make things complicated.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>138</id>
+        <description>The people that contribute to holocaust studies and archives are increasingly diverse. Not only researchers and archivists, but a much broader section of the general public as well.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>It has become more diverse in terms of participants, the people that contribute to holocaust studies and archives. Which now is only researchers, not only archivists, but it is the much broader good section of the general public as well.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>139</id>
+        <description>The holocaust is studied with more diverse research methodologies, both in terms of digital methodologies, but also in terms of disciplinary perspectives that are brought upon the sources, and the research topic that people pursue.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>much more diverse in terms of research methodologies that people use to study the holocaust, both in terms of digital methodologies which we talked about at the beginning a little bit, but also in terms of disciplinary perspectives that are brought upon the sources, and then also in terms of the topic, the research topic that people pursue. So you know what you have seen is really a diversification of the field</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>140</id>
+        <description>It's important that we don't lose sight of the core mission; that we keep hold of the core scholarly mission that we have set ourselves.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV001</provenance>
+        <quotation>it's also important that we don't lose sight of our core mission as it were. That we keep hold of the core scholarly mission that we have set ourselves, which is, well for EHRI, it is to integrate archvies and new sources, and it is to facilitate new research into the holocaust, and I think it sometimes - especially when it comes to outreach to wider society and so on - I think it's very important and I think we should do it, that we should continue to do it, and we should deepen to do it, but it shouldn't become the core mission as it were.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>141</id>
+        <description>Digitisation ofcontent has become very widespread.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>digitisation of the content became very widespread.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>142</id>
+        <description>Full text indexing is an important development, both born digital and improvements in OCR.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>all the currently produced texts that are mostly digital already. OCR is getting that equality, so that you can look backwards to the texts and the content that has been created in the past.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>143</id>
+        <description>Speech and video recognition and indexing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>speech recognition, the video... Recognition video indexing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>144</id>
+        <description>Neural networks are mostly supporting this huge advance in how the digitisation of everything is happening.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>the recent development of neural networks, that are mostly supporting this huge advance in how the digitisation of everything is happening.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>145</id>
+        <description>There is a need for better quality manual annotations. Once this data is created to train the systems a lot of work becomes automated because loads of things can be done using the scripts, the software. The research focus can shift more towards analysis on the larger scale.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>you do need to create even better quality manual annotations. At the same time, that means that once you have created this data to train the systems with, a lot of work becomes automated because loads of things can be done using the scripts, the software. The research focus can shift more towards analysis on the larger scale. The complexity moves, from how to access the data or how to process data in slightly larger quantities, more into, "Okay, how do we-"
+            So it's more... The shift goes towards... The focus of the research is the analysis of the automatic system's output produced and how this can be connected, and how you can explain that on a larger scale.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>146</id>
+        <description>More work on ethics of work is being done. What is the data that we are using, what are the questions and what are the tasks, how do we formulate them? Especially as the social sciences and humanities are using lots of personal data. How do we access the data? How do we keep privacy and, at the same time, actually analyse the trends? How do we more carefully explain those trends?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>ethics of work that is being done, much more of... The fact that... Okay. Now the technical support, of whatever we can do, is advanced enough so that we have to be careful. What is the data that we are using, what are the questions and what are the tasks, how do we formulate them? It becomes of higher importance because we are dealing...
+            Especially when we're talking about social sciences and humanities, we are using lots of personal data. How do we access the data? How do we keep privacy and, at the same time, actually analyse the trends? How do we more carefully explain those trends?</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>147</id>
+        <description>There is a need to understand that some of the trends that we might see are not because a process is really happening, but because the initial data had a certain bias at the stage of collection or annotation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>We have to understand that some of the trends that we might see, they are not because one or the other process is really happening. It is because the initial data, that was taken for training or for analysis, had a certain bias at the stage of collection or annotation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>148</id>
+        <description>Researchers lack an explanation of howalgorithms behave.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>when researchers from other fields are using the tools and software developed by professionals in the other field, what they lack is the explanation of how the algorithms would behave. Basically, the accountability and some more of the expert advice on how to tune the systems so that... I think if there is this explanation and there is understanding then the researchers from other fields will be less afraid, maybe, to use the achievements from the other fields. Also, it would be more reliable.
+            For me, this is technological development.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>149</id>
+        <description>Wider involvement of the community into the benchmarking and evaluation work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>wider involvement of the community into the benchmarking and evaluation work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>150</id>
+        <description>There's a need for truly cross-field collaborations. There is a need for stronger connections with the actual users so that the researchers in humanities could explain what exactly needs to be done with their data so that the algorithms would be better selected.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>truly cross-field collaborations. As I said, when somebody is developing the algorithms, very often, it's a very mathematical approach, a technical thing. Very often it's assumed what the users might want. I think there is a need for stronger connections with the actual users so that, say, the researchers who are in humanities could explain what exactly needs to be done with their data so that the algorithms would be better selected. This cross-field connection is stronger, that would be mutually beneficial.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>151</id>
+        <description>It's hard to get funding for benchmarking campaigns, because you're not developing your own algorithm, you are analysing how the others perform.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>I was involved in different benchmarking campaigns. It's harder to publish this kind of analysis, and also harder to get funding for this kind of analysis, because it's not exactly that you are creating...
+            You're not developing your own algorithm, you are analysing how the others perform. This kind of cross-algorithm, cross-applications, cross-solution analysis is very valuable because usually the teams, themselves, they are... They allocate their resources to other topics, so they don't have time to compare, "How did the others do in comparison?" That's very valuable, but it's harder to get this, both, published and to get some separate funding especially for this kind of work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>152</id>
+        <description>As data becomes part of everyday life so it becomes easier to engage broader groups of society when you need to run some experiments.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>because the technology of processing the data and making use of data gradually becomes more part of everyday life so it becomes easier, even just, to explain to your grandmother what you're doing for work.
+            It also makes it easier to engage broader groups of society when you need to run some experiments.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>153</id>
+        <description>There are more crowdsourcing platforms now. So you can run the experiments on a larger scale.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>there are more of these crowdsourcing platforms now. So you can run the experiments on a larger scale.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>154</id>
+        <description>Research questions are being asked just because this data is there; a set of questions is set aside because your users have no access to the data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>Basically, some of the research questions are being asked just because this data is here so we can ask those questions. A set of questions is set aside because your users have no access to the data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>155</id>
+        <description>Research questions are being divided between industry and universities. Sometimes they are divided and the results are shared; sometimes they get separated for good.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>we don't go forward because, we know that this is an interesting topic, we either don't have the resources or we don't have the data. Then we understand that the industry has that and they are going to tackle that. Basically there are certain differentiations, now, of the research questions that being divided between industry and universities. Sometimes they are divided but, still, the results are shared. Sometimes they get separated for good.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>156</id>
+        <description>Researchers follow the data that is trendy. If you want to do something which is not trendy then it's hard to get funding, so you cannot do that research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>You follow the data, you follow what is trendy. If you want to do something which is not trendy then it's hard to get funding, so you cannot do that research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>157</id>
+        <description>There is need for funding research which is done purely for the sake of research. So you don't have to explain in which product it will end up whenever you write a project proposal.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is need for, still, having funding that could be allocated - not only to this collaboration with companies, with SMEs, and so on, but funding that is allocated - for research which is done purely for the sake of research. So not that, whenever you write a project proposal, you have to explain in which product it will end up. I</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>158</id>
+        <description>There is a need for a bit more discussion about the fundamental questions andinspirational goals that the scientific community has to offer to society so that there is some deep social studies and political accountability analysis that can be run.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>more discussion about the fundamental questions. Also, some kind of inspirational goals in terms of what the scientific community has to offer to society so that there is some deep social studies and political accountability analysis that can be run. That can support the transparency, can support the democracy, in a good sense so that the things that are being discussed are not populistic but more topics that have the background analysis behind it, and theories, and...
+            This mental exercise of setting up the goals like... Flying to the moon is not part of the SSH domain, but this type of target and- As I said, some kind of inspirational goals.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>159</id>
+        <description>More frameworks that would allow the exchange of experience and ideas.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>more frameworks that would allow the exchange of experience and ideas. So more joint events or sabbatical experiences or internship experiences, but not on the level of students only but on, also, the higher level because that's also part of the thing. When you are in the academic career, usually, after... At PhD time you have some internships, further on you have less and less of these experiences and the possibility to have these experiences.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>160</id>
+        <description>Open access publications are nice as a concept but don't always fit with the way that certain communities have established their work and practices. It's not always easy to comply with open access policies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>open access publications, which is on one hand, of course, nice as a concept. I totally support it. At the same time, it doesn't always fit with the way that certain communities have established their work and have established their practices. In computer science it's more about the conferences and the proceedings at the conferences. In DH it's more about writing some monographs and books. It's not always easy to comply with this open access policy.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>161</id>
+        <description>There is a trend towards more and more different publication venues, but at the same time it gets unclear what is more valuable or less valuable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>The trend is there are now more and more different venues, different conferences, workshops, events. On the one hand, it's good because that brings more possibility for people to get together and discuss certain things. At the same time, it gets unclear what is more valuable or less valuable.
+            When you want to publish, when you want to target most of the audiences, when you want people to hear the most about your research or your findings or your way of thinking, you are targeting the most impactful venue in the field. Very often, open access might not be applicable to that venue.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>162</id>
+        <description>Cross-field collaborations help to see how results are being shared around in other fields. So you learn the experience from the others.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>cross-field collaborations at least help to see how this whole, say, publishing of your results is being shared around in other fields. So you learn the experience from the others.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>163</id>
+        <description>Researchers try to accompany publication with the access or the explanation of the data or code. Giving more details of research practice so that it can be reproducible and accountable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research Quality</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>no matter whether you go open access or publish somewhere, you try to accompany your publication with the access or the explanation of your data or your code. So giving more details of research practice so that it can be, also, reproducible and accountable.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>164</id>
+        <description>There is a need at the educational stage, at undergrad studies, for it to become the practice to deposit and keep track of what's going on with the data, with the research. How to do that should be taught through theeducational system and supported through grant schemes and funding allocation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV003</provenance>
+        <quotation>In order for this near future to happen, I think it's... It comes from the educational stage, it's the undergrad studies. That has to become the practice of depositing and keeping track of the development of what's going on with the data, with the research. It has to be...
+            The method how to do that, they should be taught through the educational system and supported, also, through the grant schemes. There should be, gain, funding allocated for that as well.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>165</id>
+        <description>The development of portable analytical techniques. It is usually complicated in cultural heritage to take the objects to the lab, so there are many developments in moving the analytical techniques into the field, to the museum or to the objects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>the development of portable analytical techniques. For cultural heritage, usually it is complicated to take the objects to the lab, so there are many developments in the line of moving the analytical techniques into the field, to the museum or to the objects.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>166</id>
+        <description>There is a change from using 2D images, 2D scans or 2D data, to 3D. Including all aspect relating with digitalisation of cultural heritage digital models.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>the change from using 2D images, 2D [scans 0:02:36] or 2D data, let's say, graphical data, to 3D. Including all aspect relating with digitalisation of cultural heritage digital models.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>167</id>
+        <description>3D printing or creation of physical objects from 3D models.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>robably to a lesser extent but also relevant, 3D printing or creation of physical objects from 3D models.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>168</id>
+        <description>There is a trend towards the integration of data obtained by means of different analytical techniques and by 3D documentation, techniques, scanning and so on.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is a trend towards the integration of data obtained by means of different analytical techniques and by 3D documentation, techniques, scanning and so on. Integration of all this data. This is something that is also slowly moving in recent years. Previously, basically all this data has been discovered and not put together. Now, there seems to be a great interest in integrating all of this data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>169</id>
+        <description>The changes in the appearance of 3D data, 3D models and all things related with data are forcing us as scientists to think of how to work in a different way related to data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>The changes in the appearance of 3D data, 3D models and all things related with data is also forcing us as scientists to start to work or to think of how to work in a different way related to data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>170</id>
+        <description>The development of more and more analytical techniques, portable analytical techniques, less invasive analytical techniques and the integration of analytical techniques is something that is going to continue in the future.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>this trend into the development of more and more analytical techniques, portable analytical techniques, less invasive analytical techniques and the integration of analytical techniques is something that is going to continue in the future.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>171</id>
+        <description>There is a need for some some technical developments to makedata management, sharing, discovery, use, and reuse, more accessible and useable for people, for scientists that are not expert in data science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>I also think there will be more technical developments related again with data. With data management, sharing, [discover 0:09:20], use, and reuse. All these [are] related with data. We need to- For the development of some technical solutions, probably I think some technical developments to make these kinds of things more accessible and useable for people, for scientists that are not expert in data science.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>172</id>
+        <description>We can expect to see the adaptation of different techniques to the specific needs and requirements of our field, working together with people from humanities, social sciences, engineers, chemists, physicists, mathematicians.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>Probably, what we will see is more the adaptation of different techniques to the specific needs and requirements of our field. This is something that we need more people working in in this field in the future. This is not... It is a very core disciplinary field in which we are working together with people from humanities, social sciences, engineers, chemists, physicists, mathematicians, from all of these fields.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>173</id>
+        <description>There is a need for more interest in technical developments by private companies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to see also more interest in technical developments not only by people in academia or scientists. Also by private companies. Further involvement of private companies in this field would also promote further technical developments in analytical techniques.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>174</id>
+        <description>There is a need for growth in the sector generally. It is growing, and this is going to happen, but it needs to happen effectively for us to succeed in this process.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>Maybe a growth of the sector in general. This is something I think we need to change, but I also think it is going to change. It is growing. I think it is growing and this is going to happen. But we will need that effectively to happen for us to succeed in this process.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>175</id>
+        <description>There has been a change in the view of cultural heritage. It has changed from being seen as an expense to more and more seen as an investment.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>There has been a change in the view of cultural heritage. It has changed from being seen as an expense, as something we have to care- We are somehow obliged to take care of. But it is expense. In the last 10 years, more and more cultural heritage is more recognised as an asset, as something that has a very important economic and social value.
+            For that reason, any expenses that are made on understanding, preserving and doing research on cultural heritage is more and more seen as an investment.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>176</id>
+        <description>There is an increasing pressure on cultural heritage by things like climate change and tourism. There is an increased concern about the impact of this tourism on the preservation of our cultural heritage. Politicians have been more and more concerned about this, so this is also a political factor that has changed recently.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is an increasing pressure on cultural heritage for different reasons. Basically, by things like climate change, by tourism. By tourism, for instance, the cultural [operation 0:18:53] has largely increased in the last years. In the last, let's say, 10 years. There is an increased concern about the impact of this tourism or this aspect in the preservation of our cultural heritage. Politicians have been more and more concerned about this. So, this is also a political factor that has changed in the last times.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>177</id>
+        <description>The open science movement in Europe, open access and open data, these kinds of policies that have been promoted by the European Union specifically, have bee more or less adopted by all countries. These open science policies are affecting all sectors of science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>Of course, again, this is something related. All the open science movement in Europe, open access and open data, these kinds of policies that have been promoted by the European Union specifically, have bee more or less adopted by all countries. These open science policies are affecting all sectors of science. So, in our field, it's also something that has some specific- Some [peculiarities 0:20:20], but the main problems or challenges that science in general is facing in Europe for these policies of open science, open data and open access [CTC 0:20:41] are also affecting our field.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>178</id>
+        <description>That cultural heritage in general and heritage science specifically is more and more widely recognised as a relevant topic, is giving more and more opportunities to develop my work and obtain funding for more projects,bigger projects, more ambitious projects, and also to do this in collaboration with European colleagues.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>the fact that cultural heritage in general and heritage science specifically is more and more widely recognised as a relevant topic, is something that has given me more and more opportunities to develop my work. I have been able to obtain funding for more projects, for bigger projects, for more ambitious projects, and also to do this in collaboration with European colleagues.
+            This is something that I think at least in part has happened because of these changes in the political situation, or the political view of cultural heritage or heritage specifically.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>179</id>
+        <description>There's a big opportunity for the cultural heritage sector to consolidate heritage science as a discipline.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>it's a big opportunity for our sector to mainly consolidate heritage science as a discipline. As a recognised discipline, as something that is- As a discipline that is known and recognised. In some conversations with some colleagues, we have been discussing that we think that our field has some similarities with the development of environmental science that has happened maybe 20, 30 or 40 years ago.
+            This was something that emerged from [joining 0:23:24], and from the collaboration, and the interdisciplinary work of different fields, that up to that point were considered as completely different disciplines that only on occasional times collaborated together. Now, environmental science is something that is being seen as a whole discipline. Of course, with the collaboration of professionals coming from different backgrounds, and different specialisations. But it is seen as a specific field.
+            So, I think this is also going to happen and I would also like to happen for our field. I think these political and cultural changes that have happened in the past will lead the sector to that point. To a [growth 0:24:29] and consolidation of the field as a specific discipline.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>180</id>
+        <description>The cultrual heritage sector are producing data that is based on objects that have some intellectual property or exploitation property rights already attached to them. So, that probably complicates or is something specific to our field that affects very much this general trend of opening up the data and sharing of data that is happening across all the scientific fields.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>we, as scientists, are producing data that is also based on objects that have some intellectual property or exploitation property rights already attached to them. That are very specific. So, that probably complicates or is something specific to our field that affects very much this general trend of opening up the data and sharing of data that is happening across all the scientific fields.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>181</id>
+        <description>The movement to open access is really challenging the traditional publishing models.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>All this movement for open access is really challenging the traditional publishing models. The appearance of new journals, dedicated specifically to open access publishing, is challenging the traditional [pay per 0:33:17] access model led by the big scientific publishing companies. Elsevier, [Nature], Springer and so on.
+            This is something that is happening and I think it's having a real impact in our work. The way we acquire our data has changed a bit. As I mentioned, due to this trend to acquire data more and more in the field and less on the laboratory. But also, what to do with this data and with the results once they are acquired is probably the biggest change I see that is happening, and that is also going to happen in the near future.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>182</id>
+        <description>We are now in an interim situation in which the old publishing model is not working, we see that it is going to change, but we don't really have a good new model. So, I would really like to see a new model for publishing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>we are now in an interim situation in which the old model is not working, we see that it is going to change, but we don't really have a good solution, a good new model. So, I would really like to see this change of ___[0:35:49] to happen and to come out with a new model for publishing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>183</id>
+        <description>There needs to be a change of mentality in researchers in respect to the way we manage, analyse and share the data. People think that the data they produce is their sole property. The new policy for open data is really challenging this view.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>a change of mentality in researchers in respect to the way we manage, analyse and share the data. This is in our field and in other fields as well. Related fields. For instance, in archaeology, there is a strong feeling in the researchers, in the research community. People think that the data they produce is their sole property. I think the new policy for open data is really challenging this view.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>184</id>
+        <description>The development, or the approval, of the European Research Infrastructure for Heritage Science (E-RIHS) is recognised as a key element for the development of this sector in the future and for doing good science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV004</provenance>
+        <quotation>We have seen in the last year the development or the approval of the European Research Infrastructure for Heritage Science, E-RIHS. This is really a big change. This is the first time we see in our field that a big research infrastructure is approved by ESFRI, The European [Strategy 0:38:49] Forum for Research Infrastructure. This is recognised as a key element for the development of this sector in the future and for doing good science.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>185</id>
+        <description>There has been a change in text and data mining over the last 10 years wth more machine learning and libraries were available to build upon.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>anything which has to do with text and data mining, so the fact that more machine learning and libraries were available and that we could build up, in the last 10 years, some pieces of software. We really could do useful extractions from a variety of texts in a variety of environments.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>186</id>
+        <description>TEI has been a major technical development over the past 20 years.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>TEI as a major technical development in the recent 20 years.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>187</id>
+        <description>I would like to see the development of an even more flexible TDM [Text and Data Mining] environment, with well-document APIs on well-deployed technical infrastructures, so that introducing data mining components in any kind of application is just plugging in what you have.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>it's taking shape and I would like to see them more quickly... I see a development of an even more flexible TDM environment, with very well-document APIs, well deployed on technical infrastructures so that, basically, introducing data mining components in any kind of application is just plugging in what you have.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>188</id>
+        <description>There have been a number of reports dismissing the Linked Open Data approach.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>I was really astonished, even surprised, in the last couple of months to see three or four reports already to say, "Well, I've been stuck in Linked Open Data for the last five years. It lists you nothing because data is just mixed up with other data, without any kind of real semantics," which is a paradox in the context of the Semantic Web.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>189</id>
+        <description>Services are very important. You're not delivering data; you're really delivering services. You need to have the corresponding tools just to plug on through that.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Services are very important. Yes, because you're not delivering data; you're really delivering services. In the kinds of applications we have in the digital humanities, we've collections of documents, whether they are text images, datasets or whatever you...
+            Then, you want to achieve some specific result there, like re-index the full text parts or get access to specific sub-components in images that you want to detect. You need to have the corresponding tools just to plug on through that, like someone studying a painting would just have a light beam to throw X-rays on the Gioconda, the Mona Lisa. This is really something missing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>190</id>
+        <description>There is a need to have stronger service units, so that they can actually enhance and stabilise services for a wide community, and not just the DH geeks, who represent just a small proportion of those who will have to deal with digital methods in the future.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need to have stronger service units. The more I see things... With my experience from DARIAH, the countries where things are working well are countries which have developed service units with hosting capacities and RandD capacities, so that they can actually enhance and stabilise services for a wide community, and now just the DH geeks, who represent just a small proportion of those who will have to deal with digital methods in the future.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>191</id>
+        <description>Open access in the humanities is now a subject of debate. It's part of the normal culture in scientific domains to speak about open access, open science, open source software, and that has facilitated a lot of things when you speak with the communities or when you want to, for instance, make sure that a group of researchers involved in a project make their literature available openly.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>So would we have spoken of, let's say, open access 10 years ago in the humanities? No one would even have understood the expression.
+            Now, it's a subject of debate. It has gone up to you in the UK: discussions at a high level with the Research Assessment Exercise; at the French level with national lows; the fact that there is something which is not that perfect but exists with Plan S. It's part of the normal culture in scientific domains to speak about open access, open science, open source software, and that has facilitated a lot of things when you speak with the communities or when you want to, for instance, make sure that a group of researchers involved in a project make their literature available openly.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>192</id>
+        <description>There has been a change in the wayresearchers in the humanities have addressed data management issues, knowing that there could be a sense of using a standard somewhere, sharing some practices or even documenting. That's changed the development of research projects and their sustainability, above all.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>TEI is great and you know me and so on, but it's also because it's part of the things which have changed sometimes also the way the researchers in the humanities have also addressed data management issues. Nothing to do with text, but knowing that there could be a sense of using a standard somewhere, sharing some practices or even documenting, so in between, having things like the Music Encoding Initiative, which is only a quintile of the distance to the TEI. Quite a few other initiatives like this within communities are saying, "Okay, we need some precise recommendations as to where we include things." That's changed a lot the development of research projects and their sustainability, above all.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>193</id>
+        <description>The humanities, because of their intrinsic diversity and the fact that they cannot avoid going digital, could be at the forefront of the future evolutions in the domain of proper data modelling, open science and the corresponding practices.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would dream that the humanities, because of their intrinsic diversity and the fact that they cannot avoid going digital, could be at the forefront of the future evolutions in the domain of proper data modelling, open science and the corresponding practices. That would be something manageable.
+            I'm saying that because a lot of other domains have very, very specific types of data. If you go to physics or chemistry, they work with a very reduced number of facilities to do specific analysis when they're given a domain. They've got very homogenous data, so that prevents them taking from distance and seeing that variety requires, for instance, data-modelling skills and requires that you do not document a corpus of a medieval manuscript like you would do of a mathematic collection, for instance. There are specificities in materials, in provenance, in many things.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>194</id>
+        <description>We are still missing, in normal humanities' curricular at master's level, Digital Methods classes. Most researchers in the universities I still come across are arriving during their PhD in an environment where they are not prepared; that everything is digital around them and what they should be doing not to lose data, and to exchange with colleagues and have a memory of their own processes.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>We are still missing, in normal humanities' curricular at master's level, or in M1 or M2, some Digital Methods classes. I don't know how you generalise that at King's level, for instance, but I know of so many universities that, unless they've hired the single DH professor who is popping in in other master's to say, "Look, you should consider this and this, and this is the way that you could deal with your publications and your data. Have you thought of this format that you could use?" and so on...
+            Most researchers in the universities I still come across are arriving during their PhD in an environment where they are not prepared; that everything is digital around them and what they should be doing not to lose data, and to change with colleagues and have a memory of their own processes.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>195</id>
+        <description>There is a need for more stable funding and it should be an official duty of infrastructures. Having a political agenda is part of providing service to our communities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>provide more stable funding and make it official within the duties of such infrastructures, as DARIAH did. Having a political agenda is part of providing service to our communities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>196</id>
+        <description>It has become natural to be multidisciplinary by construction in any kind of research I've been doing in the last 10 years in Computer Science. Working with linguists, working with philologists and working with cultural heritage institutions is even part of general agreements, for instance, at a national level.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>the real trend for me has been that it has become national to be multidisciplinary by construction in any kind of research I've been doing in the last 10 years in Computer Science. Working with linguists, working with philologists and working with cultural heritage institutions is even part of general agreements, for instance, at a national level.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>197</id>
+        <description>Be more multidisciplinary by construction, so have exchange programmes , but this would require another change again in terms of funding.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Be more multidisciplinary by construction, so have exchange programmes or... I mean, even with higher education institutions, a professor in Computer Science could spend six months in a humanities department and contribute there. Again, taking down my cap at the DARIAH level, fostering, maintaining and encouraging these kinds of multidisciplinary activities could also be part of the normal remits of European infrastructure, but this would require another change again in terms of funding.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>198</id>
+        <description>There must be more debates on how to foster multidisciplinarity and digital skills.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital curation and edition publishing</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV002</provenance>
+        <quotation>there must be more debates on how to foster the various aspects I've mentioned.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>199</id>
+        <description>Geographic information systems are now moving away from the desktop and onto systems where you can share files or rather you stream files via services like GeoRSS and so forth.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>The desktop-based geographic information systems are now moving away from the desktop and onto systems where you can share files or rather you stream files via services like GeoRSS and so forth. So, this is moving away from the, kind of, shapefile-based system.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>200</id>
+        <description>There have been lots of development in web mapping; moving into an area beyond the point where people rely on things like Google Maps and Yahoo! Maps to gain information and are getting information streamed directly to their devices.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>a lot of development, of course, in the areas of web mapping. So, we are, I think, moving into an area beyond the point where people rely on things like Google Maps and Yahoo! Maps to gain information and are getting information streamed, kind of, directly to their devices and so forth.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>201</id>
+        <description>There is a need to recalibrate teaching to quite a great extent around for the new tools and services.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'm having to recalibrate my teaching to quite a great extent around this. In fact, I think this will probably be the last year that I teach desktop-based GIS for exactly that reason. I think it's just becoming less relevant.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>202</id>
+        <description>People are increasingly dependent on smart devices in urban environments and that is changing in the way that they interact with geodata more generally.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>people are increasingly dependent on smart devices in urban environments and I would think that that is changing in the way that they interact with geodata more generally</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>203</id>
+        <description>As a result of living in a pervasive digital culture, our views around place and so forth are changing. It is causing us to rethink the ways we've worked with technology, both in teaching and research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'm now trying to focus on the underlying reasons for why these kinds of things are happening. I mean, I've just got a book out. In fact, it should be published either tomorrow or the day after, called 'A History of Place in the Digital', where I've, kind of, examined these processes and how, as a result of living in a pervasive digital culture, our views around place and so forth are changing. So, I think it's an exciting find, but it is causing me to rethink ways I've worked with technology for a long time, both in my teaching and my research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>204</id>
+        <description>There will be a lot more reliance on geo web platforms for third-party apps, which haven't relied on these things so much in the past. There will be a lot more scope for platforms like OpenStreetMap to be used by the development community.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>we are going to see a lot more reliance on geo web platforms for third-party apps, which haven't relied on these things so much in the past. So, yes, I mean, I think there will be a lot more scope for platforms like OpenStreetMap to be used by the development community</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>205</id>
+        <description>Non-profit bodies like OpenStreetMap should be focusing more effort on providing services for people who are not necessarily developers, to critique and use that data more intelligently.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>non-profit bodies like OpenStreetMap should be focusing more effort on providing services for people who are not necessarily developers to critique and use that data more intelligently.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>206</id>
+        <description>OpenStreetMap or Google Map Maker, as was, very much reflects the concerns and the interests of white middle-aged Western men, because they are the dominant group that are active contributors.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>this is allied to various strands of thinking that we're seeing in the digital geographies literature. So, this is scholars like ___[0:08:06] and Monica Stephens, who have both written a lot about this, whereby you get the data within OpenStreetMap being skewed by the demographics who are the dominant contributors to those platforms.
+            So, OpenStreetMap or Google Map Maker, as was, very much reflects the concerns and the interests of white middle-aged Western men, because they are the dominant group that are active contributors.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>207</id>
+        <description>We need some kind of specialist version of GitHub or something like that to host geo services, user-friendly services which can enable better interaction with the data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need some kind of specialist version of GitHub or something like that to host services, you know, so user-friendly services which can enable better interaction with that data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>208</id>
+        <description>We need more literature on the theory of how that data is actually used, which focuses more on the usage than on the data itself.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need more literature on the theory of how that data is actually used, which focuses more on the usage than on the data itself.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>209</id>
+        <description>We are under huge pressure to demonstrate metrics and metrical achievement both in teaching and in research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>we are under huge pressure to demonstrate metrics and metrical achievement both in teaching and in research. Of course, I could just complain about that, but, I mean, I think, basically, a culture of measurements, both at King's and more broadly, you know, has had a very huge impact on the way that I do research.
+            I think it has also impacted on the way that I do teaching for the same sorts of reasons. We are inevitably conditioned by how we can deploy our teaching in terms of what the outcome is and who is measuring the outcome.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>210</id>
+        <description>Brexit and what impact that's going to have on the higher education sector is a big thing in everyone's minds at the moment.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>the other big thing that's up in everyone's minds at the moment is Brexit and what impact that's going to have. You know, sort of, no prejudice to my own views on the subject, it is going to have a huge impact on the higher education sector, on our efforts to recruit more students from the EU. You know, obviously, we don't know very much about how that's going to work at the moment.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>211</id>
+        <description>There are a lot of theories swirling around at the moment about how people, how user communities are interacting with geographic data and there's been a lot of theorising on the biases involved with that, particularly in areas of things like digital urban studies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>there are a lot of theories swirling around at the moment, as I was saying just now, about how people, how user communities are interacting with geographic data and there's been a lot of theorising on the biases and I'd say prejudices that the- you know, the factors involved with that, particularly in areas of things like digital urban studies, I mean, there have been a couple of big volumes come out recently on that.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>212</id>
+        <description>There are questions about who is in control of digital culture, the power of Facebook, and the power of Google.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>All of these are tied to wider factors or who is in control of digital culture, you know, the power of Facebook, and the power of Google, and all of these things. So, all of these things are tied together.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>213</id>
+        <description>There are ways of thinkingabout humanities data which we can apply to these areas of new media, digital asset management, and digital culture. We've moved on from the days where we just did XML TEI mark-up for texts for scholars in the history department or the English department.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to see is a rethinking of the way that more traditional digital humanities can input, you know, can help reframe our thinking about those things. I mean, there are various schools of thought both in the department here at King's and more broadly about where the field of digital humanities sits.
+            I mean, I think we can all agree that we've moved on from the days where we just did XML TEI mark-up for texts, for scholars in the history department or the English department or whatever. There are ways of thinking ___[0:16:44] about humanities data which I think we can apply to these areas of new media, and digital asset management, and digital culture. I would really like to see the sector embracing that synergy, see, I start using words like synergy in this role, in the future. So, yes, I mean, I think a, sort of, step change in the epistemology underlying digital humanities is what I would like to see.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>214</id>
+        <description>There's a need for a rethinking of priorities on the part of funding bodies to encourage interdisciplinary research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>rethinking of priorities on the part of funding bodies to encourage this sort of research, which sometimes we see when you get these directive, sort of, funding schemes that come out, but we're seeing much less of those these days. I think that we also, yes, we also need- well, certainly it's not going to happen this time around, but for future iterations of the REF, we need to see interdisciplinary work rewarded much more explicitly.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>215</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more frameworks in place for PhD students coming through the system having a space to develop PhD projects which link two areas together more explicitly. I would really like to see the idea of the collaborative PhD or a PhD that relies on collaborative work much more closely embraced.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>more frameworks in place for PhD students coming through the system now having a space to develop PhD projects, which, kind of, link the two areas together more explicitly. Again, I mean, the PhD is a very interesting animal in a sense because, you know, it privileges individualistic achievement over three years, but I would really like to see the idea of the collaborative PhD or a PhD that relies on collaborative work much more closely embraced.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>216</id>
+        <description>We're not interested in the digitisation of humanities anymore, we're interested in the humanities of digitisation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>We're not interested in the digitisation of humanities anymore, we're interested in the humanities of digitisation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>217</id>
+        <description>I would like to see critical thinking about how place is structured and taught, particularly in the humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would very much like to see the, sort of, critical thinking about how place is structured and taught, particularly in the humanities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>218</id>
+        <description>Technology needs to be taught more effectively to students so they think critically about how technology impacts on the sorts of research questions that they and we want to ask in the future.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>technology taught more effectively to students. I mean, not just, as I say, picking up on the basics of Python coding, but, sort of, thinking critically about how technology impacts on the sorts of research questions that they and we want to ask in the future.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>219</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more digitisation of primary sources.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV020</provenance>
+        <quotation>a lot more digitisation of primary sources.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>220</id>
+        <description>Low cost VR is now available for the presentation of research to the public,</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>in terms of presentation of research to the public, I could count the availability of low cost VR there.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>221</id>
+        <description>At the moment most of the technologies are still in an experimental stage. I would expect to see is more roll-out of any of the above in more day to day work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>at the moment most of them are still in an experimental stage. I think what I would expect to see is more roll-out of any of the above in more day to day work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>222</id>
+        <description>There is a need for more projects in other European countries to catalogue thesir finds, and greater interoperability between the catalogues.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>projects in other European countries now to also catalogue these finds. And what I'd like to see is greater interoperability between them, so I can find similar artifacts from other countries.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>223</id>
+        <description>Funding is the most imperitive thing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>funding is the most imperitive thing</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>224</id>
+        <description>There needs to be a political will to allow open access to data, which is sensitive in some countries.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>But a political will to allow open access to data in particular, which is sensitive in some countries, to enable it to happen.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>225</id>
+        <description>In the UK there's been a lot of investment in data standards and ontologies and thesauri etc. That's less well developed in some of the European countries, and that sort of basic foundational work needs to happen to facilitate this greater joining up of databases</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>we're quite well covered in the UK in terms of theres been a lot of investment in data standards and ontologies and thesauri etc. That's less well developed in some of the European countries, say to facilitate this greater joining up of databases, that sort of basic foundational work that needs to happen.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>226</id>
+        <description>The existing European Union investment in research infrastructure is making a real difference both to the sector and my own research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>definitely on the positive side, the existing European Union investment in research infrastructure, and the emphasis they're putting on funding that, is making a real difference both to the sector and my own research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>227</id>
+        <description>There's broader emphasis on the grand challenge questions - that funders are particularly emphasising through some sort of thematic programmes, and that's leading to an interest in big data solutions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's broader emphasis on the sort of big questions - the grand challenge questions - that funders are particularly emphasising through some sort of thematic programmes, and that's leading to an interest in big data solutions, which in turn then has a...is linked in really with investment in infrastructure.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>228</id>
+        <description>Government industrial strategy is distorting the funding environment a bit. Particularly AHRC's interest in the creative industries, which in some ways is positive, but in other ways it's distorting the relative funding by emphasising a particular subset.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>UK RIs - particularly AHRCs interest in the creative industries, which is, I think, in some ways it's positive, but in other ways it's distorting the relative funding by emphasising a particular subset and also in archaeology, arts and humanities more broadly, I think the emphasis on funding that fits into the governments industrial strategy is also distorting the funding environment a bit.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>229</id>
+        <description>I'm working in a much more collaborative European environment than 10-15 years ago. Most of the research projects I'm engaged in are pan-European now.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>working much more in a collaborative European environment then I was 10-15 years ago. Most of the research projects I'm engaged in are pan-European now</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>230</id>
+        <description>The increasing availability of data online and the ease of access could lead to a greater emphasis on data reuse rather than going out and re-collecting data or distroying sites by excavating them</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'd like to hope that the increasing availability of data online and the ease of access to it would lead to a greater emphasis on data reuse rather than going out and re-collecting data or distroying sites by excavating them</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>231</id>
+        <description>There's the potential for ncreased public engagement through greater open access.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>increased public engagement through greater access</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>232</id>
+        <description>The journal Internet Archaeology has been experimenting with linking between the higher level interpretive text and the underlying supporting data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>we've been experimenting with linking between the higher level interpretive text and the underlying supporting data. So traditionally these would have been just published in hard copy monographs, with lots of tables of data, and numbers, whereas there's much greater potential for focusing on the story in the higher level publication, that allows users to drill down to the data which is itself in a much more accessible format.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>233</id>
+        <description>Digital archaeology, and digital humanities more broadly, have not yet really developed adequate career structures for people moving from a masters to a phd to a post-doc to a more permanent position.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>we've not yet really developed adequate career structures for people to follow a career, moving from a masters to a phd to a post-doc to a more permanent position.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>234</id>
+        <description>It's too common that you get projects driven by computer science, which can end up with a technology looking for a research question.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>t's too common that you get projects driven by computer science, which can end up with a technology looking for a research question. It needs to be the other way round, that research questions come from the arts andhumanities but then experitise of technology is employed for those, and that needs facilitation to happen.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>235</id>
+        <description>Finds data being available online has enabled me to take a much broader landscape perspective through looking at distributions of finds.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>the impact on my research of finds data being available online, is it's enabled me to take a much broader landscape perspective through looking at distributions of finds, for example, nationaly. And what I would like to do is be able to do that much more at a European level.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>236</id>
+        <description>I want archaeology to be focused not just on being about the employment of methods, but actually finding out about the past; harnessing technology rather than just using it for it's own sake, but using it for those goals.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>I want archaeology to be focused not just on being about the employment of methods, but actually finding out about the past, which is what it started out doing. So it's harnessing technology rather than just using it for it's own sake, but using it for those goals.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>237</id>
+        <description>There's a greater need for an awareness of the importance of sustainability and the longer-term preservation of digital data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV021</provenance>
+        <quotation>the need for awareness of the importance of sustainability and longer-term preservation of digital data, which is alarmingly still not common. There isn't is a common awareness of that in the profession and we're wasting an awful lot of resource there.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>238</id>
+        <description>New technical developments have produced better technology for speech processing: improved quality, and improved performance.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>One is better technology for speech processing. Improved quality, improved performance for processing speech material</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>239</id>
+        <description>For language resources interoperability is important. In the context of research infrastructures, if people have a specific type of data it's important for them to be advised on which tools are available that could be useful. That includes the identification of tools that are suited for the language in which the data is offered.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>I mentioned interoperability and that's of course a very generic notion, but for language resources it's important. In the context of research infrastructures, if people have a specific type of data it's important for them to be advised on which tools are available that could be useful. That includes the identification of tools that are suited for the language in which the data is offered.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>240</id>
+        <description>An urgent next step is to make machine learning tools suited for people that are not experts in the technology itself but are users of the technology. User friendliness includes includes smooth interfaces, tutorials for the use of certain technologies, and better understanding of how machine learning results can be put to use.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>interoperability and machine learning. The performance of these techniques is increasing, but what's an urgent next step and I know that people are working on this, is to make these tools suited for people that are not experts in the technology itself but are users of the technology.
+            I think there will be enormous developments needed in the user friendliness of these techniques. User friendliness includes a lot of themes, it includes smooth interfaces. It's coming with tutorials for the use of certain technologies. Also, better understanding of how machine learning results can be put to use in a given scenario of use.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>241</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more attention on the methodological frameworks for working with mixed data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>more attention for the work on the methodological frameworks for working with mixed data. Mixed can mean a lot of things, so multiple languages. Of course, also language data combined with other data, such as sensor data or survey data. If you want to integrate various data streams into a research framework, then you need to understand how heterogeneous datasets and the results of the various modules involved in processing can be integrated.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>242</id>
+        <description>We need pilots first of all. I have high hopes from the fact there are now more and more projects in which humanities scholars and social science scholars are working together.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>We need pilots first of all. I have high hopes from the fact there are now more and more projects in which humanities scholars and social science scholars are working together</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>243</id>
+        <description>There's a lot of attention for a very vague concept, namely impact, the utilisation of scientific and scholarly knowledge.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>Political factors I see in my own countries, strong attention for utilisation of scientific and scholarly knowledge. That means there's a lot of attention for a very vague concept, namely impact. However vague it is, it is affecting the sector. It brings a number of good things. Namely, we're aware of where in the socioeconomic realm there's potential for the uptake of the results of what we're doing and that's good. Even though the frameworks are poorly defined, this attention is in itself good.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>244</id>
+        <description>ESFRI policies mean we're trying to identify key performance indicators.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>ESFRE policies are affecting us very clearly. The fact that we're all now trying to identify key performance indicators for the work that we're doing is a result of that.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>245</id>
+        <description>The digitisation in the cultural heritage sector andthe enormous increase of social media data brings new possibilities to study societal and cultural phenomena.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>The digitisation in the cultural heritage sector, for example, has increased the number of datasets that we can work with. Also, the enormous increase of social media data that calls for analysis are a crucial factor because this is typically the kind of language data that comes with contextual information, for example metadata, about the users or things like followers and retweets etc. These are elements that can all be taken into account in the studying of this primarily linguistic data or language data. That's bringing new possibilities to study societal and cultural phenomena.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>246</id>
+        <description>The fact the type of data that we work on is so strongly embedded in contemporary socioeconomic and cultural contexts will make the potential for contributions of the fields and visibility of the fields much more favourable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>The fact the type of data that we work on is so strongly embedded in contemporary socioeconomic and cultural contexts will make the potential for contributions of the fields and visibility of the fields much more favourable.
+            I sometimes point out to other parties working in the realm of research infrastructures that we may be the sector that takes less of the money that's available. We represent maybe the biggest sector in terms of the number of researchers working there. It's hard to come up with a very precise figure, but you can easily argue that within Europe alone there are some half a million researchers working in social sciences and humanities. If they can benefit from the work of better infrastructure, so better support for their work then there are good chances for impact on all kinds of debates.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>247</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more intense cross-sub sector collaboration.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>More intense cross-sub sector collaboration.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>248</id>
+        <description>We need to be better aware of whether our narrative is phrased in such a way the other parties understand the message.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need to be better aware of whether our narrative is phrased in such a way the other parties understand the message. We have to learn each other's language, let's put it that way. It's communication, communication, communication</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>249</id>
+        <description>There's growing attention for open science. It was taken up as a theme for science policy, lots of money went into it, and it definitely will stay for a while.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>Attention for open science, which actually started from scholarly communities, that's important to note. It was taken up as a theme for policy makers in view of science policy. Lots of money went into it and it definitely will stay for a while.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>250</id>
+        <description>Funding organisations and organisations that evaluate proposals should make sure that reviewers are pointed to the fact they should assess the potential added value of the multidisciplinary elements in proposals.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV024</provenance>
+        <quotation>Support for multidisciplinary collaboration is one of those things. What more needs to happen? In general, it has nothing to do with research infrastructures, but funding organisations and organisations that evaluate proposals should make sure that reviewers are pointed to the fact they should assess the potential added value of the multidisciplinary elements in proposals rather than focusing on the modal disciplinary qualities alone.
+            For multidisciplinary work you need to have well-informed and well-instructed reviewers. That's the responsibility of funding organisations and maybe also for community-based journals and editorial boards should develop a policy for that.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>251</id>
+        <description>There is often the need for specialists in the field of data management to develop very specific tools, tailor-made approaches in developing archives.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we definitely have used specialists in the field of data management to actually come up and develop very specific tools, that often still need some kind of tailor-made approach to develop these archives.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>252</id>
+        <description>Programs like Neatline, to illustrate research tracking down the migration process or refugee data, has become general usage for researchers to display their research in a different way than just like the common article.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have especially benefitted from the developments of programs like Neatline, where it's easier to basically illustrate the develop- basically to illustrate research tracking down the migration process or refugee data. And this has become general usage for researchers to basically display their research in a different way than just like the common article.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>253</id>
+        <description>Methodological seminars increasingly include aspects of digital humanities. For example, how to collect large sets of data, and how to display them. Also, what would be the advantages, and what new research questions could be asked, if you suddenly have thousands and thousands of pieces of information on people at a specific moment in time available.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we shifted from having methodological seminars that include sociology and cultural aspects of researching the holocaust, to also including different courses, or different learning units, on how to use and how to include aspects of digital humanities. For example, how to collect large sets of data to use, and how to display them, and also what would be the advantages, and what new research questions are allowed to be asked in the field, if you suddenly have thousands and thousands of informations on people at a specific moment in time available.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>254</id>
+        <description>We are more and more offering online access to seminars.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we are more and more offering online access to seminars that are either guided, with regular assignments, or which are kind of open and can just be read up as more from an information point of view.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>255</id>
+        <description>People in the humanities never thought that they would have to deal with digital aspects, we need to make them aware that it will help their research to engage with different kinds of digital approaches.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>people in the humanities never thought that they would have to deal with digital aspects, to slowly bring them to the fore, and make them aware that it will help their research to engage with different kinds of digital approaches.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>256</id>
+        <description>Publishing your research results will become a more diverse question, whether you want to publish it online or in book form. This will change the whole face of the output of the humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>publishing your research results will, in the years to follow, become a more diverse question; if you want to publish it online, or if you want to publish it in book form. So this will change the whole face of the output of the humanities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>257</id>
+        <description>We need more teaching on how to include and how to bring together knowledge from data specialists, with the researcher who has so far only been based in the humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need more teaching on how to include and how to bring together knowledge from data specialists, but also from the perspective of the researcher who has so far only been based in the humanities. And this basically works, and should work, both ways. Because obviously the questions that, for example, a historian asks to a set of data is maybe very much different from what someone who is just interested in the large set of information is interested in.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>258</id>
+        <description>There needs to be more lobbying for the digital humanities, because when I look at the curriculum at universities there are very few courses offered.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>lobbying more for the digital humanities. Because when I look at the curriculum at universities - and this is something of course I can only say for Germany - there are very little courses offered, where you from very early on can generate this understanding.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>259</id>
+        <description>There needs to be better exchange between people in the humanities and technical specialists; a human level of understanding the possibilities and advancements.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>better exchange between people in the humanities and technical specialists, where I would really start on, I'd almost call it a human level of understanding the possibilities and advancements. Because for example, I have been sitting in presentations by the geographics of the holocaust, collaborative, and it was amazing what they could present, and what they also could ask for new questions, when it comes, for example, to the setup of a ghetto or whatever. That is just not possible if you only go to the testimonies.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>260</id>
+        <description>There's a need to improve online access when it comes to publishing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>improving the online access when it comes to publishing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>261</id>
+        <description>Not everything can be made better by just including aspects from the digital humanities. One should be careful not to try to include it into every research question, or kind of make it try to include it, just to gain funds.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have to realise the fact that not everything can be made better by just including aspects from the digital humanities. So I think one should be careful not to try to include it into every research question, or kind of make it try to include it, just to maybe also gain funds, in a way</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>262</id>
+        <description>History sometimes runs the risk of losing its relevance. Developments have meant that in some countries where we're teaching on and about the holocaustit has become somewhat of a disputed field, gained more relevance, and it's now more visible as a factor that we have to invest more time, energy and research in.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>history sometimes runs the risk of losing its relevance. And in that way, especially the European holocaust research infrastructure has now, also due to some developments in countries where we're suddenly teaching on and about the holocaust has become somewhat of a disputed field, gained more relevance, and it's now more visible as a factor, that we have to invest more time, energy and research in.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>263</id>
+        <description>In recent years have seen a kind of dire need for a more collaborative approach, and a more transnational engaging of different researchers in the fields, but also in various countries.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>in recent years have seen a kind of dire need for a more collaborative approach, and a more transnational engaging of different researchers in the fields, but also in various countries. So for example, the study of the holocaust has always been kind of internationalised, but now it's our task to bring this internationalised research together, in a way, and make people, for example, aware of all the research that has been done on certain topics in other countries.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>264</id>
+        <description>There's a need to push research more into the public,, especially when it comes to historical questions, or to developments where we now look back on and say, "How could this happen?".</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have to push the research more into the public. This is something that we also have witnessed in the last couple of years; that with many public debates going on, especially when it comes to historical questions, or to developments where we now look back on and say, "How could this happen?", that the research of universities and related institutions often do not reach the public. And this is something that we want and need to change.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>265</id>
+        <description>We need to make tools more and easier available to all researchers.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we also need to use the worldwide web, or whatever out there, in making tools more and easier available to all researchers.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>266</id>
+        <description>There's a need to improve the situation of archives and also research institutions in places that have limited access to research infrastructures.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>improve the situation of archives and also research institutions in places that have limited access to research infrastructures. And this, for example, from our point of view, is especially true for eastern European countries, who often have a very dedicated community of researchers, but they just lack funds, and also access, to really make intense use of the tools that we have, that we have worked on.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>267</id>
+        <description>There's been a boost to research from the large sets of data, be it refugees or be it immigrants into America, and the often now searchable interviews.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>large sets of data, be it refugees or be it immigrants into America. So there has definitely been kind of a boost in this regard. And also thanks to the often now searchable interviews, our ___[0:24:00] has profited tremendously from the developments in the field. And also when it comes to social science, who can now base their findings on a much larger set of data accumulated.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>268</id>
+        <description>We need more long-term projects that have an integrated approach, where specialists from different fields come together on a regular basis.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need more long-term projects that have this kind of integrated approach, where specialists from different fields come together on a regular basis. And this has to be in close connection with offering more online access, not just to information of how to use different tools, but also on someone who might guide this process, and help people to actually engage with these new offerings, and not just say, "Okay, I learned this, but I will probably never use it."</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>269</id>
+        <description>We will have to improve open access, so that people will have the possibility to really get an overview of all the developments that are happening in the field, from a research and also methodological point of view.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV025</provenance>
+        <quotation>we will have to improve open access, so that people will have the possibility to really get an overview of all the developments that are happening in the field, from a research and also methodological point of view.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>270</id>
+        <description>The open science movement has been a big development. Open science is a solution of how to speed up the distribution of knowledge.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>the open science movement. For me, open science is a solution of how to speed up the distribution of knowledge. I think if you read the ___[0:01:12] report by the EC, it's about finding ways to distribute knowledge faster and to a broader audience. That's the open science movement.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>271</id>
+        <description>We have to consider how the development of platforms like Amazon or Airbnb, and in a way the EOSC (European Open Science Cloud) is also a platform, influence our research infrastructures.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>the development of platforms, like Amazon, or Airbnb, and in a way the EOSC, the European Open Science Cloud, is also a kind of platform. We have to take [out 0:01:47] of these developments how they influence our research infrastructures.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>272</id>
+        <description>Social data archives have evolved into data service providers. It's not only the archiving,but also developing tools and services for the researchers.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>Social data archives have evolved into data service providers. So, it's not only the archiving that they did in the 70s and 80s etc. Yes, archiving and data curation is still an important part of their activities. But it's also developing tools and services for the researchers.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>273</id>
+        <description>There's the potential for universities to take care of archiving themselves as it becomes more and more easy, so it's not a specialist task anymore. Data can stay where they are because of security.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think universities will take care of archiving themselves as it becomes more and more easy, so it's not a specialist task anymore. Data stay where they are because of security. So, we have to take care of secure access platforms, and what I see, that's also what you see in general if you look at platforms or platform economies, is orientation to the demand side.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>274</id>
+        <description>We are working on the secured access items. AAI, the Authentication and Authorisation, needs to be easy and also cheap. The tools on the market are expensive.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>We are working on the secured access items. For this, you would need the AAI, the Authentication and Authorisation. To make this AAI easy and also cheap, if we look now what's on the market for tools, then these tools are pretty expensive.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>275</id>
+        <description>There's a need to automate the assignment of metadata to a data set, so machines can extract the information we need to describe the data set.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>I also would like is that we find procedures to automate the assignment of meter data to a data set, so that the machines could extract the information we need to describe the data set and can stop the [handiwork 0:07:02], the craftsmanship wherever possible.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>276</id>
+        <description>There is a need for a catalogue of services by the e-infrastructures. Because it would not be efficient if content service providers would need to develop their own tools.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to have a catalogue of services by the e-infrastructures. Because it would not be efficient if content service providers, like [Sesa 0:07:40] or [Life Sciences] etc, would need to develop their own tool, the general tools of providing a secure platform to have this authentication. So, I would like to have a catalogue, if you want, a business to business catalogue from the e-infrastructures to the ___[0:08:05], to the research infrastructures.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>277</id>
+        <description>Standardisation is a challenge. Developing standards is one step, but implementing and compliance of these standards is another. It needs to be easier, or there to be an incentive for organisations to really start using standards and not have deviation from these standards or develop their own dialects</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>standardisation. So, yes, developing standards is one, but implementing and compliance of these standards is another step. If that would be easier or the incentive for organisations to really start using standards and not have deviation from these standards or develop their own dialects</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>278</id>
+        <description>Trust in the data is an issue. If we don't succeed in providing trust in our results, then this discussion of, "Science is just an opinion," will continue.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research Quality</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>Trust in the data. We have this producibility crisis. Even on the level of science, sometimes you hear, "Well, science is just an opinion and my opinion is this." If we don't succeed in providing trust in our results, then this discussion of, "Science is just an opinion," will continue, I think. Then providing trust within the scientific system is key.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>279</id>
+        <description>There is the potential to help researchers with their data management plans, instead of each researcher or faculty developing its own protocol, go up the data production column and have quality assessments, or quality insurance on how this data is produced. Data management protocols become very important, and the key isstandardisation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research Quality</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>We would like to go up the data production column and see whether we can have quality assessments, or quality insurance on how this data is produced. For this, the data management protocols become very important.
+            So, we are now working on the outcome of the Science Europe report, which says data management plans should have a general part but also have a disciplinary part. I think we could help researchers if we could facilitate them in how to do these data management plans, instead of each researcher or faculty developing its own protocol. So, here, the key is again standardisation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>280</id>
+        <description>There could be a great number of data platforms that become available, but if we don't succeed in keeping the overview on what's happening and how to find it, then we will get lost in the forest. As universities will now develop and keep their own data, and do their own data archiving, it's essential to have a good overview or a data catalogue.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>There could be a great number of data platforms that become available. But if we don't succeed in keeping the overview on what's happening and how to find it, then we will get lost in the forest. I can see it now in the repositories. If you go to these websites that give overviews of repositories, there are hundreds or thousands of these repositories. As universities will now develop and keep their own data, and do their own data archiving, it's essential to have a good overview or a data catalogue.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>281</id>
+        <description>There is the potential for really disruptive innovation if we manage to reach out to other users, to data professionals outside universities, to government at all levels that want to use this data, to companies who want to use this data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think we could have really a disruptive innovation if we manage to reach out to other users, to data professionals outside universities, to government at all levels that want to use this data, to companies who want to use this data. So, I think we have to find these new users.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>282</id>
+        <description>Findability in a data catalogue needs to improve.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>findability in a data catalogue, that it is easily accessible or that at least you can easily find out how to access the data, what security issues are happening and about connecting the data into operability of the data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>283</id>
+        <description>The scholarship trends are open access and interdisciplinary.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>it's open access. It's also the interdisciplinary. What we see, for example, is the combination of social and life sciences. We have big surveys. We have, for example, a twin survey, and that now is completed with DNA material, or with life or health material. The shared data set already collects human material. So, it's a combination of disciplines and this is revealed also in the data that is collected. It's a combination. It's the combination with social and geographical data. We can keep track of all movements of people. So, it's this interdisciplinarity.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>284</id>
+        <description>Semantics is making connections between data that didn't exist before, just by describing the relationships between certain data sets or certain agents.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>semantics really coming up in a way to make connections between data that didn't exist before, just by describing the relationships between certain data sets or certain agents.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>285</id>
+        <description>Big data is a scale problem that's coming up. It's not only big in amount, in gigabytes, but also in the complexity of the data. If we want researchers and other users to actually use the data, we have to tackle the complexity that is in some of these data sets, the complexity when you start combining data sets.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>you're talking about big data in amounts, in gigabytes, but also the complexity of the data. If we want users, researchers, other users to actually use the data, we have to tackle the complexity that is in some of these data sets, the complexity when you start combining data sets. So, yes, it's a scale problem that's coming up.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>286</id>
+        <description>There's more and more emphasis on coordination, to keep an overview on what is going on. It doesn't make sense to put everything in one place, but you must have a federated structure where the users know where to find what.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>more and more emphasis on coordination, to keep an overview on what is going on. So, it's not the challenge to centralise, but it's the challenge to federate. That goes within Sesa and I can see it within EOSC. It doesn't make sense to put everything in one place, but you must have a federated structure where the users know where to find what. So, yes, we have to coordinate, and that goes for Sesa within the countries with several disciplines, and it goes for EOSC between the discipline, between the research infrastructures and the e-infrastructures.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>287</id>
+        <description>One of the barriers is the lack of incentive for data sharing. Researchers are evaluated and rewarded based on the articles, the publications, not on whether they provide an excellent data set.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>one of the barriers is the lack of incentive for data sharing. Because I think social science's data is still regarded as an asset towards, for example, your next article or monograph. Researchers are evaluated and rewarded based on these kinds of outputs. The articles, the publications. Not on whether they provide an excellent data set. I would like to see this incentive scheme changing, so that sharing data becomes the new normal.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>288</id>
+        <description>One necessary condition is DOIs, or at least persistent identifiers, to data sets and reach a system where if you write an article that you make a reference to the data set in the standardised way.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV026</provenance>
+        <quotation>one necessary condition is that [we 0:22:00] provide [DOI] to the data set, or at least persistent identifiers, and reach a system where if you write an article that you make a reference to the data set in the standardised way. For example, by giving a reference to this DOI.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>289</id>
+        <description>Linked open data, the ability to exchange better quality data, has been an important trend.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>linked open data; that's the ability to exchange better quality data. So we've improved our data modelling, allowing our partners to publish better data, and also to allow us to publish better data. And the metadata becomes interlinked with other sources, thus benefitting from the richness of those other sources that we can include in our own data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>290</id>
+        <description>IIIF; more versatile access to content. So content that's easier to access technically, that's also accessible at source, so we don't have to shuffle files around, and providers; they still can see who gets access to their stuff and track it.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>IIIF, that would be generally more versatile access to content. So content that's easier to access technically, that's also accessible at source, so we don't have to shuffle files around, and providers; they still can see who gets access to their stuff and track it. And it fits quite well our agenda for more open content in general.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>291</id>
+        <description>AI will be increasingly important, mining all kinds of data: images, videos, text, metadata,usage data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>AI, of course, so trying to mine all kinds of data that's around us that can be the content, so images and videos. Also the metadata. Actually, the content, I forgot, there's text as well of course; things like newspapers and stuff like that. These can be really important data for us and for researchers in particular, I guess.
+            And also trying to apply the AI to usage data; so trying to find out what our users are looking for, and how we can better help them.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>292</id>
+        <description>Annotation technology will be increasingly important - allowing pretty much everyone to create data about cultural assets, creating a lot of opportunity for getting richer data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>annotation technology. So allowing pretty much everyone to create data about cultural assets. So we've got a handful of projects that are contributing somehow to this topic, and, well, that creates a lot of opportunity for getting richer data. And actually also more opportunities to apply the technology to derive interesting insights on the cultural heritage stuff.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>293</id>
+        <description>There's a need for AI technology, resoures and software, that are easy to use.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>AI technology. Because applying fancy stuff like data mining, or mining user needs; I mean these require resource and software that needs to be easy to use, and in our sector we don't have a lot of resources to put into that. And the result is that many people; they basically, when they try something, they just use the, well, let's say the Google APIs. Which is probably very fine, but maybe we can do a bit better, and it would be good if more AI technology was easier for us to reuse around.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>294</id>
+        <description>More resources in the field for working on data are need. The cultural sector is not very rich in general, and that's not getting better.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>more resources in the field for working on data. So we are, yes, well our cultural sector is not very rich in general, and that's not getting better. And that's becoming a problem when we have to devote more resources for, well, data stuff. So resourcing is one point.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>295</id>
+        <description>We need better access to data and content, both from the technology and legal perspective. Access to a lot of the data and the content in the cultural sector can be challenging to access, not only technologically, but there there are also still a lot of legal obstacles.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>have better access to data and content, both from the technology and legal perspective. So it's not only a resourcing problem; it's also the fact that a lot of the data and the content in our sector can be challenging to access. I mean it can be not technologically easy to access, and there are also still a lot of legal obstacles for doing stuff.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>296</id>
+        <description>The modern ways of working are collaborative and distributive, and there's a growth of communities and networks across subjects and borders.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>increased mobility and digital connectivity globally, which in my opinion contributes to a faster and easier access and distribution to knowledge, data and tools.
+            So I would say that the modern ways of working are collaborative and distributive, and we witness the growth of communities and networks across subjects and borders, the more intense communication and exchange between these networks and communities, and in the same line of thought, the adoption of collaborative approaches such as co-creation, which in any fact can foster innovation for both cultural heritage and digital humanities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>297</id>
+        <description>There's growing recognition of the socioeconomic impact of culture, for helping building European identity, for improving citizens' wellbeing, for better education and more jobs. And this recognition happens on both citizen and policy level.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>the growing recognition of the socioeconomic impact of culture, for helping building European identity, for improving citizens' wellbeing, for better education and more jobs. And this recognition happens on both citizen and policy level.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>298</id>
+        <description>There's increased recognition of cultural heritage at the political level, thanks to initiatives at an international European level, encouraged, for instance, by the European Europe Year of Cultural heritage (2018).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>increased recognition on the political level, thanks to initiatives at an international European level, encouraged, for instance, by the European Europe cultural heritage. So 2018 was a big year for gaining this ability.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>299</id>
+        <description>There's growing support on a European level for research-oriented programmes; specifically for initiatives like the European Open Science Cloud and the Horizon 2020 programme.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>the growing support on a European level for research-oriented programmes; specifically for initiatives like the European Open Science Cloud and the Horizon 2020 programme.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>300</id>
+        <description>There are opportunties to benefit from this political climate and developments. Strengthening the link between cultural heritage institution and research, to the benefit of both sectors.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>We have been working to kind of benefit from this political climate and developments. We have been actively working on strengthening the link between cultural heritage institution and research, to the benefit of both sectors. So we have been working on developing partnerships between the two sectors. We are now investigating the participation on above-mentioned programme, the European Open Science Cloud, as well, you know, any related project within the Horizon 2020 programme.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>301</id>
+        <description>There's growing recognition of the socioeconomical impact, and there are now tools and methodology to help the cultural institution measure this impact. For example, the Europeana Playbook.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>growing recognition of the socioeconomical impact. We worked on a tool or a methodology to help the cultural institution measure this impact. It's called the Europeana Playbook. And we believe that this is highly applicable for also joint cultural heritage and digital humanities projects.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>302</id>
+        <description>Fast digital repositories and collaborative formats will open new avenues for exploration, and will spark new ideas.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>fast digital repositories and collaborative formats like the co-creation will open new avenues for exploration, will spark new ideas, and Europeana aims to support these efforts to the frameworks, the standards, the project initiatives,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>303</id>
+        <description>There's a need to support innovation in cultural heritage, and re-empower the users, and researchers in particular, to engage more with cultural heritage.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>support innovation in cultural heritage, and to re-empower the users, and researchers in particular, to engage more with cultural heritage.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>304</id>
+        <description>There's a need to improve data quality, usability and retrieval.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>improving data quality, usability and retrieval</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>305</id>
+        <description>There's a need to identify more and alternative funding options to support the overall changes and innovation-related changes in the cultural sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>identifying more and alternative funding options for, yes, to support the overall changes then innovation-related changes in the cultural sector.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>306</id>
+        <description>There's increasing interest in building international projects, and applying for European funds as a consequence.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>increasing interest in building international projects, and applying for European funds as a consequence.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>307</id>
+        <description>There's an increasing number of initiatives trying to meet researchers' needs, making the projects' results more visible. Such as university or national or international repositories, platforms for showing publications, such as Academia.edu or ResearchGate, platforms for tracking the impact, like Google Scholar, or initiatives like European Science Cloud.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>The increasing number of initiatives trying to meet researchers' needs, so making projects more feasible and the projects' results more visible, such as university or national or international repositories, platforms for showing publications, such as Academia.edu or ResearchGate, platforms for tracking the impact, like Google Scholar, or ___[0:16:56] initiatives like European Science Cloud.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>308</id>
+        <description>The digitisation of cultural heritage, the use of cultural heritage and use of computational tools has changed the methodological approach in research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>the immense possibility afforded by the digitisation of cultural heritage that is our sector, the use of cultural heritage and use of computational tools that have been changing the methodological approach in research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>309</id>
+        <description>We hope that all humanists will be digital humanists in the future, and so we believe that all users will use digital cultural heritage if they need it as a source, and computational tools.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>we hope that all humanists will be digital humanists in the future, and so we believe that all users will use digital cultural heritage if they need it as a source, and computational tools.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>310</id>
+        <description>360 degrees' openness in research, with a potential impact on the integrity in research. That means also the possibility to freely access to sources and to share sources and results according with the open science principles.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to see 360 degrees' openness in research, with a potential impact on the integrity in research. That means also the possibility to freely access to sources and to share sources and results according with the open science principles.
+            Currently, there is still a lot of limits that apply in open science, mainly because of the licencing framework</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>311</id>
+        <description>I would like to see full recognition of digital open access works in the academic world. That means that use of digital data and computational tools have in the academia a full, really a true recognition, and it means also that they will affect in a different way researchers' careers.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to see full recognition of digital open access works in the academic world. That means that use of digital data and computational tools have in the academia a full, really a true recognition, and it means also that they will affect in a different way researchers' careers.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>312</id>
+        <description>The tools that we have today for doing on site technical investigation of tangible cultural heritage artefacts enables analysis without destroying the material.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>the tools that we have today for doing onsite technical investigation of tangible cultural heritage artefacts about the state of degradation of the different artefacts and the techniques used. Those are the most important things that we can do. This analyses without destroying the material.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>313</id>
+        <description>There's a need to avoid duplication and we are looking for standardisation. One of the major problems in Europe is that the different developments are not really shared, the European Research Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage still has to deliver the sharing of different tools, equipment and digital infrastructure.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>we try to avoid duplication and we are looking for standardisation. One of the major problems in Europe is that the different developments are not really... In Italy, it is still very much in a national context that you have most of the development and the use.
+            For example, what we are planning to have, the European Research Infrastructure for Cultural Heritage... I think it still has to deliver the sharing of different tools, equipment and digital infrastructure.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>314</id>
+        <description>There is a need for interlinking of the different databases of digitalised cultural heritage both for research, for identifying conservation needs, and for for fighting the illicit trade of cultural goods.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>What would be really important is to explore, "How can we link all the different databases of digitalised cultural heritage, and how can we use it for research, for analysing the need for conservation?" It would be also very important for fighting the illicit trade of cultural goods. I think one of the major problems is that what we digitalise is not good enough to decide, on an artefact, whether it is stolen, looted or a fake. This is one of the challenges for the moment.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>315</id>
+        <description>There's a need for a integrated digital back office for researchers, policymakers and law enforcement. It is not really on the development side that we are underperforming, it is the political willingness to create European cooperation for dealing with the digitalisation in the realm of cultural heritage.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to really see is an integrated digital back office for researchers, policymakers and law enforcement. It is not really on the development side, I think, that we are underperforming. It is the political willingness to create European cooperation for dealing with the digitalisation in the realm of cultural heritage.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>316</id>
+        <description>There's a need for a digital warehouse of available data. The European Commission has refused to create one saying that there is no standardisation; Europeana, is not good enough for researchers or for law enforcement.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have a lot of available technologies on 3D digitalisation, for example, or in-depth digitalisation of material layers that could be used if it was available, but, until now, the European Commission has refused to create a digital warehouse of available data, saying that there is no standardisation, and what we supported, Europeana, is not good enough for researchers or for law enforcement.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>317</id>
+        <description>Artificial intelligence might be a very interesting field to see whether it could help identifying problems, and also looted and falsified objects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>artificial intelligence might be a very interesting field to see whether it could help identifying problems, and also looted and falsified objects.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>318</id>
+        <description>We should look into the issues of how to tag tangible cultural heritage for follow-up, whether with nanomaterials or with chemical substances or just by digital information, maybe secured by new technologies like blockchain to make it more difficult in the black market to use cultural artefacts.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>We should look into the issues of how to tag tangible cultural heritage for follow-up, whether with nanomaterials or with chemical substances or just by digital information, maybe secured by new technologies like blockchain to make it more difficult in the black market to use cultural artefacts.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>319</id>
+        <description>The effect of the financial crisis that started in 2008 and 2009 is still something we haven't overcome. Research in the field of humanities and cultural heritage is underfinanced. In many countries, the institutional infrastructure behind humanities and cultural heritage is underfinanced.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>the effect of the crisis that started in 2008 and 2009 is still something we couldn't really overcome. Research in the field of humanities and cultural heritage received less funding or funding for those sectors lost its value, so it is underfinanced. In many countries, the institutional infrastructure behind humanities and cultural heritage - and, now, I have in mind what is important for research and innovation - is underfinanced. It is mostly a state, regional or local-financed infrastructure that is struggling with a lack of power funds.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>320</id>
+        <description>There's a very low level of European cooperation in cultural heritage because of this national background, meaning that museums, collections and cultural heritage sites were created and financed as part of nation building. Currently, the European Union is not ready to really create a European institutional framework for European cultural heritage.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>very low level of European cooperation because of this national background, meaning that museums, collections and cultural heritage sites were created and financed as part of nation building. Currently, the European Union is not ready to really create a European institutional framework for European cultural heritage.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>321</id>
+        <description>The infrastructures are very modest compared to hard sciences, from a financial point of view and also from the point of view of political willingness.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>the infrastructures, are very modest compared to hard sciences, for example, from a financial point of view and also from the point of view of political willingness.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>322</id>
+        <description>The next big political step would be for the European Union to acknowledge the importance of European cultural heritage and take it into account in financing decisions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>research in the field of humanities, digital humanities and cultural heritage receives a very low level of European funding. There are beautiful initiatives without any funding - for example, the Network of the European Heritage Label sites. I think the next big political step would be for the European Union to acknowledge the importance of European cultural heritage and take it into account in financing decisions.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>323</id>
+        <description>There is more support from member states in the Council and from members of the European Parliament for this field than any time before in the past. At the political level that culminated in this European Year of Cultural Heritage, the situation will slightly improve for the next programming period that will start in 2021.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>the European Year of Cultural Heritage gave a lot of visibility to the efforts of the European Union, but also the national institutions for cultural heritage, and there seems to be at this moment a growing acknowledgement of the importance of this field for European societies.
+            At this moment in time, I feel more support from member states in the Council and from members of the European Parliament for this field than any time before in the past. It might turn out that with all the little stats that we had in the last 10 years, I would say, at the political level that culminated in this European Year of Cultural Heritage, the situation will slightly improve for the next programming period that will start in 2021.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>324</id>
+        <description>Changes should be sustainable, and European leaders should consider the importance of culture for European societies, the added value of culture and cultural heritage for European integration. We have a political pillar. We have an economic pillar. Now, we are talking more and more about the social pillar, but the fourth cultural pillar is needed.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>from a political level, changes should be sustainable, and I think European leaders should consider the importance of culture for European societies, the added value of culture and cultural heritage for the European integration. Sooner or later, they should, in cooperation with all the stakeholders in all the member states and regions work for the establishment of a European cultural pillar.
+            We have a political pillar. We have an economic pillar. Now, we are talking more and more about the social pillar, but the fourth cultural pillar is needed.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>325</id>
+        <description>Through the European infrastructures we should aim at the same excellence and reference in cultural heritage conservation as the Getty institute in the States. In Europe, you don't have such a specific European centre, you should really aim at having European reference activities and centres.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>on behalf of European infrastructures, you should really aim at having European reference activities and centres. Then, you look into, for example, preservation and conservation of cultural heritage in the States. The Getty Institute comes to mind to all researchers and activities. In Europe, you don't have such a specific European centre.
+            So through the European infrastructures, we should aim at the same excellence and reference in cultural heritage conservation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>326</id>
+        <description>There is a need for political willingness. Political leaders should not consider culture and cultural heritage only as an economic resource, but its much wider societal importance for the European society. At the national level, it is obvious, at the European level, it is completely forgotten.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>political willingness. Political leaders should stop to consider culture and cultural heritage only as an economic resource in a very short-sighted interpretation, meaning, "What is the immediate economic added value of activities and the number of jobs?" Those are very important considerations, but culture, the history, the memory, the cultural heritage... It has a much wider societal importance for the European society.
+            When you tell this at the national level, it is obvious. It is obvious that is part of identity. It contributes to the gathering of people. It is an essential issue of democratisation. Access to culture is a profoundly social and political 'demographication', when you come to the European level, it is completely forgotten.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>327</id>
+        <description>Peanuts are given for this field. We should create a highly visible European project - for example, a network of cultural heritage sites, a reference research centre, more visible research infrastructures and more visible international interventions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>funding. For the moment, peanuts are given for this field. We should create a highly visible European project - for example, a network of cultural heritage sites, a reference research centre, more visible research infrastructures and more visible international interventions.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>328</id>
+        <description>There's a need to increase funding for research and innovation in a coordinated manner.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>increase funding for research and innovation in a coordinated manner. Also, an example from the past, on the Horizon 2020, the worst success rates occurred in the field of cultural heritage research. It happened that the success rate was under 3%. We had money for two projects out of 150 proposals. It shows the need of the research community for European funding and the inadequacy of available funds.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>329</id>
+        <description>The European Union should support the creation of European chairs for the study of cultural heritage in the new European universities. It would be a very easy and a relatively cheap solution to create better infrastructures and better institutions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>let me add one little idea about the institutional changes. I think that the European Union should support the creation of European chairs for the study of cultural heritage in the new European universities and those who, in other European universities, are supporting the creation of [Roma Natures 0:31:06]. I think it would be a very easy and a relatively cheap solution to create better infrastructures and better institutions.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>330</id>
+        <description>There's been a very steep increase in the thematic coverage of research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>what happened was a very steep increase in the thematic coverage of research.
+            To give a couple of examples, in the past, before Horizon 2020, we did not really have research, for example, on difficult or conflict heritage. Now, it is changing. We had no research on the cultural and creative industries, their economic and business needs, and the sociological context different to European countries. Now, we have research on this.
+            We had no research on the cultural literacy of European societies and how people approach culture. What is the background given by institutions, by families, by social media? Now, we also have research on this. We had no research in the past, or very little, on sustainable cultural tourism. No, we also have this. We had no research on the societal value of culture beyond economic value. Now, we've also launched research in these fields.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>331</id>
+        <description>There is an improvement of European research infrastructures. More research infrastructures receive funding, but many of them are in a preparation phase, so it is important to maintain funding and to see how those infrastructures really become part of the European institutional landscape.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>an improvement of European research infrastructures. More research infrastructures receive funding, but many of them are in a preparation phase, so I think it will be really important to maintain funding and to see how those infrastructures really become part of the European institutional landscape.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>332</id>
+        <description>The stakeholder community for humanities in general, for digital humanities and also for cultural heritage is really fragmented. Scholars comes from different backgrounds, there are digital experts, engineers, architects, conservation specialists, historians, archaeologists, and so on and so forth. They are not only fragmented along national lines, but also disciplinary lines, so I think one of the big improvements would be if they could more together and voice their concerns in a more unified way towards policymakers.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>The stakeholder community for humanities in general, for digital humanities and also for cultural heritage is really fragmented.
+            One of the peculiarities of this field is that scholarship comes from different backgrounds, especially for cultural heritage. There are digital experts, engineers, architects, conservation specialists, historians, archaeologists, and so on and so forth. They are not only fragmented along national lines, but also disciplinary lines, so I think one of the big improvements would be if they could more together and voice their concerns in a more unified way towards policymakers.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>333</id>
+        <description>There is a need for more long-term cooperation between different stakeholders, including also business. European enterprises and businesses are sometimes involved in research and innovation in the field of humanities or cultural heritage, but not very often.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>we are very eager to see is more long-term cooperation between different stakeholders, including also business. For the moment, European enterprises and businesses are sometimes involved, but not very much, in research and innovation in the field of humanities or cultural heritage. I think if we really talk about and if we consider that there is a sector called cultural and creative industries, we should see those industries becoming more involved in research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>334</id>
+        <description>There is a need for more cooperation between the national funding agencies in order that there is a joint programme initiative for cultural heritage. It cannot really take off because of a lack of appropriate national funding. It would be a tremendous change to see these joint programme initiatives taking off.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>more cooperation between the national funding agencies in order that there is a joint programme initiative for cultural heritage. I think it is there already for more than 10 years, and it cannot really take off because of a lack of appropriate national funding. It would be a tremendous change to see these joint programme initiatives taking off.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>335</id>
+        <description>There is a need at the university level for involving more European perspectives, comparative perspectives, and moving towards sharing curricular, sharing research questions and sharing research results. You don't really have a European shared master's or PhD programmes for cultural heritage.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>at the university level, really involving more European perspectives, comparative perspectives, and moving towards sharing curricular, sharing research questions and sharing research results. It would be very important.
+            You don't really have a European shared master's or PhD programmes for cultural heritage. There is already something starting on a very small scale, but we would need a boosting to this European cooperation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>336</id>
+        <description>Strong support from citizens is very important, working with civil society and with cultural organisations.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV028</provenance>
+        <quotation>Strong support from citizens would be very important. I think working with civil society and with cultural organisations would be very important, so a sort of reach out would be very important.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>337</id>
+        <description>Computation methods are enabling us to work with materials at a greater scale, but also with new forms of materials. For example, in music we used to analyse music manuscripts and now we analyse recordings of live performances, which is part a big data problem.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>The computational one has enabled... One area I work in is musicology, so in that context in particular it's a good example. It's enabling us to work with materials at a greater scale, but also the new forms of materials that are available. In music we used to analyse music manuscripts and now we analyse recordings of live performances, which is part a big data problem. That's a good example where it's not just doing old things in new ways, but it's doing new things as well.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>338</id>
+        <description>The use of computational modelling and simulation is on the rise, and there'll be more of this with the augmented reality and virtual reality.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>Another aspect of the computational side, this is probably reaching slightly around the edges of the DH landscape, is the use in modelling and simulation. I actually think that's on the rise and we're going to see a lot more use of computers in simulating things. There has been existing work in ___[0:07:40] simulation, for example. We'll see more of this when we get more into the augmented reality and virtual reality side of things, which is definitely the shape of things to come.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>339</id>
+        <description>Crowdsourcing is important. Humans are good at certain things that AI can't do. It's also a way of gathering information in a very democratised way.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>On the crowdsourcing side, I think there are a couple of things here. There's a very specific piece where we're enabling humans to come together to solve a problem. Humans are quite good at certain things still before AI can do it. It's also a way of gathering information in a very democratised way. There's an abstract interesting thing here as well. That way of thinking in scholarship that we can embrace the crowd has many, many different forms.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>340</id>
+        <description>Search and discovery is still hard, Google isn't the answer to everything and not everything is digitised. We're not good at creating resources as a side effect of a research project and then having them sustained.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>things being much more linked up. The search and discovery task is still hard, Google isn't the answer to everything and not everything is digitised. We're not so good at creating resources as a side effect of a research project and then having them sustained and in perpetuity. There are all sorts of issues around this.
+            There's huge value in getting things linked up, both in terms of finding what you want, but then making use of it and bringing things together to an academic end.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>341</id>
+        <description>The kinds of research questions are changing. For example, we've moved from studying a musical score in a library to analysing music that's been recorded at performance, analysing the reception of the music and finding out a lot more about the audience response.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>we've moved from studying a musical score in a library to analysing music that's been recorded at performance. Really now analysing the reception of the music and finding out a lot more about the audience response and so on. Again, the kind of research questions are changing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>342</id>
+        <description>There has been a cultural change in the the digital humanities. It used to be that if you went to a meeting about digital humanities infrastructure someone put up a slide saying, 'Do we need an infrastructure?' That's not a good starting position to seize an opportunity of new investment in the area. However, increasingly, people are thinking much more about this.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>To start off with it seemed very hard because if you go to a meeting about digital humanities infrastructure someone puts up a slide saying, 'Do we need an infrastructure?' That's not a good starting position. It's a great philosophical question, it's not a good starting position to seize an opportunity of new investment in the area.
+            However, through a series of meetings over the last six months or so I am seeing people thinking much bigger about this. I'm less worried and I think it can be done. That's a kind of cultural issue to do with this community.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>343</id>
+        <description>In this sector we have collections, we have the libraries, we have the archives, we have the museums, galleries and they're part of our infrastructure. I think that is being recognised.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>In this sector we have collections, we have the libraries, we have the archives, we have the museums, galleries and they're part of our infrastructure. I think that is being recognised.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>344</id>
+        <description>In the past a report would come out from a taskforce and it would cover everyone except humanities, we're getting humanities on the table now, which is a really positive step.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'm seeing in discussions in rooms where we have all disciplines represented and all funders and all the sectors are represented, digital humanities or the humanities as a set of disciplines is becoming a first-class citizen. Whereas in the past a report would come out from a taskforce or something and it would cover everyone except humanities, we're getting humanities on the table now, which is a really positive step.
+            I think what this means is the potential of the sector can now be realised if we seize these opportunities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>345</id>
+        <description>Some digital humanities practices are hugely relevant to other sectors. We shouldn't see ourselves as if we're playing catch up, others are playing catch up with us, they just don't realise.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>some of our practices in digital humanities are hugely relevant to other sectors. We shouldn't see ourselves as if we're playing catch up, I think the opposite is true. Others are playing catch up with us, they just don't realise. We need to get those conversations going as well.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>346</id>
+        <description>Good practices emerge in lots of different centres of research. We don't get the opportunity to share those practices and there will be more benefits to doing that.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>good practices emerge in lots of different centres of research. We don't get the opportunity to share those practices and there will be more benefits to doing that. Jane Winters' and others landscape study a year ago is good evidence of the needs in that respect. That was really looking at whether we need a national coordinated digital humanities thing, network, community or whatever.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>347</id>
+        <description>We've seen national centralised co-located research spaces, like the Turing Institute, the Crick, the Faraday and so on. There's a question as to whether there should be a national investment in a national facility to support the digital humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>If there's some kind of investment that digital humanities needs in institutions to take off and not every institution is in a position to do that, there's a question as to whether there should be a national investment in a national facility to support whatever that thing is. I mention this in the context of a number of investments like the Turing Institute, the [CRIT 0:23:40], the Faraday and so on. We've seen these national centralised co-located research spaces. It's a really interesting question as to whether we need something like that in digital humanities and in some way humanities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>348</id>
+        <description>There's a practice that's growing in the humanities that others can learn from: non-consumptive research. It's the idea instead of spending all your time getting hold of the data, cleaning it up and using it locally, you can run your analyses, do your data science, run your queries, over datasets where they're being hosted. This is prevalent in social science for secure data, it's quite prevalent in digital humanities for copyright protected data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>non-consumptive research. It's the idea instead of spending all your time getting hold of the data, cleaning it up and using it locally, you can run your analyses, do your data science, run your queries, over datasets where they're being hosted.
+            This is prevalent in social science for secure data. It's quite prevalent in digital humanities for copyright protected data. It isn't a model that other disciplines have really got their head around, except in the context of big data where the data is too big to shift it. That's a practice that's growing in the humanities that others can learn from.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>349</id>
+        <description>Everyone seems to be doing AI now. It's not, for me, an exciting new thing that's just about to happen. We can now do more with it than we could do before. That means increasing automation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>Everyone seems to be doing AI now. I didn't mention that when we talked about future trends, which is interesting. That's probably an omission and I could be told off by any one of my AI colleagues for that. That's because I just take it for granted and we've been doing it for ages anyway. It's not, for me, an exciting new thing that's just about to happen. We can now do more with it than we could do before. That means increasing automation and that's going to help all the things I talked about.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>350</id>
+        <description>There is a need to be aware of the dangers of AI. The more the infrastructure is doing the scholarship for us, the more it's applying its own lens, do we really know what we're doing anymore?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>we have to be aware of the dangers. The more the infrastructure is doing the scholarship for us, the more it's applying its own lens, do we really know what we're doing anymore? There's a whole philosophical discussion to have about that. It's certainly an assistive piece and assisting the human doing what humans are good at, which we're going to see more of.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>351</id>
+        <description>There is a need to be proactively looking at how the digital methods are improving the quality of research. There are multiple things going on. They're helping us do old things in new ways and they're helping us do slightly new things. At the same time, we need to keep our critical faculties applied to this process of research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>The question is whether that analysis also applies in digital humanities and whether we also need to be proactively looking at how the digital methods are improving the quality of research. There are multiple things going on. They're helping us do old things in new ways and they're helping us do slightly new things. At the same time, we need to keep our critical faculties applied to this process of research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>352</id>
+        <description>There's a need for a pervasive embrace of the digital methods. There are people who will never go digital, that's fine. There are people who see themselves as digital, that's fine. It's everyone in between who would benefit from using digital methods who don't need to call themselves digital humanists. That's the interesting territory where I'd like to see scholarly practice change.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>what I'd like to see happen in scholarship is there's a pervasive embrace of the digital methods. There are people who will never go digital, that's fine. There are people who see themselves as digital, that's fine. It's everyone in between who would benefit from using digital methods who don't need to call themselves digital humanists. That's the interesting territory where I'd like to see scholarly practice change.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>353</id>
+        <description>There's a need for an investment in the national DH community; training and early career researchers.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>A lot of it's about training, a lot of it's about early career researchers. Three things. Let's have an investment in the national DH community.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>354</id>
+        <description>Some things are starting to happen with the commercialisation or exploration of artificial intelligence for discovery and analysis, although there's not a lot of stuff in deployment that's truly serviceable at this point. AI, machine learning, semantic analysis, those are becoming more prevalent in the cultural heritage sector. At least at very large-scale enterprises, maybe less true at the individual library level though.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would argue that some of the things that are starting to happen in the space have to do with the commercialisation of semantic indexing technologies. The commercialisation or the exploration of artificial intelligence for discovery and analysis. I would not say there's a lot of stuff in deployment that's truly serviceable at this point.
+            I expect that as far as helping individual researchers or teams understand and use content, I would think AI techniques, machine learning techniques, semantic analysis, those are becoming more prevalent in the cultural heritage sector. At least at very large-scale enterprises, maybe less true at the individual library level though.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>355</id>
+        <description>Over the next several years there's going to be a greater expectation among researchers for technologies that can help them manage large corpora of material, help them make better use of them. Even if all content were to be open access tomorrow, you'd still have a vendor fight for the best discovery tools and the best analysis on top of that free content.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>What I'm feeling is that over the next several years there's going to be a greater expectation among researchers for technologies that can help them manage large corpora of material, help them make better use of them. Even if all content were to be open access tomorrow, you'd still have a vendor fight for the best discovery tools and the best analysis on top of that free content. I'm sensing a general need for scholars to have some tools like this at their hand.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>356</id>
+        <description>It's very hard to scale text and datamining services to a potentially infinite list of idiosyncratic needs. This is not so much a technology question, but a legal question, with content aggregation and helping researchers be able to aggregate content from multiple sources into a secure computing environment. Secure computing environments are really important for us, especially in the US, given we feel we've got a very clear claim in fair use under our copyright act to support text and datamining without reference to licences.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>what we've discovered is helping individual researchers in their text and datamining it's very hard to scale across a potentially infinite list of idiosyncratic needs from as many researchers as there might be. We find ourselves struggling with... This is not so much a technology question, but a legal question, with content aggregation and helping researchers be able to aggregate content from multiple sources into a secure computing environment.
+            Secure computing environments are really important for us, especially in the US, given we feel we've got a very clear claim in fair use under our copyright act to support text and datamining without reference to licences. For us, being able to provide deep security around unlicensed and copyright material to support a fair use of the collection is a really critical area we'll be investigating more.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>357</id>
+        <description>There is a need for a greater understanding of the potential for bias inherent in many of the algorithms.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>a greater embrace of user understanding or understanding of users in the development of AI and machine learning. A greater more in-depth understanding of the potential for bias that would be inherent in many of these algorithms has got to be a necessary part if we're going to be deploying semantic methods and machine learning techniques across corpora to help you as a researcher understand what's in there.
+            There have got to be ways to make clear to the public that are using these services what might be left out or how certain issues are getting maybe over-represented in results. Whether that's because of the techniques or because of the corpora that's being examined and what it might contain. I think more research. This is not a technological development but finding ways to make those biases a little bit more apparent and disclose them in ways that are understandable to end users I think is important.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>358</id>
+        <description>If there are going to be services that are of true value to scholars, libraries have to stop trying to own all of the infrastructure at the local level.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think what tends to happen in the cultural heritage sector is the technology side of the house will end up driving solutions without as much connection to the scholar side of things. I'm watching several conversations in the US right now where there are groups of libraries trying to figure out how to better rationalise the economic support for open access ___[0:14:44] open source software development. They're doing so by talking to each other without reference to this whole universe of open source software that's getting developed by the scholars on their campuses.
+            These tools will have some role for distributing, disseminating, making accessible original research or research products in the sciences, the humanities and social sciences. It's as if these things happen over in this other space and the libraries don't have anything to do with it. If there's going to be true scholarly... What am I trying to say? If there are going to be services that are of true value to scholars, libraries have to stop trying to own all of the infrastructure at the local level, I guess I would say.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>359</id>
+        <description>Digitisation has changed how scholarship is done today and how historical research is conducted. People use it so much that it's kind of invisible to them. In fact, it has fairly massively changed how scholarly knowledge is even understood, if the material is not accessible online, it's actually not getting used.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>One is that I think it's overlooked how much mass digitisation has changed how scholarship is done today and how historical research is conducted, I think it's taken for granted. I think that people use it so much that it's kind of invisible to them. In fact, it has fairly massively changed how scholarly knowledge is even understood. That means if the material is not accessible online, it's actually not getting used.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>360</id>
+        <description>Mass digitisation has been heavily driven by commercial agents and the library sector has not developed its own coherent strategy for historical reformatting of scholarly collections. There's not a concerted community strategy for funding or prioritisation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>the fact that mass digitisation has been driven so heavily be commercial agents means that the library sector, especially in the United States, has not developed its own coherent strategy for historical reformatting of scholarly collections. There's not a concerted community strategy for funding, not a concerted community strategy for prioritisation.
+            Instead, I think there are just lots of little drops in the bucket and waiting for publishers like Gale to show up and say, "We'll give you this money if we can digitise this collection from your library and make it accessible through our platform." That's one thing. I think essentially mass digitisation has changed everything, but libraries have been more passive at shaping how that would go.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>361</id>
+        <description>There's more consolidation, or market corrections in infrastructure services for the cultural heritage sector. There's been the start-up of too many smaller organisations that have similar missions around digital preservation and similar service offerings that don't all have compelling reasons to exist.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>while HathiTrust has been successful and there has been some other multi-institution or above the institution level infrastructure that's been developed for the cultural heritage sector. I think there's possibly been the start-up of too many smaller organisations that have similar missions around digital preservation and similar service offerings that don't all have compelling reasons to exist.
+            I'm starting to see in the United States the consolidation and even what I call market corrections in this space.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>362</id>
+        <description>There's a fear in my sector right now that public funding is going to end up retrenching even further back and it's going to start damaging our ability to really have a significant role in some of these issues in the cultural heritage sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>I sense some fear of economic retrenchment in the couple of years. I think between the unknowns of an unpredictable US administration that doesn't have a clear economic policy and the effect of Brexit in Europe and the unknown effects that's going to have. I think there's a bit of fear in my sector right now that public funding is going to end up retrenching even further back and it's going to start damaging our ability to really have a significant role in some of these issues in the cultural heritage sector.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>363</id>
+        <description>There's been an emergence, in the US in particular, of social justice interests in the library sector, pointing to gaps in the large corpora that have been made available for studying and computation. There are vendors that have been making a point of creating primary source collections around issues like African American history, African American newspapers and LGBTQ issues. You're not seeing that reflected in lots of openly available materials.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>One is in the emergence in the US in particular of social justice interests in the library sector. It's a welcome scholarship pointing to gaps in the large corpora that have been made available for studying and computation. There are vendors that have been making a point of creating primary source collections around issues like African American history, African American newspapers and LGBTQ issues. You're not seeing that reflected in lots of openly available materials.
+            One criticism that comes to the HathiTrust is that it's not as inclusive of underrepresented communities in the US as it might be. That has a lot to do with historical collecting interests, but it's an issue that's going to start playing out more over the next several years in terms of service development and service provision.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>364</id>
+        <description>There's been a significant amount of generational change that's over the last few years, a lot of retirement at very senior levels in libraries, in higher education and allied fields. Less experienced leaders are finding themselves in senior leadership roles now and it's important to be aware of how this generational change might affect these institutions and how these institutions will work together.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's a significant amount of generational change that's happened over the last few years. There's been a lot of retirement at very senior levels in libraries, in higher education and allied fields. As a result, less experienced leaders are finding themselves in senior leadership roles now because there are just not as many people available. I think it's important to be aware of how this generational change might affect these institutions these individuals will be leading, how these institutions will work together.
+            The generation that's been receding right now has had a lot to do with the start of getting the libraries into a digital space. What I'm seeing in my generation of leaders is they're definitely more engaged in reaching across the university to form partnerships with their academic collages. Trying to get the library seen as a partner with the sciences, the humanities and the social sciences in developing programmes of support for those scholars and their students.
+            What I'm not so sure about is how that will play out at above the institution level and will cultural heritage organisations continue to partner or be able to partner in ways that are meaningful going forward? If they don't, they're going to find themselves at the mercy of ___[0:22:49] solutions.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>365</id>
+        <description>We're starting to see diversification of library leadership, not just in terms of age but also in terms of ethnic and gender. At the very senior levels in men still tend to be the senior leaders, but we're starting to see that balance shift more. That's notable because it's generally a highly female profession.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>we're starting to see some diversification of library leadership, not just in terms of age but also in terms of ethnic and gender make up as well. At the very senior levels in libraries men still tend to be the senior leaders in libraries, but we're starting to see that balance shift more. That's notable because it's generally a highly female profession.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>366</id>
+        <description>There's a need more compelling storytelling about what libraries do in the contemporary era if we're going to continue to make a difference in higher education, the research sector, and the public sector as well. This ability to tell the story of what a library is and does is undervalued in the community and is still not one that we're very good at doing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>we continue to need more compelling storytelling about what libraries do in the contemporary era. We need storytelling that's about now and not about nostalgic representations of what libraries were when you were a kid. Not nostalgic representations of, "I always liked to read and I loved going to the library, so I love the library now."
+            I'll just cite a couple of examples in the US media right now where major magazines are consistently publishing articles about great discoveries in the archive. "Here's a Sylvia Plath story that was lost. Here's this photo archive that was going to get thrown away." These articles never once mention the acquisition of these collections by libraries. The fact the libraries have actually organised these materials and created discovery mechanisms, so that a researcher can come in and say, "That Sylvia Plath story was never published before." It's not the researcher who discovered that alone.
+            What we see instead are best-seller books about libraries and about fires in libraries that happened 35 or 40 years ago that are not telling the story of what libraries have become. This might seem completely out of leftfield from everything else I've been telling you. If we're going to continue to make a difference in higher education and in the research sector, we've got to continue to make a difference in the public sector as well. I feel like this ability to tell the story of what a library is and does is undervalued in my community and is still not one that we're very good at doing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>367</id>
+        <description>There's not the emergence of candid analysis that goes beyond the level of punditry, that gives us an opportunity to really understand what the costs are of sustaining research collections into the coming 20 years, 25 years.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>because of financial constraints, the closure of one organisation and the merger of other organisations. There are very good reasons you don't disclose all the financials of these things upfront and to the public and tell people how much money someone got paid for not doing a good job or something like that. There's not the emergence of a mode of candid analysis that goes beyond the level of punditry honestly or social media threading that gives us an opportunity to really understand what the costs are of sustaining research collections into the coming 20 years, 25 years. This is the closest we can get to forever, a generational timeline.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>368</id>
+        <description>There's an element of churn in the profession where things are changing so rapidly, we're actually having a hard time seeing what's changing in front of us sometimes.The fact that there is an important and critical element of revenue generation that has to be incorporated into our planning in the cultural heritage sector is not well understood because it's historically one that relies on public funding, relies on charitable gifts or relies on existing within a university where your budgets are coming to you every year.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>There's an academic side to that, but I think it's also an element of churn in the profession where things are changing so rapidly, we're actually having a hard time seeing what's changing in front of us sometimes. I feel like under-research, under-understood is the economics of the sector. The fact that there is existence of a very important and critical element of revenue generation that has to be incorporated into our planning in the library sector, in the cultural heritage sector. That's not well understood by the cultural heritage sector because it's historically one that relies on public funding, relies on charitable gifts or relies on existing within a university where your budgets are coming to you every year.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>369</id>
+        <description>Within the library community there is a tendency to view the commercial sector of the scholarly communication world with deep suspicion and with good reason. It makes the library community sceptical of anything that looks like revenue generation. It's very easy for an organisation which supports access to collections, to be thought of like a vendor, to be thought of as something one subscribes to.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV032</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think that there is within the library community such a tendency to view the commercial sector of the scholarly communication world with deep suspicion and with good reason. Some sectors, for sure, with very good reason. It makes the library community sceptical of anything that looks like revenue generation. I would just say it's very easy for an organisation like mine, which supports access to collections, to be thought of like a vendor, to be thought of as something one subscribes to.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>370</id>
+        <description>Using the cloud has been a recent development and will have a big impact in the future.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>the recent development and there's a big impact in the future, the extension of using the cloud.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>371</id>
+        <description>Traditionally the humanities is a sector where people work in isolation, the opening and faciliting the sharing of ideas is an interesting pattern.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>So open this and the facilitating, the situation of ideas is an interesting [pattern]. This is particularly relevant in the humanities. Traditionally, a sector where people work in isolation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>372</id>
+        <description>We are facing a similar change in scholarly publishing as the first scientific journals, not only the sharing the results, but also what has happened from the beginning. So sharing that data, sharing all the activities that came before arriving at the results.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>Nowadays, probably we are facing similar change in methodology and not only the results, but also what has happened from the beginning. So sharing that data, sharing all the activities that came before arriving to the results.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>373</id>
+        <description>The psychology is changing, and as the younger people supercede the older generation, there will be more willingness to embrace cloud technologies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>psychology is changing and these numbers also show that there is a technological barrier which comes from some ___[0:07:29] and also by an older generation, which are progressively superseded by younger people and that is really ___.
+            So this will also move ahead the numbers of those who were working in this way.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>374</id>
+        <description>The attention of funders and policy makers is desperately needed. There must be a movement coming from the humanities in particular, showing that the lack of attention and pushing 'science' may eventually increase the gap and produce a digital divide in the research world.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>The third thing which is desperately needed is the attention of funders and policy makers.
+            They either ___[0:08:04] the last concept. For example, I simply heard that the forthcoming developments of ___ have decided to postpone the so-called [long tail] of science. The long tail of science is an expression used to define all the researchers and the research fields in which data has been researched, is at present, less relevant.
+            This, of course, is the humanities. These are like the government which decides to support only rich citizens and ignore the poor ones. This may lead to disaster at the end of the day. So I think there must be a movement coming from the humanities in particular, and I'm working on ___[0:09:09] applications.
+            From the sector showing that the lack of attention and pushing only on the so called 'science' may eventually increase the gap and produce a digital divide in the research world.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>375</id>
+        <description>There is a growing social pressure for disclosing scientific results, not only in a publication when they're done, but also during the work. Scientists in this domain feel to be accountable for the money they receive for the research they produce.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>It relates to social pressure for disclosing the ___. The scientific results, not only [is there an exhibition] or publication when they're done, but also during the work, usually, the research activity- this comes from, well, mainly from outside because I think that what is happening now is that scientists in this domain feel to be accountable for the money they receive for the research they produce.
+            So somebody still doing some [exothermic 0:11:03] on a little-known writer or working on some item which is little relevance, for example, like [theologists] studying specific features some less important characteristics and this is a society that discusses this kind of study and so people are more socially responsible for what they are doing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>376</id>
+        <description>Openness might change the perspective that people have on archaeology; It is also easier to explain why the roadworks will continue for two weeks more because the archaeologists are studying something they discovered.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>they might change the perspective that people have- ___[0:12:28]. So I could [only stand] the more [Indiana Jones] and on the other hand, there are no more other people who stop public works because they had to study some small remain from the... why the ___ commercial sense [or a new motorway]. It's more important to the people than the past.
+            So there is a greater attitude towards social responsibility of this kind of research activity. It is also easier to explain why the ___[0:13:16] will continue for two weeks more because the ___ studying something they discovered and stopped because of [construction of the new motorway].</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>377</id>
+        <description>There is a need for a different political attitude towards this sector. It's not just a place to make money from selling tickets. It's a place for helping- for supporting the understanding by people of their identities in the modern world.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>this will also be easier to- different political attitude towards this sector. ___[0:15:14] is not just a place to make money from selling tickets. It's a place for helping- for supporting the understanding by people of their identity, of their identities, let's say, in the modern world.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>378</id>
+        <description>The most important change that is required in scholarly practice is the recognition of collaborative work. Unfortunately, in the academy, the evaluation of a promising career is still based on old concepts and old ways of doing things.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>the main change to scholarly practice is the recognition of work done in this way. Unfortunately, in the academy, the evaluation and the career, promising a career still is based on old concepts and old ways of doing things.
+            So unless this changes quickly, it does not payback to behaviour in a new way to do new things. So recognition, in my opinion, is the most important change that is required</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>379</id>
+        <description>We must find a new way to communicate. Communication based on publication and the related activities and methods needs to change because they are no longer sustainable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>we must find a new way to communicate. I mean, ___[0:19:04] communication is based on publication and the related activities and methods. These needs to change because they are no more sustainable.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>380</id>
+        <description>Openness can be a good thing or a very bad thing. You see this happening every day on the internet, where everybody pretends to be an expert and there is an overflow of fake news.There's a risk that this may also happen also in academic practice if the community control on what is published does not find new ways of checking that openness does not negatively impact on quality.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>Openness by itself can be a good thing or a very bad thing. You see this happening every day on the internet, really, where everybody pretends to be an expert and there is an overflow of fake news.
+            The risk is that this may happen also in academic practice if the community control on what is published does not find new ways of checking that openness does not negatively impact on quality.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>381</id>
+        <description>There is a need to give young researchers the possibility of working without having to care how they will get their salary next month. Researching is a difficult activity and you must have the brain and the heart free from other concerns, as much as possible.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV007</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is, in my opinion, a need for giving young researchers the possibility of working without having to care necessarily how they will get their salary next month.
+            Researching is a difficult activity and you must have the brain and the heart free from other concerns, as much as possible. Unfortunately, it's not possible because everybody has personal problems but, some [personal 0:22:11] problems cannot be solved by others.
+            A few personal problems can be solved by others so providing a safe environment for these people and let them work freely without having to continue the look for a position or for a salary next month.
+            Probably this is less relevant in countries where there is different- well, there are more opportunities and the research ___[0:22:54] market is more dynamic.
+            So mobility is not an issue if everybody is moving. Mobility is a big issue if the market is static and so you must start- when you get a one-year position, you must immediately start thinking of how you wish to revive it next year.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>382</id>
+        <description>New capture and display technologies have been having a big impact, 2D photography but mainly in the area of 3D or special types of visualisation. The introduction of the IIIF standard.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>new capture and display technologies and then, let's say, [2D 0:02:39] photography but mainly in the area of 3D or special types of visualisation. The introduction of the IIIF standard.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>383</id>
+        <description>Small technological innovations are also having an impact, like Pixel Plus which aims to integrate different kinds of formats for a very specific viewing technique for clay tablets. This technology should open collections recorded in different formats throughout the world to be accessed as one larger collection.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>small technological innovations like, I'm in a small project called Pixel Plus which aims to integrate different kinds of formats for a very specific viewing technique for [clay tablets 0:03:19], ___ tablets.
+            This technology should open the collections now, recorded in different formats throughout the world to be accessed as one larger collection.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>384</id>
+        <description>Digital technology like Wikipedia and social media causes a museum to break down its walls, to give access to more than what's in display in the galleries. Although engagement with this varies in maturity.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>Yes, Wikipedia and social media, they are partly technical, of course. Partly they are not. (Laughter) In any case, digital technology causes a museum to break down its walls. To give access to more than what's in display in the galleries. Sometimes, we're still in a very immature state. Sometimes, mature.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>385</id>
+        <description>How we preserve all this digital information and digital heritage is still often a bit overlooked. How do we ensure that what's being digitised now will be digitized for a longer period? What technologies and procedures will be put in place to update the digital information and also what kind of backwards technology should be used in order to be able to use this digital information to its full extent?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>one of the things I think is a bit overlooked at this stage is, how do we preserve all this digital information and digital heritage? Of course, there has been much improvement since work started somewhere in the late '80s and early '90s but that's only maybe 20 years ago.
+            I think it's fair to say there's hardly any document or documentation left from that era, in digital form, which is still readable or accessible. So how do we ensure that what's being digitised now will be digitized for a longer period? What technologies and procedures will be put in place to update the digital information and also what kind of backwards technology should be used in order to be able to use this digital information to its full extent? Specific viewing cards, etc.
+            They should be maintained or there should be a solution in order to be able to access such kinds of information in the future like emulation or similar. That's something I do not hear a lot of in my talks to colleagues.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>386</id>
+        <description>There's clearly digital savvy curators and the not-so-savvy curators. There's a need for a lot of policy making and rethinking of how the museum is organised and how curators, researchers etc., do their work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's clearly the IT or digital savvy curator and the not-so-savvy curator. In my museum, I see digital has not become a policy, as such, yet. I know, for example, in the UK that's much more the case. Here in Belgium, we're still a bit behind.
+            If you change- refer that to your question, then I think that there's need for a lot of policy making and rethinking of how the museum is organised and how curators, researchers etc., do their work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>387</id>
+        <description>There is a need for a balancing between open access culture and proprietary systems. Mechanisms for ensuring links between cultural heritage institutions and social media sites like Wikipedia. How do you make sure that this information is updated without any interference from museum personnel.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>balancing between open access culture and proprietary systems. I mean proprietary as saying a museum website is some kind of source.
+            Yes, how do other systems make use of that? Mechanisms for ensuring links between cultural heritage institutions and social media sites like Wikipedia. How do you make sure that this information is updated without any interference from museum personnel.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>388</id>
+        <description>IPR is still a big question. A lot of the developments are hampered by IPR legislation which is contrary to the aims we want to achieve.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>IPR is still a big question. I think a lot of the developments, also the EU is looking for the use of culture and heritage is hampered by IPR legislation which, in fact, is contrary to the aims we want to achieve.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>389</id>
+        <description>There is a need for speed and urgency. Digital cultural heritage develops rather slowly. If you look at Europeana, for example, how slowly but consistently it developed and matured, but it's too slow. That's partly because a lot of work being done in all these groups and taskforces in Europe are more or less volunteer work, and also because the Europe Commission does not have a real strategy on culture.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>speed and urgency. It seems that culture and heritage develops rather slow. Digital cultural heritage develops rather slow. If you look at Europeana, for example, how slowly but consistently it developed and matured, but it's too slow.
+            That's partly because a lot of work being done in all these groups and taskforces in Europe are more or less volunteer work which has, by its nature, a slowness and volunteer work lacks the urgency which is probably needed to really step up the speed and gain some urgency, reflecting on that also because Europe, as such, does not have a real strategy on culture. Or the European Commission, I mean.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>390</id>
+        <description>About 10 years ago there was the idea that culture was an instrument of understanding each other in Europe. I wonder if that's still the case today.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>About 10 years ago, when Europeana was founded, it was the idea that the culture was an instrument of understanding each other in Europe. That certainly has worked.
+            It's a bit... I wonder if that's still the case today. Though I do not have any answer on that but I feel that society and Europe, especially, the last two years have changed with that... erm... culture as an instrument has probably changed. It did work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>391</id>
+        <description>10 years ago international cooperation between culture and heritage and institution was very limited or almost non-existent in comparison to now. That is something to last, continuing and profound cooperation will be the future. Maybe it would be a good idea if culture or culture and heritage is supported more strongly from the point of view of the European Commission.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>10 years ago, international cooperation between culture and heritage and institution was very limited or almost non-existent in comparison to now.
+            So the first thing you would do now is work internationally, either in collections or in exhibitions but also in all kinds of research. Going on to question number eight, I think that is something to last, continuing and profound cooperation will be the future. Maybe it would be a good idea if culture or culture and heritage is supported more strongly from the point of view of the European Commission.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>392</id>
+        <description>There's more long-term planning needed by government, by international programmes. The development of a longer study, strategic view which can be worked upon. More projects similar to PARTHENOS Foresight where the commission asks professionals in culture and heritage what do they see and what their needs are.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's more long-term planning needed by government, by international programmes. The development of a longer study, strategic view which can be worked upon. Also, the ___[0:18:01] something like that is happening because your project and your questions and other events I've been lately, have sent many- attended many discussions which were along these lines, where the commission was really asking, let's say the professionals in culture and heritage, what do they see and what their needs are.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>393</id>
+        <description>There's a lot of strategic planning, and also some demonstrations and involvement, to show researchers that they can do the work differently than they used to do.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's a lot of strategic planning and also some demonstrations and involvement in order to show the researchers that they can do the work differently than they used to do.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>394</id>
+        <description>The curricular of all kinds of culture and heritage studies, the whole idea of digital humanities, needs far more attention in education. The next generation of professionals in culture and heritage will be equipped with the right knowledge to put the ICT or the digital to use much more than today.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV035</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would think that in the curricular of all kinds of culture and heritage studies, the whole idea of digital humanities which is only about four or five years old - well, maybe I'm exaggerating - but that needs far more attention in education. I think the next generation of professionals in culture and heritage will be equipped with the right knowledge to put the ICT or the digital to use in culture and heritage much more than now, my colleagues today.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>395</id>
+        <description>For many culture institutions it is important to have a second or a third place to store its collection. It is not obvious that all of them are storing all the files safely.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>For many culture institutions it is important to have a second or a third place to store its collection. This is maybe not about developments, technology developments, but it's more about safety of our digital recordings, and how we keep them. We try to reach different organisations that are responsible for storing quite big units of digital assets.
+            One of them is a National Audiovisual Institute, which is an organisation that is part of our Ministry of Culture and Heritage. We want to collaborate and work with this institution to share our digital repository to keep it safe. This is not that obvious that in the museum field institutions are doing that. I mean, all of them wish too, but sometimes because of lack of money, or time, or because in Poland we have a museum boom, so many different institutions are being organised now, but they are now working on making themselves professional. This is not obvious that all of them are storing safely all the files, so this is one thing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>396</id>
+        <description>Another thing that we are dealing with now at our museum is how to share, for instance, our oral history collection. We have a collection of oral history interviews, and they are not that easy to store, and they are not that easy to disseminate and also to be published online as they are. These are audio files or video files. We are dealing with this issue on how to make them accessible for the audience online.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>Another thing that we are dealing with now at our museum is how to share, for instance, our oral history collection, because especially the Polish Righteous website is based on oral history collections. I will probably talk more about oral history as a method or a methodologically in the third part of the interview.
+            But, we have maybe not that impressive as the USC Shoah Foundation collection, but we do have a collection of oral history interviews, and they are not that easy to store, and they are not that easy to disseminate and also to be published online as they are. These are audio files or video files. We are dealing with this issue on how to make them accessible for the audience online.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>397</id>
+        <description>What would be helpful is to have Open Source programs that I can use to develop a platform for putting collections online.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>What would be helpful, obviously, for me as a person coming from this museum environment, is to have Open Source programs that I can use to develop such a platform.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>398</id>
+        <description>It is really important tohave a good team of people on both sides, so those who are into thehumanities and are museologists, and IT programmers, who will be willing to understand what are the needs of people working in a cultural institution.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>what is really important is to somehow have a good team of people on both sides, so those who are into humanist, those who are museologists, and IT programmers, who will be willing to understand what are the needs of people working in a cultural institution. I think such developments, which might sound quite basic, are now the most important,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>399</id>
+        <description>Some technical applications turn out to be not that successful. Our museum had a few failures designing, for instance, an application for tourists so they can have a walk in Jewish Warsaw. People just didn't use it. They didn't use it not because it was designed in a really bad way, but because they don't have such habits.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>in this field of for instance, I don't know, different applications, different websites that were failures. Some commercial solutions that came out to be not that successful. Definitely in the museum market we noticed such ___[0:11:54] that even if we tried to catch some new developments, if it comes to item sharing knowledge in an interesting way, it is not that easy for us.
+            Our museum had a few failures designing, for instance, I don't know, an application for tourists so they can have a walk in Jewish Warsaw, for instance, and people just didn't use it. They didn't use it not because it was designed in a really bad way, because it wasn't, but because they don't have such habits.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>400</id>
+        <description>People use our websites. It doesn't sound that fashionable as it could be, but in fact this is what people like, and this is what they are expecting from us.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>People use these websites. We have over 1m visitors per year, only on those two websites. This is a lot, in fact, for the Institution of Culture as for something that is for free and is about sharing knowledge, and it's not about, I don't know, pornography, which could be definitely more, I don't know, disseminated. We are sharing knowledge about Polish Jews. It doesn't sound that fashionable as it could be, but in fact this is what people like, and this is what they are expecting from us.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>401</id>
+        <description>We don't use hi-definition orVR technology our museum. Although we are full of audiovisual units, we are quite a traditional museum in this aspect of sharing knowledge on the Internet.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>We are, I would say, quite traditional in our institution. We don't use, I don't know, hi-definition, so-called hi-touch. Are you familiar with this technology, or some VR technology? Such things, we don't use them in our museum. Although we are full of audiovisual units, for instance, our current exhibition is full of audiovisual footage and presentations; we are, I would say, quite a traditional museum in this aspect of sharing knowledge on the Internet.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>402</id>
+        <description>Stable finances for the Institution of Culture, and long-term financial guarantees are required. It is not good for us to lose people and to have different people working on this website. Creating a team of people committed to their work is important.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>stable finances for Institution of Culture, which has every year planning. This is important to have such a perspective that we will have money next year. It's not always obvious in the Institution of Culture, and to keep the websites, for instance, secure, we need money. We need a web page and IT staff, and today is a day that two of our colleagues from the IT department are leaving the museum, and we are obviously looking for new people to employ.
+            But this is not a good condition for us as a department, to lose people and to have different people working on this website. Here, again, creating a team of people who would be committed to their work is important.
+            Long-term financial guarantees, this is again important.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>403</id>
+        <description>Open Source programs are required. On the one hand it is easier to support because there are more IT programmers on the market who can help you to maintain the website if there is a space on the Open Source program, but on the other hand, it's much easier to prepare for instance for a hacker attack on such Open Source program. So it has good and bad sides.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>Open Source programs, but here again, it's not that easy sometimes to support. Because on the one hand it is easier to support because there are more IT programmers on the market who can help you to maintain the website if there is a space on the Open Source program. But on the other hand, it's much easier to prepare for instance for a hacker attack on such Open Source program, so it has good and bad sides.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>404</id>
+        <description>There is an atmosphere of fake news, and the media, Polish media definitely, are not a reliable source of information any more.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>most difficult for us, people who are disseminating knowledge, which is supposed to be reliable information, is to deal with an atmosphere of fake news, and the fact that media, Polish media definitely, are not a reliable source of information any more.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>405</id>
+        <description>Fake news has created a chance for us as a museum. People can come to us, to our institution, to search for reliable information, at least if it comes to the context of history of Polish Jews.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>Definitely this is the biggest challenge on how to make our work at the museum reliable, so people can open our website, read an article, and they know this is prepared in a good way.
+            This is not that easy anymore, because many institutions in Poland lost their authority, lost their good, maybe opinion, so definitely the political situation and the situation around media and what happened to media, also the public media, and different institutions that are supposed to serve the society, but they do not nowadays.
+            In fact, it created a kind of chance for us as a museum, so people can come to us, to our institution, to search for reliable information, at least if it comes to the context of history of Polish Jews.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>406</id>
+        <description>Hate speech is ubiquitous on the Internet now, even on our own platforms.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>hate speech, which is ubiquitous, I think everywhere on the Internet now. But, obviously in the context of history of Jews in Poland, we are sometimes observing hate speech even on our own platforms. In fact it's very ___[0:23:16] to chase. For instance, the police is not that eager, I would say, on the one hand. On the other hand, I think this is somehow related to poor, I would say, law regulations in Poland. This is not that easy to chase somebody for hate speech, and also to somehow prove that this is hate speech.
+            Fake news manipulating information and hate speech, I think these are the factors that definitely affect our sector of people who are sharing knowledge.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>407</id>
+        <description>Poland is a country that is developing, developing rapidly, but culture is not the most important good. Poland has to be a richer country.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>Culture is still, in Poland, I think we are dealing with this fact that we are a country that is developing. We are developing rapidly, but still, in the case of different needs, it's always this way that government is willing to give more money for, let's say, medical issues than culture. Culture is not the most important good. I think Poland has to be a richer country.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>408</id>
+        <description>It is important to keep the standards, so the documentation prepared during the struggles will be good enough to be published on the website. Obviously, we have some special specific standards, where we consult with experts on conservation, experts on photography.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>The most important is just to keep the standards, so the documentation prepared during the struggles will be good enough to be published on the website. Obviously, we have some special specific standards, where we consult with experts on conservation, experts on photography. This is what we do. Basically, again, nothing I would say new.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>409</id>
+        <description>In a Polish context it's not about methodology, it's more about interpretation of the history. So far this interpretation of the history, which is quite often based on brutal politics, didn't reshape the information we are preparing here at this museum. We believe we are just providing people with facts, and understand they can build their own opinion on different events in the history. I hope we will continue this way. I hope that we still will be a trustable, reliable place for people to come and to learn what the holocaust was about,</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>in a Polish context it's not about methodology, but again, it's more about interpretation of the history. I mentioned the clash we have between political parties and the people in Poland, so the clash, obviously, is taking place between different colours, and definitely there is a clash in Poland if it comes to the history of holocaust in Poland, and different groups of scholars that approach the history of holocaust differently.
+            I guess the most difficult topic is so-called contribution of part of the Polish society within the holocaust, which is all the time provoking political commotion and sometimes diplomatic crisis. We used to have one a year ago between Poland and Israel. So far, this interpretation of the history, which is quite often based on brutal politics, didn't reshape the information we are preparing here at this museum. We believe we are just providing people with facts, and understand they can build their own opinion on different events in the history.
+            I hope we will continue this way. I hope that we still will be a trustable, reliable place for people to come and to learn what the holocaust was about,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>410</id>
+        <description>What is really needed now is to change the discourse, our standards of communication. We can disagree on things, but we have to do it in a cultured way, and what is even more important is we should be willing to talk to each other. Sometimes even a basic conversation is impossible now, because of the polarisation of the society.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>what is really needed now is to change the discourse. Again, I am returning to hate speech, and this division of the society, of the Polish society. This is something that is also reflected in this scholarship environment. I think what we really need to do in Poland now is to change our standards of communication. We can disagree on things, but we have to do it in a cultured way, and what is even more important is we should be willing to talk to each other. Now sometimes, even a basic conversation is impossible, because of the polarisation of the society,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>411</id>
+        <description>People should become more empathic to each other, more willing to work on some neutral standards of communication. Maybe if our political scene would be more diverse it would be easier to happen, because people would have to communicate.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>People should become more empathic to each other, more willing to work on some neutral standards of communication. But how to make it happen? How to make it happen?
+            Maybe if our political scene would be more diverse it would be easier to happen, because people would have to communicate.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>412</id>
+        <description>It is very for us to use social media, but carefully. Quite often we have paid for some commercials, and people stay for instance, on Facebook instead of going to our websites. Then they have discussions on Facebook quite often using hate speech, so this is a difficult situation for us, in which we are in a kind of clash. On the one hand we want to promote ourselves, but we see sometimes poor results of our promotion.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV038</provenance>
+        <quotation>as a museum, it's very important for us to use social media. But again carefully, because quite often we have paid for some commercials, and people stay for instance, on Facebook instead of going to our websites. Then they have discussions on Facebook quite often using hate speech, so this is a difficult situation for us, in which we are in a kind of clash. On the one hand we want to promote ourselves, but we see sometimes poor results of our promotion.
+            The movement, the stream of people is not directed to our website. It stays on the social media, quite often provoking some hate speech behaviours of some of the users.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>413</id>
+        <description>Funding is tighter, and competition is fiercer.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Funding tighter, competition fiercer.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>414</id>
+        <description>Subscriptions for journals cut, access to funding is a social issue.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Subscriptions for journals cut, access to funding is a social issue.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>415</id>
+        <description>OA expensive and time consuming.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>OA expensive and time consuming.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>416</id>
+        <description>Cultural consideration|For example, Picture of sacred Inuit costume design in a learned publication being used by a Fashion Designer and upsetting the Inuit community.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>cultural consideration. [Example of Picture of sacred Inuit costume design in a learned publication being used by a Fashion Designer and upsetting the Inuit community].</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>417</id>
+        <description>There's a challenge of digitally preserving data in the long term.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Challenge of digitally preserving data in the long term.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>418</id>
+        <description>There's a need to educate people that they don't have to give their rights away.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Educate people that they don't have to give their rights away.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>419</id>
+        <description>It can be difficult to get DOIs as there is a limited no. of journals for Theatre.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>difficult to get DOIs as there is a limited no. of journals for Theatre.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>420</id>
+        <description>Non-digital humanists need to be digital or die! |Important barrier is that we are a community that uses technology. Humanists who don't use these tools are marginalised.
+            * DH tools vs methods - classical researchers won't start using statistics.
+            * Problem of Smug DH</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Non-digital humanists - how to get message through?
+            * One view is that they need to be digital or die!</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>421</id>
+        <description>Introduce digital competences into courses and education.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>introduce digital competences into courses and education.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>422</id>
+        <description>More data enrichment needed.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>more data enrichment needed</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>423</id>
+        <description>Dynamic docs online.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Dynamic docs online</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>424</id>
+        <description>The humanities need to work together with other fields.|We should also look at other fields e.g. science where data publication is normal and acceptable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Work together with other fields,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>425</id>
+        <description>There's a lack of infrastructure</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lack of infrastructure</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>426</id>
+        <description>There's still a need to digitise primary sources in some disciplines and countries.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>digitise primary sources</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>427</id>
+        <description>A lot of technical support required.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lot of support needed with tech stuff,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>428</id>
+        <description>There's a fear of black box techology, for example, with the cloud.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Fear of black box tech</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>429</id>
+        <description>It's not easy to convince people to use standards and tools.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Not easy to convince people to use standards and tools</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>430</id>
+        <description>There needs to be a better understanding of licensing and service use.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Understand licences, service use better.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>431</id>
+        <description>There needs to be more centres and meeting points for researchers and technologists.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_SB_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>more centres and meeting points for researchers and technologists. DARIAH is a meeting point for communicating.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>432</id>
+        <description>Access to tools, services, expertise can become more fluid.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>access to tools, services, expertise can be more fluid</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>433</id>
+        <description>Is Digital Humanities becoming more democratized, or new silos?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Is DH becoming more democratised, or new silos?</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>434</id>
+        <description>Mission-based funding is prioritised, tied to sustainable development goals.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Mission-based funding prioritised, tied to sustainable development goals.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>435</id>
+        <description>The nearest horizon is open science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Nearest horizon is open science.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>436</id>
+        <description>There is a dislike of the word data because there are perceived to be better/more nuanced words.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>We don't like the word data because we like better/more nuanced words.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>437</id>
+        <description>There is a problem of shared ownership when sharing resources - one doesn't necessarily own the sources one uses.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>The problem of shared ownership - one doesn't necessarily own the sources one uses.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>438</id>
+        <description>The future of DH isn't about technology, it's about adapting the strengths that we already have to the opportunities we encounter.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>the future of DH isn't about technology, it's about adapting the strengths that we already have to the opportunities we encounter.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>439</id>
+        <description>Research software facilitates modern research, access to and use of data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Research software - facilitates modern research, access to and use of data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>440</id>
+        <description>There's a lack of communication between developers, researchers, scholars, projects, data centers, libraries andarchives</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lack of communication between: devs, researchers, scholars, projects, data centers, libraries/archives</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>441</id>
+        <description>There is movement towards humanities at scale, with the development of best practice guidelines and documentation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Humanities at scale - working with CESTA and CLARIN to create guidelines/best practices, documentation/testing, continuous everything, reviews/standards</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>442</id>
+        <description>Software should be recognized as a research output.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>software as research output</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>443</id>
+        <description>Re-usable software is necessary for a sustainable infrastructure.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>re-usable software for a sustainable infrastructure</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>444</id>
+        <description>Standards are required from research institutes.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>standards and requirements from the RIs</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>445</id>
+        <description>Software training and education is required in digital humanities curricula.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>training and education in DH curricular</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>446</id>
+        <description>There's an uneven distribution of resources between the humanities and other fields.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Uneven distribution of resources, humanists can't 'pay-to-play', socio-politicalimbalances</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>447</id>
+        <description>There is a trend in making open access created in libraries and universities (DIY OA) standards-compliant, and improving infrastructure.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Promising trends in making open access created in libs and universities (DIY OA) standards-compliant, and improving infrastructure</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>448</id>
+        <description>The start of services to make new software/systems.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>The start of services to make new software/systems.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>449</id>
+        <description>There's a growing distinction between infrastructure funding and research funding.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>A growing distinction between infrastructure funding and research funding</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>450</id>
+        <description>New regimes of access that follow cultural protocols need to emerge.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>New regimes of access that need to follow cultural protocols need to emerge</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>451</id>
+        <description>The long-term preservation of data is required.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>long-term preservation of data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>452</id>
+        <description>Hybrid approaches that mix commercia publication.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>We should provide hybrid approaches that mix commercia publication.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>453</id>
+        <description>OA is underpinned by legal issues.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Underpinning of OA by legal issues</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>454</id>
+        <description>Perverse incentives in publication are brought on by national funders/consortia.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Perverse incentives in publication brought on by national funders/consortia.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>455</id>
+        <description>There is adivide between DH and non-digital humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Divide between DH and non-digital humanities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>456</id>
+        <description>Digital humanists are too proud of themselves, ascribing an elite station to the digital humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>We are too proud of ourselves - close door to others - ascribe elite station to DH</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>457</id>
+        <description>There needs to be a segmentation of future DH strategy - different regions, different answers.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Segmentation of future DH strategy - different regions, different answers</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>458</id>
+        <description>Communications and sharing need to be a top priority for the humanties.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Communications and sharing are top priority</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>459</id>
+        <description>There's the potential for the introduction of data-enriched publications.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_JSnotes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Introduction of data-enriched publications.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>460</id>
+        <description>Open access for publications implies open data underpinning the research outputs.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Open access for publications implies to open data underpinning the research outputs.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>461</id>
+        <description>There's a gap between ideal data practice and real data practice.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Ideal world vs real world</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>462</id>
+        <description>There's a fear of data sharing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Fear is the path to the dark side...
+            "Data sharing is a bit like going to the dentist. We can all agree that it is a good thing to do and intrinsic to good scientific practice. In reality, however, researchers tend to view data sharing with a mix of fear, contempt, and dread.", Felicia LeClere, 2010.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>463</id>
+        <description>Open data increases your research impact and visibility</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Increase your research impact and visibility</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>464</id>
+        <description>Open data preserves data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Preserve your data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>465</id>
+        <description>Open data ensures higher quality data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Ensure higher quality data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>466</id>
+        <description>Open data creates new collaborations.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Create new collaborations</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>467</id>
+        <description>Open data maximise transparency and accountability.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>Maximise transparency and accountability</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>468</id>
+        <description>Researchers need to be trained in data practice.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>So Arts and Humanities researchers need
+            to be trained and reassured,
+            to have access to guidelines and best practices,
+            to use tools that will help them to manage and share their data,
+            to be supported when they want open their data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>469</id>
+        <description>Researchers need national and international infrastructures.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>National and international infrastructures</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>470</id>
+        <description>"Standards are a key to great digital research"</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS1_PurenSlides</provenance>
+        <quotation>"Standards are a key to great digital research,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>471</id>
+        <description>FAIR principles - everyone tries to apply them but uses differnet approaches.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>FAIR principles - everyone tries to apply it but uses differnet approaches.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>472</id>
+        <description>There's digital colonisation, for example, infrastructure and metadataonly in privileged places, e.g. PARTHENOS, not across the community.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Digital colonisation e.g. infrastructure, metadata but only in privileged places e.g. PARTHENOS. Not across the community.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>473</id>
+        <description>There's not enough resources for growing digitisation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Not enough resources for growing digitisation</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>474</id>
+        <description>The Twitter hashtag #DigitalHumanities produces a lot of useful data for the future analysis for trends etc, but it's not recognised as a source of research and not kept.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Twitter hashtag DH produces a lot of useful data for the future analysis for trends etc. Not recognised as a source of research - not kept.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>475</id>
+        <description>It may be that technologies can't deal with the variation in Digital Humanities information, so the technologies are not taken up as quickly as in area such as Physics.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>In Physics, already use maths so computers taken up quickly. In the Humanities, it's not the same. Maybe it's because the technologies can't deal with DH information (which is very varied).</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>476</id>
+        <description>Cultural Heritage is not required to produce exact results - an archaeologist may not use the same epistemistology.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>CH is not required to produce exact results - an archaeologist may not use the same epistemistology.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>477</id>
+        <description>Maths is a common language so the same ground needs to be covered in the Digital Humanities, but it is unclear whether humanists willing to go this way,</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Maths is a common language so the same ground needs to be covered in the DH. Are Humanists willing to go this way? Is there a language that allows Humanists to say things clearly? We need to define the language first. Concept, parameters need agreeing</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>478</id>
+        <description>There is an ideological barrier -human vs. robot - and the "Old dies hard."</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>There is an ideological barrier - e.g. human vs. robot.
+            "Old dies hard."</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>479</id>
+        <description>Humanists need to know how the black box works, i.e. how to analyse the results, the underlying assumptions and the limitations of the tools.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Humanists need to know how the black box works, i.e. how to analyse the results, the underlying assumptions and the limitations of the tools.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>480</id>
+        <description>The new generation will adopt digital tools, but it's not happening yet.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>The new generation will adopt digital tools (and many of the issues will go away) .. but not happening yet.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>481</id>
+        <description>Younger people have a much better appreciation of how technology is embedded.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Younger people have a much better appreciation of how technology is embedded.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>482</id>
+        <description>Ideological harmonisation between sciences and arts, stop dividing knowledge in this way.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Idealogical harmonisation between sciences and arts, stop dividing knowledge in this way.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>483</id>
+        <description>There's a bias to sharing positive results and not negative ones.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Bias to sharing positive results and not negative ones.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>484</id>
+        <description>We need to strongly incentivise people to publish their data, making it FAIR and open.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Strongly incentivise people to publish their data... making it FAIR, open.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>485</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities is "hip and happening"; adoption is probably widespread.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Digital Humanities is "hip and happening"; adoption is probably widespread;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>486</id>
+        <description>There is increased political pressure to demonstrate the value of Humanities research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>There is increased political pressure to demonstrate the value of Humanities research;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>487</id>
+        <description>There are a lot of digital humanities initiatives. Support by technology must be top-notch.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>There are a lot of digital humanities initiatives. Support by technology must be top-notch;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>488</id>
+        <description>Not everyone is necessarily enticed by using digital methods.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Not everyone is necessarily enticed by using digital methods;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>489</id>
+        <description>Technology is perceived as a threat by some.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Technology perceived as a threat by some</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>490</id>
+        <description>Humanities research is struggling with a quantitative valorisation scheme; DH research is very much qualitative.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Humanities research is struggling with a quantitative valorisation scheme; (D)H research is very much qualitative;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>491</id>
+        <description>Institutions are not always accommodating to digital research; technology is out-dated or lacking.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>institutions are not always accommodating to digital research. Technology is out-dated or lacking</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>492</id>
+        <description>We borrow technology from other fields which is not tailored towards Digital Humanities research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>We borrow technology from other fields (accounting or...) which is not tailored towards Digital Humanities research</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>493</id>
+        <description>People keep running away of Digital Humanities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>People keep running away of Digital Humanities;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>494</id>
+        <description>People are afraid that their work will be stolen.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>People are afraid that their work is used by someone else (stolen);</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>495</id>
+        <description>The value of the humanities is harder to demonstrate than STEM fields.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Humanities harder to demonstrate that STEM fields</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>496</id>
+        <description>Velocity of change in DH is lagging behind technological change in society. A lot of work done by hand means wasted time, and people who could be interviewed dying in the mean-time.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Velocity of change in DH is lagging behind technological change in society. A lot of work done by hand = wasted time and people who could be interviewed dying in the mean-time.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>497</id>
+        <description>There is poorer research data/findings due to unfit technology for DH research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Due to unfit technology for DH research: poorer research data/findings</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>498</id>
+        <description>Paying credit to those that collect data is a necessity; blockchain as a possible solution for the ownership of digital data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Paying credit to someone else who collected data is a necessity;
+            --Block chain as a possible solution for the ownership of digital data ;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>499</id>
+        <description>Groups are already demonstrating and lobbying for alternative models to demonstrate value. Projects such as PARTHENOS could advocate these.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>Groups are already demonstrating (publishing) / lobbying for alternative models to demonstrate value. Projects such as PARTHENOS could advocate these;</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>500</id>
+        <description>More PARTHENOS-like projects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>more PARTHENOS-like projects</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>501</id>
+        <description>More money is required.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_Socio_Technical</provenance>
+        <quotation>More money</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>502</id>
+        <description>The most striking trend is that everything around us is changing continuously and rapidly.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Most striking trend is that everything around us is changing continuously and rapidly.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>503</id>
+        <description>New data types come with new research opportunities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>New data types come with new research opportunities</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>504</id>
+        <description>Both future and current practitioners have to learn how to work with new data types.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Both future and current practitioners have to learn how to work with them</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>505</id>
+        <description>There's a need to create training facilities, not just for students but also for people already working in the field.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Create training facilities, not just for students but also for people already working in the field</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>506</id>
+        <description>There's a need to encourage funding bodies to invest in creation of data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Encourage funding bodies to invest in creation of data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>507</id>
+        <description>New technologies produce new research opportunities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>New research opportunities</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>508</id>
+        <description>Bridge the digital divide by teaching scholars and practitioners and technical people to talk to each other and understand each other.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Bridge the digital divide by teaching scholars and practitioners and technical people to talk to each other and understand each other</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>509</id>
+        <description>Research Infrastructures should promote themselves better and continuously monitor their communities' needs and requirements</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>RIs should promote themselves better and continuous monitor their communities' needs and requirements</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>510</id>
+        <description>Research Infrastructures should find ways to offer users not just access to data, tools and services but also technical support</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>RIs should find ways to offer users not just access to data, tools and services but also technical support</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>511</id>
+        <description>Communities should be more open to supporting the publication and dissemination of border-crossing research, and use the opportunities offered by new developments in scientific communication.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Communities should be more open to support publication and dissemination of border-crossingresearch, and use the opportunities offered by new developments in scientific communication</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>512</id>
+        <description>IPR creates significant obstacles in many disciplines where data is re-purposed (e.g. using and annotating newspaper texts for linguistic or sociological research).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>IPR creates significant obstacles in many disciplines where data is re-purposed (e.g. using and annotating newspaper texts for linguistic or sociological research)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>513</id>
+        <description>GDPR creates significant obstacles in many disciplines that make use of the observation of human behavior (e.g. making video or audio recordings of endangered languages, or language development in children)</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>GDPR creates significant obstacles in many disciplines that make use of observation of human behavior (e.g. making video or audio recordings of endangered languages, or language development in children)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>514</id>
+        <description>Legislators should allow for research exceptions to IPR and GDPR.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>push legislators to allow for research exceptions</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>515</id>
+        <description>FAIR can give an enormous boost to research in that it allows people to build on each other's results and avoid duplication of work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Can give an enormous boost to research in that it allows people to build on each other's results and avoid duplication of work</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>516</id>
+        <description>FAIR helps to ensure replicability of research results.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research Quality</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Helps to ensure replicability of research results</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>517</id>
+        <description>There is a lack of data awareness and skills in the communities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lack of awareness and skills in the communities</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>518</id>
+        <description>Implementing FAIR doesn't come for free, and there are often no provisions in project budgets to cover the cost of living up to the FAIR principles.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Implementing FAIR doesn't come for free, and there are often no provisions in project budgets to cover the cost of living up to the FAIR principles</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>519</id>
+        <description>There's a need to promote FAIR and educate users to apply it.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Promote FAIR and educate users to apply it</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>520</id>
+        <description>We need to ensure that users can always find a sustainable place where their data and results can be deposited.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Ensure that users can always find a sustainable place where their data and results can be deposited</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>521</id>
+        <description>We need to ensure that funders make FAIR compulsory and provide funding in their grants or otherwise to comply with it.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Ensure that funders make FAIR compulsory and provide funding in their grants or otherwise to comply with it</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>522</id>
+        <description>EOSC [European Open Science Cloud] will be a fundamental enabler of open science and the digital transformation of science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>EOSC will be a fundamental enabler of open science and the digital transformation of science</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>523</id>
+        <description>Globalisation of the data landscape may lead to unified and broad access to data world-wide, thus creating an equal playing field for all .</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Globalisation of the data landscape may lead to unified and broad access to data world-wide, thus creating an equal playing field for all</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>524</id>
+        <description>There is a risk that movements with a very broad scope (both thematically and geographically), such as the European Open Science Cloud, will lose the connection with at least parts of the communities.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>There is a risk that movements with a very broad scope (both thematically and geographically) will lose the connection with at least parts of the communities,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>525</id>
+        <description>Some emerging and potentially very valuable activities risk becoming completely ignored, such as Citizen Science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>Some emerging and potentially very valuable activities may risk to become completely ignored, such as Citizen Science (both data collection and independent research by citizens)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>526</id>
+        <description>RIs in our field should include the support for citizen science explicitly in their agenda, even if this is not necessarily part of what counts as Research Excellence in EU-speak .</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>RIs in our field should include the support for citizen science explicitly in their agenda, even if this is not necessarily part of what counts as Research Excellence in EU-speak</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>527</id>
+        <description>Research infrastructures keep collecting new requirements, and accommodating them is an incremental activity, and not evidently sustainable unless we find new business models.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP2</provenance>
+        <quotation>RIs to keep collecting new requirements and accommodating them is an incremental activity, and not evidently sustainable unless we find new business models.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>528</id>
+        <description>IPR: What does the new GDPR law have for impact on my work?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>IPR: What does the new GDPR law have for impact on my work?</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>529</id>
+        <description>Data Quality: How do I satisfy the funder of my project?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>Data Quality: How do I satisfy the funder of my project?</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>530</id>
+        <description>Open access: Can I make my data open or does the law prevent this?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>Open access: Can I make my data open or does the law prevent this?</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>531</id>
+        <description>Data Management Protocol for the Humanities: Collaboration across disciplines on research data management</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>Data Management Protocol for the Humanities: Collaboration across disciplines on research data management</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>532</id>
+        <description>FAIR data helps to bring the message across that there's a need to improve the quality of the data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research Quality</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>FAIR data helps to bring the message across to improve the quality of the data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>533</id>
+        <description>Sharing of data may become more common.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>Sharing of data more common</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>534</id>
+        <description>There's a need for direct contact between researchers, and collaboration between important stakeholders like Research Infrastructure's, archives, cultural heritage institutes, projects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP3</provenance>
+        <quotation>Direct contact between researchers and collaboration between important stakeholders like RI's, archives, cultural heritage institutes, projects.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>535</id>
+        <description>We can expect to see the role of infrastructures continue to rise in importance as a locus for building skills.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>We can expect to see the role of infrastructures continue to rise in importance as a locus for building skills</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>536</id>
+        <description>Hierarchies for knowledge creation are shifting (e.g., citizen science).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>Hierarchies for knowledge creation are shifting anyway (citizen science)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>537</id>
+        <description>'Problem-' or 'Mission-based' research is on the rise.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>'Problem-' or 'Mission-based' research is on the rise</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>538</id>
+        <description>New career paths for the research-trained continue to emerge.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>New career paths for the research-trained continue to emerge</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>539</id>
+        <description>ESFRI (European Strategy Forum on Research Infrastructures) Roadmap continues to grow.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>ESFRI Roadmap continues to grow</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>540</id>
+        <description>There's a need to advocate for culture change (valorisation, evaluation).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>Advocate for culture change (valorisation, evaluation)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>541</id>
+        <description>There's a need to develop better cooperative models between infrastructures and higher education institutions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>Develop better cooperative models between infras and HE</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>542</id>
+        <description>There's a need to develop a model to promote and host internships.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS2_WP7</provenance>
+        <quotation>Develop a model to promote and host internships</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>543</id>
+        <description>The EOSC [European Open Science Cloud] risks that small areas like Social Sciences and Humanities and Cultural Heritage get lost.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>EOSC - risk that small areas like SSH and CH get lost.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>544</id>
+        <description>Libraries are losing their main (traditional) function and need to rethink their role. The preservation of data should be taken over by libraries, but not data services and tools.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>In Humanities, there is a role for the libraries. They are losing their main (traditional) function and need to rethink their role. Pay attention to the preservation of data. Should be taken over by libraries. But not data services and tools. In the NL, already collaborate with the National Library who have huge data. This creates two problems 1) managing a huge amount of data and 2) research projects create data which (should) go back to the National Library. The Nat. Library also provide a sandbox to stimulate use of their data by researchers.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>545</id>
+        <description>Data citation, repository citation and survey citation are needed.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Data citation and survey citation needed. Also repository citation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>546</id>
+        <description>The future is already "now" especially with deep learning technologies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>The future is already "now" especially with deep learning technologies.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>547</id>
+        <description>There is a desire to not reinvent the wheel, but then do it anyway.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Preservation</discipline>
+            <discipline>conservation</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>We don't want to reinvent the wheel but then do it anyway.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>548</id>
+        <description>It would be good to have a shared software repository for Cultural Heritage. Some people won't use GIT-HUB as there's too much on it (and it's owned by Microsoft).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Preservation</discipline>
+            <discipline>conservation</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>It would be good to have a shared s/w repository for CH. Some people won't use GIT-HUB as too much on it (and Microsoft).</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>549</id>
+        <description>The UK are scoping a roadmap for Reasearch Infrastruces, including Cultural Heritage, Heritage Science, and Social Science. Very digitally focussed. Hard scientists used to have the voice but others now have some voice too. GLAMS are mentioned.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>In the UK doing scoping a roadmap for RIs includes CH and Heritage Science (and SS). Very digitally focussed. Hard scientists used to have the voice but others now have some voice too. GLAMS are mentioned.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>550</id>
+        <description>ERIHS (European Research Infrastructure for Heritage Science) will colonise best practice: Propose the practice, get feedback and approval. De facto standard and recommended practice.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Preservation</discipline>
+            <discipline>conservation</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>ERIHS will colonise, best practice. If we agree on what we mean, the problem is not the word, propose the practice, get feedback and approval. De facto standard. Some people mean ISO, others de facto. Recommended practice.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>551</id>
+        <description>Interoperability is required from the seneral to the specific, i.e from Json, NTML to Domain Ontologies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Interoperability - from General to Specific i.e from Json, NTML to Domain Ontologies.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>552</id>
+        <description>EOSC (European Open Science Cloud) makes it easier to explain what OA means.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>EOSC makes it easier to explain what OA means</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>553</id>
+        <description>Funding is not following new regulations/policies so it is not possible to comply with OA policies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Funding is not following new regulations/policies so it is not possible to comply</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>554</id>
+        <description>Legal framework has not adapted to present time and open access.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Legal framework not adopted to present time</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>555</id>
+        <description>There's a need for new frameworks and laws that control the use of metal detectors. Raise the awareness of cultural heritage so that people do not misuse detectors.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>New frameworks and laws that control the use of metal detectors. Raise the awareness of cultural heritage so that people do not misuse the detectors</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>556</id>
+        <description>It's not good that there are more tv shows about archaeology that encourage untrained people to play archaeologists. There's a need to engage people in archaeological research projects to make them aware of cultural heritage.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>More (tv-)shows about archaeology that more or less encourage untrained people to play archaeologists. Not good. The shows sometimes shows archaeologists as non professionsl that anyone can be...
+            Engage people in archaeologic research projects to make them aware of cultural heritage</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>557</id>
+        <description>We're part of the Third Science Revolusion. There's increasingly extended use of natural science in archaeology. Ref: K. Kristiansen (2014) Towards aNew Paradigm? The Third ScienceRevolution and its Possible Consequences in Archaeology. Current Swedish Archaeology, 22, 11-34.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>extended use of Nat Sci in archaeology. Ref Kristian Kristiansen . Way to do archaeology. Micromorphology. Technology enabling. Colonist ideas going to Positivist.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>558</id>
+        <description>There's been a change in communication practice, and archaeologists are expected to have a much wider range of activities. They now have to use Twitter, write a blog, and there's pressure to have a Facebook profile.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Change in communication practice. Now have to use Twitter, write a blog, something else. Pressure to have a FB Profile. (Archaeologists are expected to have a much wider range of activities now).</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>559</id>
+        <description>It's easier for experts and non-experts to access information, but there's too much noise!</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Easier for experts but too much - noise!</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>560</id>
+        <description>There's a huge conversation about popular archaeology being used to promote right wing ideology. Scientists should communicate what their results really mean, and educate the public.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Huge conversation about popular archaeology to promote right wing ideology. So, scientists should communicate what their results really mean. Educate the public. E.g. Newspaper in GR - DNA ancestry of Minoan Crete. 50 individual samples, finds exaggerated.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>561</id>
+        <description>GitHub is the burial grave of everything! OS software and data is dumped on GitHub, but there's no service behind it.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>GitHub is the burial grave of everything!
+            OS s/w dumped on GitHub - e.g. PhD researchers. But no service behind it. Also, data
+            there.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>562</id>
+        <description>There's a paradigm change in the questions that are available.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>paradigm change in the questions that are available.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>563</id>
+        <description>A lot of the technologies mentioned could have been mentioned 10 years ago.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>A lot of the things mentioned on the slides could have been mentioned 10 years ago.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>564</id>
+        <description>There are differences in funding challenges. While there is often plenty of funding for open data, there is little funding for education.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>There are also differences in funding challenges. While there is often plenty of funding for open data, in Italy, for example, there is little funding for education.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>565</id>
+        <description>In the UK bioarchaeology is being better funded as it can be counted as STEM.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>In the UK bioarchaeology is being better funded as it can be counted as STEM.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>566</id>
+        <description>There's been a shift from social or cultural theory, to a more grounded engagement with those born digital objects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>shift from a more strictly, from the perspective of, let's say, social or cultural theory, to a more grounded engagement with those objects.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>567</id>
+        <description>We've moved from looking at devices, platforms, at mobile eco-systems, to the data generating within those sites. Now we're looking at the algorithmic dimensions and necessarily turning our attention into developments within machine learning and AI.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>we started off by looking at devices, platforms, looking at mobile eco-systems. We then looked at data itself, in terms of the kinds of data that we were generating within those sites. Increasingly, now, we're looking at the algorithmic dimensions and necessarily turning our attention into developments within machine learning and I guess you could say, 'AI'.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>568</id>
+        <description>We need to build learning platforms around the concept of explainable machine learning, so that we can start to better understand the social, cultural and political economic impact of AI, so there can be a kind of increasing array of digital practices.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need to build learning platforms, let's say, around the concept of, let's say, explainable machine learning, so that we can start to better understand the social, cultural and political economic impact of AI. And part of the research that we're undertaking, hopefully, is modestly contributing to that in order to make these sorts of open platforms, so that there can be a kind of increasing array of, let's call them critical data practices.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>569</id>
+        <description>UK universities need to address the crisis of Brexit. We need to ensure that we have access to our European research partners, are able to participate in funded research, and are able to access and participate in continent-wide research infrastructures.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>UK universities need to address the crisis of Brexit. We need to ensure that we have access to our European research partners, are able to participate in funded research, and are able to access and participate in continent-wide research infrastructures.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>570</id>
+        <description>The biggest impact has been the emergence of datafication: Mobile devices have become every day, our environment is an environment of interconnected smart devices, and our everyday lives and lived environments are being translated into discreet data points</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>'datafication'. The fact that smart phones, mobile devices have become every day, that our environment that we live in, this supposed kind of internet of things, environment of smart devices, interconnected. And that our everyday lives and lived environments are being translated into discreet data points</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>571</id>
+        <description>There is a wider realisation of the need to understand the technological mediation of society and of culture.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is a wider realisation of the need to understand the kind of technological mediation of society and of culture.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>572</id>
+        <description>Hopefully digital methods will resonate more with humanities researchers, and we can continue to develop digital tools for humanities research. But also, to deepen our understanding of the constitutive relationship between the human and its technological mediation, and to understand that relationship more clearly.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV017</provenance>
+        <quotation>hopefully, what will be possible is that these methods will resonate more with humanities researchers, and that we can both continue to develop tools, digital tools for humanities research. But also, to deepen our understanding of the constitutive relationship between the human, and by human, I mean society and culture, and its technological mediation, and to understand that, kind of, human, non-human relationship more clearly.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>573</id>
+        <description>AI on cultural works is starting to be used in museums and in cultural settings. The Smithsonian, for example, has a data science group looking at potential new uses of artificial intelligence and ways of better classifying biological samples,andhistorical images. There's a project doing facial recognition, trying to adapt facial recognition techniques to civil war photography, to identify reidentify people.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV018</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'm very interested in the impact of AI on cultural works. It's starting to be used in museums and in cultural settings. The Smithsonian, for example, in the United States, has a data science group within the cultural institution and their work is embedded across various cultural departments and they're looking at potential new uses of artificial intelligence and ways of better classifying- There's one interesting side that came out, better ways of classifying biological samples, historical images.
+            There's a crazy project doing facial recognition, trying to adapt facial recognition techniques to civil war photography, to identify reidentify people.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>574</id>
+        <description>People are looking at better understanding of cultural data at scale.For examle, the EHRI (European Holocaust Research Infrastructure) project is exploring the use of graph databases to understand how cultural data is networked and how you can represent historical events, people in the past, etcetera.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV018</provenance>
+        <quotation>people are looking at better understanding of cultural data at scale.
+            So, among others, you have a really interesting project at King's, which is the EHRI Project, right? Holocaust Research Infrastructure. One of the technological developments they are exploring is the use of graph databases and understanding how cultural data is networked and how you can represent historical events, people in the past, etcetera.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>575</id>
+        <description>The particular environmental factors that have affected my own sector have to do with, attempts to influence elections over the last few years. Fore example, in the last few days of the Brexit debate, millions of messages were floated from Russian bots, etcetera.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV018</provenance>
+        <quotation>The particular areas that I think have affected my own sector have to do with, well, how elections were rigged or attempts to influence elections over the last few years, right? From the UK, if you think about the Brexit thing, there were all these reports that, in the last few days- I don't know how accurate my statement is, but, in the last few days of the Brexit debate, millions of messages were floated from Russian bots, etcetera.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>576</id>
+        <description>There's a need for innovative, safe research laboratory type environments, where people who may not have the training yet or the level of comfort can come and be in conversation and engage with colleagues across the aisle. Interdisciplinary conversations are really important.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV018</provenance>
+        <quotation>you really need to promote innovative, safe research laboratory type environments, where people who may not have the training yet or the level of comfort can come and be in conversation and engage with colleagues across the aisle. That's why I think interdisciplinary conversations are really important.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>577</id>
+        <description>There's a trend in convolutional neural networks and the beginning of the application of artificial intelligence tools and methods to humanistic databases.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>convolutional neural networks and, I suppose, the beginning of the application of artificial intelligence tools [and methods 00:03:54] to humanistic kinds of databases</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>578</id>
+        <description>Video conferencing technologies, the ability to bring people together over great distances, means that you can run projects from wherever you are in the world. The team doesn't have to be in one place.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>Zoom technology, the ability to bring people together over great distances means that you can run projects from wherever you are in the world. The team doesn't have to be in one place.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>579</id>
+        <description>Digitisation technologies in the archival and cultural heritage sector has completely transformed the way that we are able to do our work. It enables working with very large datasets from Parker On the Web to the whole of the British Museum's database, to the Met or Schoenberg.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>digitisation technologies in the archival and cultural heritage sector are having the most impact on my own work. I'm working with very large datasets from Parker On the Web to the whole of the British Museum's database to the Met or Schoenberg. Any of these libraries and repositories, you can gain access to these materials now. It's completely changed, absolutely transformed, the way that we are able to do our work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>580</id>
+        <description>The functionality of the various browser interfaces that the various projects use - Mirador (http://projectmirador.org/), for example, IIIF - means that you can manipulate your data in ways that simply weren't imaginable even five years ago,</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>The functionality of the various browser interfaces that the various projects use - Mirador, for example, IIIF - means that you can do all kinds- You can manipulate your data in ways that simply weren't imaginable even five years ago really.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>581</id>
+        <description>There are not sufficient interpretative frameworks to allow really genuine democratic access. The material is open access, but the majority of users don't have the skillset to begin to interpret the material in efficient ways.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>I don't think that we provide sufficient interpretative frameworks to allow really genuine democratic access. That is to say that this material is open access, which I think is significant, but the majority of users, browsers- Even scholars, especially junior scholars, don't have the skillset to interpret the material or to begin to interpret the material in efficient ways.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>582</id>
+        <description>There needs to be some kind of Davos-like summit, in the arts and humanities. The questions that we need to ask are the questions that everybody understands.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>there needs to be some kind of summit. I know that various disciplines do that, but that's not the point. I think the point is arts and humanities, more broadly, there ought to be some kind of high-level summit. At that, I think the questions that we need to ask are the questions that everybody understands.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>583</id>
+        <description>There's the possibility that specialisations within departments will disappear. Rather than be united through specialism people will be united by major themes or major types of approaches to the work that they do, folded into giant humanities departments.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think that specialisations within departments, to do with things like medieval, early modern, 18th century, or whatever, those will disappear. Rather than be united through something like new historicist or post-colonial, we'll actually be united by major themes or major types of approaches to the work that we do.
+            I think we will all get folded into giant humanities departments and that we will see our expertise somewhat diluted or made thinner, but I don't think that's necessarily a terrible thing.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>584</id>
+        <description>Everybody over 60 has to retire. The elitism and snobbery, so prevalent in White privileged scholarship, has to be knocked off its perch. The eurocentricity and the maleness and the whiteness of the field has to change.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>Everybody over 60 has to retire. I think the elitism and snobbery, so prevalent in White privileged scholarship, has to be knocked off its perch. I really think that the eurocentricity and the maleness and the Whiteness of the field has to change, it has to change. If that's done... I don't know how that is achieved, but I think that the people who are in positions to counter White male privilege, which is what established these hierarchies and what allows those hierarchies to persist. I think that really has to be challenged.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>585</id>
+        <description>The standardisation of metadata from the cultural heritage institutions and the ability to put it together under things like linked open data or the Europeana Data Model has probably been the most impactful thing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV034</provenance>
+        <quotation>he standardisation of metadata from the cultural heritage institutions and the ability to put it together under things like linked open data or the Europeana Data Model. I think that's been, actually, probably the most impactful thing</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>586</id>
+        <description>As an institution you can put your data into Wikidata, take advantage of the multilingual functionality that's there because of Wikipedia, take advantage of the fact that they've loaded all the ontologies in, but you are owning your own data, it's up to you when you release it into the Commons or into Wikipedia or elsewhere.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV034</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'm very interested in at the moment are things like the Wikidata phenomena. So, the idea that instead of Wiki Commons, where you're putting it all into one place, as an institution, you put your data into Wikidata, you take advantage of the multilingual functionality that's there because of Wikipedia, that you take advantage of the fact that they've loaded all the ontologies in, but you are owning your own data. So, it's up to you when you release it into the Commons or into Wikipedia or elsewhere.
+            From the point of view of where I am now, at the Hunt Museum... I'm at a small museum that's got no real digital presence. It's got photos of things, some are good, some are bad. Its metadata is pretty poor. It's got no content management system in place, it's got no real database in place, everything is very ad hoc, you retrieve something for something, you don't have a database in any shape or form. So, I'm actually thinking of making use of Wikidata as a means of getting the Hunt collection out onto the open web.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>587</id>
+        <description>We are currently in the process of designing algorithms that will allow us to finesse colour recognition tools, using medieval manuscripts as our basis, because the nuance of colour in medieval manuscripts is obviously remarkable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV033</provenance>
+        <quotation>We are currently in the process of designing algorithms that will allow us to finesse colour recognition tools. We're doing that using medieval manuscripts as our basis, because the nuance of colour in medieval manuscripts is obviously remarkable.
+            I think, because we have algorithms that allow programs to run and to isolate decorated and coloured initials, we are then able to use technology like multispectral imaging and terahertz imaging to produce really fine layered analyses of colour. Not just in terms of pigmentation, which isn't really what interests me, but in terms of the actual band of the colour itself.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>588</id>
+        <description>The particularly tough thing seems to be getting the people funded to do the work. They'll fund a project but they won't fund people within that project. They'll fund the ability for you to plonk a sculpture in the middle of somewhere, but they won't fund the project management that it takes for you to get that sculpture in. They'll fund the digitisation, but they won't fund the people who need to do the flow for the digitisation or to manage the whole process.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV034</provenance>
+        <quotation>The particularly tough thing seems to be - very much so in Ireland, less so under European projects - getting the people funded to do the work. So, they'll fund a project but they won't fund people within that project. They'll fund the ability for you to plonk a sculpture in the middle of somewhere, but they won't fund the project management that it takes for you to get that sculpture in. They'll fund the digitisation, but they won't fund the people who need to do the flow for the digitisation or to manage the whole process. So, I think there are quite a lot of issues around the 'what' and 'how' of funding, as well as the actual funding itself.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>589</id>
+        <description>There is a need for better diversity in the cultural heritage sector. It's very much the white, middle class domain. That affects our understanding on how you relate to the communities, your relevance to the communities, how you pitch your education programmes, as well as actually just complete lack of diversity within the museums' libraries' archives themselves.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV034</provenance>
+        <quotation>better diversity within the sector. I think one of the problems with the cultural heritage sector is that it's very much the white, middle class domain. I think that affects our understanding on how you relate to the communities, your relevance to the communities, how you pitch your education programmes, as well as actually just complete lack of diversity within the museums' libraries' archives themselves.
+            I think the gender balance is not so bad these days. In fact, if anything, it's probably tipping too much the other way, with many more women in the senior positions in the cultural heritage organisations. But there is a real lack of diversity of colour or creed or types of people.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>590</id>
+        <description>The social media APIs are increasingly being shut down. It's getting increasingly hard to obtain data from platforms like Facebook and Instagram, which is a problem when you want to do critical studies of modern media and politics, for instance.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>one of the most important technological developments is that the APIs - where you can get data from social media - are increasingly being shut down. It's getting increasingly harder to obtain data from platforms like Facebook and Instagram, which is a problem when you want to do critical studies of modern media and politics, for instance.
+            The fact is that you, as a researcher, can no longer do analysis on certain political debates on Facebook because after Cambridge Analytica, that access has been shut down. I think that's actually a technological development that is problematic, in terms of us getting data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>591</id>
+        <description>There may be more debates about whether we should be better at scraping social media platforms - taking the data without Facebook giving us permission.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>we'll maybe see debates about whether we should be better at then scraping these platforms - taking the data without Facebook giving us permission. There is a huge ___[0:04:27] here between... Obviously there are important privacy discussions to be had about this type of data. There are also discussions of whether we can allow companies like Facebook to have a monopoly on data.
+            I think technological developments will happen ___[0:04:46] when people increasingly try to find other ways to get that data. That's one of the developments that I see taking place in the near future. Instead of going through what are called the APIs, people will begin to discuss if we should take the data anyway from the ___[0:05:08], [for instance].</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>592</id>
+        <description>There is a need for better semantic text algorithms for minority languages such as Danish.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to see better semantic text algorithms that will look for Danish language or other minority languages. It's hard to study stuff digitally that is not in English or one of the major languages.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>593</id>
+        <description>The societal discussion about data needs to be more balanced. We need to be able to move the discussion beyond just getting rid of all data and closing everything down.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>the societal discussion about data needs to be more balanced. We need to be able to move the discussion beyond just getting rid of all data and closing everything down.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>594</id>
+        <description>There is a need for funding for training semantic algorithms in minority languages.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>obviously for training ___[0:07:19] semantic algorithms in the ___ languages, we need to have some sort of funding for that because it's expensive.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>595</id>
+        <description>We need to strike some sort of deal with the data owners [social media companies] so it's still possible to do independent data research on questions that are so important for democracy.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>We need to strike some sort of deal with the data owners so it's still possible to do independent data research on questions that are so important for democracy.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>596</id>
+        <description>Facebook's suggestion that they will primarily work with American researchers is deeply problematic for European digital humanities. Facebook is not just an American company; they also have influence on European elections and European public debate.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>Facebook's own suggestion is that they will primarily work with American researchers. That's also, I think, deeply problematic for European digital humanities if this is the way things go. Obviously, Facebook is not just an American company. They also have influence on European elections and European public debate also.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>597</id>
+        <description>If the EU could find the same kind of energy around forcing them to make the data available for research and for good public use, as they have with fines, that could potentially move something in the right direction. The EU is not totally powerless.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>the EU has proved pretty powerful in, you know, giving these companies fines and regulating them in terms of the way they orchestrate their taxes in Europe. I mean, if they could find the same kind of energy around the question of forcing them to make the data available for research and for good public use, I think that could potentially move something in the right direction. The EU is not totally powerless.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>598</id>
+        <description>Students of humanities have been far more engaged in opening the black box of digital technologies and starting to learn to code and write Python scripts, and so on.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV040</provenance>
+        <quotation>when I look at the students, students of humanities have been way more engaged in opening the black box of digital technologies and starting to learn to code and write Python scripts, and so on.
+            Even people by own age - I'm 37 - already at my age there seems to be a huge gap to people who are just 10 years younger. In terms of when I was educated nobody mentioned programming to me as an option. The languages I had to learn were German and French, in order to read philosophers in those languages. I think there is a growing tendency that philosophers can also see that it's important to learn and master a programming language. If you want to do good epistemological studies, you need to be able to understand how the digital knowledge economy works or how algorithms work and so on. I think that's a huge change but mostly at student level right now.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>599</id>
+        <description>There has been an explosion in data traces about mundane, everyday life practices.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>an explosion in data traces about mundane, everyday life practices,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>600</id>
+        <description>There's a move away from pre-packed tools, and into actually encoding everything ourselves, which obviously changes the competence profile that we need to have to do our research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>we're sort of moving away from pre-packed tools, and into actually encoding everything ourselves, which obviously changes the competence profile that we need to have to do our research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>601</id>
+        <description>There's now a scale of data where it is necessary to work with either cloud computing, which is rarely possible because of GDPR issues, but then we have to work on an HPC [High Performance Computer] cluster, and have to know how to use database architecture.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>we're now in a scale of data where we have to work with either cloud computing, which is rarely possible because of GDPR issues, but then we have to work on an HPC cluster, we have to know how to use database architecture like ___[0:05:48] to be able to do our work, because nothing runs on our machine any more.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>602</id>
+        <description>There is a nightmarish scenario for this whole branch of digital humanities, that GDPR has potentially put us on, towards not doing any qualitative work at all because it's basically become impossible to anonymise datasets.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is a nightmarish scenario, if I can put it that way, for this whole branch of digital humanities, which is that one of the ways, one of the paths, that GDPR has put us on, is potentially towards not doing any qualitative work at all. Like, so if you... I mean it's basically become impossible to anonymise datasets.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>603</id>
+        <description>Technological developments, such as blockchain technology for example, may make it possible to keep the richness of the material without making it personally identifiable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>blockchain technology, for example. There are technological developments that promise to perhaps make it possible to keep the richness of the material without making it personally identifiable.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>604</id>
+        <description>There has been the whole era of interdisciplinarity -"Let's get a computer scientist on our project." - but I think you will increasingly see humanistic research becoming that hybrid themselves.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>there has been the whole era of interdisciplinarity - you know, "Let's get a computer scientist on our project." But I think you will increasingly see humanistic research becoming that hybrid themselves.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>605</id>
+        <description>There's the opportunity to start doing more consultancy-type research, or at least there's a risk that you end up doing more consultancy-type research. There is something about lots of data and that somehow is persuasive to some clients who otherwise might think that a humanistic analysis is going to be a bit fluffy. So there is a range of new funding opportunities which are becoming available.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV041</provenance>
+        <quotation>we've also started doing more consultancy-type research. Or at least there's a risk that you end up doing more consultancy-type research. Because you're in a, there is something about lots of data and [nice this 0:23:52], that somehow is persuasive to some clients who otherwise might think that, you know, a humanistic analysis of this is going to be a bit fluffy. But then if you spin a big [data list] in the background, all of a sudden you have their attention.
+            So I think there is a range of new funding opportunities which are becoming available.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>607</id>
+        <description>There's a need to buid up digital skills and capabilities -both in the cultural heritage sector and for research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV027</provenance>
+        <quotation>building up digital skills and capabilities - it's meant in the cultural heritage sector, but I believe that this is important also for research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>608</id>
+        <description>The research councils andfunders are open for discussions. One of the things we need in order for this to happen is your, and similar, reports.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV031</provenance>
+        <quotation>the research councils and the funders are open for these discussions. Reports like Jane's and reports like the one you're working on I hope will help enable those discussions. There's a neat answer to question 15. One of the things we need in order for this to happen is your report.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>609</id>
+        <description>Cultural Heritage and social sciences need lab facilities. This need is not always recognised by pure sciences.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>CH and SS need lab facilities. Need not always recognised by pure sciences.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>610</id>
+        <description>Research Infrastructures should promote themselves better, and offer tech supports as well as tools and services.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>RIs - lack of awareness of what RIs have to offer, user needs evolve, lack of means to bridge these, no dissemination channels for cross discipline research. E.g. where do you publish it. RI should promote themselves better, offer tech supports as well as tools and services.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>611</id>
+        <description>Communities should support publication and dissemination of cross-border research and new scientific communications.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Communities should support publication and dissemination of x-border research and new scientific communications.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>612</id>
+        <description>GDPR and IPR are significant obstacles - there's a need for research exceptions in legislation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>GDPR and IPR are significant obstacles - need research exceptions in legislation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>613</id>
+        <description>FAIR provides synergy, andavoids duplication and replication of results. But there is a lack of awareness and a need to provide a budget to support FAIR.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>FAIR - synergy, avoids duplication, replication of results. But lack of awareness and need provide budget to support FAIR.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>614</id>
+        <description>There are a number of questions about the funding of research infrastructures - funding typically comes from either from researchers or EC. Is diversification? What can be assured at any level? Co-operation with national agencies who fund the researchers who use the research infrastructures. There's no co-operation between the 48 different RIs!</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Funding comes from either from researchers or EC? Digital Labs (at KCL) had to work out costs for keeping or killing resources.
+            Is the way to do this is diversification? Financially... ERIC funding comes from national level and projects. What can be assured at any level? Co-operation with national agencies who fund the researchers who use the RIs. No co-operation between 48 diff RIs! Need to take care of the data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>615</id>
+        <description>Humanities and computer scientists inhabit different worlds and speak different 'languages'.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Different worlds of humanities and computer scientists (different 'languages').</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>616</id>
+        <description>Research Infrastructures, such as CLARIAH, must work with external partners.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Work with external partners</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>617</id>
+        <description>Biggest fear is that a research infrastructure, like CLARIAH, is used by no-one.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Biggest fear - CLARIAH used by no-one.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>618</id>
+        <description>There's growing Digital Humanities interest - from universities, GLAMS. Europeana Research - humanities research has a digital face.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Growing DH interest - from universities, GLAMS. Europeana Research - humanities research has digital face.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>619</id>
+        <description>Funding opportunities require research to show link between research and innovation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Opportunities - is research able to show link between research and innovation? Must have this for funding.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>620</id>
+        <description>Risk is a missing tile in Humanities research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Risk is a missing tile in Humanities research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>621</id>
+        <description>EOSC is everywhere in the DIRs conference in Portugal.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>EOSC is everywhere in the DIRs conference in Portugal.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>622</id>
+        <description>Developer language is far from researcher language, and there's a need to bridge this.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Developer language far from researcher language, trying to bridge this.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>623</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more digital platforms and repositories and to increase digital literacy.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Needs more digital platforms and repositories and to increase digital literacy.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>624</id>
+        <description>It's a big connected world across many aspects. The Linguistic Data Consortium is used across many fields, and there are many possible sources of data and judgments.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Big connected world across many aspects. LDC used across many fields.
+            * X-sourcing - many possible sources of data and judgments.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>625</id>
+        <description>Need to rethink the traditional Workflow. Analyse project into parts, incentivise people and then combine outputs together again.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Need to rethink the traditional Workflow. Analyse project into parts, incentivise people and then combine outputs together again.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>626</id>
+        <description>Research Institutes need to get more stable funding - not just project funding. Institutional funding should ensure that data is preserved, but not become archives.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Research Institutes get more stable funding - not like projects. Institutional funding should ensure that data is preserved (but not become archives).</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>627</id>
+        <description>Only institutions with long term funding can become a CLARIN Centre.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>only institutions with long term funding can become a CLARIN Centre.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>628</id>
+        <description>There is a lot of fragmentation of tools and services.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>So much fragmentation of tools and services.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>629</id>
+        <description>It's difficult getting training into the curriculum of students Educational materials can be created, but they may not be taken up much. CZ DARIAH has provided some courses - CLARIN and DARIAH need to work together.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>lus getting this (training) into the curriculum of students. Jan - did it for 3 years but difficult (not in control of the curriculum). Created a lot of educational materials but not taken up much.
+            * CZ DARIAH has provided some courses - CLARIN and DARIAH need to work together.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>630</id>
+        <description>Individual access policy is needed for KPIs (Key Performance Indicators), it can't be done with federated access.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Individual Access policy needed for KPI, can't do this with federated access. How can we generate statistics? D-SPACE can produce some stats. But difficult to exclude some robots (Chinese), can only be done manually. Only get 5% - everything provided is OA or CC. No login required... GDPR stops IP analysis (?) Note that German institutions don't like fed logins (possibly because they don't allow statistics to be collected?)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>631</id>
+        <description>Sustainability is difficult because technology is evolving. The big multinationals take giant steps, while all the tools developed by the academy often fall into disuse.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>sustainability could be difficult because technology is evolving, the big multinationals take giant steps, all the tools developed by the academy often fall into disuse, because private individuals/organisations hold power (like Google, Amazon and Facebook).</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>632</id>
+        <description>Communication outside the academy is important, otherwise all the tools developed will always be relegated to the use of researchers only.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>An important aspect is that of communication outside the academy, otherwise all the tools developed will always be relegated to the use of researchers only.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>633</id>
+        <description>There's a lack of education for digital humanists. A great achievement could be the integration of educational resources.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS3_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>the lack for the education of digital humanists, a great achievement could be the integration (of educational resources?)
+            * Especially for NLP, sometimes the communication between multidisciplinary working groups becomes complex.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>634</id>
+        <description>There's a need for shared protocols and procedures which could described in the same place.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Preservation</discipline>
+            <discipline>conservation</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Also need shared protocols and procedures which could described in the same place.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>635</id>
+        <description>The reliability of data is a big issue. Sometimes researchers get results and the data is not clean so they don't want to share it. Metadata needs to be added, but they don't have resources to go back to old data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Preservation</discipline>
+            <discipline>conservation</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>What data can be accessible? Big issue is reliability of the data. Sometimes get results and the data is not clean so don't want to share it. The metadata need to be added. But don't have resources to go back to old data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>636</id>
+        <description>There's a nee to drop the word digital! Everyone does it to some extent or another.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>drop the word digital! Everyone does it to some extent or another. Get round the politics of a separate thing</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>637</id>
+        <description>Digital Humanities have a different focus to traditional Humanities departments.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Digital Humanities have a different focus to trad Humanities depts.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>638</id>
+        <description>Education and training only works when you have something that needs doing. It's a chicken and egg situation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>Education and training only works when you have something that needs doing. Chicken and Egg situation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>639</id>
+        <description>Research infrastructures are hideously complicated and huge amounts of communications needed.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS4_Draft</provenance>
+        <quotation>RI are hideously complicated and huge amounts of communications needed</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>640</id>
+        <description>There's an increased demand to demostrate the social benefit of research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>increased demand for demo social benefit of research</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>641</id>
+        <description>There's lots of engagement with technology but still a digital divide.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lots of engagement with technology but still a gap</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>642</id>
+        <description>Digital resistance from traditional humanists.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Resistance from traditionals</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>643</id>
+        <description>Increased specialisation in journals.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Specialisation in journals</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>644</id>
+        <description>Lots of new departments for Digital Heritage</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lots of new depts for Digital Heritage e.g. Comp Sci, humanities etc.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>645</id>
+        <description>No more traditional relationship of technician - user.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>No more traditional relationship of technician - user</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>646</id>
+        <description>There are no clear goals, and a lack of co-ordinated effort.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>no clear goals,
+            * Lack of co-ordinated effort</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>647</id>
+        <description>Lack of clear multi-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary language.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lack of clear multi-disciplinary and cross-disciplinary language</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>648</id>
+        <description>More effort needed to showcasing the 'digital' in Heritage research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>More effort needed to showcasing the 'digital' in Heritage research</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>649</id>
+        <description>Moving towards a data-driven science in heritage.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Towards a data-driven science in Heritage</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>650</id>
+        <description>There's a trend towards collaboration and sharing data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>move towards collaboration and sharing data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>651</id>
+        <description>Other areas looking towards Cultural Heritage now because of documentation of process and data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Other areas looking towards CH now because of documentation of process and data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>652</id>
+        <description>There's a trend towards pooling resources into training.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Pooling resources into training.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>653</id>
+        <description>People retire and collections get lost. We need to document collections to avoid loss of data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Ref collections - people retire and collections get lost. Need to document them to avoid loss of data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>654</id>
+        <description>There's more effective collaboration, supported by senior management; starting to reach out and creating a more structured network.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>More effective collaboration, supported by senior mgt.
+            * Starting to reach out and creating a more structured network.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>655</id>
+        <description>Heritage includes a wide range of fields - and there's a need for a shared language.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Heritage wide range of fields - need a shared language</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>656</id>
+        <description>File formats need to be open, metadata shareable. Tools are critical for searching metadata - across the board.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>File formats need to be open, metadata shareable. Work with manufacturers to achieve this. Tools are critical for searching metadata - across the board.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>657</id>
+        <description>Reuse of existing data is under-utilised.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Reuse of existing data is under-utilised.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>658</id>
+        <description>There's the problem of orphan data after a project ends.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Orphan data after project end.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>659</id>
+        <description>There's a lack of recognition of the potentiality of data, and a lack of understanding of mining of existing datasets. Data curation not effective enough, especially for international collaboration.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>lack of recognition of potentiality of data.
+            * Lack of understanding of mining of existing datasets.
+            * Data curation not effective enough, especially for international collaboration.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>660</id>
+        <description>Data creation, management, and documentation is a very complex social process, requiring different backgrounds and expertise. Trying to establish a publishing workflow approach to FAIR.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Archaeological excavations - do have expertise to document the data? Reuse it? Creation is very complex social process. Data Management is big issue. Different backgrounds and expertise.
+            Example: ADS documentation - dataset for Anglo-Saxon site. Not coherent with other projects.
+            * Publishing workflow approach to FAIR. Try to replicate this in archaeology e.g. cross-ref datasets, context of info.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>661</id>
+        <description>Reproducible research, making claims verifiable, is becoming more important now.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Reproducible research is becoming more important now. Make claims verifiable.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>662</id>
+        <description>It is important to influence policy on the preservation of archaeological resources that may be impacted by climate change. PLOS One paper on how sea level rises will impact thousands of sites if there's a 1m rise.https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0188142</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Prior knowledge</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>PLOS One paper on sea level rises will impact 15k sites if 1m rise. Can influence policy on preservation of these resources.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>663</id>
+        <description>Collaboration is increasingly important.The Library of Congress is looking at how to engage more effectively with EU and other partners. Funders want to support projects that produce sustainable data and want institutions to collaborate. Need to continue collaborate with industry at well, and metadata is the way forward.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Don't have a Ministry of Culture - there are pros and cons. Looking of how to engage more effectively with EU and other partners.
+            * Funders want to support projects that produce sustainable data. Want institutions to collaborate. Need to continue collaborate with industry etc. and metadata is the way forward.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>664</id>
+        <description>There's resistance to sharing information in the US , there's a sense of ownership of data by institution. National Gallery of Art is making data much more open, influenced by Mellon Foundation who insist on this for funding.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>US perspective different - resistance to sharing information, sense of ownership of data by institutions. Nat. Gallery making data much more open, influenced by Mellon Foundation who insist on this for funding. Still difficult to get US institutions to share data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>665</id>
+        <description>New non-invasive scientific techniques are becoming much more common.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>New scientific techniques, non-invasive coming much more common.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>666</id>
+        <description>Scientific imaging produces large files, which can lead to bandwidth issues.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Scientific imaging produces large files -&gt; bandwidth issues.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>667</id>
+        <description>There's a need to create the tools and mechanisms that talk to each other, to adopt standards. OA and FAIR policies mean youhave to spend time on the standards, such as IIIF and CIDOC-CRM.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Need to create the tools and mechanisms that talk to each other - adopt standards.
+            Impact on policies such as OA, FAIR have to spend time on the standards. E.g. IIIF and CIDOC-CRM. Have adopted Open Link.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>668</id>
+        <description>Tools are appearing on GitHub; GLAMS scared of using them but it will happen.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Tools appearing on GitHub. GLAMS scared of using them but will happen.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>669</id>
+        <description>Cultural Heritage work gets published in obscure journals and is not visible!</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>CH work gets published in obscure journals - not visible!</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>670</id>
+        <description>Data sharing is still a problem.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>data sharing still a problem</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>671</id>
+        <description>Lot of work is project-based, and dies with the project. There's a need for a permanent record, and documentation of procedures and protocols is just as important as the data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lot of work is project-based, dies with it. Need permanent record. Documentation of procedures and protocols just as important as the data.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>672</id>
+        <description>Reuse licences are not understood by researchers or re-users. Need clear licences.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Reuse licences - not understood by researchers or re-users. Need clear licences.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>673</id>
+        <description>Practitioners often feel left behind.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS5_notes</provenance>
+        <quotation>Practitioners often feel left behind.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>674</id>
+        <description>Documentation, metadata, CIDOC and LIDO compliant standards are increasingly having an impact.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Findability</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Documentation, metadata, CIDOC and LIDO compliant standards,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>675</id>
+        <description>Laser scanners are having an impact.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>laser scanners</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>676</id>
+        <description>Data can now be integrated, analysed in new ways, and from different institutions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>analysing data in a different way, integration of data, data at different institutes can now be analysed</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>677</id>
+        <description>The data that is available will increasingly be exploited in the future.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>The data that is available will increasingly be exploited.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>678</id>
+        <description>The potential of machine learning and deep learning will increasingly be realised.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Potential of machine learning, deep learning</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>679</id>
+        <description>There's a need for digital discipline and data cleaning. People don't care about consistency.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Digital discipline and data cleaning. People don't care about consistency.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>680</id>
+        <description>Tools aren't good enough, people who do not have good skills have poorer tools.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Tools aren't good enough, people who do not have good skills have poorer tools.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>681</id>
+        <description>There is not a tradition of archaeological data scientists - although there are pockets of archaeological information scientists. "Archaeologists use C14 dating without blinking, why not data". There's a need for digital archaeology courses and data skills.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>There is not a tradition of data scientists - although there are pockets of archaeological information scientists.
+            "Archaeologists use C14 dating without blinking, why not data"
+            What do we need: digital archaeology courses and data skills.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>682</id>
+        <description>The fields are becoming more integrated...there are signs it is going to change, but it is important they don't lose the archaeology background.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>The fields are becoming more integrated...there are signs it is going to change, but it is important they don't lose the archaeology background.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>683</id>
+        <description>In Spitsbergen, Norway, one of the challenges is permafrost is melting and a deteriorating cemetery.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>in Spitsbergen, Norway, one of the challenges is permafrost is melting and a deteriorating cemetery.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>684</id>
+        <description>EU policies on open data are having an impact, but people don't know what to do.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>EU policies on open data are having an impact, but people don't know what to do.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>685</id>
+        <description>In Japan, rescue archaeology developers have to pay and give data to the country. They used to have to pay for printing, but now there is no law about who pays for the digital archiving.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>In Japan, rescue archaeology developers have to pay and give data to country. They used to have to pay for printing, but now there is no law about who pays for the digital archiving.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>686</id>
+        <description>Governments and states need to provide sustainable support for data so that it can be exploited in the future. We will have more and more in the future. This requires both policies and funds.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Sustainability of data - governments and states should be sustaining support for these data so that it can be exploited in the future. We will have more and more in the future. This requires both policies and funds.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>687</id>
+        <description>There needs to be more data education for students - although some participants suggest there are now courses leading people through.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Education for students - others say there are now courses leading people through.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>688</id>
+        <description>Open data and interpretation is very important. If you don't share data now, next year it is old.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Open data and interpretation is very important. If you don't share data now, next year it is old.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>689</id>
+        <description>Digital technologies are driving acceleration.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Innovation</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>Digital technologies are driving acceleration.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>690</id>
+        <description>In Japan, difficult to make the archaeological records open because of copyright. Similar issues arise in all countries.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>In Japan, difficult to make the archaeological records open because of copyright. Similar issues arise in all countries.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>691</id>
+        <description>More open. Not just open access, but open data too.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_DS</provenance>
+        <quotation>More open - museum conservations. Not just open access, open data too. But not as far as open notebooks - although this would be useful, and has been useful</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>692</id>
+        <description>There are big changes in 3D Technology, opening up new possibilities. How to store 3D documentation and results is an open question.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>3D Technology - large changes. How to store 3D doc and results is an open question. Opening up new possibilities</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>693</id>
+        <description>There's a growth in cross-disciplinary research, and incorporating the natural Sciences and genetics archaeological research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Natural Sciences, genetics, growth in cross-disciplinary research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>694</id>
+        <description>Increasingly big data is being used in archaeology to try to find patterns and find explanations - rather than tradtional interpretation. Hoping to get a middle ground and use Big data for interpretation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Get big data, try to find patterns and find explanations vs. interpretations.
+            Hoping to get a middle ground and use Big data for interpretation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>695</id>
+        <description>To work in cross-disciplines, need some knowledge, e.g. PhD combined courses, from archaeology and natural sciences.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>To work in cross-disciplines, need some knowledge. E.g. PhD combined courses from Arch and Nat Sciences.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>696</id>
+        <description>Costs for cross-discipline methods have to budgeted into funding applications, as funders expect you to be using these methods!</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Costs have to budgeted into funding applications. Asked to include costs for certain (cross-discipline) methods as funders expect you to be using these methods!</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>697</id>
+        <description>Public archaeology is more about crowd sourcing than citizen science, and it depends on the sector. There are not many examples in universities.
+            Public (volunteers) do:
+            * Translation of old records, diaries, also photographing monuments, generating 3D models.
+            * Vienna archaeology museum - volunteers do translations, communicate to the public.
+            * Preparation of samples for processing.
+            * CH sector creating database of sites and damage to sites. Monuments under threat, put on platform and monitored.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Public archaeology - citizen science, more about crowd sourcing. Public (volunteers) do:
+            * Translation of old records, diaries, also photographing monuments, generating 3D models.
+            * Vienna archaeology museum - volunteers do translations, communicate to the public.
+            * Depends on the sector. Not many examples in universities.
+            * Preparation of samples for processing.
+            * CH sector creating database of sites and damage to sites. Volunteers do this. Study imagery between the years. Will teach volunteers who are interested in this.
+            * GR - Monuments under threat, put on platform. Monitoring.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>698</id>
+        <description>Archaeology involves two ends of spectrum - from the general public to hi-tech experts.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Archaeology involves two ends of spectrum - public to Hi-tech experts.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>699</id>
+        <description>The recent finding that mitochondrial DNA is not just inheritable from the mother led to a whole theory collapsing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Recent find that mitochondrial DNA not just from mother! Whole theory collapsed.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>700</id>
+        <description>The internet has changed publishing, there are now more tasks and the ivory tower has gone: You now have a high level paper and a blog for the public.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>have a high level paper + blog for the public. More tasks - the ivory tower gone.
+            Internet has done this.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>701</id>
+        <description>Everything publicly funded should be Open Access, including documentation and data. You should get funding for the fieldwork and also the processing, the data archiving, dissemination.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Everything publicly funded should be OA.
+            * Documentation also. Same for the data.
+            * Get funding for the fieldwork and also the processing, the data archiving, dissemination.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>702</id>
+        <description>There's a need for new specialisms to develop - have to do so many different things, new roles e.g. communication roles.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>New specialisms to develop - have to do so many diff things, new roles e.g. communication roles.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>703</id>
+        <description>Archaeology is a competitive field, so few jobs. Nicer to have more jobs.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Such a competitive field, so few jobs. Nicer to have more jobs.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>704</id>
+        <description>There's a need for communications courses at university, addressing miscommunication, and misconception. There's a huge spectrum of skills.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Have communications courses at Uni. Address miscommunication, misconception. Huge spectrum of skills.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>705</id>
+        <description>Data management. is another area where training is required. There's a difference between archaeology and Digital Humanities in digital skills.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Data management. is another area. Digital skills - difference between archaeology and Digital Humanities (DH). Big DH centres popping up - shift to the digital. The centres have different roles, large part of their work is to support the students in digital humanities way of working. Can get funding if go in this direction e.g. Mellon Foundation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>706</id>
+        <description>Archaeology has taken on all these technologies for data acquisition, not so much for the publishing and archiving.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>In Archaeology - taken on all these techs for data acquisition, not so much for the publishing and archiving.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>707</id>
+        <description>New topics popping up: Anthropocene - impacts of humans on the earth, driving changes in nature, geology, climate change. What can archaeologists tell us about how people adapted?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>New topics popping up. Atrophosy - impacts of humans on the earth. Driving changes in nature, geology. Climate change - what can archaeologists tell us about how people adapted?</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>708</id>
+        <description>There's increasing virtualisation. Each researcher has own Virtual Research Environment offering service on demand. Diversity of archaeology could be problematic. CLARIN [European Research Infrastructure for Language Resources and Technology] is a very well-defined area, easier to cater for.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Are RI good for archaeology?
+            Sees virtualisation. Each researcher has own environment. VRE offering service on demand, do researchers like this approach? Do they resent the loss of control? Will this cater for our needs? Potentially great? Don't let the technologists think for you. Diversity of archaeology could be problematic. CLARIN is a very well-defined area, easier to cater for.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>709</id>
+        <description>It needs to be much easier to deal with spatial temporal data, to be able to do more analysis on temporal-spatial distribution. 4 dimensional.All archaeologists use this.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Dealing with spatial temporal data, make this much easier - all archaeologists use this. Basic thing. Make maps, analyse. Where, when, .. To be able to do more analysis on temporal spatial distribution. 4 dimensional.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>710</id>
+        <description>Respondents would like to see a shift from the view that the end of data is archive, to one of preservation: thinking about different versions, reuse, and treating it as an ongoing process.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Data and storage - like to see a shift in view that end of data is archive to preservation. E.g. have different versions, think about reuse, treat as an ongoing process. (DMPs?)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>711</id>
+        <description>Envision a situation where scientists take a stand, people are arguing for this, e.g.in environmental studies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_SB</provenance>
+        <quotation>Envision a situation where scientists take a stand. E.g. Environmental studies - people arguing for this.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>712</id>
+        <description>There is a lack of funding.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lack of funding</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>713</id>
+        <description>The field is becoming increasingly commercialized.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Commercialization</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>714</id>
+        <description>Researchers still hesitating about sharing their data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Researchers still hesitating about sharing their data</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>715</id>
+        <description>Political changes (governments) results in changed policies (OA etc.). No long-term policies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Political changes (governments) results in changed policies (OA etc.). No long-term policies</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>716</id>
+        <description>Cultural heritage funding is misused- it is more important to finance several small projects instead of a few that makes impact.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Cultural heritage is misused (more important to finance several small projects instead of a few that makes impact)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>717</id>
+        <description>Archaeology is trying to be more open to "private" archaeologists so that all of them are happy, however not all of them are qualified archaeologists.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Archaeology is trying to be more open to "private" archaeologist so that all of them are happy, however not all of them are qualified archaeologists</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>718</id>
+        <description>Make politicians aware that cultural heritage is not always profitable.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Make politicians aware that cultural heritage is not always profitable</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>719</id>
+        <description>There's a need to raise control mechanisms (i.e., quality and professionalism). There's too many low quality publications, too few publications in comparison to the amount of surveys and poor quality on reports due to the system (not possible to force the archaeologists to write it better).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archaeology</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>WS6_UJ</provenance>
+        <quotation>Raising control mechanisms (quality, professionalization...)
+            Low quality on publications
+            Too few publications in comparison to the amount of surveys etc.
+            Poor quality on reports due to the system (not possible to force the archaeologists to write it better)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>720</id>
+        <description>The most significant development is locked platforms. First Instagram and then Facebook, and subsequently Twitter and YouTube to a degree. Narrowing the scope of the data that one can access. Quite paradoxically, in the so-called age of big data, the data, at least on social media platforms, is shrinking.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>the most significant developments to take place are what you could call locked platforms. The idea of... Certainly, first Instagram and then Facebook. Subsequently, to a degree, Twitter. Now, also to a degree, YouTube. Narrowing the scope of the data that one can access. Quite paradoxically, in this so called age of big data, the data, at least on social media platforms, is shrinking.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>721</id>
+        <description>These locked platforms are being substituted for corporate curated, datasets.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>that sort of data is being substituted, in some sense, for what you could call corporate, curated, datasets. These are also technological developments that have an impact.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>722</id>
+        <description>The forced use of these corporate, proprietary, systems in order to access and analyse the data. For example, in the Social Science One project by Facebook, one is offered all the URL's that have passed through Facebook on Facebook posts over the last year. In order to analyse them, you would have to pipe in from wherever you are and analyse them on the servers of Facebook and only retrieve, from those servers, aggregated outcomes.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>the forced use of these corporate, proprietary, systems in order to access and analyse the data. For example, in the Social Science One project by Facebook, one is offered all the URL's that have passed through Facebook on Facebook posts over the last year. In order to analyse them, you would have to pipe in from wherever you are and analyse them on the servers of Facebook and only retrieve, from those servers, aggregated outcomes. That's the third development.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>723</id>
+        <description>As platforms begin to narrow access to data, we are moving to post-API research. What kind of research can take place using different techniques, approaches, that don't reply on the application programming interface or the developers' mode or the developers' way into social media platforms? People are beginning to think about rehabilitating scraping.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>as platforms begin to narrow access to data... Not just data generally, but also the types of data available. There are a number of developments in the field. One of those, you could call post-API research. What kind of research can take place using different techniques, approaches, that don't reply on the application programming interface or the developers' mode or the developers' way into social media platforms?
+            One of the ways in which it's changing is people are beginning to think about rehabilitating scraping, finding...</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>724</id>
+        <description>People are thinking about trying to put pressure on social media companies to create public archives, or at least metadata, of what is stored. They've started to do this through political ad archiving tools, but these are only for a very, very, specific type of data.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>thinking about trying to put pressure on social media companies to create public archives, or at least metadata, of what is stored. They've started to do this through political ad archiving tools. These are only for a very, very, specific type of data. I think public archives are one of the things that is currently being advocated for.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>725</id>
+        <description>There are new pushes towards thinking about new ethnographic approaches, small data approaches.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>there new pushes towards thinking about new ethnographic approaches, small data approaches</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>726</id>
+        <description>People are increasingly asking themselves whether or not we should be over-investing our time in trying to crack the API/social media platform as a dataset. Instead, thinking about other kinds of data are available, about new kinds of collection and sampling techniques. Whether they're sensors or other more traditional forms of data collection.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>people are increasingly asking themselves whether or not we should be over-investing our time in trying to crack the API or the social media platform as a dataset. Instead, think about what other kinds of data are available out there, thinking about new kinds of collection and sampling techniques through... Whether they're sensors, whether they're other more traditional forms of data collection. So, basically, rethinking our reliance on the API.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>727</id>
+        <description>People are talking about developing alternatives to the commercial social media platforms. There are terms such as 'platform cooperativism', there are also actual concrete examples of alternatives. The question is, in which areas of life would these be workable?</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>People are talking about developing alternatives to the commercial social media platforms. There are terms such as 'platform cooperativism', there are also actual concrete examples of alternatives. The question is, in which areas of life would these be workable?
+            In academia, for example, there is quite a reliance, still, on these academic social hubs online, whether it's academia.edu or ResearchGate or things like this, where there are community organised and led initiatives that are alternatives. So, to think about some alternative platforms.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>728</id>
+        <description>There has been a momentum shift with respect to the big social media platforms. Whether it's share prices or unique monthly visitors, or what have you, we're now at a point where we have seen concrete signs of decline. That's only in a few countries, for Facebook. Whereas some of its other platforms are only continuing to grow, such as Instagram.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>there has been a momentum shift with respect to the big social media platforms. Whether it's share prices or unique monthly visitors, or what have you, we're now at a point where we have seen concrete signs of decline. That's only in a few countries, for Facebook. Whereas some of its other platforms are only continuing to grow, such as Instagram.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>729</id>
+        <description>We're also seeing an interesting shift, by certain platforms, to begin to decide what sort of speech is proper and what sort of speech is improper. They're beginning to use wider definitions of this new notion of extreme speech being something that should be regulated. Platform self-regulation. These sorts of developments, generally speaking, are beginning to create further awareness of the need for alternatives.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>we're also seeing an interesting shift, by certain platforms, to begin to decide what sort of speech is proper and what sort of speech is improper. They're beginning to use wider definitions of... Well not necessarily hate, but this new notion of extreme speech being something that should be, in some ways, regulated. Platform self-regulation.
+            Of course, there is also what has been put forward by the European Commission and, of course, what's also been advocated for by the UK government. On a parliamentary committee level, not on a governmental level, but nevertheless active measures being taken to hold big social media companies more accountable. I think these sorts of developments, generally speaking, are beginning to create further awareness of the need for alternatives.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>730</id>
+        <description>The humanities have taken quite a hit in the last five years or so, with quite a systematic drop in funding. This is one of the things that has impacted, just generally speaking, the capacity to have the time to do research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>The humanities, of course, have taken quite a hit in the last five years or so, with quite a systematic drop in funding. This is one of the things that has impacted, just generally speaking, the capacity to have the time to do research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>731</id>
+        <description>In digital media studies or digital studies there has also been a computational turn, or shift, culturally. Which is interesting on the one hand, on the other hand we see that it is not necessarily so easy to distinguish one's approach from that of data science. The digital humanities, more broadly, is caught in a number of debates, whether they're internal or external, concerning the extent to which what one is doing is more humanities or more data science.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>More specifically, I think digital media studies or digital studies, I think there has also been a computational turn, or shift, culturally. Which is interesting on the one hand, on the other hand we see that it is not necessarily so easy to distinguish one's approach from that of data science. I think that the digital humanities, more broadly, is caught in a number of debates, whether they're internal or external, concerning the extent to which what one is doing is more humanities or more data science.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>732</id>
+        <description>Digital humanities is the growth area in humanities. I don't know if it's improving the sector, but it's certainly driving it. What you see, of course, is the rise of the data rich and the data poor and the data skilled and the less skilled. You get new divides, you get new tensions, you get new debates, that are vociferous, about the difference between being a subject matter expert versus being an analytical software expert and the need to bridge that divide. You get two cultures, that type of divide.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>the digital humanities is the growth area, in some ways, in humanities. I think that is driving the sector. I don't know if it's improving the sector, but it's certainly driving it. What you see, of course, is the rise of those who have the data- You have the data rich and the data poor and the data skilled and the less skilled. You get new divides, you get new tensions, you get new debates, that are vociferous, about the difference between being a subject matter expert versus being an analytical software expert and the need to bridge that divide. You get a new kind of... Two cultures, that type of divide</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>733</id>
+        <description>The kinds of research questions that are posed in the humanities should continue to be posed, rather than having work be methods or software or even data-driven.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>the kinds of research questions that are posed in the humanities should continue to be posed, rather than having work be methods or software or even data-driven. I think this whole idea of what drives research is something that I think needs to change in the age of the rise of data science within digital humanities.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>734</id>
+        <description>A lot of data science work is done is in tiger teams.There are a number of ways of approaching ways to work in an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary or multidisciplinary fashion. A lot of work needs to be done on figuring out the means by which to bring the different skillsets together.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>the way in which a lot of the data science work is done is in tiger teams. I mentioned, before, that there are those who are deft at handling the analytical software and those who are not. Oftentimes, the work that is done is in those hands. There are a number of ways of approaching ways to work in an interdisciplinary or transdisciplinary or multidisciplinary fashion. I think that a lot of work needs to be done on figuring out means by which... Formats, or other working methods, to bring the different skillsets together.
+            My own approach to it is a kind of transcultural... One needs to understand how to talk to programmers and how to talk to designers and visualisers, how to talk to methodologists, how to talk to analysts. Everyone should understand each other's language. That is how I like to approach it.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>735</id>
+        <description>There has been an increase in the study of extremism and toxicity online. There's been the rise of the study of alternative platforms as incubators of some of these subcultural trends, whether it's 4chan or Reddit. There has also been, increasingly, research into what one could call web vernaculars. These specific subcultural milieu where language and code are developed, and the extent to which those are the breeding grounds for its spread into the mainstream or to the normies as it were.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>there has been an increase in the study of extremism and toxicity online. There's been the rise of the study of alternative platforms as incubators of some of these subcultural trends, whether it's 4chan or [Remnet 00:20:39]. There also has been, increasingly, research into what one could call web vernaculars. These specific subcultural milieu where language and code are developed, and the extent to which those are the breeding grounds for its spread into the mainstream or to the normies as it were. I think that those are palpable trends.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>736</id>
+        <description>The other trend is the rise of so-called fake news and disinformation. These particular subject matters are being studied ontologically, epistemologically, and also being historicised. There's been a lot of work on that recently.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>The other one is the rise of so-called fake news and disinformation. I think that these particular subject matters are being studied ontologically, epistemologically, and also being historicised. There's been a lot of work on that recently.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>737</id>
+        <description>There's been a new computational turn towards an interest in AI and machine learning, both in terms of how to critique machine bias but also how to retrain the machine.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>of course, there's been a real recent turn... A new computational turn towards an interest in AI and machine learning, both in terms of how to critique machine bias but also how to retrain the machine.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>738</id>
+        <description>One of the solutions put forward for fake news has been the rise of small-scale fact checking bureaus, which have been hired or asked to volunteer by Facebook, to solve what is a vast problem. How that's impacted my work has been to go back into the debates about the construction of fact, largely from science studies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>one of the solutions put forward for so-called fake news has been the rise of small-scale fact checking bureaus which have been hired or asked to volunteer by Facebook to solve what is a vast problem. It's interesting that that what is... How that's impacted my work has been to go back into the debates about the construction of fact. Largely, from science studies and... This new notion of... This neologism of what is a public fact, as different from a fact manufactured in a laboratory for example. I think that's been one of the outcomes, substantive... It's one of the scholarly outcomes of one of the developments in the field.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>739</id>
+        <description>There is probably, quite soon, fake news fatigue setting in. There is also the question of persuasion; there might be a fake news problem, but are people actually being persuaded. This is a return to some of the gambits from early cultural studies, and from television studies in particular, about active audiences as opposed to just spectators or passive consumers of online goop.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>there is probably, quite soon, fake news fatigue setting in. I think there is also the question of... Yes, the question of persuasion is what people are now talking about increasingly. The extent to which... There might be a fake news problem, but are people actually being persuaded in the return, then, to some of the gambits from early cultural studies about... Or from television studies, in particular, about active audiences as opposed to just spectators or passive consumers of online goop. That, I see developing already.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>740</id>
+        <description>A lot of people in media studies, whether it's journalism studies or digital media, are increasingly being asked to participate in governmental committees and ultimately make policy recommendations. I would like to see happen, probably, would be for us, either, to be better at it or to stop being asked.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>a lot of people in media studies, whether it's journalism studies or digital media, are increasingly being asked to participate in governmental committees and ultimately make policy recommendations. I find this to be an interesting change in scholarly practice, certainly, for our field. What I would like to see happen, probably, would be for us, either, to be better at it or to stop being asked.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>741</id>
+        <description>Whether it's through funding bodies or academic review processes, there is increasingly this call for so-called valorisation, the idea of having your work have some kind of societal impact.
+            We're seeing quite a lot of our work as having quite some impact. Whether it's press impact or whether we're asked to do studies for the government or we're asked to participate in committees, high level commissions at the European Commission, or things along those lines.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV043</provenance>
+        <quotation>whether it's through funding bodies or academic review processes, there is increasingly this call for so-called valorisation, the idea of having your work have some kind of societal impact.
+            So I think we're seeing quite a lot of our work as having quite some impact. Whether it's press impact or whether we're asked to do studies for the government or we're asked to participate in committees, high level commissions at the European Commission, or things along those lines.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>742</id>
+        <description>There is a trend towards archives as networked institutions rather than knowledge silos.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>Archives as networked institutions rather than knowledge silo's</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>743</id>
+        <description>There is increasingly more focus on data aggregations. Technical know-how is needed on how to plug data sets of individual archives into larger entities (e.g. through API's).</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>More focus on data aggregations. Technical know-how is needed on how to plug data setsof individual archives into larger entities (e.g. through API's)</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>744</id>
+        <description>Combined data may not adhere to the same standards. It becomes important to develop tools to clean data, to enhance their multilinguality etc. preferably per batch and automated as much as possible.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Interoperability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>Combined data may not adhere to the same standards. It becomes important to develop tools to clean data, to enhance their multilinguality etc. preferably per batch and automated as much as possible</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>745</id>
+        <description>The focus on technological developments might be too strong. A big part of all archives are not even scanned. Instead of investing in more tools, it is important to recognise the importance of the groundwork of 'simply' scanning more archives.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>the focus on technological developments might be somewhat too strong. In the end, a big part of all archives is not even scanned. Instead of investing in more tools, it is important to recognise the importance of the ground work of 'simply' scanning more archives.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>746</id>
+        <description>The amount of archival material which is now digitally available is only the tip of the iceberg. Funding bodies need to be more aware that the thing researchers desire most of all, is more data to work with.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>the amount of archival material which is now digitally available is only the tip of the iceberg. Funding bodies need to be more aware that the thing researchers desire most of all, is more data to work with.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>747</id>
+        <description>It is important that researchers become more acquainted with the necessary skills to work with more data, such as programming.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>it is important that researchers become more acquainted with the necessary skills to do that, such as programming.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>748</id>
+        <description>After some years of relatively low attention, the importance of cultural heritage is now increasingly recognised. This happens both at a national and at European level.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>After some years of relatively low attention, the importance of cultural heritage is now increasingly recognised. This happens both at a national and at European level.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>749</id>
+        <description>Working in the field of European Research Infrastructures, I personally feel that the European Commission has been quite generous when it comes to funding solid proposals. This investment has payed off in the form of a vibrant HSS RI landscape. I can gladly state that I experience this in my day to day work as well.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>Working in the field of European Research Infrastructures, I personally feel that the European Commission has been quite generous when it comes to funding solid proposals. This investment has payed off in the form of a vibrant HSS RI landscape. I can gladly state that I experience this in my day to day work as well.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>750</id>
+        <description>It is promising that cultural heritage has received more political attention. Longer term funding allows institutions to plan ahead and to put a longer term strategy in place, which greatly enhances the sustainability of these organisations.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Archives</discipline>
+            <discipline>libraries</discipline>
+            <discipline>museums</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>it is promising that cultural heritage has received more political attention. Longer term funding allows institutions to plan ahead and to put a longer term strategy in place, which greatly enhances the sustainability of these organisations.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>751</id>
+        <description>On a national level the political attention cultural heritage receivesdeserves some careful attention. As identity politics has become more prominent over recent years, it is important to keep an eye on the consequences of this new focus on the 'national narrative' for policy making and for funding streams.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>on a national level the political attention cultural heritage receives also deserves some careful attention. As identity politics has become more prominent over recent years, it is important to keep an eye on the consequences of this new focus on the 'national narrative' for policy making and for funding streams.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>752</id>
+        <description>The stories heritage tells are often plural and not confined to national boundaries. It is important that our approach to heritage as a society remains deliberate, nuanced and openminded.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>The stories heritage tells are often plural and not confined to national boundaries. It is important that our approach to heritage as a society remains deliberate, nuanced and openminded.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>753</id>
+        <description>The perceived importance of cultural heritage has to stretch beyond the 'national masterpiece'. Local archives can be of great importance in showing more marginal histories. At the same time, the notion of international heritage can help to contextualise heritage better.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY001</provenance>
+        <quotation>The perceived importance of cultural heritage has to stretch beyond the 'national masterpiece'. Local archives can be of great importance in showing more marginal histories. At the same time, the notion of international heritage can help to contextualise heritage better.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>754</id>
+        <description>Web 2.0 tools are the most relevant tech development having an impact on the sector in recent years.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Web 2.0 tools</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>755</id>
+        <description>Multimodality is increasingly important because of web 2.0.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Multimodality</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>756</id>
+        <description>Social media will change our approach to teaching and assessing.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Social media will change our approach to teaching and assessing</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>757</id>
+        <description>There is the potential for community interconnection through high-speed, probably 5G, networking: School and teacher communities twinning.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Community interconnection [through high-speed probably 5G networking]. School and teacher communities twinning.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>758</id>
+        <description>Greater community interconnection requires a change in legislation, mentality, and technological infrastructure.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Networks</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Legislation, mentality, technological infrastructure</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>759</id>
+        <description>There is a tension (in Greece) between leftist and neo-liberal policy mindsets.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Tension between leftist and neo-liberal policy mindsets</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>760</id>
+        <description>The impact of the financial crisis continues to affect the sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>financial crisis</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>761</id>
+        <description>Some countries, such as Greece, continue to be impacted by migration and the braindrain.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>migration and braindrain</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>762</id>
+        <description>There is a lack of constant policy, funding, and human capital.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Other</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY002</provenance>
+        <quotation>Lack of constant policy, lack of funding, lack of human capital</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>763</id>
+        <description>Aritificial Intelligence and Machine Learning are having an impact on the sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY003</provenance>
+        <quotation>AI/ML</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>764</id>
+        <description>Quantum Computing is having an impact on the sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All social sciences</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY003</provenance>
+        <quotation>Quantum Computing</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>765</id>
+        <description>The digitalisation of archival and bibliographical sources and their availability online have had an impact on the sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>digitalisation of archival and bibliographical sources and their availability online</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>766</id>
+        <description>It is increasingly difficult to organise and keep track of everything relevant that is online.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>making it more visible but also more difficult to organise and keep track of everything relevant that is online</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>767</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more open access initiatives as regards bibliography, more classification tools that would enable researchers to better organise their research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>more open access initiatives as regards bibliography, more classification tools that would enable me and other researchers to better organise our research</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>768</id>
+        <description>There's a need for faster internet connections, bigger digital institutional depository space that would enable me and other researchers to keep our work visible, use and reuse our data and findings.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Reusability</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>faster internet connections, bigger digital institutional depository space that would enable me and other researchers to keep our work visible, use and reuse our data and findings</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>769</id>
+        <description>There's a need for consistent long term state and European funding of the public institutions which undertake research and ensure the curation of depositories.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>consistent long term state and European funding of the public institutions which undertake research and ensure the curation of depositories</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>770</id>
+        <description>There's a need for state and European investing in the technical updating of the existing digital infrastructures.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>state and European investing in technical updating of the existing digital infrastructures</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>771</id>
+        <description>The sector has been affected by austerity measures, brain drain as young researchers of every field have to leave Greece to find work, and the indifference of state and European decisions makers to fund public reasearch institutions.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>Austerity measures, brain drain as young researchers of every field have to leave Greece to find work, indifference of state and European decisions makers to fund public reasearch institutions</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>772</id>
+        <description>There's a trend towards the widespread use of digital resources and tools that enable researchers to get quicker results, but sometimes this gives young researchers the illusion that what is not digitalised does not exist.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>wide use of digital resources and tools that enable researchers to get quicker results but sometimes give young researchers the illusion that what is not digitalised does not exist</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>773</id>
+        <description>We have to find a balance between getting quick results from online resources and analysing in a profound way the results.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>have to find a balance between getting quick results from online resources and analysing in a profound way these results</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>774</id>
+        <description>There's the potential for more collaborative projects developing, since digitalisation and digital tools enable such a venture.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>I would like to see more collaborative projects developing, since digitalisation and digital tools enable such a venture</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>775</id>
+        <description>Researchers and academics should not focus on quantitative results seeking to increase
+            their influence in academia.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>researchers and academics should not focus on quantitative results seeking to increase
+            their influence in academia,</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>776</id>
+        <description>Researchers should seek to collaborate in an interdisciplinary context.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>should instead seek to collaborate in an interdisciplinary
+            context</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>777</id>
+        <description>Researchers should seek to share their work in an open access environment.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY004</provenance>
+        <quotation>share their work in an open access environment</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>778</id>
+        <description>In Computational Linguistics, Machine Learning is the most dominant and relevant techology trend.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY005</provenance>
+        <quotation>Computational Linguistics, Machine Learning is the most dominant and relevant tech for my research/teaching.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>779</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more open-access applications.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY005</provenance>
+        <quotation>More open-access apps.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>780</id>
+        <description>Recent trends in computational linguistics include: authorship detection, machine translation, and corpora analysis.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY005</provenance>
+        <quotation>Authorship detection, Machine Translation, Corpora analysis</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>781</id>
+        <description>There is a need for rapid changes and readjustment of research policies.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY005</provenance>
+        <quotation>Rapid changes and readjustment of research policies.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>782</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more Digital Humanities and Computational Linguistics undergraduate and postgraduate programmes.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>SVY005</provenance>
+        <quotation>I hope to see more DH and CL undergraduate and postgraduate programmes.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>783</id>
+        <description>Artificial intelligence is impacting the cultural heritage sector. The discussions around the machine classification of records, for example, have been going on for a number of years now, more recently I've conducted research in using machine learning for arrangement description of archives and the representation and exploration of archival material.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>in terms of the cultural heritage and, in particular, archive, definitely, I see artificial intelligence as impacting this sector. The discussions around the machine classification of records, for example, have been going on for a number of years now.
+            Applications since the, maybe, mid-2000s for artificial intelligence in the digital humanities for exploration of archival materials.
+            More recently I've conducted research in using machine learning for arrangement description of archives and the representation and exploration of archival material. So that's definitely one that continues to shape the future of the sector.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>784</id>
+        <description>Digitisation, the transformation of analogue materials into digital form has been an ongoing theme from about the mid-1990s at least, maybe even before then.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>digitisation itself, just the transformation of analogue materials into digital form has been an ongoing theme, and all that entails, from about the mid-1990s at least, maybe even before then.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>785</id>
+        <description>The big trend is blockchain and decentralised trust systems or technologie, sometimes they're also called distributed ledgers. That is not even a crest of the wave of this technology yet.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Infrastructure</context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>the big one that I'm personally focused on, and that I think is not even a crest of the wave yet of this technology, is blockchain and decentralised trust systems or technologies.
+            I refer them more broadly. Sometimes they're also called distributed ledgers.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>786</id>
+        <description>We haven't really seen the full effects of blockchain, and I do feel that's going start to shape things.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>We haven't really seen the full effects of blockchain, and I do feel that's going start to shape things.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>787</id>
+        <description>It won't be just one individual technology on its own, but combinations of technologies, like digitisation, AI and blockchain. That might even be combined with other types of technology like biometrics. For example, facial recognition for the identification of people in photographs, or other types of machine matching that would help us identify individuals.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+            <context>Integration</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>combinations of these technologies, like digitisation, AI and blockchain. So it won't be just one individual technology on its own. It'll be using all of these technologies in combination.
+            And that might even be combined with other types of technology like biometrics. For example, facial recognition for the identification of people in photographs, or other types of machine matching that would help us identify individuals.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>788</id>
+        <description>The applications of AI is going to become deeper and broader. Before we might have been looking at machine classification of records, or maybe network analytics to look at relationships between different individuals mentioned in a corpora, maybe even linked open data. I think we'll see much more application of machine learning for the detection of manipulation, for assessment of the trustworthiness, especially in an era of fake news and deep fakes. Potentially to assess authenticity of archival work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>the applications of AI are going to become deeper and broader. So whilst before we might have been looking at machine classification of records, or maybe network analytics to look at relationships between different individuals mentioned in a corpora, maybe even linked open data.
+            I think we'll see much more application of machine learning for the detection of manipulation, for assessment of the trustworthiness, especially in an era of fake news and deep fakes. Potentially, to assess authenticity of archival work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>789</id>
+        <description>We're working on a project we're calling 'computational archival science' and the formation of a new trans-discipline that combines computer science with archival science.
+            Because I firmly believe that if we just deploy these technologies without thinking critically, and especially through an archival lens, they do have the potential to do, perversely, more damage than good.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>'computational archival science' and the formation of a new trans-discipline that combines computer science with archival science.
+            Because I firmly believe that if we just deploy these technologies without thinking critically, and especially through an archival lens, they do have the potential to do, perversely, more damage than good.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>790</id>
+        <description>There's a need to promote this trans-discipline of computational archival science.
+            It means that in the training of our students in archival programs, we have to introduce them much more to computational thinking, computational approaches. They have to become comfortable with different forms of AI, with blockchain technologies. And this is a steep learning curve for many students that are coming in from backgrounds that are still largely from within the arts. So we may need to recruit more students from engineering and computer science, and then hopefully also bring along some of the students from the arts who are willing to learn.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need to promote this trans-discipline of computational archival science.
+            It means that in the training of our students in archival programs, we have to introduce them much more to computational thinking, computational approaches. They have to become comfortable with different forms of AI, with blockchain technologies.
+            And this is a steep learning curve for many students that are coming in from backgrounds that are still largely from within the arts. So we may need to recruit more students from engineering and computer science, and then hopefully also bring along some of the students from the arts who are willing to learn.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>791</id>
+        <description>We need more venues to present Computation Archival Science research. We've got IEE Big Data, Computational Archival Science. I'd like to see one more similar type of conference in Europe. There are a few that have been focused on preservation, which tend to be more computational in focus, but I think they really have a focus for preservation.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>we need more venues to present that research. So we've got IEE Big Data, Computational Archival Science. I'd like to see one more similar type of conference in Europe. There are a few like ___[0:16:11], I guess.
+            There are a few that have been focused on preservation, which tend to be more computational in focus, but I think they really have a focus for preservation.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>792</id>
+        <description>Computational Archival Science has had a very strong AI, data science type feeling to it. There's work, like I'm doing with blockchain, that is more the solutions architecture side of things looking at cybersecurity, cryptography. So integrating all of those into this computational archival science big tent might be the way to go.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>Computational Archival Science has had a very strong AI, data science type feeling to it. There's work, like I'm doing with blockchain, that is more the solutions architecture side of things looking at cybersecurity, cryptography.
+            So integrating all of those into this computational archival science big tent might be the way to go.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>793</id>
+        <description>The archival sector is certainly not well funded; it's not a sector that traditionally has been a high public policy priority area. Consequently, the kinds of resources that are needed for large scale computation, and the kinds of sophisticated computational research, have not really been coming our way. Large, collaborative-type research projects are needed, otherwise we run the risk of really falling behind in how we deal with the preservation of our cultural heritage material.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>archival sector is certainly not well funded. It's not a sector that traditionally has been a high public policy priority area.
+            And so, consequently, the kinds of resources that are needed for large scale computation, and the kinds of sophisticated computational research, that may be AI, the types of work that project ARCHANGEL has been undertaking, have not really been coming our way.
+            So, I mean, the fact that John Collomosse, as an engineering professor at University of Surrey, received $400,000 in combination with the Open Data Institute, I believe it was, and the National Archive, that's the kind of big, large scale research that can really move the needle.
+            And so large, collaborate-type research projects are needed like this. Otherwise, I think we run the risk of really falling behind in how we deal with the preservation of our cultural heritage material.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>794</id>
+        <description>The records that are being created around us are not standing still, so we can't just bury our heads in the sand.There is increasingly a vast swathe of digital materials that are now being created on social media platforms, and on blockchain platforms, that we'll have no way of preserving these materials.
+            There's somewhat of an urgency, but from a public policy perspective, when you're faced with things like Brexit and so on, it's very difficult to get traction for these kinds of issues.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>The records that are being created around us are not standing still, so it's not as if we can just bury our heads in the sand. "Well, our preservation duties will just limit themselves to material that we already know how to handle."
+            There is increasingly a vast swathe of digital materials that are now being created on social media platforms, and on blockchain platforms, that we'll have no way of preserving these materials.
+            So I do feel there's somewhat of an urgency, but from a public policy perspective, when you're faced with things like Brexit and so on, it's very difficult to get traction for these kinds of issues.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>795</id>
+        <description>It's been really very important for me to partner with engineers, and computers scientists, and industry partners, because that's where I've gotten the big money to do my archival work.
+            Often, the archival work is stealthily built into projects. It's a challenge, because I often find myself having to write research proposals and shape things in a way that aren't directly in archival science, because it's not a well known field. I either have to make it really applied and focused, so applying big data science to the exploration of large corpora, or I have to cloak more fundamental questions by putting a different angle on it.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>it's been really very important for me to partner with engineers, and computers scientists, and industry partners, because that's where I've gotten the big money to do my archival work.
+            Often, the archival work is stealthily built into. It's a challenge, because I often find myself having to write research proposals and shape things in a way that aren't directly in archival science, because it's not a well know field. It's not one that they recognise.
+            I either have to make it really applied and focused, so applying big data science to the exploration of large corpora, or I have to cloak more fundamental questions in some kind of... put a different angle on it. So like, "Okay, we're exploring blockchain technology." So, I guess, you just find your ways and means to make things work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>796</id>
+        <description>The really computation archival science oriented work will be large collaborative scientific teams. We need funding agencies to acknowledge the need for this type of research, and to accept the model. We need our national archives, or large archival institutions, to step up as agents of change. To play a leadership role, and a living lab, in a sense, to do the research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>the really computation archival science oriented work will be large collaborative scientific teams.
+            So the changes needed to improve the sector? Well, we need funding agencies to acknowledge the need for this type of research, and to accept the model. We need our national archives, or large archival institutions, to step up as agents of change. To play a leadership role, and a living lab, in a sense, to do the research.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>797</id>
+        <description>Funding agencies need to be educated on archival science and where it's heading, and how explorations in archival science can fan out into other areas as well.So part of the work I do explores how archival science theory can inform efforts around identification of disinformation online and lead to the better design of blockchain systems, not just for archival applications, but in applications like, for example, healthcare.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>Funding agencies need to be educated on archival science and where its heading, and how explorations in archival science can fan out into other areas as well.
+            So part of the work I do explores how archival science theory can inform efforts around identification of disinformation online, fake news, deep fakes. Lead to the better design of blockchain systems, not just for archival applications, but in applications like, for example, healthcare.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>798</id>
+        <description>There's a large stream of anti-colonialism, human rights oriented research and the role of archives and archivists, both as acting to buttress regimes that have been less than respectful of human rights, as well as the role the archives in defending human rights.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>There's a large stream of anti-colonialism, human rights oriented research.
+            And the role of archives and archivists, both as acting to buttress regimes that have been less than respectful of human rights, as well as the role the archives in defending human rights. So there's been quite a good bit of research that focuses on that.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>799</id>
+        <description>There is a lot of important research on the socially constructed nature of the archives, critical theoretic archival scholarship. That is actually really useful scholarship to bring to the table in the data science discourse, where I find if you talk to computer scientists about the data science production supply chain, they're very naive about where data comes from and how transformations of data can affect its authenticity. They really don't think about it at all in most cases.
+            Data is constructed, socially constructed, technically constructed and transformed in many different ways that can affect the story that it tells you.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+            <consequences>Bias</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV044</provenance>
+        <quotation>research on the socially constructed nature of the archives, if you will. So I would call it critical theoretic archival scholarship.
+            That is actually really useful scholarship to bring to the table in the data science discourse, where I find if you talk to computer scientists about the data science production supply chain, they're very naive about where data comes from and how transformations of data can affect its authenticity.
+            They really don't think about it at all in most cases. And so it's really by bringing these critical theoretic conversations into the conversations with computer scientists, and data scientist, that we can begin to say, "Data does not spring full blown from the head of Zeus."
+            That it is constructed, socially constructed, technically constructed and transformed in many different ways that can affect the story that it tells you. And that's not always consciously. It can distort the story that it tells you. I feel that scholarship has a lot to offer scholarship in the technology space as well.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>800</id>
+        <description>The big tech development is that all of the things that we used to need specific machines for, everyone has on them now: We don't need a scanner because your phone can take 600 DPI images; you don't need recording audio equipment to do oral history, you can just put on the notes app or memo app. The burden has been lifted of institutions because all of it is done with off-the-shelf tech that people have in their pockets anyway.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>the big tech development is just the fact that all of the things that we used to need specific machines for, everyone has on them now. We don't need a scanner because your phone can take 600 DPI images if it's any reasonable Android or iPhone. You don't need recording audio equipment to do oral history, you can just put the notes app, I think it has, like, a... or memos app has a record function.
+            So, it's really just been... the burden has been lifted on institutions in a lot of ways to have these very specific pieces of technology, because all of it is done with off-the-shelf tech that people have in their pockets anyway.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>801</id>
+        <description>The ubiquitous of mobile technology forces us to think of ways to integrate apps into lessons, or to lean in the direction of using the phones, because everyone is quite familiar with how they work. It forced me to economise time and resources, it puts me in a mindset of how to be more efficient because everyone has a piece of technology they're quite familiar with.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Accessibility</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>it forces my hand, sort of, or my mind more than anything to think of ways to integrate apps and things into lessons or to lean in the direction of using the phones because everyone is quite familiar with how they work.
+            So, it has really, kind of, forced me to economise time and resources because training people, you know, we may still have some of that equipment or maybe the scans need to be at a higher resolution than what we can necessarily get out of a phone or transcription software that'll only run on a Windows machine or something, it does make me think, "How important is it to have those things?" because I know it's going to require training, specialist training and other resources to get done. So, it puts me in a mindset of how to be more efficient because everyone has a piece of technology they're quite familiar with.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>802</id>
+        <description>The big push in cultural heritage is just going to be increasing emphasis on 3D modelling and image work. As recently as two or three years ago, if you wanted to scan objects and create 3D models of them, you needed really specialised equipment. Now, if you get a couple of phones together with the right open-source app, you can create perfectly valuable 3D models.
+            The Nomad project is a great example of that, where they went into a Somali immigrant neighbourhood in Britain and had them use off-the-shelf technology to scan 3D objects of pots and things from Somalia in order to try to connect the younger generation, which is a diaspora to its original roots.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>the big push in cultural heritage is just going to be increasing emphasis on 3D modelling and image work. As recently as maybe even two, three years ago, if you wanted to scan objects and create 3D models of them, you, kind of, needed really specialised equipment. Now, if you get a couple of phones together with the right open-source app, you can create perfectly valuable 3D models.
+            The Nomad project is a great example of that, where they went into a Somali immigrant neighbourhood in Britain and had them use off-the-shelf technology to scan 3D objects of, like, pots and things from Somalia in order to try to connect the younger generation, which is a diaspora to its original roots.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>803</id>
+        <description>We're going to start shifting away from the overly textual-based emphasis that we do in cultural heritage. It's really going to be images and objects more and more, even in archives. It'll need a lot of professional development that's going to need to push us in that direction, but we're also going to completely rethink our outward-facing, public-facing designs, because, right now, it's all based on text search, but in five years, we're going to have to figure out how to get people to search scalable rotatable objects, which is completely different.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Data types</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Digital Humanities</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>we're going to start shifting away, I think, from the overly textual-based emphasis that we do in cultural heritage. It's really going to be images and objects more and more, even in archives. That's what's going to get more priority in terms of the work. It's just going to force all of us to have to think about whether or not we even know how to make 3D models. Like, it'll be a lot of professional development that's going to need to push us in that direction, but it's also going to make us think about...
+            We're going to completely rethink our outward-facing, public-facing designs, because, right now, it's all based on text search, but in five years, we're going to have to figure out how to get people to search scalable rotatable objects, which is completely different.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>804</id>
+        <description>I'd like to see more emphasis on working with learning machines. It feels as if whenever the concept of learning machines comes up, people think of it as a replacement for volunteers,if we were to focus our ideas towards a Siri or an Alexa that works with our volunteers to help enhance the kind of work they do that would be huge because. I don't want to see artificial intelligence and even learning machines replace volunteerism because it matters so much to the people who are doing the volunteering.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'd like to see more emphasis, in the cultural heritage sector especially and in the crowdsourcing sector, on working with learning machines. It feels as if whenever the concept of learning machines comes up, people think of it as a replacement for volunteers, like we'll have the AI do the work.
+            I think if we were to focus our ideas towards a Siri or an Alexa that works with our volunteers to help enhance the kind of work they do and works with our students that we bring into the archives to just give them assistance, seeing it as more of a tool set. I think that would be huge because I don't want to see artificial intelligence and even learning machines replace volunteerism because it matters so much to the people who are doing the volunteering, that part of their duty.
+            Also, it's going to help keep up with things like shifting to 3D modelling if we have learning machines that work with volunteers, that can adjust and take on some of the more [rote 0:07:53] duties and some of the more technical duties that require coding and these sorts of things that are behind the scenes. If it's something that can work with people, it's going to help them adjust better, rather than, "Alright, scrap everything you learned before and now we have to start from the beginning, working with 3D modelling." It's just going to turn off way too many people.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>805</id>
+        <description>The cultural heritage sector is going to have to get over its fear of change. There are two main fears when it comes to dealing with volunteers: One is the fear of replacing professionals with volunteers and the other is the fear of replacing humans with machines. That's going to need a cultural shift, seeing that neither thing is actually replacing the other but seeing these things as tools to enhance, the same way that the laptop and the phone has completely changed the way we do work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>the cultural heritage sector is going to have to get over its fear of change. So, there are two main fears that I've come across in my research when it comes to dealing with volunteers, especially crowdsourcing. One is the fear of replacing professionals with volunteers and the other is the fear of replacing humans with machines.
+            That's just going to be maybe a cultural shift that neither thing is actually replacing the other, which is a broader cultural shift as well. I mean, plenty of ppl are afraid of machines taking their jobs, but seeing these things as tools to enhance the way that the laptop and the phone has completely changed the way we do work, that's the first thing that's got to shift.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>806</id>
+        <description>There needs to be an investment indeveloping more bespoke learning machines, as opposed to try to ham-fist in broader AI, like Siri for example, into the cultural heritage sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Tool development</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>There's going to need to be an investment in actually developing more bespoke learning machines, as opposed to try to ham-fist in broader AI, like Siri for example, into the cultural heritage sector. It just doesn't... there are a lot of specific things that happen in archives and museums in particular, and libraries as well, that if you were to make it a part of Siri's programming, I just don't see how it would work. I don't see how it would fit what those things are designed to do, which is to sell you things, but I don't see how it fits those designs.
+            We, kind of, need to come up with our own system, the way that George Mason University looks to Omeka and all of these, and Zotero, to meet the demands of designing exhibitions, and collecting research and keeping it all in order. We need that kind of movement towards bespoke learning machines.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>807</id>
+        <description>We need a common language andmore open access in the sector, because we need more data for learning machines to process and understand. across a lot of these digital programmes. If there's open access, learning machines would be better able to meet the demands of most of the discipline, but the problem is, even if you have open access, getting two projects to talk to each other and to match up is often complicated because there hasn't been an equivalent of a Google for the digitisation in the cultural heritage sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think that a third thing we would need to do to make this happen is to come up with a more common language across a lot of these digital programmes. We have a mostly common language for things like metadata, but when it comes to sharing things across projects, you know, one of threats to open access that would make learning machines...
+            If there's open access, learning machines would be better able to meet the demands of most of the discipline, but the problem is, even if you have open access, getting two projects to talk to each other and to match up is often complicated because there hasn't been an equivalent of a Google for the digitisation in the cultural heritage sector. Everyone, kind of, had to make their own systems for a long time and it's only been very recently that anyone has come up with platforms that work across the board. If we don't move further in that direction, that's going to cause all kinds of trouble.
+            I guess I'd, kind of, throw in a fourth one. We need more open access in the sector, just because we need more data for learning machines to process and understand.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>808</id>
+        <description>There is a socioeconomic trend seems to be to more and more projects aimed towards middle upper-class persons. One of the big parts of the sector that gets a lot of money is genealogy, like, Ancestry.com, for example, but that is for rich white people, it just is.
+            Similarly, the British Museum launched a virtual tour of the Egyptian exhibits they had a couple of years ago, that required an Oculus Rift, it was very limited. As public funding decreases in cultural heritage and there's an increasing reliance on things like the lottery here in UK, you just have to have more projects that appeal to the people who donate money and the people for whom groups like the National Lottery want to show off, which is just going to be rich people.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>Socioeconomic, the trend seems to be that more and more projects are aimed towards middle upper-class persons. You know, one of the big parts of the sector that gets a lot of money is genealogy, so, like, Ancestry.com, for example, but that is for rich white people, it just is. If you're, say, African-American, there is Ancestry.com before probably 1865, depending. Your people were brought over in ships, you can't go back. I can trace my family back to the 13th century. Whoop-de-doo for me, that's great, but because those people have money, that's where everyone's, sort of, shifting a lot of the resources, is to making sure we feed those kinds of projects.
+            Same thing, the British Museum launched this VR... a virtual tour of the Egyptian exhibits they had a couple of years ago that required an Oculus Rift, which maybe 2 million people have in the world. So, it was very limited. So, from a socioeconomic standard, part of it is just the lack of funding, you know, as public funding decreases in cultural heritage and there's an increasing reliance on things like the lottery here in UK. You just have to have more projects that appeal to the people who donate money and the people for whom groups like the National Lottery want to show off, which is just going to be rich people.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>809</id>
+        <description>Culturally there's just the fear amongst historians, they're just afraid of change. Unsurprisingly, people who study the past are afraid of the future. There's a bit of a generational seed change going on in the cultural heritage sector where a lot of older people are retiring and they made up a very large portion of the workforce for a lot of reasons. Now, there's a new generation of young people coming in. So, that will correct itself.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>culturally, there's just the fear amongst historians, they're just afraid of change. Unsurprisingly, people who study the past are afraid of the future. That is changing. As younger people... there's a bit of a generational seed change going on in the cultural heritage sector where a lot of older people are retiring and they made up a very large portion of the workforce for a lot of reasons. Now, there's a new generation of young people coming in. So, that one will, sort of, correct itself.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>810</id>
+        <description>Politically, it comes back to funding. You win more votes when you say you want to put money into science, technology, engineering and maths because those things have a clear job connection. If you put money into the cultural heritage sector, people don't necessarily see the jobs that come out of it. So, there has just been a real threat to the sector in that almost no politicians are out there stumping for The National Archivesor any other kind of institution like that.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>Politically, I think, again, it comes back to funding. You win more votes when you say you want to put money into science, technology, engineering and maths because those things have a clear job connection. If I get a degree in engineering, I could become an engineer, you know, plain and simple, whereas if you put money into the cultural heritage sector, people don't necessarily see the jobs that come out of it. How many docents could you possibly need or curators in the world? So, there has just been a real threat to the sector in that almost no politicians are out there stumping for The National Archives, really, or any other kind of institution like that.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>811</id>
+        <description>The current environment has limited the scope of digital projects. You either need to have something so practical (e.g., transcription projects) everyone can get behind it, or something so showy, it can't be ignored (e.g., Oculus Rift in the British Museum) and it doesn't leave room for really pushing forward what we could be doing, and learning and diversifying the types of digital projects.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>So, it's limited the scope. More than anything, it's limited the scope of digital projects. Projects either need to have no imagination and deliver something that has repeated results. So, if you look at a transcription project, for example, there are countless numbers of those because we know exactly the by-product you're going to get out of it. So, you can do a quick cost-benefit analysis and justify a grant or going to your institution saying, "This is necessary in the following ways."
+            On the other spectrum is you get people who are trying to do things creatively, but, like I said before, they have to be showy, so you get that VR project from the British Museum, which isn't very good. It doesn't work very well, it has a lot of bugs, it doesn't even show off all of the pieces in the exhibit and you have to have an Oculus Rift or a Facebook account just to access it, but it was a showy thing, you know, they could build a launch event around it.
+            So, that's it, they're, sort of, the two posts. You either need to have something so practical it can't be ignored, or, excuse me, you have something so practical, everyone can get behind it, or something so showy, it can't be ignored and it doesn't leave room for really pushing forward what we could be doing, and learning and diversifying the types of digital projects.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>812</id>
+        <description>The current environment is going to lead us to more boring projects that don't actually engage the public in a way that cultural heritage has to engage the public in order to fulfil its duties. Maybe five years ago, everyone was trying out new things with new technology, now they're a little bit more stagnant. I hope that the big imaginative showy things will create more examples of media that represent cultural heritage, that can compete in the oversaturated media sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>I mean, the pessimist in me says it's going to lead us to just more boring projects than anything else, things that don't actually engage the public in a way that cultural heritage has to engage the public in order to fulfil its duties. It seems like what's the point? Why are we transcribing all of these things? It's not addressing the fundamental concern, which is that something like one in five or four out of five records that are digitised don't ever get accessed. So, why are we spending all this time transcribing things that literally no-one is going to look at? One in five of them will ever be seen. Again, it balances a ledger.
+            So, I think more things are going to head that way, whereas I'd say maybe five years ago, everyone was trying out new things with new technology, they're a little bit more stagnant. I hope that the big swings and the big imaginative showy things will end up bringing more people... well, create more examples of media that represent cultural heritage, that can compete in the oversaturated media sector by just saying, "No, things can be interesting here as well, like, it's there." So, those are the two, sort of, paths we might go down. Pretty confident that the former one is going to be more likely</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>813</id>
+        <description>We've got to put more stable funding into digital cultural heritage. There's no sustainability to the feast and famine grant system. I'd much rather have seen that money spread out over time and a slow growth that can keep going, rather than, "Let's make a big show out of what we've made," and then cut the faucet off immediately.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Economic</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>The biggest change, we've just got to, and this is an international thing, we've got to put more stable funding into digital cultural heritage. This feast and famine grant system, I mean, I'm talking about academia in general, but in cultural heritage, it doesn't work, there's no sustainability to it.
+            A project like the Historical Hospital Admission Records Project, I want to say is what it's called, had this amazing push in the 2000s. Kingston University was behind, the NHS was behind, all this money came in. They found out ways to... by looking through these records and digitising them and collating the data, they found, like, potential ways of mitigating ___[0:21:30] damage and fatalities in UK hospitals. Then, once that grant money ran out, the whole project is now being kept alive by one professor who's just paying the web fees to keep the data online out of her own pocket. That just didn't work.
+            I'd much rather have seen that money spread out over time and a slow growth that can keep going, rather than, "Let's make a big show out of what we've made," and then cut the faucet off immediately.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>814</id>
+        <description>There's got to be concerted effort across cultural heritage to work together to pitch to the public the value of public history, of history that the public can engage in. It has got to be provocative to get people to show up because as fun as it is to go to, a Norman castle in Kent and walk around and see what it would have been like to have lived there 1,000 years ago, that doesn't communicate anything actionable to a person's life on its own.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's got to be concerted effort across cultural heritage to work together to pitch to the public the value of public history, of history that the public can engage in. It has got to be provocative to get people to show up because as fun as it is to go to, you know, a Norman castle in Kent and walk around and see what it would have been like to have lived there 1,000 years ago, that doesn't communicate anything actionable to a person's life on its own.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>815</id>
+        <description>One of the trends has been interdisciplinary works. Very influential has been the number of historians and cultural heritage workers who have gone to the natural sciences and have studied things like citizen science, bringing that over and trying to copy and amend things done in citizen science to become the backbone of what is now crowdsourcing in the cultural heritage sector.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>n terms of scholarship, one of the trends has been interdisciplinary works. I think a lot of the great work that has been very influential has been the number of historians and cultural heritage workers who have gone to the natural sciences and have studied things like citizen science and the impact that has really had on our work in volunteering and in education has been huge because these projects like Galaxy Zoo, for example, or what the South African Natural Heritage Museum did with citizen science, it led the way.
+            I mean, if you want to talk about a showy project that people got excited about was Galaxy Zoo and then charting stars. I can just open my computer and chart some star system that they've got pictures of. Like, that's incredible, there's no-one in the world who's not at least mildly impressed by the concept. If there are, I mean, we can't account for that, but everyone got excited and it was inspiring to a lot of historians who felt like, "Well, we have exciting stuff right here on Earth that we've uncovered and we've digitised."
+            That was a big... people researching that, and bringing that over and trying to copy and amend things done in citizen science just has really formed the backbone of what is now crowdsourcing in particular in the cultural heritage sector.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>816</id>
+        <description>What's going to happen is we're going to see not only are the researchers talking to each other, and sharing ideas and having these joint conferences under the big tent digital humanities label, but the citizen scientists and the citizen historians are going to start to blend together. For a lot of people, it's going to become just a part of their daily routine to engage in these projects. For some people, they're going to go home and watch football and, for some people, they're going to home and pick a project based on whatever their interests are at the moment in either science, or heritage, or literature or the whole range of things. It's going to really start to become one giant crowd movement.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>this reciprocal relationship that's developed and I think what's going to happen is we're going to see not only are the researchers talking to each other, and sharing ideas and having these joint conferences under the big tent digital humanities label, but the citizen scientists and the citizen historians are going to start to blend together. For a lot of people, it's going to become just a part of their daily routine to engage in these projects.
+            We're already starting to see it in certain sectors, especially as the open access Wikimedia movement keeps gaining steam, but I think there's just going to be... for some people, they're going to go home and watch football and, for some people, they're going to home and pick a project based on whatever their interests are at the moment in either science, or heritage, or literature or the whole range of things. It's going to really start to become one giant crowd movement.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>817</id>
+        <description>Threre is a need for greater emphasis on sustainability and future thinking. There's no model for sustainability at the moment, and people are reactionary instead of "proactionary". People will put out a projectm and then they haven't even thought about tomorrow, let alone five years from now, as to what will happen. That's going to stymie a lot of research.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Methodologies</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>More emphasis on sustainability and future thinking. I feel, I could always be wrong, but the feeling I've got from all of my research, which has been into sustainability, is there's no model for sustainability, hopefully I'll make one, but there isn't one at the moment and people are, kind of, reactionary instead of proactionary, if that's a word. They're reacting to the tech and the changes as they come and no-one along the lines is really trying to look 5, 10 years ahead and say, "Okay, these are the things that might come down the road. How do we prepare to be flexible enough to meet one or more of them if it comes down?"
+            So, it just feels like a lot... especially in the crowdsourcing, just people will put out a project and raise a crowd and then they haven't even thought about tomorrow, let alone five years from now, as to what will happen. That's going to stymie a lot of research, for sure.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>818</id>
+        <description>There's a need to have people who are more jacks of all trades and less masters of a specific discipline. Industrialisation was taken very seriously in cultural heritage and we really made it so that any two people inside an institution cannot do one another's jobs. That makes the, kind of, creative imaginary thinking about what the future's going to be difficult. More professional development opportunities for people to learn a broader skill set is going to be essential because we need a culture of people who have skills but also have imagination and creativity and can pay attention to trends.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Careers</consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think we're just going to have to have people who are more jacks of all trades and less masters of a specific discipline. ___[0:33:29] is such a specific set of skills and even inside a given institution, different parts of the institution have just very... we took industrialisation very seriously in cultural heritage and we really made it so that any two people inside an institution cannot do one another's jobs. That makes the, kind of, creative imaginary thinking about what the future's going to be difficult.
+            So, we need some more people who maybe... you know, maybe they've got their masters in the library sciences, or archival sciences or museum education, but their bachelor's degree was in philosophy or their bachelor's degree was in mathematics, or IT or something along those lines. More professional development opportunities for people to learn a broader skill set is just going to be essential because we need a culture of people who have skills but also have imagination and creativity and can pay attention to trends.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>819</id>
+        <description>There's a need for more projects that successfully last. Open access is essential to sustainability. If you don't open up to community input, and community modifications and additions and community-based projects, then you're just at the whim of whatever corporations decide to with proprietary technology. We need to be sharing what we're doing, our systems, our platforms, our data, so that when we're not able to use this proprietary piece of tech, someone else has maybe already cracked how to keep the project going a little bit longer.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+            <consequences>Scholarly publishing</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Publication formats</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>Cultural Heritage</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV045</provenance>
+        <quotation>We need more projects that successfully last and that one's just going to happen, fingers crossed. I think that the fact that the Bentham Project at UCL now has a second wind and is doing more moving forward with some new grant money is a grant sign of the sustainability of these types of projects.
+            So, more projects like that, that started nearly a decade ago and are going strong and aren't just a thing that we study as, "Oh, in that time period, we did that." That's going to be a huge help to keeping people forward-thinking, because, right now, it, kind of, feels like, "Well, these projects only last for a couple of years anyway." So, if we could have more examples of, "No, they can keep going," that's going to help.
+            Then, you know, I think I would turn to open access as being essential to sustainability. Just from an archivist's perspective, none of this stuff is guaranteed to work tomorrow, just from a technical standpoint. If you don't open up to community input, and community modifications and additions and community-based projects, then you're just at the whim of whatever corporations decide to with proprietary technology.
+            One of the great examples out there is if you look at retro videogame guys. They are keeping alive 30, 40-year-old technologies that, for the average user, fall apart in less than a decade. There are these ZX Spectrums that shouldn't work that these guys keep alive by sharing all of the modifications, selling parts at cost, showing off how to do these things to keep them working, and functioning and improving. It's the community, and being open and not hiding things behind your own proprietary systems that make that stuff still work decades past its actual shelf life.
+            That's something that cultural heritage institutions really need to be thinking. We need to be sharing what we're doing, our systems, our platforms, our data, so that when we're not able to use this proprietary piece of tech, someone else has maybe already cracked how to keep the project going a little bit longer.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>820</id>
+        <description>Google Translate and automatic translation in general.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>Google Translate and automatic translation in general</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>821</id>
+        <description>Language learning apps like Duolingo and so on,are really asking questions of modern languages.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>language learning apps like Duolingo and so on, which are really transforming... Well, asking questions of modern languages.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>822</id>
+        <description>Then of course there are wider developments, such as the influence of AI, and the increasing datafication of society, that are affecting everything but are also influencing languages and making personalisation a much more important feature.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Research practice</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>Then of course there are wider developments, such as the influence of AI, and the increasing datafication of society, and things like that. That are affecting everything but are also influencing languages and making personalisation a much more important feature.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>823</id>
+        <description>Serious underfunding of languages in the UK and further afield is undermining modern languages as a discipline, and they are having to rely more on wider [technology] platforms to carry out their work.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>serious underfunding of languages in the UK and further afield and the undermining of modern languages as a discipline. Those disciplines are weaker and are having to rely more on wider platforms to carry out their work.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>824</id>
+        <description>People are ahead of the game in language learning, certainly in comparison to other areas of language learning. They talk about tandem language learning, where you do exchanges with somebody else who knows the language you want to learn. You do a half an hour each or an hour each. That's really affecting the landscape quite significantly on the language learning end of things.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>On the language learning side of things also, I would say that people are ahead of the game, certainly in comparison to other areas of language learning, and I would say actually in comparison to other areas of the humanities.
+            Even the digital humanities. Pedagogically, they're really... What do you call it? Virtual learning. What's the term? Tandem. That's right. They talk about tandem language learning, where you do exchanges with somebody else who knows the language you want to learn. You do a half an hour each or an hour each. That's really affecting the landscape quite significantly on the language learning end of things.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>825</id>
+        <description>Personalised language learning has enormous potential; people see that as something which could seriously grow.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>Personalised language learning I think has enormous potential. I think people see that as something which could seriously grow.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>826</id>
+        <description>There's a lot of talk in modern languages about authentic content. The ability to access content that is real language as opposed to the artificial constructed languages that traditionally language educators often had to produce.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>There's a lot of talk in modern languages about authentic content. The ability to access content that is real language as opposed to the artificial constructed languages that traditionally language educators often had to produce.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>827</id>
+        <description>There's a lot more emphasis on audio-visual than there used to be, and thathas enormous pedagogical potential but also makes language learning and the engagement with languages much more engaging.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>There's a lot more emphasis on audio-visual than there used to be. And that obviously has enormous pedagogical potential but also makes language learning and the engagement with languages much more engaging, because you can get to grips with a culture in a way that if you're reading a text it makes much more limiting.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>828</id>
+        <description>The boring stuff, the kind of stuff that Duolingo does, the automated drilling, you can gamify that and make that a lot more exciting. Indeed gamification, although there's a lot of hype about it, is an area where I think we'll see a lot of growth in the future.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Adoption</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>The boring stuff, the kind of stuff that Duolingo does, the automated drilling, you can gamify that and make that a lot more exciting. Indeed gamification, although there's a lot of hype about it, is an area where I think we'll see a lot of growth in the future.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>829</id>
+        <description>Not a lot of thought at the moment has gone into how to use online translation tools like Google Translate, but I think that is going to have to be an area where modern languages really do some deep thinking. Instead of just trying to ignore it they could use that in a positive way. Thinking about how that changes translation studies, and how it changes learning a language, where you want to look up words and so on.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>Not a lot of thought at the moment has gone into how to use online translation tools like Google Translate, but I think that is going to have to be an area where modern languages really do some deep thinking.
+            Instead of just trying to ignore it they could use that in a positive way. Thinking about how that changes translation studies, and how it changes learning a language, where you want to look up words and so on.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>830</id>
+        <description>I think virtual reality probably has been a little bit hyped but has, again, lots of potential to help people learn language in immersive environments.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think virtual reality probably has been a little bit hyped but has, again, lots of potential to help people learn language in immersive environments.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>831</id>
+        <description>There's a need to get a sense of how people function translingually and multilingually. Instead of just thinking of these languages as belonging in a very narrow sense to particular nations or nation groups, and this erroneous idea that people just speak one language, and in one particular way, and with one particular dialect, and with one particular accent, I think we'll get a much richer sense of how language works. Multilingually, transligually, and so on.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>I think getting a sense of how people function translingually and multilingually. Instead of just thinking of these languages as belonging in a very narrow sense to particular nations or nation groups, and this erroneous idea that people just speak one language, and in one particular way, and with one particular dialect, and with one particular accent, I think we'll get a much richer sense of how language works. Multilingually, transligually, and so on.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>832</id>
+        <description>There's potential to enable survival and indeed growth in some of the smaller languages through technology. But there are also dangers there, particularly there are lots of languages which are oral only, which don't have a written history, where the audio-visual side of things could be a game changer, if that comes through in any meaningful way.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Potentiality</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Other tag</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <tags>
+            <tags>Sustainability</tags>
+        </tags>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's also potential, although it's contested whether the influence would be in a positive or negative way, but the impact on minority languages or endangered languages, which are in serious threat. Some people talk about high percentages dying out in the next 50 to 100 years.
+            There's potential to enable survival and indeed growth in some of the smaller languages. But there are also dangers there, and I think that will rely on...
+            Particularly there are lots of languages which are oral only, which don't have a written history, where the audio-visual side of things could be a game changer, if that comes through in any meaningful way.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>833</id>
+        <description>I'd like to see digital humanities and other areas of digital practice in research, and indeed in the commercial world, take a much deeper and richer engagement with languages as a concept and modern languages as a discipline. At the moment I think that people with a digital technological background tend to view languages in a very instrumental way.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Education</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>What I'd like to see is digital humanities and other areas of digital practice in research, and indeed in the commercial world, take a much deeper and richer engagement with languages as a concept and modern languages as a discipline.
+            At the moment I think that people with a digital technological background tend to view languages as something to... They could be digitised, and they don't see how languages can enrich their own practice.
+            So that's the major thing I would like to see. I think languages are viewed in a very instrumental way.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>834</id>
+        <description>I'd like to see more engagement with more languages; engaging with multilingualism as opposed to monolingualism. Multilingualism is the norm in most of the world.
+            In the UK and in the US we tend to think of the world operating monolingually. Well, it doesn't. Most of it is multilingual, and people are used to often switching between languages very quickly. So I'd like to see a greater engagement with that reality.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'd like to see more engagement with more languages. So in people developing tools, or developing platforms, or carrying out research in digital humanities or other areas of digital practice, engaging with more languages.
+            Engaging with multilingualism as opposed to monolingualism. Because it's one thing to engage with English, or Spanish, or Mandarin Chinese, or whatever, but it's another thing to engage with multilingualism, which is the norm in most of the world.
+            In the UK and in the US we tend to think of the world operating monolingually. Well, it doesn't. Most of it is multilingual, and people are used to often, in places like India, switching between languages very quickly. So I'd like to see a greater engagement with that reality.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>835</id>
+        <description>[Digitial humanities and other areas of digital practice in research need to understand better how languages work and how modern languages works as a discipline.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>those disciplines just need to understand better how languages work and how modern languages works as a discipline.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>836</id>
+        <description>Digital humanities and other areas of digital practice in research need to think of it as a two-way engagement, instead of an engagement where they tell modern languages how to become modern, which I think is sometimes the perception they have.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>they need to think of it as a two-way engagement, instead of an engagement where they tell modern languages how to become modern, which I think is sometimes the perception they have.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>837</id>
+        <description>Digital humanities need to look critically at the platforms, and tools, and methods that they use, and see how they are very monolingual, and often very English biased, and don't function as well, or don't function as equally, with other languages. Whether they be other European languages, or non-European languages, or non-Latin script languages.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Tools and services</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>they need to look critically at the platforms, and tools, and methods that they use, and see how they are very monolingual, and often very English biased, and don't function as well, or don't function as equally, with other languages. Whether they be other European languages, or non-European languages, or non-Latin script languages, or whatever.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>838</id>
+        <description>The general weakening of the humanities has affected modern languages and the way languages are viewed. The increasing emphasis on all things digital, and the development of things like Google Translate, has made people think that they don't need to learn languages any more.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Cultural</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>The general weakening of the humanities has been one serious factor that's affected modern languages and the way languages are viewed. That's one factor.
+            I think the increasing emphasis on all things digital, and the development of things like Google Translate, has made people think that they don't need to learn languages any more.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>839</id>
+        <description>In the US the bias towards English in political discourse.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Impact and outreach</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>In the US the bias towards English in political discourse.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>840</id>
+        <description>In the UK, Brexit and the dynamics that led to Brexit have also had serious impacts. Brexit, if anything, should make languages more important. The UK already had a very serious problem in terms of linguistic deficit.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>in the UK Brexit in particular, but the dynamics that led to Brexit have also had serious impacts.
+            Brexit, if anything, should make languages more important, because without having so many people from mainland Europe the UK has a greater linguistic deficit than it already has.
+            Which has been analysed by people like the British Academy, in various reports, as being a serious problem. I won't summarise those reports, but they're on record as showing that the UK already had a very serious problem in terms of linguistic deficit.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>841</id>
+        <description>The hyper-central nature of a lot of digital communication around English tends to give the impression that everything can be done in English, when in fact that's not true. Large areas of the world still don't speak English and the global English that is spoken, between people in the world who are not native, is not the same English that I as a native speaker would speak.
+            Therefore it's at risk of isolating people who speak English and only know English-speaking cultures primarily. It's in danger of making them very isolated in commercial and other cultural forms of human interaction.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Diversity</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>the hyper-central nature of a lot of digital communication around English tends to give the impression that everything can be done in English, when in fact that's not true. Large areas of the world still don't speak English and will probably never speak English. In fact, the dynamic may well go against English in the future.
+            Also, various people involved in modern languages have analysed the fact that even the global English that is spoken, between people in the world who are not native, is not the same English that I as a native speaker would speak.
+            Therefore it's at risk of isolating people who speak English and only know English-speaking cultures primarily. It's in danger of making them very isolated in commercial and other cultural forms of human interaction.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>842</id>
+        <description>The political environment hass tended to instrumentalise the view of languages, so the view of languages just as grammar and vocabulary that you need to learn. It's kind of divorced languages from an understanding of cultures.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Political</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>it's tended to instrumentalise the view of languages, so the view of languages just as grammar and vocabulary that you need to learn. It's kind of divorced languages from an understanding of cultures in a way that I think is really unhelpful.
+            I should [say 0:17:55] that actually languages are flourishing in the app world, so Duolingo and Memrise and so on. People are flocking to those apps as a way of engaging with language. I don't want to pour negativity on that per se, but that does give a rather limited view of languages.
+            The other area where there's been a lot of growth is in modern language centres. I think people are taking on more languages outside of the traditional disciplines.
+            The negative side of that is that again it feeds into this instrumentalism of language. Seeing language just as something divorced from culture and so on.
+            At the positive level, it's meaning that people are engaging with languages outside of the traditional disciplines. That's no bad thing.
+            So there is some complexity in what I've just described. I wouldn't want to describe it all as negative.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>843</id>
+        <description>The language sector needs to be more proactive in its approach to change. It needs to think about becoming less fragmented. The old model, where you had a Spanish department, a French department, needs to be rethought. Departments need to be much more broader in focus, need to engage beyond their traditional areas, in cultural studies for example, and engage with other areas of the academy, and indeed areas of contemporary social concern.
+            We've started to see that to some extent as well, with departments or faculties combining modern languages with business, or with communication.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>the sector needs to be more proactive in its approach to change.
+            It needs to think about becoming less fragmented. So the old model, where you had a Spanish department, a French department, a Portuguese department, a German department, needs to be rethought. And indeed that's happened. Departments tend to be much more broader in focus.
+            That modern languages need to engage beyond their traditional areas, in cultural studies or whatever, and engage with other areas of the academy, and indeed areas of contemporary social concern.
+            We've started to see that to some extent as well, with departments or faculties combining modern languages with business, or with communication, or with whatever.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>844</id>
+        <description>Modern languages needs to engage with digital culture in a more meaningful way. It's had a very passive relationship to digital culture and digital studies. It needs to engage with how digital is changing the discipline and changing the concept of languages in a more proactive way, and to embed that in its actual intellectual thinking as well as some of the practices that are happening. At the moment, in the same way that people tend to do view languages instrumentally, I think modern languages tends to view digital instrumentally and doesn't view the broader cultural and intellectual changes that digital is bringing about.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Social</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>the sector needs to engage with digital culture in a more meaningful way. It's had a very passive relationship to digital culture and digital studies.
+            And I think it doesn't need to wholeheartedly embrace everything digital without being critical. But it does need to engage with how digital is changing the discipline and changing the concept of languages in a more proactive way, and to embed that in its actual intellectual thinking as well as some of the practices that are happening.
+            At the moment, in the same way that people tend to do view languages instrumentally, I think modern languages tends to view digital instrumentally and doesn't view the broader cultural and intellectual changes that digital is bringing about.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>845</id>
+        <description>There's been a growing understanding, particularly among emerging researchers, that digital is something that's important. It's tended to be concentrated very much on social media, for example, in relation to cultural studies or particular areas. So I don't think it's as broad as it could be, but there is definitely a change in attitude that you can see.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>There's been a growing understanding, particularly among emerging scholars, emerging researchers, that digital is something that's important.
+            I think it's tended to be concentrated very much on social media, for example, in relation to cultural studies or particular areas. So I don't think it's as broad as it could be, but there is definitely a change in attitude that you can see.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>846</id>
+        <description>There's a growing understanding that we need critical digital literacies in modern languages. People quite understand, or agree, or have consensus on what those would constitute, but there's definitely, a growing sense that there's an urgent need to improve critical digital literacy, so we can use tools/methods more effectively.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Trend</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Theory</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>there's a growing understanding that we need critical digital literacies in modern languages. I don't think people quite understand, or agree, or have consensus on what those would constitute, but there's definitely, I think, a growing sense that there's an urgent need to improve critical digital literacy, so we can use tools/methods more effectively.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>847</id>
+        <description>I'd like to see digital modern languages be more prominent as an area of research, as a recognised area of research within modern languages.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Scientific interpretation</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'd like to see digital modern languages be more prominent as an area of research, as a recognised area of research within modern languages.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>848</id>
+        <description>I'd like to see greater collaboration across language groups and across different areas of languages. So linguistics, language, pedagogy, language cultures and so on to integrate. Or to at least to look for commonality in the way that they deal with digital.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Requirement</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Team structure</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>I'd like to see greater collaboration across language groups and across different areas of languages. So linguistics, language, pedagogy, language cultures and so on to integrate. Or to at least to look for commonality in the way that they deal with digital.
+            There's a huge divide in modern languages, for example, between the language end of things and what they call content. History, and literature, and so on. And you also see that divide in the way they deal with digital. So it would be nice to see a more integrated approach there.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+    <Entry>
+        <id>849</id>
+        <description>The problem is there's just so little time, energy, resource to think about things that are not urgent. There's just so much going on at the moment they just don't have any capacity.
+            We need more funding within the discipline as a whole; it would be nice to see funding specifically on digital modern languages.</description>
+        <type>
+            <type>Obstacle</type>
+        </type>
+        <consequences>
+            <consequences>Funding</consequences>
+        </consequences>
+        <context>
+            <context>Research interests</context>
+        </context>
+        <discipline>
+            <discipline>All language related studies</discipline>
+        </discipline>
+        <provenance>ITV046</provenance>
+        <quotation>the problem is there's just so little time, energy, resource to think about things that are not urgent. That the kinds of issues I'm talking about don't seem as urgent.
+            And I have a lot of sympathy with people in modern languages who think that way, because I think there's just so much going on at the moment they just don't have any capacity. So I think one thing which [should 0:28:04] happen is they need to be given a break.
+            We need more funding within the discipline as a whole. It would be nice to see funding specifically on digital modern languages.</quotation>
+    </Entry>
+</root>
\ No newline at end of file
